Trump's sons deny involvement in ‘official' Trump memecoin wallet
The Trump family is quickly learning what happens when you get into business with one of the internet's most bizarre sideshows.
As a quick catch-up: On Tuesday, crypto researcher Molly White dropped a scoop that said the president was about to launch a Trump-branded cryptocurrency wallet to encourage people to trade his $TRUMP memecoin — yet another product expanding the Trump family's reach in digital assets. (For the uninitiated, a crypto wallet is a kind of personal online vault for storing digital assets like cryptocurrencies.)
The project, White wrote, was being developed by the two Trump-family-run entities behind the memecoin in partnership with a crypto marketplace called Magic Eden.
A few hours later, Magic Eden confirmed White's reporting and pushed out its own announcement of the 'Official $TRUMP Wallet by President Trump.' The official Trump memecoin website also confirmed the launch in a post on X.
So far, just another day in crypto-land under Trump 2.0. The Trumps have raked in nearly $1 billion in paper gains (according to a Bloomberg estimate) through various ventures since the president's re-election in November, and the wallet seemed like just the latest project in an ever-expanding crypto empire.
But then, the story took a turn.
Trump's sons came out saying the family had 'zero involvement with this wallet product.'
Donald Trump Jr. posted that he and his brother Eric knew 'nothing about it,' but that separately one of their other crypto ventures, World Liberty Financial, would be launching an official wallet 'soon.' Even Barron Trump, who rarely posts on social media, chimed in to say the family 'has zero involvement with this wallet.'
It appears to be more than just a slight miscommunication.
As White noted in an update to her story, Magic Eden is a relatively big player in crypto, 'so this is not a case of some nobody creating a fake project pretending to be an official Trump-affiliated app.'
But it's far from clear how a run-of-the-mill wallet announcement turned into a public feud.
A Trump Organization spokeswoman wrote in an email to CNN that 'Eric and Don had no prior knowledge on this project and there is no agreement with The Trump Organization.'
Representatives for the Trump memecoin and Magic Eden didn't respond to CNN's request for comment Wednesday.
Just to underscore the point: Eric Trump appeared to threaten Magic Eden with a lawsuit in a post Tuesday night, telling the company 'I would be extremely careful using our name in a project that has not been approved and is unknown to anyone in our organization.' (Eric also told the New York Times that the Trump family would legally challenge the creation of the 'Official $TRUMP Wallet.'
This rift is surprising because of how closely connected the two sides are.
On one side we've got the Trump boys, on the other the folks at Magic Eden and the official $TRUMP memecoin.
Those two sides are hardly isolated strangers.
The Trump boys run the Trump Organization, which has an affiliate called CIC Digital, which shares the majority of $TRUMP memecoins with another company called Fight Fight Fight.
*Deep breath*
Fight Fight Fight is led by a longtime Trump business associate named Bill Zanker, who co-wrote a book with the president in 2008 and has worked on several Trump-related crypto projects, and it runs the $TRUMP website.
So, Zanker is not officially part of the Trump Org, but he is deeply connected to the president and the family's various crypto money-making operations. Zanker was the brains behind last month's memecoin dinner at Trump's DC-area golf club, Bloomberg's Olga Kharif wrote recently.
'Zanker's name is not on the website for the memecoin and he has avoided any comment on it,' Kharif writes. 'But on a Delaware corporate filing, Zanker is listed as the 'authorized person' for Fight Fight Fight LLC.'
The $3 trillion crypto industry has been thrilled to get a cheerleader in the White House who's promised to push friendly legislation and defang the regulators that have historically held crypto at arm's length.
But at the same time, many crypto executives and investors are holding their nose and looking the other way whenever Trump embraces some of the silly (at times scammy) elements of crypto-land. Like the memecoin, a joke-based subcategory of crypto that has no utility and is closely associated with 'rug-pull' scams. See also: the bitcoin strategic reserve and the pardoning of a notorious crypto criminal who was serving a life sentence for selling and distributing narcotics. Or the Trump $TRUMP dinner, widely criticized as selling access to the president.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt pushed back heavily on those criticisms during a press briefing hours before the May 22 dinner, telling reporters it was 'absurd for anyone to insinuate that this president is profiting off of the presidency.'
This confusion over the crypto wallet rollout isn't helping anyone trying to pitch crypto as a sophisticated market that's ready for prime time.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
14 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
NATO leaders are set to agree a historic defense spending pledge, but the hike won't apply to all
THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — NATO leaders are expected to agree this week that member countries should spend 5% of their gross domestic product on defense, except the new and much vaunted investment pledge will not apply to all of them. Spain has reached a deal with NATO to be excluded from the 5% of GDP spending target, while President Donald Trump said the figure shouldn't apply to the United States, only its allies. In announcing Spain's decision Sunday, Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said the spending pledge language in NATO's final summit communique — a one-page text of perhaps half a dozen paragraphs — would no longer refer to 'all allies.' It raises questions about what demands could be insisted on from other members of the alliance like Belgium, Canada, France and Italy that also would struggle to hike security spending by billions of dollars. On Friday, Trump insisted the U.S. has carried its allies for years and now they must step up. 'I don't think we should, but I think they should,' he said. 'NATO is going to have to deal with Spain.' Trump also branded Canada 'a low payer.' NATO's new spending goals The 5% goal is made up of two parts. The allies would agree to hike pure defense spending to 3.5% of GDP, up from the current target of at least 2%, which 22 of the 32 countries have achieved. Money spent to arm Ukraine also would count. A further 1.5% would include upgrading roads, bridges, ports and airfields so armies can better deploy, establishing measures to counter cyber and hybrid attacks and preparing societies for future conflict. The second spending basket is easy for most nations, including Spain. Much can be included. But the 3.5% on core spending is a massive challenge. Last year, Spain spent 1.28% of GDP on its military budget, according to NATO estimates, making it the alliance's lowest spender. Sánchez said Spain would be able to respect its commitments to NATO by spending 2.1% of GDP on defense needs. Spain also is among Europe's smallest suppliers of arms and ammunition to Ukraine, according to the Kiel Institute, which tracks such support. It's estimated to have sent about 800,000 euros ($920,000) worth of military aid since Russia invaded in 2022. Beyond Spain's economic challenges, Sánchez has other problems. He relies on small parties to govern and corruption scandals have ensnared his inner circle and family members. He is under growing pressure to call an early election. Why the spending increase is needed There are solid reasons for ramping up spending. The Europeans believe Russia's war on Ukraine poses an existential threat to them. Moscow has been blamed for a major rise in sabotage, cyberattacks and GPS jamming incidents. European leaders are girding their citizens for the possibility of more. The alliance's plans for defending Europe and North America against a Russian attack require investments of at least 3%, NATO experts have said. All 32 allies have endorsed these. Each country has been assigned 'capability targets' to play its part. Spanish Foreign Minister José Albares said Monday that 'the debate must be not a raw percentage but around capabilities.' He said Spain 'can reach the capabilities that have been fixed by the organization with 2.1%.' Countries much closer to Russia, Belarus and Ukraine all have agreed to reach the target, as well as nearby Germany, Norway, Sweden and the Netherlands, which is hosting the two-day summit starting Tuesday. The Netherlands estimates NATO's defense plans would force it to dedicate at least 3.5% to core defense spending. That means finding an additional 16 billion to 19 billion euros ($18 billion to $22 billion). Setting a deadline It's not enough to agree to spend more money. Many allies haven't yet hit an earlier 2% target that they agreed in 2014 after Russia annexed Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula. So an incentive is required. The date of 2032 has been floated as a deadline. That is far shorter than previous NATO targets, but military planners estimate Russian forces could be capable of launching an attack on an ally within five to 10 years. The U.S. insists it cannot be an open-ended pledge and a decade is too long. Still, Italy says it wants 10 years to hit the 5% target. The possibility of stretching that period to 2035 also has been on the table for debate among NATO envoys. An official review of progress could also be conducted in 2029, NATO diplomats have said. ___ Suman Naishadham in Madrid contributed to this report.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Major U.S. banks poised for massive shift in approach toward cryptocurrency: 'Defend your right to buy'
Despite the instability of cryptocurrency, major U.S. banks are considering a move toward supporting these emerging currencies, Reuters reported. However, they are being rightfully cautious given the shifting legal landscape and how easy it would be to run afoul of laws designed to keep our financial systems honest. Reuters spoke to industry executives about the possibility and revealed that internal discussions are already happening regarding the potential change. However, no bank wants to make the first move. "When I look at the bitcoin universe, the leverage in the system, the misuse in the system, the money laundering issues, trafficking, I'm not a fan of it," said Jamie Dimon, CEO of the largest U.S. bank, JPMorgan Chase, per Reuters. "We're going to allow you to buy it, we're not going to custody it. ... I don't think you should smoke, but I defend your right to smoke. I defend your right to buy bitcoin." It's not surprising that banks have their eye on this move. President Trump has courted cryptocurrency enthusiasts with promises to create a federal cryptocurrency reserve and make other investments as president. However, it's also not surprising that they're hanging back. The risk is high, and anti-money laundering rules and other regulations could sharply limit their activities, with no guarantees yet as to how those rules may change. When banks do enter the game, it will likely be in small ways, as partners to existing organizations. They may also want to create a stablecoin of their own. It's in the best interests of the American public for legal protections regarding cryptocurrency to be strengthened and for banks to be cautious. All the computing power needed is bad for the environment, at least until we switch to a more eco-friendly cryptocurrency. In the meantime, until banking regulators speak up, we're unlikely to see much change in crypto banking. Do you think the federal government should give us tax breaks to improve our homes? Definitely Only for certain upgrades Let each state decide instead No way Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Sign in to access your portfolio
CNN
24 minutes ago
- CNN
CNN team witnesses Israeli airstrikes in Tehran
Israeli airstrikes have rocked the north of Tehran on Monday. CNN's Frederik Pleitgen shows the aftermath of the attack.
