Iran Nuclear Weapon: Intelligence chief Tulsi Gabbard is wrong, says President Donald Trump
President
Donald Trump
has again disagreed with Director of National Intelligence
Tulsi Gabbard
's statement that Iran is not developing a nuclear weapon. His remarks highlight ongoing differences within the administration regarding Iran's nuclear intentions.
Trump Questions Intelligence Findings
President Trump arrived in New Jersey on Friday. A reporter asked him about earlier intelligence reports. The question was based on a statement by Tulsi Gabbard. She had testified that Iran was not building a nuclear weapon.
Trump replied by questioning the source. When told it was Gabbard, Trump said, 'She's wrong.' He added that if the
intelligence community
made that claim, it was incorrect.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Only 2% Traders Know this Powerful Intraday Strategy
thefutureuniversity
Learn More
Undo
Also Read:
Voice of America Layoffs: Trump Administration Cuts 1,400 Jobs. Here's why
Gabbard's Testimony in March
In March, Gabbard testified before Congress. She said Iran was not building a nuclear weapon. She stated that the supreme leader of Iran had not approved any
nuclear weapons program
.
Live Events
She also mentioned that Iran had a large
uranium stockpile
. She said this level of stockpile was not normal for countries without nuclear weapons.
Internal Administration Response
This week, Trump also said, 'I don't care what she said. I think they were close to having one.'
Gabbard's position in the administration is under focus. Some have questioned her role and influence. Her relationship with Trump has been discussed in media reports.
Also Read:
New Baba Vanga July 5 Disaster Prediction: Here's what may happen on this day
Vice President Defends Gabbard
Vice President Vance
and other officials have supported Gabbard. Vance posted on social media that the situation has changed since Gabbard's testimony. He described her as a veteran and a strong supporter of Trump. He said she is important to the current administration and its goals.
Trump Considers Next Steps
Trump is thinking about how to handle the conflict between Iran and Israel. He has said Iran must not be allowed to get a nuclear weapon. He has given two weeks for talks before he might take direct military action.
FAQs
Why did Trump reject Gabbard's statement?
Trump believes the intelligence community is wrong. He thinks Iran is close to developing a nuclear weapon despite Gabbard's testimony.
What has Vice President Vance said about Gabbard?
Vance supported Gabbard, saying circumstances have changed since March. He called her a loyal supporter and an important member of Trump's team.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
34 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Delhi must underline for Washington the grave dangers of Asim Munir's vision of Pakistan
In 2018, in his first term, US President Donald Trump had spelt out, in his typically blunt style, the sense that Rawalpindi and Islamabad had taken advantage of Washington: 'The United States has foolishly given Pakistan more than 33 billion dollars in aid over the last 15 years, and they have given us nothing but lies & deceit, thinking of our leaders as fools… they give safe haven to terrorists'. This week, he said: 'I love Pakistan'. It would be simplistic to view the unprecedented lunch meeting at the White House between Trump and General Asim Munir — the first time a military leader who is not head of state in Pakistan has been accorded the honour — as a major u-turn. Indeed, India-US ties have been steadily deepening over the last three decades, based on a convergence of economic and strategic interests and shared values, even as the US-Pakistan relationship has grown more volatile. That said, the current moment in international relations is one of flux and Delhi must tread carefully. The Pahalgam attack underscored the grave national security threat that Pakistan-sponsored terrorism continues to present for India. With Operation Sindoor, Delhi has made it clear to both Rawalpindi and the world that it will pierce the shield of 'proxies' and not give in to Pakistan's nuclear blackmail. India has raised the costs of terror in order to ensure that such attacks on its soil are not carried out with impunity. Communicating the new normal it has etched with Pakistan after Pahalgam to its friends abroad is Delhi's challenge. To be sure, Delhi cannot control who Trump chooses to engage, and for what reasons. Pakistan's geography — it shares a 900-km border with Iran — may make it an attractive tactical partner for the US in the current Israel-Iran war. There is speculation that Pakistan's rolling out the red carpet for the privately-owned US cryptocurrency firm, World Liberty Financial (WLF), may have helped ingratiate Munir to the White House — Donald Trump Jr has close ties with WLF. A White House spokesperson has claimed that Munir has proposed Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize for his self-proclaimed role — firmly denied by India — in the post Op Sindoor cessation of hostilities. For India, though, the question is less why the Munir-Trump meeting, and more about how to ensure that the red lines it has laid down are respected, including by the US. Just a fortnight before terrorists killed 26 people in Pahalgam after confirming their religion, Munir had reiterated some of the nastiest tropes of the two-nation theory. He called Kashmir Pakistan's 'jugular vein', and reduced the complex and layered identities of the Subcontinent's people to their religion. It is now for Delhi — diplomatically, through the appropriate channels — to remind Washington that Pakistan's Field Marshal is a fundamentalist with an army at his disposal. Delhi has done well so far in standing its ground and making it clear that it will not compromise on its national interest: Even if belatedly, it issued a clear denial of President Trump's claims about mediating the ceasefire. Now, it must underline for Washington the danger that Munir's vision of Pakistan poses for stability in the region and for global order — and why Delhi has drawn some hard red lines.
Mint
35 minutes ago
- Mint
Iran-Israel conflict: Donald Trump warns Iran has ‘two weeks' to avoid US strikes
US President Donald Trump warned escalating tensions on Friday, giving Iran a "maximum" of two weeks to avoid potential American air strikes. His remarks come as Israel asserts it has already delayed Iran's presumed nuclear ambitions by at least two years. Trump also dismissed European diplomatic efforts, saying it would be "very hard" to ask Israel to halt its ongoing military actions, according to a report by AFP. A series of blasts were heard in Tehran on Friday as Israel kept up the massive wave of strikes it says is aimed at stopping Iran from developing nuclear weapons -- an ambition Tehran has denied. 'According to the assessment we hear, we already delayed for at least two or three years the possibility for them to have a nuclear bomb,' Israel's foreign minister Gideon Saar said in an interview published Saturday. Saar said Israel's week-long onslaught will continue. "We will do everything that we can do there in order to remove this threat," he told German newspaper Bild. As Trump mulls the prospect of joining the war on Israel's side, top diplomats from Britain, France and Germany met their Iranian counterpart Abbas Araghchi in Geneva and urged him to resume talks with the United States that had been derailed by Israel's attacks. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said "we invited the Iranian minister to consider negotiations with all sides, including the United States, without awaiting the cessation of strikes, which we also hope for." But Araghchi told NBC News after the meeting that "we're not prepared to negotiate with them (the United States) anymore, as long as the aggression continues." Trump was dismissive of European efforts, telling reporters, "Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us. Europe is not going to be able to help in this." Trump also said he's unlikely to ask Israel to stop its attacks to get Iran back to the table. "If somebody's winning, it's a little bit harder to do," he said. Any US involvement would likely feature powerful bunker-busting bombs that no other country possesses to destroy an underground uranium enrichment facility in Fordo. On the streets of Tehran, many shops were closed and normally busting markets largely abandoned on Friday. Since Israel launched its offensive on June 13, targeting nuclear and military sites but also hitting residential areas, Iran has responded with barrages which Israeli authorities say have killed at least 25 people. A hospital in the Israeli port of Haifa reported 19 injured, including one person in serious condition, after the latest Iranian salvo. More than 450 missiles have been fired at the country so far, along with about 400 drones, according to Israel's National Public Diplomacy Directorate. We will do everything that we can do there in order to remove this threat. Iran said on Sunday that Israeli strikes had killed at least 224 people, including military commanders, nuclear scientists and civilians. It has not updated the toll since.
The Hindu
36 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Pakistan nominates Donald Trump for Nobel Peace Prize for ‘leadership' during India-Pakistan conflict
Pakistan has said in a post on social media platform X that U.S. President Donald Trump should get Nobel Peace Prize in 2026 'in recognition of his decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership during the recent India-Pakistan crisis'. Mr. Trump has repeatedly claimed credit for playing a substantial role in easing the conflict — despite Indian authorities disputing that. The nomination came after Mr. Trump was asked on Friday (June 20, 2025) about the Nobel and said he should be awarded it for a variety of reasons, including his work on India and Pakistan and arranging a treaty he said would be signed on Monday to end hostilities between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda. 'I should have gotten it four or five times,' the President said. 'They won't give me a Nobel Peace Prize because they only give it to liberals.'
