Axelrod: Ernst response to Medicaid remarks ‘insensitive,' ‘politically stupid'
Veteran political strategist David Axelrod knocked Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) on Monday for her sarcastic video response to backlash she faced over remarks about Medicaid cuts and death during a town hall last week.
'It was really insensitive of her to put that video up and politically stupid,' Axelrod said in a panel discussion with CNN's Jake Tapper.
Ernst, a military veteran who has been in the Senate for more than a decade, posted a mock apology video on Instagram that showed her walking through a cemetery and discussing the backlash she faced from telling the Butler, Iowa crowd a day earlier, ' Well, we're all going to die ' when an attendee yelled that people would die because of the Medicaid cuts in the House-approved version of President Trump's agenda-setting ' One Big, Beautiful Bill.'
'I made an incorrect assumption that everyone in the auditorium understood that, yes, we are all going to perish from this earth,' Ernst said in the video. 'So I apologize, and I'm really, really glad that I did not have to bring up the subject of the tooth fairy as well.'
Axelrod, a chief political analyst at CNN and podcast host who was a top adviser to former President Obama, said Ernst 'probably could have gotten away' with her initial comments at the town hall as she made the case that the proposed Medicaid cuts are directed at people who should not receive benefits, including undocumented migrants and able-bodied adults who are not seeking employment.
'But putting up that spot the next day …' Axelrod said. 'When you take 10, you know, seven, eight, nine million people off of Medicaid, there will be people who will die. There will be people who are affected.'
Conservative political commentator Scott Jennings, who also appeared on the panel, agreed that Ernst's video was not wise but said her initial message was sound.
'She had it right in the town hall meeting, and then she deviated at the end,' Jennings said. 'I wouldn't have posted the follow-up video myself, but I think the Republicans can actually win this debate.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Business News
6 minutes ago
- Time Business News
Your Guide to Botox and Lip Fillers in El Segundo
If you've ever looked in the mirror and thought, 'Hmm, maybe just a little boost,' you're not alone. Botox and lip fillers have become incredibly popular, especially among people who want a natural, refreshed look without surgery. In El Segundo, more and more locals are discovering the power of subtle cosmetic treatments. Whether it's smoothing out a few lines or adding volume to your lips, the right provider can make all the difference. That's why so many people are turning to this clinic, known for its careful work and personalized results. Let's clear up the myths first. Botox isn't about 'freezing your face.' It's a simple treatment that relaxes the muscles under your skin, mostly in areas where fine lines form from repeated facial expressions like frowning or smiling. It's FDA-approved and has been used safely for years. Most people use Botox to reduce lines around the forehead, between the eyebrows, and around the eyes (those 'crow's feet'). Treatments take just 10–15 minutes, and you can go back to your day right after. The results appear within a few days and can last three to four months. It's not permanent, which means you can always adjust how much or how little you want in future visits. Lip fillers are perfect if you want fuller, smoother, or more balanced lips. Most fillers today use hyaluronic acid—a substance your body already makes. It adds volume and shape in a way that feels soft and natural. You don't need to go for an over-the-top look. In fact, many people use fillers to correct asymmetry or just add a touch of definition. The procedure usually takes under 30 minutes, and results are immediate. Swelling may happen for a day or two, but it's usually mild. With proper care, lip fillers can last from 6 months to a full year. Most adults are good candidates, but your provider will always check your medical history to make sure it's safe for you. These treatments are great for: ● People see early signs of aging ● Anyone wanting subtle improvements ● Those preparing for events like weddings or reunions ● People who want to boost their confidence What's important is going to a qualified injector. You don't want just anyone putting a needle in your face. A licensed expert knows how to enhance your natural features, not change them. If it's your first time, don't worry. Most clinics make the process easy and comfortable. Here's how it usually works: 1. Consultation: You'll talk about what you want, ask questions, and get expert advice. 2. Prep: The provider may mark the treatment areas and apply a numbing cream if needed. 3. Injection: It takes just minutes to do the actual injections. 4. Aftercare: You'll get tips on how to avoid swelling or bruising, like skipping alcohol or heavy workouts for a day. You may be surprised by how quick and simple the whole thing is. Myth 1: Botox and fillers are only for older people. Truth: Many younger people use these treatments to prevent lines before they form. Myth 2: You'll look fake or 'done.' Truth: When done right, the results look natural and fresh—not frozen or overfilled. Myth 3: It's super painful. Truth: Most people say it feels like a tiny pinch or quick sting. Plus, numbing options help. Don't just look at price—look at experience and reputation. Read reviews. Check before-and-after photos. Ask how many years they've been doing this work. A great provider listens, explains clearly, and never pressures you into getting more than you need. Also, make sure the place is clean, licensed, and uses approved products. You deserve the best care for your face. Getting Botox or lip fillers or any form of cosmetic help isn't about changing who you are. It's about feeling confident in your skin and doing something for you . Whether you're after smoother skin or fuller lips, a little enhancement can go a long way when done right. Ready to explore your options in El Segundo? A good first step is booking a consultation and asking questions. You'll be amazed at how small changes can lead to a big boost in self-esteem. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Boston Globe
13 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
GOP tax bill would ease regulations on gun silencers and some rifles and shotguns
Advertisement Republicans who have long supported the changes, along with the gun industry, say the tax infringes on Second Amendment rights. They say silencers are mostly used by hunters and target shooters for sport. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'Burdensome regulations and unconstitutional taxes shouldn't stand in the way of protecting American gun owners' hearing,' said Clyde, who owns two gun stores in Georgia and often wears a pin shaped like an assault rifle on his suit lapel. Democrats are fighting to stop the provision, which was unveiled days after two Minnesota state legislators were shot in their homes, as the bill speeds through the Senate. They argue that loosening regulations on silencers could make it easier for criminals and active shooters to conceal their weapons. Advertisement 'Parents don't want silencers on their streets, police don't want silencers on their streets,' said Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. The gun language has broad support among Republicans and has received little attention as House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., work to settle differences within the party on cuts to Medicaid and energy tax credits, among other issues. But it is just one of hundreds of policy and spending items included to entice members to vote for the legislation that could have broad implications if the bill is enacted within weeks, as Trump wants. Inclusion of the provision is also a sharp turn from the climate in Washington just three years ago when Democrats, like Republicans now, controlled Congress and the White House and pushed through bipartisan gun legislation. The bill increased background checks for some buyers under the age of 21, made it easier to take firearms from potentially dangerous people and sent millions of dollars to mental health services in schools. Passed in the summer of 2022, just weeks after the shooting of 19 children and two adults at a school in Uvalde, Texas, it was the most significant legislative response to gun violence in decades. Three years later, as they try to take advantage of their consolidated power in Washington, Republicans are packing as many of their longtime priorities as possible, including the gun legislation, into the massive, wide-ranging bill that Trump has called 'beautiful.' 'I'm glad the Senate is joining the House to stand up for the Second Amendment and our Constitution, and I will continue to fight for these priorities as the Senate works to pass President Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill,' said Texas Sen. John Cornyn, who was one of the lead negotiators on the bipartisan gun bill in 2022 but is now facing a primary challenge from the right in his bid for reelection next year. Advertisement If the gun provisions remain in the larger legislation and it is passed, silencers and the short-barrel rifles and shotguns would lose an extra layer of regulation that they are subject to under the National Firearms Act, passed in the 1930s in response to concerns about mafia violence. They would still be subject to the same regulations that apply to most other guns — and that includes possible loopholes that allow some gun buyers to avoid background checks when guns are sold privately or online. Larry Keane of the National Shooting Sports Foundation, who supports the legislation, says changes are aimed at helping target shooters and hunters protect their hearing. He argues that the use of silencers in violent crimes is rare. 'All it's ever intended to do is to reduce the report of the firearm to hearing safe levels,' Keane says. Speaking on the floor before the bill passed the House, Rep. Clyde said the bill restores Second Amendment rights from 'over 90 years of draconian taxes.' Clyde said Johnson included his legislation in the larger bill 'with the purest of motive.' 'Who asked for it? I asked,' said Clyde, who ultimately voted for the bill after the gun silencer provision was added. Clyde was responding to Rep. Maxwell Frost, a 28-year-old Florida Democrat, who went to the floor and demanded to know who was responsible for the gun provision. Frost, who was a gun-control activist before being elected to Congress, called himself a member of the 'mass shooting generation' and said the bill would help 'gun manufacturers make more money off the death of children and our people.' Advertisement Among other concerns, control advocates say less regulation for silencers could make it harder for law enforcement to stop an active shooter. 'There's a reason silencers have been regulated for nearly a century: They make it much harder for law enforcement and bystanders to react quickly to gunshots,' said John Feinblatt, president of Everytown for Gun Safety. Schumer and other Democrats are trying to convince the Senate parliamentarian to drop the language as she reviews the bill for policy provisions that aren't budget-related. 'Senate Democrats will fight this provision at the parliamentary level and every other level with everything we've got,' Schumer said earlier this month.
San Francisco Chronicle
21 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Valkyries join call for better pay: ‘We're fighting for a fair share'
Golden State Valkyries players Kayla Thornton and Tiffany Hayes joined a chorus of WNBA players on Sunday in calling for a better collective bargaining agreement from the league. Following the Valkyries' 87-63 blowout of the Connecticut Sun at Chase Center, Thornton opened the postgame news conference with a statement about the upcoming CBA negotiations between the WNBA and the Players Association. 'On behalf of my teammates and every member of our union, I want to be clear, we remain committed to negotiating the next CBA with the league and the team in good faith and privately,' she said. 'But we do want to set the record straight, not for the headlines, but for the fans to support us and deserve transparency about what's at stake.' Hayes added, 'This is a defining moment for the WNBA as the league grows, it's time for a CBA that reflects our true values. We're fighting for a fair share of the business that we build. It's business, we're not fighting for anything unreasonable.' Players across the league offered similar statements during their media availabilities on Sunday. Indiana Fever players Sophie Cunningham and Sydney Colson read the same statement as Thornton ahead of their game against the Las Vegas Aces, while Chicago Sky forward Elizabeth Williams also told reporters, 'the current system is unsustainable.' The current CBA expires at the end of this season, and player salaries are expected to increase significantly. This season, the minimum salary is $66,079, but the WNBA agreed to a record 11-year, $2.2 billion media rights deal — about $200 million per year, more than triple its previous deal. The WNBPA posted on Instagram on Sunday: 'It's time. As the league grows, it's time for a CBA that reflects our true value. We're fighting for a fair share of the revenue we generate. If not now, when?' In October, the union opted out of the league's current CBA in anticipation of negotiating for increased salaries. In March, Chicago Sky forward Angel Reese and Dallas' DiJonai Carrington hinted that the players would be willing to strike. Front Office Sports reported Sunday that players wanted to make 'significant headway' in bargaining for a new CBA before the WNBA All-Star Game in Indianapolis on July 19. Valkyries head coach Natalie Nakase offered support for the players in her postgame presser. 'A huge reason why I wanted to work in the W was, how can I help, and how can I impact?' she said. 'As this league is growing, I want to help, too. I want to do whatever it takes so they what they want and to get what they deserve. So I'm supporting them 100%.' Thornton and Temi Fagbenle, who is currently away from the team for EuroBasket, are the team's Player Association representatives. The WNBA said in a statement on Sunday, 'The WNBA continues to meet regularly with the Women's National Basketball Players Association and engage in constructive dialogue as part of our ongoing collective bargaining discussions.'
