Supreme Court upholds ban on medical treatment for transgender minors
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court in a ruling released Wednesday upheld a Tennessee law that bans gender-related medical treatments for transgender minors. The court rejected an argument that the ban violates the Constitution's equal protection clause.
The ruling affirmed a previous decision by the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals that a Tennessee law banning certain treatments, like puberty blockers and hormone treatments, can remain in place.
In the 6-3 decision, delivered by Chief Justice John Roberts, the court said the case carries the weight of 'fierce scientific and policy debates about the safety, efficacy and propriety' of medical treatments in the 'evolving' field.
'The voices in these debates raise sincere concerns; the implications for all are profound,' Roberts wrote.
Roberts said the court's role is to ensure the Tennessee law does not violate the Constitution's equal protection clause and is not subject to heightened scrutiny.
He was joined by the other conservative justices, including Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. Thomas and Barrett issued separate concurring opinions.
'Having concluded that it does not, we leave questions regarding its policy to the people, their elected representatives, and the democratic process,' Roberts wrote.
The three liberal justices dissented. Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented, and was joined in full by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson and in part by Justice Elena Kagan.
Sotomayor argued that the court is authorizing 'untold harm' to transgender children and their families.
'Because there is no constitutional justification for that result, I dissent,' she said.
The case stems from a doctor, parents and transgender minors who challenged Tennessee's law. They secured a partial victory at the district court level, when the court ruled transgender youth should have access to treatments that were available to non-transgender peers.
The 6th Circuit overturned that decision on an appeal and argued the policy does not promote sex discrimination. The Supreme Court's ruling Wednesday affirmed the circuit court decision.
The case could impact around two dozen other states who also have similar gender-related restrictions on treatments, including Utah, and is a setback for some in the LGBTQ+ community who disagree with the Trump administration's actions on transgender issues.
Sen. Mike Lee was supportive of the Supreme Court's decision.
'A great victory for America's children and the right of states to protect them,' he said Wednesday in a post on X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘Just wrong': Oregon advocates say SCOTUS decision targets transgender youth
PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) – Oregon groups and lawmakers are responding to a Supreme Court ruling made Wednesday that restricts access to gender-affirming care for minors. The , along with three families and a physician, who claimed a Tennessee law violated the Constitution's guarantee of equal protection. Travis Decker, accused of murdering 3 daughters, may have changed appearance: Here's how The found the law does not discriminate against transgender youth based on their sex and is constitutional. It will effectively protect Republican-led state governments that are rolling back protections for transgender people from any future legal challenges. U.S. Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) said the 'life-altering decision lays out the playbook for extremist politicians to continue their crusade against trans people and further exclude them from daily life.' Meanwhile, to call the ruling a 'landmark victory for Tennessee in defense of America's children.' BLM warns of 'aggressive' mountain goats along Oregon river According to the Oregon Nurses Association, puberty blockers and hormone therapy is 'endorsed by every major medical organization in the U.S.' and has shown to significantly reduce depression, anxiety, and suicidal thoughts among transgender youth. 'ONA believes that all young people deserve access to medically necessary care, free from political interference,' their statement read. 'Today's decision is not based on science, public health, or the well-being of children; it is rooted in ideology, and it places vulnerable youth at serious risk.' Basic Rights Oregon called the ruling 'a devastating outcome for transgender people, our families and our medical providers.' However, Oregon law still protects access to gender-affirming care on a state level. 'Gender affirming care is still legal in Oregon, and Oregon law prohibits discrimination against people based on their gender identity or sex, including from healthcare providers,' ACLU litigation manager Eri Andriola said. The decision comes as local activists campaign for an Equal Rights for All ballot measure in 2026. As proposed, the ERA would guarantee equal rights 'regardless of one's sex, gender identity, or sexual orientation' and create certain protections in the Oregon Constitution. These protections include the right to abortion, contraception and IVF, transgender health care, and same-gender marriage. Oregon lawmakers consider strengthening National Guard oversight Sen. Merkley's full statement can be read below: 'Access to medically-necessary care for trans youth saves lives, and the U.S. Supreme Court's callous decision puts trans youth and their families at risk. 'MAGA extremists across the nation will not stop at banning medically-necessary gender-affirming care for trans youth. The Court's life-altering decision lays out the playbook for extremist politicians to continue their crusade against trans people and further exclude them from daily life. And this is just the beginning—this decision opens the floodgates for MAGA extremists in state legislatures and Congress to ban medically-necessary care, from gender-affirming care to abortion access. 'This is just wrong—everyone should have access to the care they need, when they need it. No exceptions. 'Let's get politicians out of the exam room. We will continue to fight these divisive policies in communities nationwide to fully realize the vision of America as a land of freedom and equality for all, and I won't rest until my Equality Act is signed into law to deliver on this fundamental promise.' Stay with KOIN 6 News as we continue to follow this story. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Supreme Court backs Missouri, Kansas ban on gender transitions for children
KANSAS CITY, Mo. — On Wednesday, the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of Missouri, Kansas and other states seeking to ban gender transition procedures. The ruling in United States v. Skrmetti reflects Missouri's law banning what Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey calls 'gender mutilation' procedures for minors. Bailey says that the state played a pivotal role in the ruling. 16-year-old boy killed in Basehor, Kansas crash: KHP In February, Kansas became the 27th state to ban or restrict such care when after barring federal support for gender-affirming care for youth under 19. Kelly vetoed the bill on Feb. 11, saying it's inappropriate for politicians to infringe on parental rights. One week later, on Feb. 18, the veto was reversed. 'My office has been on the front lines of the fight to stop the mutilation of children in the name of radical gender ideology,' Bailey said. 'Missouri was the first state in the nation to win on this issue, and the Supreme Court's decision affirms what we've said all along: states have both the right and the duty to protect children from these irreversible and experimental procedures.' Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach also released a statement on Wednesday, saying 'This decision is a big win for those of us who want to protect the original meaning of the Constitution. The 14th Amendment equal protection clause in no way prevents states from protecting minors in this contest. The decision also strengthens the state's position regarding Kansas's law. The Kansas equal protection clause must be interpreted in the same fashion as the U.S. equal protection clause. I look forward to defending the law in court.' Suspect dead, trooper injured after shooting in Saline County In the Skrmetti case, Bailey's office says that Missouri led 19 other states in asking the Supreme Court to allow states to ban gender transition practices. 'This is a victory not just for Missouri, but for every state fighting to shield children from irreversible harm disguised as medical care,' concluded Bailey. 'We are proud that the Supreme Court has now adopted the same position we've led on from day one: children deserve protection, not permanent damage. As a father and as Attorney General, I will not rest until every entity harming kids is shut down, every bad actor is held accountable, and Missouri remains the safest state in the nation for children.' Other local leaders joined in as well. U.S. Senator Roger Marshall, R-Kan., shared a statement praising the decision. 'Today was not just a win for basic biology and common sense, but for human decency, sound medicine, and the dignity and safety of children everywhere,' Marshall said. 'As a doctor for over 25 years, I understand the gravity of these harmful so-called treatments radical activists have been pushing on children. They leave permanent scarring, sterilization, and other horrible side effects. Make no mistake, there's more work to do, and I remain committed to eliminating taxpayer-funded transgender procedures on both minors and adults.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
New Texas law requires 10 Commandments to be posted in every public school classroom
AUSTIN, Texas — Texas will require all public school classrooms to display the Ten Commandments under a new law that will make the state the nation's largest to attempt to impose such a mandate. Gov. Greg Abbott announced Saturday that he signed the bill, which is expected to draw a legal challenge from critics who consider it an unconstitutional violation of the separation of church and state. A similar law in Louisiana was blocked when a federal appeals court ruled Friday that it was unconstitutional. Arkansas also has a similar law that has been challenged in federal court. The Texas measure easily passed in the Republican-controlled state House and Senate in the legislative session that ended June 2. 'The focus of this bill is to look at what is historically important to our nation educationally and judicially,' Republican state representative Candy Noble, a co-sponsor of the bill, said when it passed the House. Abbott also signed a bill that allows school districts to provide students and staff a daily voluntary period of prayer or time to read a religious text during school hours. The Ten Commandments laws are among efforts, mainly in conservative-led states, to insert religion into public schools. Texas' law requires public schools to post in classrooms a 16-by-20-inch poster or framed copy of a specific English version of the commandments, even though translations and interpretations vary across denominations, faiths and languages and may differ in homes and houses of worship. Supporters say the Ten Commandments are part of the foundation of the United States' judicial and educational systems and should be displayed. Opponents, including some Christian and other faith leaders, say the Ten Commandments and prayer measures infringe on others' religious freedom. A letter signed this year by dozens of Christian and Jewish faith leaders opposing the bill noted that Texas has thousands of students of other faiths who might have no connection to the Ten Commandments. Texas has nearly 6 million students in about 9,100 public schools. In 2005, Abbott, who was state attorney general at the time, successfully argued before the Supreme Court that Texas could keep a Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of its Capitol. Louisiana's law has twice been ruled unconstitutional by federal courts, first by U.S. District Judge John deGravelles and then again by a three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which also considers cases from Texas. State Attorney General Liz Murrell said she would appeal and pledged to take it to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary.
