Gym-goer claims he was kicked out of a Wisconsin Crunch Fitness for wearing a ‘Trump 2024' hat

A devoted Donald Trump fan was thrown out of a Crunch Fitness in Madison, Wisconsin, after cops said he 'screamed and cursed' at other members trying to work out, but the aggrieved member – who is now suing the chain – believes his banishment stems from the Trump hat he sometimes donned while there.
Michael Green filed a federal lawsuit against Fitness Ventures, LLC, a Crunch franchisee with locations in 27 U.S. states, claiming he was discriminated against for being a Trump supporter – not for causing a disturbance, as a police report obtained by The Independent shows.
'I still don't understand exactly what happened, but I'm thinking someone at the gym had a perceived issue with me and decided to weaponize the police against me,' Green's March 31 complaint states. 'I had been wearing a pro-Trump hat during prior gym visits but stopped due to the stares I would get from staff and members… Perhaps it was some kind of retaliation for being a Trump supporter, even worse a [B]lack Trump supporter in Dane County.'
Green, 42, believes Crunch violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by 'engaging in discriminatory practices' against him. He is seeking $75,000 for his alleged troubles, writing in his self-filed complaint, '$75,000 is enough that may provide a deterrent from similar behavior in the future.'
Two weeks before filing suit against Crunch, Green sued another area health club over similar allegations, claiming he had been discriminated against for 'show[ing] my support of our president by wearing different types of Trump apparel such as hats, book bags, tee shirts, etc.' He was also removed from that gym by police for allegedly harassing the manager, a Democrat, over her political leanings.
In a phone call on Wednesday, Green told The Independent that the hat in question at Crunch read: 'Trump 2024.'
'I had stopped wearing it, but they had already pegged me as a Trump guy,' Green said.
Over the course of 40 minutes, Green, who said he voted for Trump in 2024, railed against DEI initiatives, the transgender community, and the 'liberals' he insisted were responsible for pushing him into the president's arms.
'I'm not a cult follower, it's just living in that area, them telling me that he's bad… that made me say, 'OK, well, I'm gonna vote for him then,'' Green said.
Fitness Ventures, LLC executives did not respond to requests for comment.
Green's beef stems from an encounter on March 30, the day before he sued Crunch, when he was exercising at a local gym, according to his complaint. While there, his complaint states, he 'was approached by a staff member and two Madison Police officers.'
'The staff member said that I was being 'aggressive' to gym members,' Green's complaint goes on. 'I still have no clue what exactly is going on, the staff member was extremely vague. I was drenched in sweat so I asked If I could use the shower before I left, the staff member told me I could not so I went into the locker room to change clothes as quickly as I could.'
Upon leaving the locker room, Green 'was confronted by 6-10 madison [sic] police officers,' his complaint continues. 'I asked them what was going on, they explained they were called to make sure I left the premises. I left as instructed.'
Once he was out of the building, Green realized he had forgotten some of his belongings at the gym, his complaint says. So, as cops were still on the scene, Green called Crunch and asked a staffer to give his things to the officers so he could get them back, according to the complaint.
But, it says, the police soon left, and the Crunch employee told Green to meet him at the gym entrance to pick up his stuff.
'While walking towards the gym I flagged down a Madison Police officer and asked them If they could get my items instead of me approaching the gym,' Green's complaint states. '[T]he officer agreed.'
Green then called the gym to tell the staff member that police would be coming back instead of him, according to his complaint. During that call, Green complained about the 'vulgar, racist, stereotyping rap music' Crunch plays, which, the complaint asserts, 'paints African-Americans in a fictional[,] terrible light.'
The staffer followed up by denigrating Black people, to which Green responded with a homophobic slur, says the complaint, which does not specify whether or not Green ultimately got his property back.
However, an incident report shared with The Independent by a Madison Police Department spokeswoman tells a different story. Officers were dispatched on March 30 to Crunch after an employee called the cops about a gym member – Green – who was allegedly 'causing a disturbance,' and asked to have police standing by when staffers ejected him, according to the report.
Green reportedly had 'approached other gym members and screamed and cursed at them' because he wanted to use their exercise equipment, the report states. It says these members asked the manager to have Green removed, but did not wish to press charges against him.
According to the incident report, only two officers responded to the call, not the half-dozen or more mentioned in Green's complaint. They escorted Green to the locker room and stood outside as he gathered his belongings, the report explains. The officers instructed Green not to return to Crunch for the remainder of the day, after which Green was seen walking away toward a nearby mall, according to the report.
'The case is closed on our end,' the Madison police spokeswoman told The Independent.
Last month, a woman claimed she had been kicked out of an Indianapolis bar for wearing a MAGA hat; the bar said she had been harassing an employee. Last year, two women were removed from a British Airways flight after trading punches over a Trump hat one was wearing. Things have also gone the other way for people sporting Trump merch – in October, former Pittsburgh Steelers running back Le'Veon Bell claimed to have gotten out of a speeding ticket thanks to a cop who spotted his MAGA hat and let him go.
In his complaint, Green declares Dane County, where Madison is located, to be 'extremely liberal,' and derides its residents as biased against those on the right.
'The anger I feel about this can only be overshadowed by an overall sense of sadness,' Green's complaint concludes. 'I don't believe this to be a Crunch or Fitness Venture issue as it's more a Dane County issue.'
Dane County is not named as a defendant in Green's suit.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Daily Mail​

30 minutes ago

• Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE Inside the ferocious power struggle to control Trump's daily intelligence briefing as he tiptoed toward Iran decision

A high-stakes power struggle sprang up inside the U.S. intelligence community as Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard moved to wrest control of President Donald Trump 's daily intelligence briefing from the CIA, the Daily Mail has learned. With the Iran and Israel war in full swing, the Russia-Ukraine war still churning and Chinese military forces training at an accelerated pace, whoever controls the distribution of the nation's most classified intelligence has the upper hand in shaping the decision-making process in whether to wage war. Last month, Gabbard ruffled feathers by threatening the CIA's influence after reasserting the ODNI's authority over the president's daily briefing (PDB), a role long dominated by the CIA. 'She's trying to move, physically move and take control of the President's daily brief,' one senior intelligence official told the Daily Mail. Despite the intelligence director taking over responsibility for the PDB in 2004, the CIA maintained the internal systems capable of creating the intelligence reports, which often contain much of the agency's classified information distilled into digestible memos. But Gabbard's attempt to shift production and delivery of the PDB from CIA headquarters in Langley to her own office has rattled the traditional power structure. 'Obviously, that controls what the president sees,' the source said. 'So she's, I would say, probably caused a lot of ripples within the CIA, especially within the DA, the Director of Analysis, by saying, "Hey, I'm going to take the PDB physically from Langley and move it down the street to the ODNI,"' the source said. Ratcliffe, the CIA director, is not necessarily thought to be grappling for the president's attention, the official confirmed. But others at Langley have been miffed by the recent move. 'Of course, the CIA is unhappy because they want to keep control of the product,' one ODNI official told the Daily Mail. 'Their phrase at the CIA is 'Whoever controls the information the President sees, controls the President.'' 'By housing the PDB staff under the ODNI, the production process aligns more closely with the ODNI's mission to integrate foreign, military, and domestic intelligence,' the official continued. 'This will yield a more cohesive and holistic intelligence product that reflects contributions from all IC agencies, reducing the risk of CIA dominance in the PDB's content.' The CIA did not return the Daily Mail's request for comment. 'There are a lot of folks at the agency, in particular, the Directorate of Analysis, they're used to being the final say,' the senior intelligence official shared. 'They're not used to someone saying, "Hey, I'm gonna ask you some questions about this."' Presidents have received regular morning briefings - comprised of intelligence on the most pressing national security issues - since Lyndon Johnson in the 1960s. Compiling intelligence reports has traditionally fallen to the CIA, specifically its Directorate for Analysis. Though in 2004 the Intelligence Reform Act created the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), which then began overseeing the PDB. The ODNI has publicly confirmed last month that some functions located at the CIA will now be moved to the ODNI, including the staff who oversee the PDB. Gabbard is responsible for overseeing all 18 federal intelligence agencies, including the CIA, though its Director John Ratcliffe is also a Cabinet member, creating a natural tension between the two agencies and its staff. While the war in Iran and Israel moves into its second week without any indication of a ceasefire, sources familiar with the DNI have shared that Gabbard is in nearly constant contact with the president on intelligence matters. 'She's been in every meeting,' a White House official told the Daily Mail. The official added Gabbard has been spotted at the White House nearly every day since the start of the conflict. CIA Director Ratcliffe has also reportedly been one of the key figures advising Trump on the war while suggesting the DNI has taken a back seat. Reports of internal jockeying within the administration come just as the president is at what is perhaps the most tenuous point of his second term. 'I think those are coming from people who either like drama for the sake of drama, or they're trying to give the CIA more power,' the official shared. 'I think people are trying to play the palace intrigue game,' he added. 'It's a power play.'

Reuters

36 minutes ago

• Reuters

JD Vance says US at war with Iran's nuclear program, not Iran

WASHINGTON, June 22 (Reuters) - Vice President JD Vance said on Sunday the U.S. was not at war with Iran but at war with its nuclear program, adding the program had been pushed back by a very long time due to American strikes ordered by President Donald Trump. Trump said he had "obliterated" Iran's main nuclear sites in strikes overnight with massive bunker-busting bombs, joining Israel's assault against its Middle East rival in a significant new escalation of conflict in the region. "We're not at war with Iran. We're at war with Iran's nuclear program," Vance said in an interview on NBC's "Meet the Press with Kristen Welker" show "I think that we have really pushed their program back by a very long time. I think that it's going to be many, many years before the Iranians are going to be able to develop a nuclear weapon." Vance accused Iran of not negotiating in good faith, which he said served as a catalyst for U.S. strikes. The U.S. had been in diplomatic talks with Iran about Tehran's nuclear program. Tehran vowed to defend itself while UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said he was "gravely alarmed" by the U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear sites. "We don't want a regime change," Vance added. "We do not want to protract this... We want to end the nuclear program, and then we want to talk to the Iranians about a long-term settlement here." Vance said Trump made the final decision to strike Iran right before the strikes took place and that Washington has received some "indirect" messages from Tehran since the strikes. Vance said the U.S. "had no interest in boots on the ground." Trump said on Friday he was going to decide in the next two weeks about direct U.S. involvement in the Israel-Iran war which began with Israel's attacks on Iran on June 13. The war has raised alarm in a region already on edge since the start of Israel's war in Gaza in October 2023. U.S. ally Israel is the only country in the Middle East widely believed to have nuclear weapons and says it struck Iran to prevent Tehran from developing its own nuclear weapons. Iran, which says its nuclear program is peaceful, is a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, while Israel is not. Many Democratic U.S. lawmakers said Trump's actions were unconstitutional and that it was the U.S. Congress that had the power to declare war on foreign countries. Vance responded to that criticism by saying Trump had "clear authority to act to prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction."

The Guardian

43 minutes ago

• The Guardian

Florida Republicans racially gerrymandered two state senate districts, court hears

Republicans in Florida racially gerrymandered two key state senate districts to disenfranchise Black voters and skew results in the Tampa Bay area, a panel of judges has heard. In one district, they took a small chunk of St Petersburg heavy with minority voters and added it to an area of Tampa in a different county, and across a 10-mile waterway, leaving the remainder of its electorate 'artificially white', the court was told. Lawyers for the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida, representing voters at a four-day trial in Tampa last week, said the state's defense that the waters of Tampa Bay made the new district contiguous was ridiculous, pointing out in the lawsuit that 'manatees don't vote'. 'These are cities on opposite sides of the bay and there's no way to go directly between them,' Caroline McNamara, an ACLU staff attorney, said. 'You either have to go across 10 miles of open ocean at the mouth of Tampa Bay, or you have to cut through other districts in the area through the north end.' The case has direct parallels in previous moves by Republican officials in Florida to manipulate voting districts to their advantage by undercutting Black voting power. Ron DeSantis, the hard right governor, was behind a move in 2022 to redraw congressional maps to secure four additional seats, a plan that resulted in white Republicans winning all four races in northern Florida while cutting the number of districts in which Black voters had a chance to elect a candidate of their choice from four to two. 'It was a lynching,' Brenda Holt, a Black commissioner in Gadsden county, told the Guardian at the time. In the Tampa Bay case, the three judges will give their ruling at a later date on whether the Republican-held senate's 2022 redistricting process was unconstitutional. A decision in favor of the plaintiffs would require a redrawing of Florida's 16th and 18th senate districts, subject to appeal. Currently, the state senator for the split district is Darryl Rouson, a Democrat, who maintains offices in both St Petersburg and Tampa, and must drive through the middle of another district to get from one to the other. 'It's like all of the voters have half a senator, half of the time. It's crazy,' McNamara said. 'Every year there's big celebrations on Martin Luther King Day in January, and he has to alternate years whether he's in St Petersburg or Tampa, because he can't do both.' One of the three plaintiffs, Keto Nord Hodges, a Black Hillsborough county voter, told the court he felt underrepresented. 'We don't really see Senator Rouson in Tampa. I can't remember the last time I saw him,' he said. While the Tampa side of the district Rouson represents was always reliably Democratic, and he secured almost twice the number of votes than his Republican opponent in the 2022 election, the removal of Black voters from St Petersburg diluted their voting power in the newly created district there, the lawsuit states. Republican Nick DiCeglie, who is white, coasted to victory over his Democratic challenger Eunic Ortiz, who is Hispanic and openly gay, in 2022 by more than 30,000 votes in one of the country's most diverse cities. Effectively, the ACLU argued, the maps represent racial gerrymandering because they pack about half of the region's Black population into a single one of the its five senate districts. 'This trial laid bare what many communities have long felt, that Florida's mapmakers chose politics over fairness,' Bacardi Jackson, executive director of the ACLU of Florida, said in a statement. 'When lawmakers choose to prioritize outdated assumptions about where Black voters 'belong' over meaningful representation, it reinforces structural inequities. We're here to ensure that voters in Tampa and St Petersburg are no longer crammed into one district in a way that diminishes the value of their votes.' McNamara dismissed the arguments of lawyers for Cord Byrd, the Florida secretary of state, and Ben Albritton, the Florida senate president, that the maps complied with state law requiring any redistricting process to ensure minority voters have an equal opportunity to elect candidates of their choice. 'They just thought this is a box to check they probably wanted to do what they needed to do but not more,' she said. 'We say that they didn't even do what they needed to do, like they just didn't take it seriously, they were dismissive throughout the process.' The Florida department of state did not respond to the Guardian's requests for comment. McNamara said that although DeSantis had no direct role in drawing the senate maps, the process took place against the governor's backdrop of 'disenfranchisement and attacks on communities of color'. She said: 'You could say this is just a technical thing, or it's about numbers, and sure, who cares if it crosses water? 'But the fact they're like, 'who cares if these two completely far-flung areas are joined together without any real connection, and the only basis for doing it is the color of the people's skin?' Well, that's exactly the issue that the 14th amendment of the constitution has a problem with.'