‘What an idiot': New York Times savaged over ‘boys on the bombers' fact check
Don't miss out on the headlines from News. Followed categories will be added to My News.
The US has officially joined Israel in its battle against nuclear power Iran, and the New York Times was ready and waiting to wag a woke finger in the direction of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over his choice of words in a press briefing.
In a Sunday news conference, Hegseth heaped praise on President Trump and the military campaign that saw six 'bunker buster' bombs dropped on key nuclear sites in the country.
'The operation President Trump planned was bold and it was brilliant, showing the world that American deterrence is back,' he said, warning, 'when this president speaks, the world should listen — and the US military, we can back it up.'
At one point, Hegseth casually called the B-2 pilots who dropped the 15-ton bombs on targets in Iran 'our boys on those bombers,' which the New York Times appeared to jump on.
'In the briefing, Hegseth referred to B-2 pilots as 'our boys on those bombers,' yet both men and women have been trained to fly them,' NYT Pentagon reporter John Ismay corrected the record on the outlet's blog.
The posting drew hundreds of scornful comments on social media.
'This is why people use the New York Times to line their bird cages,' one poster mused.
'Yes, let's make sure to be politically correct at this serious time,' another sarcastically quipped.
'What an idiot. We women know exactly what Secretary Hegseth meant,' said an X user.
It's not clear whether any women took part in the 37-hour B-2 bomber raid, which saw the stealth planes take off from and return to Whiteman Air Force Base in western Missouri.
What are the New York Times doing? Photo by ANGELA WEISS / AFP
Pete Hegseth during a media conference. Photo:/AFP
It's a bizarre time to drop a fact check on something that wasn't even trolling from the Trump administration, particularly when Iran threatened US bases in the Middle East as a result of the US attacks.
International concern focused on fears that the unprecedented US attacks would deepen conflict in the volatile region after Israel launched a bombing campaign against Iran earlier this month.
Ali Akbar Velayati, an adviser to Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said bases used by US forces could be attacked in retaliation.
'Any country in the region or elsewhere that is used by American forces to strike Iran will be considered a legitimate target for our armed forces,' he said in a message carried by the official IRNA news agency.
'America has attacked the heart of the Islamic world and must await irreparable consequences.'
President Donald Trump urged Iran to end the conflict after he launched surprise strikes on a key underground uranium enrichment site at Fordo, along with nuclear facilities in Isfahan and Natanz.
'We had a spectacular military success yesterday, taking the 'bomb' right out of their hands (and they would use it if they could!)' he said on social media.
The B-2 bombers dropped the bombs on Iran. Photo by US Department of Defense / AFP
And while the US president did not directly advocate regime change in the Islamic republic, he openly played with the idea – even after his aides stressed that was not a goal of American intervention.
'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' Trump posted on his Truth Social platform.
'But if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!'
Hegseth told a Pentagon press briefing earlier that Iran's nuclear program had been 'devastated,' adding the operation 'did not target Iranian troops or the Iranian people.'
Standing beside Hegseth, top US general Dan Caine said that while it would be 'way too early' for him to determine the level of destruction, 'initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction.'
With AFP
This story first appeared in the New York Post and was republished with permission.
Originally published as 'What an idiot': New York Times savaged over 'boys on the bombers' fact check
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Australian
an hour ago
- The Australian
Coalition and Jewish leaders welcome ‘courageous' move Tony Abbott Scott Morrison
Two former Liberal prime ministers, the Coalition and Australian Jewish leaders have backed US President Donald Trump after he authorised strikes on three major Iranian nuclear sites, while the Greens condemned the attacks for causing an 'escalation in violence'. Both Scott Morrison and Tony Abbott issued statements of support for the 'necessary' attacks on the Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan facilities, with Mr Morrison arguing there was 'no other option' to prevent Iran from mobilising a nuclear weapon. 'Does anyone welcome events like this? Of course they don't,' Mr Morrison told Sky News on Sunday. 'But this was a necessary event. There were no other options available to the President.' Mr Morrison said the US military was 'the only military in the world' capable of striking Iran in the way it has, and added Mr Trump had shown he was a president who advocates for 'peace through strength'. Mr Morrison said the strikes came only 'after the failure of so many interventions in the past'. 'When all other avenues fail, this is not a President that wishes to rush to these outcomes … but if necessary will,' he said. In a post on X, Mr Abbott said Israel's actions were welcome. 'Israel is doing the world's work in trying to destroy forever the Iranian nuclear weapons program and it's good that America has supported its ally,' he said. Sussan Ley on Sunday issued a similar statement of support for the attacks, saying the world can 'never accept a nuclear-armed Iranian regime'. The Opposition Leader said Iran sought to destroy Australia's allies, and the government should not allow 'the Iranian regime the capacity to enact its objectives of the destruction of the United States and Israel'. 'It was made clear by the International Atomic and Energy Agency on 12 June that Iran was in breach of its Non-Proliferation Treaty obligations after stockpiling more than 400kg of 60 per cent enriched uranium at Fordow, the last step in enrichment towards a nuclear weapon,' she said. 'The world can never accept a nuclear-armed Iranian regime and today the United States military has taken proactive action to ensure that we never need to. A nuclear-armed Iranian regime would be a serious and direct threat to world peace and stability, especially as it continues to engage in terrorism including by supporting its proxies: Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in southern Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen.' She said the Coalition 'stands with the United States'. Acting opposition foreign affairs spokesman Andrew Hastie said the Albanese government's response to the strikes was 'far too ambiguous', after an unnamed government spokesperson called for 'de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy'. 'The United States is a close ally. The United States has a key role in re-establishing order and peace in the Middle East,' he said. 'And Iran, by contrast, is a regime that sponsors terrorism. It sponsored Hamas, Hezbollah.' Liberal senator David Sharma said the Albanese government's attitude towards growing tensions between Israel and Iran was 'unanchored from reality'. He told Sky News Labor had been 'calling for dialogue between Israel and Iran'. 'These countries have not had diplomatic relations for 46 years,' he said. Senator Sharma said Australia should focus on the 'outcome we want' not the 'process that needs to be gone through'. 'The outcome that is clearly in Australia's national interest is an Iran that is no longer able to pursue nuclear weapons, does not support armed terrorist groups in the region, and does not harbour imperialistic designs to its neighbours and does not amass thousands of ballistic missiles,' he said. Greens defence spokesman David Shoebridge slammed Labor for being complicit in the 'escalation in violence' in the Middle East, calling for Australia to distance itself from the US. Mr Shoebridge told the ABC the Albanese government should back out of the AUKUS agreement to ensure Australia is a 'force for peace'. 'At this moment, being silent when a bully like Donald Trump breaks international law and starts the United States' third war in the region just this century, being silent is complicit in that escalation and violence,' he said. 'Where is the red line the Albanese government has for the escalation and violence?' He called on Labor to 'make a clear statement' that 'no military base in Australia, whether a joint military base with the United States or otherwise, will be used for this unfolding US war'. The Palestine Action Group organised an anti-Israel protest in Sydney on Sunday, calling for the Albanese government to 'stop supporting (Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin) Netanyahu and Trump's war'. In Melbourne, protesters marched from the State Library to the US Consulate waving Iranian and Palestinian flags, calling on America to 'stop attacking Iran'. The Australian/Israel and Jewish Affairs Council praised the 'welcome' assaults on the Iranian sites, saying the US attacks would support Australia's national security interests. Executive director Colin Rubenstein described the Fordow underground nuclear site as 'the linchpin of the Iranian nuclear program' and said the US strike on the facility 'provides much greater confidence that Iran's illegal pursuit of nuclear weapons capabilities will not be reconstituted any time soon'. 'US President Trump deserves congratulations for making a difficult but essential and courageous decision to intervene in the interests of not only the US, but of global security and stability – including Australia's national security interests,' Mr Rubenstein said. 'We now hope and pray the war between Iran and Israel can be brought to a rapid close and measures put in place that guarantee the rogue regime in Iran is never again able to present a similar menace to its neighbours, to international stability, or to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Agreement.' Zionist Federation of Australia president Jeremy Leibler says the US attacks were a 'necessary and courageous response to an urgent threat'. 'The Iranian regime has for years pursued nuclear weapons while sponsoring terrorism that has killed thousands of Israelis, Americans, and others,' he said. 'Iran's actions are not just a danger to Israel, they are a clear and present threat to the West and the international rules-based order. 'We commend President Trump and the United States for their moral clarity and leadership in taking decisive action.' Read related topics: Donald TrumpGreens Ellie Dudley Legal Affairs Correspondent Ellie Dudley is The Australian's legal affairs correspondent covering courts, justice and changes to the legal profession. She edits The Australian's weekly legal newsletter, Ipso Facto, and won Young Journalist of the Year in 2024 at both the Kennedy Awards and the News Awards. Music Its past two Australian tours sold one million tickets in total, and the passage of time has not diminished demand for what the promoter describes as 'the world's greatest rock 'n' roll band'. Politics An additional $12.7m in funding for the Queensland childcare regulator will be announced in this week's state budget, helping to bolster staff numbers and ensure kids are kept safe.
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
What the Israel-Iran war means for oil prices and the cost of goods
As Israel and Iran, now joined by the US, escalate from conflict to war, the price of oil is rising. Energy and fuel costs, food prices, and spending on infrastructure and welfare programs will likely be affected, says a leading economics researcher. This means higher prices for consumers across Asia. For Asian nations, there is no real alternative to oil from the Gulf states, meaning volatility in that region is likely to cause pressure thousands of kilometres away. Indo-Pacific countries who rely on oil imports would have to spend more, but many do not have the resources to keep borrowing without cutting spending in other areas," said Joaquin Vespignani, associate professor in finance at the University of Tasmania. "For the average person ... inflation will increase significantly, while income may decline. So, you have a double whammy there,' he said. Prices have already increased 3 per cent following the US's bombing of an Iranian nuclear site. A squeeze on oil supplies could have serious ramifications for countries such as Indonesia which have provided fuel subsidies. ( Reuters: Ajeng Dinar Ulfiana ) Are oil prices likely to rise more? Yes, according to Dr Vespignani. In the initial stages of the Israel-Iran war, markets reacted with a 5 per cent "risk premium", he said. 'Forecasts under high-risk scenarios suggest Brent could exceed $US100 per barrel if supply from Iran is disrupted and strategic transport routes are compromised. 'If the United States becomes further involved, especially through direct engagement or enhanced sanctions on Iranian crude exports, we could see a significant and sustained rise in oil prices into 2025.'' How will that affect the Indo-Pacific? 'The impact could be very significant,'' said Dr Vespignani. 'India, Indonesia, and most Southeast Asian nations are highly dependent on imported oil, much of it sourced from the Middle East.'' India imports about 85 per cent of its crude oil, Indonesia imports about 60 per cent, and Southeast Asia imports more than 70 per cent. Countries like Thailand, the Philippines and Vietnam are heavily exposed to price increases. 'If prices rise by $US10–20/barrel over a sustained period, this would widen current account deficits, increase fuel subsidies, and feed into broader inflation,' said Dr Vespignani. Joaquin Vespignani said the Indo-Pacific would be significantly affected by any price rises or interruption to supplies from the oil-producing Gulf states. ( Supplied ) In India, for example, a 25 per cent increase in global oil prices would raise its oil import bill by an estimated $US30–40 billion annually, placing substantial pressure on the current account deficit, the rupee and domestic inflation. Indonesia would face similar pressure. The burden on the state budget due to fuel subsidies could substantially increase the deficit or force a reallocation of spending from infrastructure and welfare programs. Dr Vespignani said countries with little room to move with finances and external vulnerabilities would be forced to choose between inflation control, currency stability, and managing sustainable debt. '[This] could also slow economic growth, reduce disposable incomes, and create new pressures on government finances — particularly in economies still recovering from COVID-19 and global food price inflation,' he said. Oil tankers pass through the Strait of Hormuz ( Reuters: Hamad I Mohammed ) What happens if Iran blocks the Strait of Hormuz? Iran has approved a move to close the Strait of Hormuz, which still requires sign off from the Supreme National Security Council, a body led by an appointee of Ali Khamenei. The step is widely seen as Iran's most effective threat to hurt the West. The Strait of Hormuz is the world's most critical oil chokepoint — about 20 per cent of global oil flows pass through it. Analysts agree if Iran were to block or significantly restrict shipping, the immediate result would be a major supply shock. The price of crude oil could surge well above $US90–105 per barrel depending on the duration and severity of the blockade, said Dr Vespignani. 'India, Indonesia, and most Southeast Asian countries would be among the hardest hit due to their geographic proximity and trade links to Gulf producers,' he said. 'Refiners in these countries would face delays, higher freight and insurance costs, and ultimately be forced to pass on costs to consumers.'' Any squeeze on oil supplies would mean 'higher costs for fuel, electricity, and transport — with downstream effects on food and manufacturing prices.'' Are there alternatives to Middle East oil? 'There are no immediate short-term alternatives that can fully offset a severe supply disruption,' said Dr Vespignani. He said strategic reserves can provide some buffer but these are relatively small and would only cover a few weeks of demand. 'In the absence of substitution options, higher prices will be required to reduce demand — potentially weakening growth and amplifying inflation pressures across the Indo-Pacific.''
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Suicide bombing on Syrian church kills at least 22, injures dozens
At least 22 people have been killed and 63 injured in a suicide bombing at a church in Syria's capital of Damascus, according to state media. WARNING: This story contains distressing content. Worshippers had gathered for a packed Sunday service at the Mar Elias Church in the Dweila neighbourhood when the attack took place. The suicide bomber entered and opened fire, before detonating his explosive vest, Syria's interior ministry said in a statement. It said the suicide bomber was a member of Islamic State (IS). A security source told Reuters two men were involved in the attack, including the man who blew himself up. It is the first suicide bombing in Damascus since Bashar al-Assad was toppled by an Islamist-led rebel insurgency in December. The blast sparked panic and fear in the church, which had been full of worshippers, including children and the elderly, eyewitnesses said. The building was strewn with wood from fittings and pews after the attack, with fallen icons and pools of blood on the floor. Families are still searching for missing loved ones, with some local media reporting children were among the dead. Lawrence Maamari was inside the church when the attack happened. He told AFP a man had entered and begun shooting, with people trying "to stop him before he blew himself up". Ziad Helou, who was at a shop nearby, said he heard gunfire then an explosion, and saw glass flying. "We saw fire in the church and the remains of wooden benches thrown all the way to the entrance," he said. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said it was the first suicide attack inside a church in Syria since war erupted in 2011. IS has been behind several attempted attacks on churches in Syria since Mr Assad's fall. But a security source told Reuters this was the first to succeed. The Orthodox patriarchate in Damascus urged authorities to "bear full responsibility for what … is happening concerning the violation of the sanctity of churches, and to ensure the protection of all citizens". The United Nations special envoy for Syria, Geir Pedersen, expressed "outrage at this heinous crime", calling for a full investigation. Syria's foreign ministry described the attack as "a desperate attempt to undermine national coexistence and to destabilise the country". Since the new authorities took power, the international community has urged the government to protect minorities and ensure their participation in Syria's transition, particularly after sectarian violence in recent months. Syria's interior minister, Anas Khattab, said specialised teams had begun investigating. "These terrorist acts will not stop the efforts of the Syrian state in achieving civil peace," he said in a statement. Earlier this month, he said IS had attempted to carry out attacks against Christian and Shiite communities that authorities had thwarted. Syria's Christian community has shrunk from about 1 million before the war to under 300,000 due to displacement and emigration. ABC/Wires
