Parks over I-35: In final push, some Austin city council members pitch new $143M plan
AUSTIN (KXAN) — The day before Austin City Council is set to vote on how much money it will commit to the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) for the roadway elements of future covers over TxDOT's I-35 expansion project, some council members are putting forward a new plan.
As of Wednesday, there are two sub quorums of five city council members — each with different ideas on how to proceed. The council is made up of 10 members, meaning the vote is split right down the middle. That leaves the tiebreaker to Austin Mayor Kirk Watson.
One group — Council Members Ryan Alter, Chito Vela, Jose Velasquez, Zo Qadri and Natasha Harper-Madison — want the city to invest in roadway elements for as many highway covers, known as caps and stitches, as possible.
The other group — Mayor Pro Tem Vanessa Fuentes, Council Members Krista Laine, Marc Duchen, Mike Siegel and Paige Ellis — are willing to go only as far as city staff's latest proposal, a paired down plan that commits funding to the early construction elements of two downtown caps. The mayor announced Tuesday he will vote with this group.
Parks over I-35: Mayor to vote for more conservative plan amid council split
That latter sub quorum posted on the message board earlier this week and said in-part:
'We understand that the staff recommendation for Thursday's decision will require a $49M commitment. Given our overall debt capacity of $750M, Council can commit this sum towards building the support structures for two important caps and still have $701M remaining for the 2026 Comprehensive Bond package to address our community's wide range of needs – from parks to housing to mobility to libraries to climate resilience – or caps. This is a balance we can support.'
You can read more about each stance in my coverage from Tuesday.
Wednesday afternoon, that first group put forward a new proposal they hope will sway council members from that second more conservative group.
'And that compromise is to do the roadway elements for the downtown caps — that's Cesar Chavez to 4th, 4th-7th and 11th-12th as well as one northern cap,' Alter said.
The divide between these sub quorums isn't necessarily the desire to have caps — but concern about the city being on the hook for paying for them and what spending money on this venture might take away from other city services.
'Yes, and approach': Council members combing through alternate funding options for I-35 covers
'My sub quorum said let's be realistic about our limited dollars and create a plan that we know we can fund that when we promise to build something we can deliver it,' Austin City Council Member Paige Ellis said Tuesday (before the new proposal came out).
The new proposal includes new funding methods that don't take away from the city's borrowing capacity, Alter said. The funding proposal boils down to this:
Pay for the roadway elements for the Cesar Chavez to 4th Street cap ($40M) by asking Austin voters to approve a car rental tax for this purpose
Fund the roadway elements for the 4th-7th Street cap ($29M) and the 11th-12th Street cap ($9M) using a state loan the city has already been awarded for this project
And finally, the sub quorum proposed the city pays for a northern cap ($65M) using right-of-way fees and through a Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ)
Altogether, that proposal shakes out to $143 million.
The new proposal also 'directs staff to generate a funding plan for the roadway elements and future caps that can incorporate the sources we have offered here or come up with additional ideas, but which does not rely on any additional debt that limits the City's ability to issue GO debt, beyond the $49 million amount we all seem to agree on,' the sub quorum wrote.
'I would just highlight that what we're trying to do here is preserve future options and do it with the least amount of debt possible,' Alter said.
KXAN has reached out to the members of the other sub quorum as they look through those new details. We will update this story when they issue a response.
A spokesperson for the city of Austin said staff couldn't immediately comment but would be at the city council meeting Thursday to answer council questions on any of the proposals put forward.
You can read the latest full proposal here.
Sen. Sarah Eckhardt, D-Austin, and Representatives John Bucy, Sheryl Cole, Lulu Flores, Vikki Goodwin, Gina Hinojosa, Donna Howard and James Talarico sent a letter to Austin leaders making this decision Thursday.
Austin staff recommend reduced number of 'caps' over I-35 expansion project
'We urge you to prioritize this project and to secure the necessary funding and support from local, state, and federal stakeholders. By pushing for State financial support and exploring additional funding streams in place of the General Fund, we can ensure adequate financial backing without a significant impact to Austin's other priorities. As a result of this investment, the I-35 Cap and Stitch will create lasting positive change for generations to come. We are eager to see it move forward and assist in whatever ways we can,' the letter said in-part.
'We all care about these values. What the city is working through right now is how much money we can spend on a State project and what we should use on city projects. I appreciate any assistance from our local delegation to help secure funding to mitigate adverse impacts for I-35 when we have little control over the schematics. I know they are working hard for our constituents right now at the Capitol,' Ellis responded.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Texas lawmakers send letter to Tesla asking to delay robotaxi rollout in Austin
AUSTIN (KXAN) — A group of Texas lawmakers sent a letter to Tesla urging the company to delay its robotaxi operations in Austin. Tesla reportedly planned to launch the self-driving service on Sunday, June 22. The letter said the Texas Legislature approved a revision to the state's 2017 autonomous vehicle operations framework. It mentioned how this new law goes into effect this September. 'Under the new framework, commercial autonomous vehicle operators transporting passengers or property must receive prior authorization from the Department of Motor Vehicles before operating on public streets without a human driver,' the letter read. In order to get that authorization, an operator must demonstrate each vehicle is: Capable of operating in compliance with state traffic laws Equipped with a recording device Compliant with federal law, including federal motor vehicle safety standards Capable of achieving a minimal risk condition if the automated driving system is rendered inoperable Registered, titled, and insured under Texas law Safety concerns emerge as Tesla robotaxis prepare for launch Along with those requirements, operators have to submit a First Responder Interaction Plan to the Department of Public Safety to explain the following: How first responders interact with the autonomous vehicles How to communicate with fleet support and safely remove or tow vehicles from the roadway Any additional information regarding hazardous conditions or public safety risks associated with the vehicles 'As members of the Austin delegation in the Texas Senate and Texas House of Representatives, we are formally requesting that Tesla delay autonomous robotaxi operations until the new law takes effect on September 1, 2025. We believe this is in the best interest of both public safety and building public trust in Tesla's operations,' the letter read. Austin-based business says it will offer Tesla robotaxi rentals in 2026 The letter said if Tesla still proceeds with its plans to launch this month, they request the company responds to this letter with detailed information demonstrating that Tesla will be 'compliant with the new law upon the launch of driverless operations in Austin.' Last month, Tesla CEO Elon Musk discussed plans with CNBC to launch the service in Austin. 'We want to deliberately take it slow,' Musk said. 'I mean, we could start with 1,000 [robotaxis] 10,000 on day one, but I don't think that would be prudent. So we will start with probably 10 for a week, then increase it to 20, 30, 40.' Musk himself mentioned testing already started. Just last week, he posted on X that, 'for the past several days, Tesla has been testing self-driving Model Y cars (no one in driver's seat) on Austin public streets with no incidents.' The service is reportedly already available for some employees. In April, Tesla's AI account posted a video on X claiming that 'supervised ride hailing service is live for an early set of employees in Austin and [the] San Francisco Bay Area.' This letter adds to another one Tesla recently received by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). US agency asks Tesla questions about its Austin 'robotaxi' plan In a letter sent to Tesla in May, the NHTSA asked the company to explain how it plans to operate safely. Questions focused on things like: Crash reporting Complying with traffic safey laws Automated responses to emergencies NHTSA asked how the robotaxis will safely operate in low-visibility, like sun glare, fog, rain or snow. Those conditions are tied to previous accidents involving the company's driver-assistance software. KXAN reached out to see if NHTSA heard back. The agency told us earlier this month that its investigation remains open and that Tesla's response must be submitted by June 19. NHTSA said any updates will be posted in the investigation file online. KXAN reached out to Tesla for comment, and we're waiting for a response. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Council Member Ellis announces run for reelection, challenged by former EMS union president
AUSTIN (KXAN) — Both Paige Ellis, incumbent Austin City Council Member, and Selena Xie, an Austin-Travis County EMS commander and former Austin EMS Association president, announced they will run for the Austin City Council District 8 seat next year. 'As a frontline worker, I don't work from home—and I don't think our City Council should either,' Xie said Wednesday. 'I came to the decision to run after meeting with numerous district residents from many different backgrounds. They all said the same thing—that D8 deserves a Councilmember who shows up. On council, I will bring the same energy to improving affordability, public safety, infrastructure, the environment, constituent services, and communication with residents to District 8 that I brought as EMS Association President. I know we can do better for the people who I've been proud to serve.' Ellis, who is serving her second term as the representative of District 8 (southwest Austin), has hit her term limit, but Austin allows council members to run for reelection for a third term if they get five percent of qualified voters in their district to sign a petition to get back on the ballot. According to the city of Austin, there are 67,918 qualified voters in District 8 as of Jan. 31, 2024, 'but this voter data will change soon as we recently received new voter data from the counties,' the city of Austin said. That means Ellis would need 3,396 signatures. 'We cannot determine how much the number will vary, but as previously stated, we recently received new voter data and will be updating the page soon,' the city said. ''Qualified' voter means a duly and timely registered voter,' the city's website said. Ellis announced she will seek that option and run for reelection Wednesday: Councilmember Paige Ellis will seek a third term to the Austin City Council in 2026. Ellis, one of the most tenured members currently serving on council, will continue to bring a steady hand to policy making and expertise in the areas of housing, mobility, environmental responsibility, and emergency services. Paige Ellis has also served a leadership role on major events in Austin such as hiring a new City Manager, the COVID-19 pandemic, and navigating the aftermath of two winter storms. 'I have lived and worked in Southwest Austin for 15 years and I understand the unique needs of our friends and neighbors. Together we have improved parks and roads, come together in crisis, and worked to make life a little bit better for everyone. I would be honored to have the community's support once again.' Paige Ellis, Austin City Council District 8 'The petition is required to be turned in along with the ballot application. The ballot application window is July 20 – August 17, 2026,' the city of Austin said of Ellis' petition. District 8 voters will vote in this election on November 3, 2026. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Texas launches first investigations into ‘potential noncitizen voting' in 2024 election
AUSTIN (KXAN) — The Texas Office of the Attorney General, or OAG, announced in a Tuesday press release that AG Ken Paxton opened investigations into 33 'potential noncitizens who allegedly voted' in the 2024 election. The release did not say where these alleged cases occurred or how the potential noncitizens voted. They are the OAG's first investigations into specific cases of possible noncitizen voting since the 2024 general election. According to the release, this is because of an executive order by President Donald Trump, which allowed states to freely access the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services' SAVE database. 'Noncitizens must not be allowed to influence American elections, and I will use the full weight of my office to investigate all voter fraud,' said Paxton in the release. 'In order to be able to trust the integrity of our elections, the results must be determined by our own citizens—not foreign nationals breaking the law to illegally vote.' In October 2024, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott announced the removal of 6,500 noncitizens from the state's voter rolls. He also said Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson recommended the OAG investigate approximately 2,000 of those individuals. However, an October 2024 investigation by ProPublica, The Texas Tribune and Votebeat uncovered that those figures were inflated. Paxton has tracked along with his party's stance on elections—the OAG release calls him 'a champion for election integrity.' He launched an 'illegal voting tipline' in August 2024 and sent poll watchers to several counties in November 2024. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
