Watch Sly and the Family Stone Rip Through ‘I Want to Take You Higher' at Woodstock

Sly and the Family Stone didn't have an easy task in front of them when they stepped onstage at Woodstock. It was 3:30 AM, several hours past their scheduled start time, the grounds were soaked and muddy after a pissing rainstorm earlier in the day, and they were terrified to even touch their equipment because earlier acts in the night, including the Grateful Dead, had been badly electrocuted.
But Sly Stone — who died Monday after a long battle with COPD — knew this was a moment to prove himself on the biggest stage possible. 'As I flew in I couldn't see the whole crowd, but you could see enough people dotting the landscape that it was hard to believe that there were even more,' he wrote in his 2023 book Thank You (Falettinme Be Mice Elf Agin): A Memoir. 'Goddamn.' I said to myself. 'Goddamn. What the fuck is this?' So many people, an ocean of them without any land for miles. When something is that big a deal, be sure you're ready.'
More from Rolling Stone
Sly Stone, Family Stone Architect Who Fused Funk, Rock, and Soul, Dead at 82
Hear Sly and the Family Stone Rock a Small Club in 1967 With Funky 'I Gotta Go Now'
Dire Wolves Are Back. One 'Dire Wolf' Never Went Away
The band had been gigging practically nonstop since forming in 1966, and their landmark LP Stand! — featuring 'I Want To Take You Higher,' 'Everyday People' and 'Stand!' — hit just three months earlier. And less than a month before Woodstock, they dropped the single 'Hot Fun in the Summertime.' In other words, this was a band at the absolute peak of their powers.
They opened for a high-energy, euphoric rendition of 'M'Lady,' and the set only grew in intensity from there. The Woodstock movie showcased 'I Want To Take You Higher, the climax of their blazing, ten-song performance.
'What we would like to do is sing a song together,' Sly Stone told the crowd. 'And you see what usually happens is you got a group of people that might sing and for some reasons that are not unknown any more, they won't do it. Most of us need to get approval from our neighbours before we can actually let it all hang down. But what is happening here is we're going to try to do a singalong. Now a lot of people don't like to do it. Because they feel that it might be old-fashioned. But you must dig that it is not a fashion in the first place. It is a feeling. And if it was good in the past, it's still good.'
He was speaking the language of the nearly 500,000 hippies in attendance, and they all responded by dancing together in the mud. 'The call, the response. It felt like church,' Stone wrote in his memoir. 'By then the film crew was fully in place. The horns went up into the sky. When the show was over, we were wet and cold…By the next day it was clear that Woodstock had been a big deal, and that we had been a major part of that deal. The festival had put a spotlight on lots of groups, but us and Jimi [Hendrix] the most.'
Even though the Who directly followed Sly and the Family Stone, he was absolutely right. A huge percentage of Woodstock attendees cite Sly and the Family Stone's set as the best moment of the entire weekend. (By the time Hendrix played on Monday morning, the place had largely emptied out. No matter what people claimed later, not many people witnessed his set live.) But everyone saw Sly and the Family Stone, and millions more followed once the movie hit.
It's no secret that Sly Stone faced many sad and difficult times in the years that followed. But he achieved musical immortality that night at Woodstock. It showcases the power of live music better than perhaps any other performance ever captured on film.
Best of Rolling Stone
Sly and the Family Stone: 20 Essential Songs
The 50 Greatest Eminem Songs
All 274 of Taylor Swift's Songs, Ranked

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

News24

2 hours ago

• News24

Sabrina Carpenter triggers backlash with racy photos ahead of her new album

Pop star Sabrina Carpenter has raised eyebrows by posting some very racy photos ahead of the release of her new album. Her seventh studio album, Man's Best Friend, will be out on 29 August. Fans of the 26-year-old singer, who just released the single, Manchild from the upcoming album, have been divided on the recently posted album art – a photograph of Sabrina, on her hands and knees, wearing a short black dress with heels, as an unseen man grabs her hair. 'Am I the only one who thinks this is dehumanising for women?' a social media user wrote. Another said she believed in women owning their sexuality and feeling powerful in their bodies, 'but a woman on all fours with a man pulling her hair isn't empowering. It mirrors the very objectification we're trying to break free from'. Sabrina responded to one X user after the person retweeted her album art and asked, 'Does she have a personality outside of sex?' saying, 'Girl yes and it is goooooood.' Sabrina has also faced backlash for her recent Rolling Stone cover where she poses nude with pair of white stockings as her long blonde hair and arms cover her. The former Disney child star has also been accused of being over-sexualised and inappropriate during her current Short n' Sweet tour which runs until November. For her concerts Sabrina wears glittery corsets, garter belts, lacy baby doll nighties and has very intimate choreography. When she performs her song Juno, she sings, 'Wanna try out some freaky positions? Have you ever tried this one?' and acts out sex positions. At the end of the song, Bed Chem, she lies on a heart-shaped bed, staging intercourse with a male dancer behind a curtain. | 'Fight's not over' – Justin Baldoni is still hitting back at Blake Lively's sex-pest claims 'It's always so funny to me when people complain. They're like, 'All she does is sing about this'. But those are the songs that you've made popular,' she told Rolling Stone. 'Clearly you love sex. You're obsessed with it. It's in my show. There's so many more moments than the Juno positions but those are the ones you post every night and comment on. I can't control that.' Sabrina says she finds irony and humour in all the criticism and that she isn't bothered by people's opinions. 'I don't want to be pessimistic but I truly feel like I've never lived in a time where women have been picked apart more and scrutinised in every capacity. I'm not just talking about me. I'm talking about every female artist that is making art right now,' she said. 'It's definitely not always great and I don't always feel like I know what's happening. I feel like I have some clarity on what I want, at least for the near future, which is rare. I'm so lucky to be in a place right now where I feel present.'

Yahoo

6 hours ago

• Yahoo

‘28 Years Later': What the Critics Are Saying

After more than two decades, director Danny Boyle and writer Alex Garland have returned to the world of the infected with 28 Years Later, the long-incubating sequel to 2002's 28 Days Later. The film hosted its world premiere in London on Wednesday, with reviews from critics arriving shortly after — and so far the results are strong. With 78 reviews in, it stands at 95 percent critics rating on Rotten Tomatoes. More from The Hollywood Reporter Danny Boyle Talks '28 Years Later' Trilogy Plan, Turning Down 'Alien' and the Time '127 Hours' Made Pixar Animators Faint '28 Years Later' Review: Jodie Comer and Aaron Taylor-Johnson in Danny Boyle's White-Knuckle Sequel to His Apocalyptic Game-Changer Jodie Comer and Ralph Fiennes Talk Danny Boyle's Genius at '28 Years Later' World Premiere: "It's Horror, but I Was Struck by How Moved I Was" Read on for a sampling of what critics are saying about the film, which opens Friday and stars newcomer Alfie Williams, Jodie Comer, Aaron Taylor-Johnson and Ralph Fiennes. The Hollywood Reporter's David Rooney wrote, 'One of the chief rewards of 28 Years Later is that it never feels like a cynical attempt to revisit proven material merely for commercial reasons. Instead, the filmmakers appear to have returned to a story whose allegorical commentary on today's grim political landscape seems more relevant than ever. Intriguing narrative building blocks put in place for future installments mean they can't come fast enough.' Rolling Stone's David Fear wrote in his review of Boyle, 'That he simply didn't retroactively ruin the first film by releasing a new franchise-expanding, Easter-egg hunt of an entry just for the sake of it would've been enough. Yet the filmmaker and his collaborators have also deepened their vision of a world on the brink, adding in strong elements of British folk horror, anxiety over good-old-days nationalism and an emphasis on what happens to a generation growing up in the shadow of normalized chaos.' Writing for Entertainment Weekly, Jordan Hoffman opined, 'Stylistically, Boyle throws a lot of things into a blender here, and somehow it all works. Early scenes intercut stock footage of Brittania propaganda films, which has no other motivation than to provide a vibe. Every kill of an infected slams on the brakes with a freeze frame, and the editing takes an occasionally cavalier approach to presenting sequences linearly, opting instead for a flush of sensation.' In his review for New York magazine, Bilge Ebir questioned if the film was hurt by it needing to set up a trilogy, with the critic writing, 'Despite several moving moments, and excellent performances from Fiennes and Taylor-Johnson, the film has an omnibus quality that makes it feel like a collection of loosely connected ideas instead of something that coheres into an actual vision, or even a story. Maybe it'll all come together in the end. Or maybe it's not supposed to. After all, what would be more appropriate for our moment than a franchise movie that devolves into a series of anguished and disjointed screams? 28 Years Later is choppy, muddled, strange, and not always convincing. But I'm not sure I'll ever forget it.' IndieWire's David Ehrlich writes in his review, 'with more earnest grace than any films have tried to humanize zombies before, 28 Years Later is increasingly preoccupied with the idea that the difference between 'us' and 'them' is only a matter of perspective. Honestly, I cringed at the movie's first indications that it was going to explore how the infected have evolved (so boring, so far removed from the primitivism of the original), but Garland's script iterates on that concept in such radical and unexpected ways that I couldn't help but surrender to its potential.' I09's Germain Lussier writes that the world-building answered questions he never thought to ask about a zombie-infected world: 'What would 28 years without humans do to an ecosystem? What human mistakes may have lingered over that time? What, if any, human traits do the zombies still carry with them? Is there a zombie pecking order? 28 Years Later consistently fires on all cylinders but then also hits you with a moment or idea that pushes things to a whole new level, and you almost wish there was a whole movie just about that.' The Associated Press' Jake Coyle took issue with a visual style he called 'frequently gratingly disjointed,' but concluded, 'Buried in here are some tender reflections on mortality and misguided exceptionalism, and even the hint of those ideas make '28 Years Later' a more thoughtful movie than you're likely to find at the multiplex this time of year. This is an unusually soulful coming-of-age movie considering the number of spinal cords that get ripped right of bodies.' Vanity Fair's Richard Lawson writes, 'Three quarters of the way through, 28 Years Later slows the horror to become a rumination on death's inevitability and life's carrying on even in the grips of calamity. It's poignant in an odd way, positioned as it is in what is ostensibly a horror film. Really, Boyle's film is more post-apocalyptic anthropology than anything else, an alluring peer into a near future in which humanity is at a fraught crossroads. Which isn't to say that the film isn't frightening. There are myriad unbearably tense and disturbing scenes, steeped in the impossible dread of being stuck somewhere far from safety, surrounded by unseen things lurking in the shadows.' Best of The Hollywood Reporter 13 of Tom Cruise's Most Jaw-Dropping Stunts Hollywood Stars Who Are One Award Away From an EGOT 'The Goonies' Cast, Then and Now

Business Insider

7 hours ago

• Business Insider

Vintage photos show how people lived, partied, and protested during the 'Summer of Love'

Held in January 1967, San Francisco's Human Be-In event was a precursor to the Summer of Love. The Human Be-In event took place in San Francisco's Golden Gate Park on January 14, 1967, and is considered a key moment that led to the Summer of Love. Featuring counterculture figures including psychologist and psychedelic-drug advocate Timothy Leary and writer Allen Ginsberg, the event drew as many as 30,000 attendees, who gathered to meet like-minded young people, play music, dance, recite poetry, and in many cases trip out on psychedelics. It would inspire later iterations, such as the Colorado Human Be-In in July 1967. The movement began in the Haight-Ashbury district of San Francisco. By spring break in 1967, young people began to flock to the Haight-Ashbury district in San Francisco. From dropout high school and college students to runaway minors, they began to fill the streets in what became a never-ending gathering. The Summer of Love was defined by a strong ideological movement. While masses would gather at music events and bond over their shared love for rock bands, the most significant part of the summer was the political movement that spread across the country and drew young people to the West Coast. With some members of a historically large generation — the baby boomers — entering their teenage years in 1967, the youth movement rapidly gained momentum. The hippie culture that erupted in the Haight-Ashbury district held an anti-war stance and preached about peace and love as a new way of life. They stood against consumerism and were distrusting of the government, setting up free shops and clinics within the district. Some of the largest gatherings happened at music festivals headlined by acts like the Grateful Dead and Jimi Hendrix. At some of the summer's most populous events, like the Fantasy Fair and Magic Mountain Music Festival and the Monterey Pop Festivals, up to 60,000 people gathered to hear acts like the Who, Otis Redding, the Grateful Dead, the Mamas & the Papas, Jefferson Airplane, and Janis Joplin play live. With thousands of hippies traveling from other states for the music festivals, California became the center of one of the largest cultural exoduses in American history. PBS reported that it was "the largest migration of young people in the history of America." That summer, The Beatles released "Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band," a soundtrack of the scene. Encapsulating the spirit of the times, which was influenced by the growing popularity of psychedelic drugs like LSD and psilocybin, The Beatles released their eighth studio album, "Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band." The album was released on May 26, 1967, ahead of the Summer of Love. With lyrics speaking of peace, love, and surrealism, it resonated with the growing hippie communities in the US and Europe. Use of psychedelic drugs was widespread and a significant element of the movement. Discovered in 1943, the synthetic psychedelic drug LSD became a defining element of the Summer of Love. Psychologist Timothy Leary was an advocate for psychedelic drug use and research. His speeches, which encouraged young people to "turn on, tune in, drop out," became a mantra through which the hippie youth shaped their spiritual experimentation, aided by the drugs. Protesters often faced police resistance. Mass protests across the country, whether it was spreading the hippie ideals of peace and love, or rejecting racial injustice, popped up in major cities like New York, Detroit, Los Angeles, and Washington, DC. Local authorities were overwhelmed by the thousands of young people migrating to San Francisco. On March 24, 1967, a headline ran in the San Francisco Chronicle announcing the mayor's "war on hippies." Despite the authorities' opposition to the movement happening in the Haight-Ashbury, the hippies ultimately outnumbered them. Meanwhile, in Detroit and Newark, New Jersey, people were protesting racial injustice. While the hippie youths gathered in California, the greater Civil Rights Movement continued spreading in the Northeastern states, where thousands protested the racism that persisted after the passage of the Civil Rights Act in 1964. The riots peaked during what became known as the " long hot summer of 1967" in cities including Detroit and Newark, over issues including police brutality and racial injustice. The riots, which went on for days at a time, often saw the involvement of the US National Guard and Army troops, which heightened tensions. On July 24, 1967, President Lyndon B. Johnson invoked the Insurrection Act to help suppress riots in Detroit. Hippies and draft dodgers began seeking refuge in communes separate from the rest of society. Seeking to escape the authority of the US government and the structure of life they saw as damaging to society, many hippies — among them, Vietnam draft dodgers — moved to rural communes, where they could live outside commercialism. Preaching self-reliance, these communes aimed to "return to the land." The "back-to-the-land" movement in 1967 focused on a detachment from power structures rather than revolting against them. Self-reliance through independent farming led to the rise of organic food, vegetarianism, and holistic medicine, as reported by But not everyone's commitment to the movement endured, and by fall, some began to return home. The far-reaching impact of the "Summer of Love" was partly due to mass media representation of the movement, including a Time cover dedicated to the hippies. Over the course of the summer, the movement achieved dominance in the music charts, with songs like "San Francisco (Be Sure to Wear Flowers in Your Hair)" by Scott McKenzie spreading the idea of a cultural movement promoting love taking place in San Francisco. By the peak of the summer, Haight-Ashbury had become a hot spot not only for young people seeking to connect with like-minded souls but also for tourists wanting to witness the crowds that had taken over the city. However, as the summer came to an end and the new school year started, young people began leaving, with some returning to their work or studies. The "Summer of Love" ended with a symbolic funeral. On October 6, 1967, a mock funeral was held in the Haight-Ashbury district. The deceased? "Hippie, devoted son of Mass Media," read flyers around the city. The event was meant to give an official end to the "Summer of Love" in San Francisco that had become plagued by addiction, per the University of California San Francisco. "We wanted to signal that this was the end of it, to stay where you are, bring the revolution to where you live and don't come here because it's over and done with," Mary Kasper, who organized the event, told PBS, as reported by the Saturday Evening Post.