Park upgrade paid for with stashed cash
Thousands of pounds stashed in Dudley Council's coffers for years is to be spent on upgrades at a borough park.
Work at King George V Park, Wordsley, will go ahead using £24,800 from property developers who agreed to pay for improvements in areas where they build homes.
Dudley is to splash cash in the Lawnswood Road green space from agreements linked to applications approved as far back as May 2004.
The deals, called planning obligations, are enforced under section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act.
Councillor Damian Corfield, Dudley cabinet member for neighbourhoods, said: 'Section 106 contributions are often multi-faceted with large sums allocated to many different projects. In this case we have held on to and combined several smaller elements of these S106 payments together to generate a significant total amount.
'That amount is now being used to fund this hugely beneficial project for the community in Wordsley, and an example of very smart use of section 106 money.'
The park will get upgrades including resurfacing of the multi-use games area, the reinstatement of the bowling green and a revamp of the children's play area.
The cash will come from four developments which were approved between 2004 and 2011.
Latest figures published by Dudley Council show at the end of March 2024 a total of £2.8m of unspent S106 money was sitting in the authority's bank.
In the financial year which ended on the same date the council's income from S106 payments was £61,580.
In the same financial year the council spent £1.05m of S106 cash, mostly on education facilities while a further £956,810 had been allocated but not spent.
Hoarding S106 funding is common practice for local authorities despite most agreements having a time limit which means the money has to be spent within a specific period or paid back to the developer.
According to a report published by the Home Builders Federation (HBF) in autumn 2024, a total of around £6bn of unspent S106 cash was held by councils in England and Wales – with the average council holding £19m.
The HBF is calling for greater transparency in local government about why spending is delayed and how long councils are holding on to cash for.
Neil Jefferson, CEO at HBF, said: 'Each year developers contribute around £7 billion to local authorities for the provision of local infrastructure, affordable housing and education, recreational and health facilities but some councils are increasingly failing to invest this cash into the services that so desperately need it.
'Investment in new housing delivery brings unrivalled economic and social benefits to communities but too many of these advantages are going unseen by local people. With the government desperate to find money to invest in infrastructure to drive growth, it is nonsensical to have billions sat in council bank accounts.
'Furthermore, a lack of infrastructure provision is often cited as a reason to oppose development, yet this pipeline of billions of pounds of unspent infrastructure funding is too often underappreciated in debates about the impact of new development.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Council ‘kept me in the dark' over parking spaces shop owner claims
The owner of a Brierley Hill supermarket says Dudley Council planners left him in the dark in a row over parking spaces. Asif Majid, from Brierley Wholesale Superstore, has been refused a change of use planning application because planners say he is not providing enough parking spaces at the site. Mr Majid asked the council to remove conditions limiting the store to selling 'vintage retro collectables, antiques and local craft items' and operating a small tea room, which were linked to an approved planning application dating back to 2016. The new application was thrown out because the store has eight parking spaces and the council required 24 spaces; however the council did approve a separate application for a change in opening times. Mr Majid said: 'I have been left completely in the dark by the authority, their unwillingness to cooperate has completely baffled me. 'We have provided a store with continental grocery items as well as goods and foods from all corners of the world. 'Brierley Hill is a multi-cultural community and a store like this caters for all residents.' The council deny Mr Majid's claim and say they were trying to assist him during an enquiry into whether he was operating without planning permission. Councillor Phil Atkins, Dudley cabinet member for development and regulation, said: 'As part of a planning enforcement investigation, officers have worked with the applicant to try and resolve the matter. 'Both applications were assessed and determined in accordance with relevant policy and procedure as required by legislation. 'In terms of the refused application, the applicant can appeal this decision or submit a revised application with additional information to try and address the previous reasons for refusal. 'The council is currently reviewing its position on any further planning enforcement action.' An appeal against the refusal has been made to the government's Planning Inspectorate. Brierley Hill and Wordsley South councillor Matt Cook from Black Country Party is backing Mr Majid. Cllr Cook said: 'What's most frustrating is that the council is insisting on planning conditions that simply don't reflect the reality of how this business operates. 'The majority of the store's customers are local residents who travel on foot.'
Yahoo
11-06-2025
- Yahoo
Hundreds of new homes approved for sites near town
Two housing developments totalling more than 450 homes around a town in Nottinghamshire have been approved by planners. Ashfield District Council approved two housing projects, one on Hamilton Road in Sutton-in-Ashfield and the other 1.8 miles (2.3km) away on Beck Lane in Skegby, on Wednesday. The applications for 250 properties in Hamilton Road and 230 in Beck Lane are solely for housing and public spaces. Permission was granted as the developers of the estates will enter into Section 106 agreements to help fund local services. District councillor Arnie Hankin told the Local Democracy Reporting Service after the meeting: "We still fall short of our housing needs in Ashfield and our members voted to pass it – and I think that was the right decision. "We've received one letter of objection on the [Hamilton Road] application – but we approved it and it's a contribution of 250 houses. "None of us like getting rid of green belt - unfortunately this has to happen from time to time." Follow BBC Nottingham on Facebook, on X, or on Instagram. Send your story ideas to eastmidsnews@ or via WhatsApp on 0808 100 2210. Plans for two housing estates set for approval Community centre to make way for council homes Plans for new football pitches approved Local Democracy Reporting Service Ashfield District Council
Yahoo
11-06-2025
- Yahoo
Dudley Council rushed local plan 'to avoid new rules'
A tough examination of Dudley Council's plans for borough development started with claims it was rushed to avoid new regulations. Government planning inspector Louise Nurser will hold six days of hearings throughout June to assess the Dudley Local Plan. During the first session at Dudley Council House on June 10, the inspector told participants representing the council, the West Midlands Police and Crime Commissioner, Birmingham and Black Country Wildlife Trust and the construction industry, she could either approve the plan, reject it but say it could be improved or throw it out completely. READ MORE: 'Disruption' warning as key short cut near M6 closed until Autumn READ MORE: The killer Midlands gang members who brought violence and death to our streets Read more: Dudley 'has enough brown field land' for building as local plan hearings start Read more: See which Midland council is set to approve felling dangerous trees She added: "I am here to examine the plan on behalf of the secretary of state to make sure it is sound and legally compliant, I am not here to make it better." Carl Mellor, Dudley Council's head of planning, told the inspector the plan was supported by robust evidence. He said: "The new local plan builds on adopted policies and plans and provides sustainable development and protects the borough's natural and historic environment. "The plan provides a sound and positive strategy for the borough." Discussion on the plan will be split into separate sessions to delve into the details and how it was formulated first on the agenda. In their submission to the hearing, planning consultants Lichfields on behalf of developer Taylor Wimpey pointed out the plan was prepared under rules which have been superseded. The consultant says under the new framework, Dudley's plan which promises 10,470 new homes, is 13,821 homes short of what will be needed. Developers complained Dudley rushed the plan through using a framework which allowed them to avoid including greenbelt to provide land for the extra homes. Don't miss the biggest and breaking stories by signing up to the BirminghamLive newsletter here Myles Wild-Smith, from Lichfields, said: "It was a politically motivated push to get it over the line, the plan will not last a year before it is undermined by appeal or speculative applications." Peter Goatley KC, for Dudley Council, told the hearing the framework used for the plan meant it was not necessary to release greenbelt land and the council intended to protect it.
