Bill seeks to expand speed cameras on CT highways. DOT says 24,900 warnings issued in pilot
The Connecticut Department of Transportation has made it clear: The crisis of accidents and fatalities the state sees on its roads would decline if drivers were to follow the speed limit, kept their phones put away and follow other rules put in place to keep motorists, passengers and pedestrians safe.
Now, with the goal of further enforcement of speeding and reckless driving laws, a Connecticut General Assembly bill passed by the Transportation Committee calls for a plan to expand speed safety cameras on state highways. The bill was approved by the committee and placed on the House calendar, records show.
The proposed bill, HB-7058, would require the Department of Transportation commissioner to develop a plan to expand speed camera use on state roads by Feb. 1, 2026.
It also would 'permit a municipality to use any funds generated from the use of an automated traffic enforcement safety device to reimburse a vendor for the expenses associated with the design, installation, operation or maintenance of such device.'
The bill was introduced on Feb. 20, a public hearing was held, and it has been on the House calendar since April 1. The calendar does not indicate whether or when it could be taken up.
Why fatal crashes were up in CT in 2024 despite massive efforts to curb alarming trend
'This bill aims to reduce instances of reckless driving and support local and state law enforcement in monitoring and detecting instances of reckless behavior, while saving local municipalities the massive costs associated with installing and maintaining these cameras,' according to the Transportation Committee's joint favorable report.
According to an Office of Legislative Research summary, the proposed bill would require the Department of Transportation commissioner also to submit any proposed legislation to the Transportation Committee by February 1, 2026.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Commissioner Garrett Eucalitto provided written testimony in favor of the proposed bill.
'CTDOT has long advocated for the use of speed safety cameras, as they are a proven safety tool that can be deployed as part of comprehensive speed management programs to target speeding‐related safety problems,' Eucalitto said in the testimony.
Eucalitto said the DOT 'administered a highly successful pilot program to operate speed safety cameras in select highway construction work zones' from April to November 2023.
During that span, the DOT issued more than 24,900 warnings, as well as 750 fines in five pilot locations. The data showed a reduction in speeds and lower drivers going slower when there were warning signs and cameras were effect.
'Of the five pilot locations analyzed, all showed reductions in driver speeds, with four locations showing significant reductions in speed when compared to data collected prior to enforcement,' Eucalitto said.
'Speeding was reduced at two work zones on I‐95 by 17 to 18 percent. This reduction can be attributed to the active speed enforcement, signage, and public outreach,' he said. 'In addition to showcasing a low percentage of drivers who were subject to fines, the small number of repeat offenders highlights that work zone safety technology can be effective without adding substantial costs to drivers. Based on the demonstrable success of the pilot program, the General Assembly authorized CTDOT to re‐establish the work zone program on a permanent basis, and we expect the program to launch in the summer of 2025.'
Ronnell Higgins, the commissioner Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection, also supported the bill.
'Our agency supports Section 1 of the bill which would allow the Department of Transportation to develop a plan to expand the use of speed safety cameras on the state Highways,' Higgins said in written testimony. 'We look forward to being a thought partner in this endeavor as roadway safety remains a top priority.'
'Our agency also supports leveraging technology to assist our troopers especially as we continue to face challenges with recruitment and retention,' Higgins wrote. 'Concerns about reckless driving and speeding motorists have been growing since the start of the coronavirus pandemic five years ago.'
Higgins cited the growing number of traffic fatalities in the state that has included more than 300 traffic fatalities in the state since 2021 as well as rising numbers in speeding infractions of motorists driving at 100 mph and above as well as between 80 and 85 mph.
'In developing the plan, the commissioner must consider the Federal Highway Administration's Speed Safety Camera Program Planning and Operations Guide and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's High Visibility Enforcement Toolkit,' the OLR report notes.
Scotland First Selectman Dana Barrow also supported the bill.
'As the First Selectman of a small town in Eastern CT without a police department this is the only way to slow down the traffic,' she said in testimony.
Town of Winchester-Winsted Town Manager Paul Harrington and Hamden Mayor Lauren Garrett also were the supporters of the legislation, specifically with reference to the municipal camera portion. Under current law, municipalities can start speed and red light camera programs but only after they adopt an ordinance that meets the law's requirements and get a speed and red light camera plan approved by DOT every three years.
CT's first speeding cameras are set to roll out in January in town with just one stoplight
The Office of Fiscal Analysis found the bill would add no municipal or state fiscal impact.
'The bill requires the Department of Transportation to develop a plan to expand speed camera use on state roads and does not result in a fiscal impact because this is within the department's current expertise,' the OFA report said. 'The bill also allows municipalities to use revenue from fines collected as a result of municipal speed and red-light cameras to reimburse a vendor for camera design. This does not result in a fiscal impact as it does not change the revenue a municipality will collect from these devices.'
'Regarding the use of municipal speed and red-light camera fine revenue, current law allows municipalities to use the revenue to pay costs associated with camera use. The bill specifies that these costs include reimbursing a vendor for speed and red-light camera design, installation, operation, or maintenance. By law, fine revenue may also be used to improve transportation mobility and invest in transportation infrastructure,' the Office of Legislative Research said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senate Readies Tax Bill for Vote as Holdouts Threaten Delay
(Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump's tax-and-spending agenda is nearing a climactic vote in the Senate this week in the wake of air strikes on Iran, which risk embroiling the US in a prolonged Middle East conflict. Bezos Wedding Draws Protests, Soul-Searching Over Tourism in Venice One Architect's Quest to Save Mumbai's Heritage From Disappearing NYC Congestion Toll Cuts Manhattan Gridlock by 25%, RPA Reports Trump's $4.2 trillion tax-cut package, partially offset by social safety-net reductions, does not yet have the support it needs to pass the Senate. Fiscal hawks seeking to lower the bill's total price tag are at odds with Republicans worried about cuts to Medicaid health coverage for their constituents and phase-outs to green energy incentives that support jobs in their states. Finessing a deal to line up the votes will require focus — and a bit of arm-twisting — from Trump, who is juggling both a pivotal week for his domestic agenda alongside a highly uncertain situation in Iran following the US strikes. Trump on Sunday, as US officials and foreign leaders were still digesting what the attacks on Iranian nuclear sites will mean for Middle East stability, urged members of his party to swiftly pass the tax bill. 'Great unity in the Republican Party, perhaps unity like we have never seen before. Now let's get the Great, Big, Beautiful Bill done. Our Country is doing GREAT,' Trump said on social media. Senate Republicans plan to begin the multi-step process to vote on Trump's tax and spending cut bill mid-week, setting up final passage in the latter half of the week or over the weekend. That timeline would allow the House to vote on the latest version next week and meet Trump's goal of enacting his signature bill by July 4. Meeting that ambitious deadline will require senators to quickly negotiate resolutions to a series of thorny policy issues that have divided Republicans for weeks. Senate Majority Leader John Thune must balance demands by fiscal conservatives for deeper spending cuts with qualms from moderate Republicans concerned the bill goes too far in making people ineligible for Medicaid and cutting funding for rural hospitals. Renewable energy incentives continue to divide the party as well, with some conservatives pushing for a faster phase-out of tax breaks for wind, solar, nuclear, geothermal and hydrogen. Other senators are angling to keep the breaks in place for projects that have already begun. Senators will also find themselves in talks with some of their House counterparts over the state and local tax, or SALT, deduction. The Senate bill would keep the current $10,000 cap in place, while the House-passed version would raise it to $40,000. Several House members from high-tax states, including New York, New Jersey and California, have threatened to block the bill if it doesn't include a $40,000 SALT cap. The Senate has some negotiating room to increase the SALT cap. The bill, per Senate rules, can lose up to $1.5 trillion over a decade. But a new estimate from the non-partisan Joint Committee on Taxation, found the legislation only costs $441 billion over ten years — after deploying a budget gimmick that assumes the $3.8 trillion cost of extending Trump's first-term tax cuts cost nothing. Rules Battles Democrats are locked out of the deal-making, with Trump able to pass his agenda on Republican votes alone. But they have been able to use arcane Senate rules to successfully challenge and strike some provisions from the bill if the Senate parliamentarian declares the measures aren't sufficiently related to taxes, spending or the budget. The parliamentarian blocked a provision that would make it harder for judges to hold Trump administration officials in contempt for failing to abide by rulings. Democrats were able to eliminate measures that would curb some Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits. Provisions to strip funding from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and cut Federal Reserve employee salaries were also tossed out. Late Sunday Democrats announced Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough had thrown out provisions related to the federal workforce, including a plan scaling back civil service protections for federal workers and a measure that would allow the president to eliminate agencies without approval from Congress. She also ruled that a provision forcing the US Postal Service to sell off all its electric vehicles must be removed from the bill. The parliamentarian has permitted Republicans to use the bill to pressure states not to regulate artificial intelligence by denying them funding for broadband Internet projects. That's a watered-down version of a House proposal that would have blocked states from issuing AI regulations. That plan drew bipartisan criticism for overstepping states' authority. Democrats are also seeking to remove the Section 899 'revenge tax' on companies domiciled in countries with 'unfair' tax regimes. That provision has stoked fears on Wall Street of capital flight from the US. That parliamentarian ruling could be released as soon as Monday. The tax bill is the core of Trump's economic agenda combined into a 'big, beautiful bill.' The Senate version makes permanent individual and business tax breaks enacted in 2017, while adding new breaks for tipped and overtime workers, seniors and car-buyers. The bill would allow hundreds of billions of dollars in new spending for the military, border patrol and immigration enforcement. To partly pay for the revenue losses, the bill imposes new work and cost-sharing requirements for Medicaid and food stamps while cutting aid to students. The measure would also avert a US payment default as soon as August by raising the debt ceiling by $5 trillion. (Updates with additional parliamentarian decisions.) Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros The US Has More Copper Than China But No Way to Refine All of It Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio
Politico
2 hours ago
- Politico
Capitol agenda: How Johnson may block an Iran rebuke
President Donald Trump already had Republicans scrambling to get their 'big, beautiful bill' to his desk by next week. Now he's got Congress grappling with something even bigger: the aftermath of his airstrikes on Iran. The issue could come to a head with a vote as soon as this week. Sen. Tim Kaine's (D-Va.) resolution requiring congressional approval for military action in Iran ripens on Friday, but is expected to be on the floor sooner with the megabill set to eat up the back half of the week. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is pushing to move up the vote. He's urging his party to support the measure, but Democrats expect to lose the vote of Sen. John Fetterman (Pa.). On the GOP side, keep an eye on Sens. Rand Paul (Ky.) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), who said Sunday on X 'Congress alone' has the power to authorize war. Lawmakers in both chambers are set to receive briefings Tuesday on the situation in Iran; they were on the books before the strikes. In the House, Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna's (D-Calif.) war powers resolution, which would block U.S. involvement in Iran, will not ripen until next week. But House GOP leadership is considering getting ahead of that: Speaker Mike Johnson could move this week to kill the effort with language getting rid of the privileged nature of the resolution, according to a person granted anonymity to relay the private discussions. Trump and GOP leaders are moving to unify the rank-and-file behind Trump's decision to strike, even as Trump openly muses about pursuing regime change in Iran. Take note of Trump's renewed attacks on Massie — a source tells POLITICO it's part of an effort to keep members in line. Adding to the chaos for Republicans is Trump's Sunday evening musing about pursuing 'regime change' in Iran if its current leaders can't 'MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN.' 'This is not America First folks,' Massie said in response to Trump's Truth Social post. House Democrats are less unified. Most are questioning the constitutionality of the strike, but the party is split on where to go from there. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.) has brought up impeachment. Others, like Rep. Steny Hoyer (Md.), were more supportive of the strike. That could be a problem for Democrats trying to strengthen their opposition. The top Democrats on Foreign Affairs, Intelligence and Armed Services are drafting their own resolution in response to the strikes, according to a person granted anonymity to discuss the plan. There are likely a handful of pro-Israel Democrats who will vote against any war powers resolution. Even if the bill makes it to a House floor vote there likely won't be enough Republicans. What else we're watching: — Megabill's big week: Republicans will hold a closed-door meeting Monday night after votes for leadership to update members on the GOP megabill and its outstanding issues. Full bill text could land Monday, though it may also slip. While the 'big, beautiful bill' could hit the floor as soon as Wednesday, Thursday is looking more likely. — First Dem oversight vote: House Democrats' steering committee will vote this evening on who should be the party's leader on the Oversight Committee, followed by a full caucus vote Tuesday. California Rep. Robert Garcia, 47, is seen as the favorite in a field split along generational lines. He's running against Reps. Jasmine Crockett of Texas, 44; Kweisi Mfume of Maryland, 76; and Stephen Lynch of Massachusetts, 70. — Slashes to GAO funding: House Republican appropriators are proposing to cut funding for the Government Accountability Office by nearly half. It's the latest in a series of flashpoints between the GOP and the watchdog agency, which has been involved in clashes this year over DOGE, regulatory rollbacks and Trump's incursions into the power of the purse. Meredith Lee Hill, Jordain Carney, Nicholas Wu and Katherine Tully-McManus contributed to this report.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Week in review: Major universities take steps to rein in budgets
This story was originally published on Higher Ed Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Higher Ed Dive newsletter. The Senate's education committee released its own higher education proposals earlier this month for the sweeping reconciliation bill. While like the House-passed version it seeks to end Grad PLUS loans and add accountability for student outcomes, it also differs from the House bill in key ways. Number of the week 8% The largest excise tax wealthy private colleges could pay on their endowments under a proposal put forward by the Senate Finance Committee — well short of the 21% top rate approved by House Republicans. In the Senate version, the tax would start at the current rate of 1.4% and rise to 4% and 8% depending on a college's endowment assets per student. Florida's Board of Governors cleared a plan to allow the state's universities to hike out-of-state tuition by 10% this fall and 15% the next, Spectrum Local News reported. Individual university boards will ultimately decide on how much to raise tuition. Temple University is projecting a $60 million structural deficit for fiscal year 2026. The university's deans and vice presidents were asked to develop plans to shrink how much they spend on employee compensation by 5% — a move that will require cutting positions, President John Fry said in a community message. Cornell University President Michael Kotlikoff and other top officials said the institution must adopt 'financial austerity' in the face of federal research cuts, potential endowment tax increases, escalating legal expenses, inflation and other cost pressures. The Ivy League institution plans to review programs and positions, restrict hiring and travel expenses, and find ways to streamline operations. A federal judge vacated the National Institute of Health's directives to terminate research grants for projects related to diversity, equity and inclusion. U.S. District Judge William Young also ordered the agency to reinstate the plaintiffs' canceled research funding, which amounts to roughly 800 grants. U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy granted a temporary restraining order blocking the U.S. Department of Defense from implementing a 15% cap on reimbursement for colleges' indirect research costs. Murphy's ruling marks the third agency that has been blocked by a court from carrying out the cuts to federal funding for research overhead. However, another federal judge recently declined to block the U.S. Department of Education's cuts to the Institute of Educational Sciences, which gathers and analyzes higher education data. In rejecting the motion for a preliminary injunction, U.S. District Judge Stephanie Gallagher ruled that while the Education Department 'has likely gone too far in downsizing IES,' the associations that sued have not shown that IES is required to operate as it did before the agency's mass layoffs. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
