Israeli tech giant delays £300m City float as Iran conflict escalates

An Israeli technology business has delayed plans to list on the London Stock Exchange after escalating tensions in Iran rocked global markets.
Waves, which specialises in audio software, is now hoping to float the business by October, having previously aimed for as early as this month.
It marks a fresh setback for the beleaguered stock market, as the Tel Aviv-based company's planned £300m deal has been one of the few listings poised to take place in London.
Bankers at Panmure Liberum are still working on the deal, although they have pushed back the completion date while market conditions remain challenging.
Israel's conflict with Iran has also contributed to the decision, as geopolitical volatility has rattled traders around the world.
Oil prices have surged in response to the conflict, while gold has edged close to a fresh record high as investors seek safe haven assets. Stock markets have largely shrugged off the war since the initial strikes carried out by Israel, but investors remain nervous about the prospect of US involvement.
Waves, which was set up in 1992 and employs more than 200 people, sells its audio software technology globally.
Details of its proposed listing first emerged this year, when it was reported that bosses were assembling a board that could smooth Waves's transition to a public company.
Gavin Patterson, the former BT chairman, has been sounded out as a potential candidate to chair the business.
Eventual completion of the deal will provide the Square Mile with a rare boost as it battles a dearth of new listings and an exodus of existing companies.
Pressure on the London Stock Exchange has also intensified in recent weeks after a string of tech companies announced plans to leave the market or seek listings elsewhere.
This includes British fintech champion Wise, which confirmed this month that it plans to move its main listing to New York.
Charles Hall, of Peel Hunt, said this month: 'Urgent action is required if we want a healthy UK equity market that supports our listed companies and encourages the next generation of companies to list.'
Last month, the US private equity billionaire Orlando Bravo also claimed the London stock market was in need of 'major' reforms to be able to compete internationally.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Daily Mail​

32 minutes ago

• Daily Mail​

Israel's tech jewel can help it emerge from the fog of war

The glistening towers of the Tel Aviv skyline, an inviting target for Iran's incoming ballistic missiles, symbolise Israel's status as one of the world's most popular destinations for investment in pioneering technology. But the prolonged campaign in Gaza, boycotts and a nervy Silicon Valley have squeezed funding and come at a heavy price. Advanced warfare is costly and the conflict with Iran is a blow to Israel's science and digital sectors. Despite this, the country's currency, the shekel, has risen and shares on the Tel Aviv stock exchange have gone up in value in recent days. Global investors are betting that when the bombardment of Iran is complete Israel will be a safer place and demand for the advanced technology behind the cyber weapons deployed against Iran will roar back. The current conflict is also not, so far, proving to be a repetition of the 1973 Yom Kippur War, when Israel was attacked by a coalition of Arab states led by Egypt and Syria. An oil embargo enforced by the Gulf states during the conflict sent energy prices rocketing and sparked both inflation and recession among the world's richest democracies. Israel's enfeebled economy took decades to recover, but this century growth has rocketed. Economic output is now 50 times higher, and public finances have stabilised, creating more budget headroom for long military engagements. There has been much discussion as to whether the mullahs in Tehran might now seek to block the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow passageway through which Gulf oil and liquefied natural gas supplies must pass for export. Since Israel launched its assault on Iran last week oil prices have climbed, and investors have sought safe havens such as gold. But the energy picture is now different from what it was during previous Middle East conflicts. Oil shipments from the Gulf still represent 20 per cent of global supply, but the US, the world's second-biggest consumer of energy after China, is now self-sufficient in oil and gas. As a result, its energy supply is less at risk if rulers in the Middle East turn off the taps. That is not to underestimate the threat, especially to Israel's economy. Fighting wars, particularly those using high-tech weaponry, is hugely costly. Re'em Aminach, a former financial adviser to the chief of staff of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), puts the bill for offensive and defensive operations against Iran at £550,000 a day. That is not where the fiscal and economic damage stops. The costs of mobilising troops, calling up reservists, a disrupted labour market and reconstruction from rocket damage, are mounting. The ongoing cost of the Gaza campaign is £40 billion. With lost investment and growth, it could reach £300 billion over a decade. Israel's debt now stands at 67.9 per cent of the country's economic output, up from 61.5 per cent at the end of 2023. In comparison with most Western democracies, this is modest. In Britain it is close to 100 per cent. Israel's 2025 budget set a limit for borrowing at 4.9 per cent of national output. But the costs of the Iran war will blow this out of the water so Israeli citizens and firms can now expect tax increases and further budget cuts. Israel already spends a huge 8.8 per cent of its output on defence. The country's soaring borrowing and debt is less of a problem than in much of the West because of its growth prospects. Despite the long period of mobilisation, Israel's finance ministry predicted growth this year of 3.6 per cent – before the assault on Iran was unleashed. But Israel's war has hurt cashflow into its vibrant tech sector on many fronts. Earlier this decade, new investment reached a peak of £4.5 billion and Israel was seen by venture capitalists as the second-best place to back new tech after Silicon Valley. But last year this figure had plunged to £900 million as investors were put off by the situation in Gaza. What is clear is that a revival will take time, especially when so many young engineers, cyber experts and scientists are in IDF uniform. The country's longest war is proving tough for Israel's economy and citizens. But there is confidence among key investors that the darkest hour is just before dawn.

Times

3 hours ago

• Times

Thames Water rescue plan could hand shares to staff

Thames Water employees could be given shares in the company before a potential return to the London stock market, under plans being drafted by its creditors to rescue the stricken utility. A group of about 100 financial institutions holding about £13 billion of Thames debt are the only contenders to take over the company and stop it sliding into special administration, under which it would be controlled by the government. The creditors have drawn up proposals to pump fresh money into the company — which they have submitted to Ofwat, the industry regulator, for approval. Documents seen by The Sunday Times suggest that the creditors will eventually seek an initial public offering (IPO) of Thames to secure their exit from the firm, 'exploring options to allow the local communities the company serves and the employees to financially benefit from the turnaround of the business'. Sources close to the creditor group suggested this could take the form of an allocation of shares to an employee benefit trust that could be cashed in if the business floats, with the hope that this would encourage staff to stay. But no IPO would come before 2033 under the plans. There are precedents for giving shares to staff, including the privatisation of Royal Mail, which allocated 10 per cent of shares to its workers when it listed in 2013. The creditors would also look at setting up community trusts that would be awarded shares to fund environmental work in areas served by Thames. However, the prospects of any IPO rest on the creditors first agreeing a deal with Ofwat to take control of the company and then pulling off a turnaround. The creditor group has completed weeks of due diligence on Thames, and told Ofwat in its submission that the state of the company's assets was 'worse than expected with significant asset risk'. The group insists that it can turn around Thames with an injection of at least £5 billion of new funding. However much will depend on whether the creditors can win concessions from Ofwat on fines imposed on Thames because of its poor performance around sewage spills, for example. The regulator is under pressure to hold the line on fines and last week Steve Reed, the environment secretary, said the government was 'stepping up' plans for an emergency nationalisation. Reed's claims were disputed by Whitehall sources, who said there had been no increase in contingency planning before a possible bankruptcy. 'Frankly, there's got to be pain to take all round,' said a senior source with knowledge of the talks between the creditors and Ofwat. 'We hope pragmatism will prevail at the end of the day. We all need to give something to get something.' The creditor group believes it needs to reach an agreement with the regulator by the end of July. After this point, special administration may grow more likely. Thames has until July 22 to decide whether it will appeal against its latest five-year pricing settlement with Ofwat at the Competition & Markets Authority. Thames serves 16 million households in southeast England.

BBC News

9 hours ago

• BBC News

Tangled history and trouble today - what is the UK's plan on Iran?

"If this is true, all our troubles are over." A British businessman fast running out of cash, William Knox D'Arcy, is said to have uttered those words when he received a telegram from Persia, 113 years had been discovered, after years of failed explorations under Knox D'Arcy, who had been granted the rights to hunt for the black stuff at the turn of the him, striking oil was to provide a second fortune after he'd made millions from Australian gold. For the UK, Persia - later to become Iran - and for the rest of the world, it was the moment the Middle East's financial and political fortunes became linked to the West like never D'Arcy's cash problem might have been solved. But the troubles in the region were far from weekend, although ministers want to concentrate on their plans to make it easier to do business at home ahead of their industrial strategy being published next week, two big questions hang heavy. What happens next in the hottest of conflicts in a vital region? And does the UK play a role?Whether you like it or not, "it should matter, and it does matter" to the UK, according to one Whitehall is the fraught tangle of history. Not just the fortune from the first discovery of oil going into British coffers at the start of the last also the UK's involvement in overturning the government in 1922, invading with the Russians during World War Two, backing another coup in 1953, then along with America, propping up the Shah until his exit in 1979, after months of turbulence and increasing protest against his regime. You can watch amazing archive of his departure here. "We were all over them" for decades, one former senior minister forward to modern times and successive governments have been deeply concerned about Iran's ambitions to build a nuclear bomb. There were efforts, particularly by the former Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, to do deals that put weapons beyond reach. But there is acute worry now about Iranian activities in the UK itself. Yesterday, seven men were arrested on suspicion of grievous bodily harm after two people were assaulted outside the Iranian embassy. The Met Police have said they believe the altercation happened between protesters supporting and opposing the Iranian month three alleged Iranian spies were charged for planning to commit serious violence against UK based journalists. And the director general of MI5 said the UK has responded to 20 Iran-backed plots since the start of 2022, presenting potentially lethal threats here at home.A source involved with an Iranian opposition group warned the regime, "has a massive network in the UK promoting terrorism and extremism – we'd never let the Russians get away with this… It's happening on our streets". What is the UK role? Ministers' public focus is on diplomacy for now. As ever, it was a suggestion from US President Donald Trump that sent Whitehall into a spin. This time, the notion that America might help Israel take out Iran's nuclear Foreign Secretary David Lammy jumped on to a plane to Washington. The government emergency committee, Cobra, convened. Everything went into overdrive before another update from team Trump. Actually, he'd take a fortnight to think about left No 10 thinking, "everyone can take a breath – the two weeks and the volume of engagement means there is some tone of optimism – we're just focusing on trying to calm things", an insider Lammy spent more than an hour with Marco Rubio, the US Secretary of State, and Steve Witkoff, the president's envoy, leaving with the impression there was still a chance for diplomacy, although the threat of America joining the military action is worth remembering there is deep disagreement in Trump's party about whether to assist Israel or the foreign secretary was seeking information from his American hosts, the president had been having lunch with Steve Bannon, one of the foremost Make America Great Again (Maga) backers, who has been very loudly pressing Trump not to get involved. Diplomacy then moved to Geneva, where Lammy and several European colleagues met the Iranian foreign minister. They repeated concerns about Iran's nuclear ambitions and it breaking the international talks finished with no fixed decisions on next moves or negotiations, but a willingness to try. Ultimately, the UK and European push is to keep talking, trying to stop the war spreading more widely. But some sources question whether this makes any difference."Europe is pretty irrelevant in all this," one senior figure told me - and the American president even said it out loud."Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us. Europe is not going to be able to help in this one, " Trump said, dismissing the diplomatic sources describe diplomacy as a "sticking plaster", questioning how effective it can be when Israel is so clearly intent on breaking the status quo, and changing the shape of the region hoping for regime change in Iran and stopping them creating a nuclear former senior official told me, "Israel think this is a once in a lifetime, it's now or never… it doesn't represent a long term solution, but if you are in Tel Aviv the obvious riposte is, 'Yes, we'll still be alive'."Another security source suggested the UK would not be relevant by taking a "preachy European position, like a teacher in a playground", but could instead pursue "alignment with the Americans for our own hard interests".Aligning with America is so often a no-brainer for British prime ministers. But a Labour prime minister aligning with Trump to bomb a country in the Middle East? That's something else. There is the practicality, "people in Whitehall will be very sceptical if thinking bombing Iran will yield any better outcome", one former diplomat source suggests the UK simply hasn't done enough thinking in recent years about how to help Iran, a country of around 90 million people with serious political repression and economic hardship: "Britain doesn't have a strategy or a plan for Iran. It looks at Iran through the point of view of Israel or Gaza but doesn't look at it in its own right, so that's a problem."If America were to get involved with British support in one way or another, what happens next?The source said: "The Americans can go and attack Fordo (Iran's nuclear facility that's buried deeper than the Channel Tunnel), but if the Iranians lash out after, what then?"Then, there is the legality. You don't need me to remind you that the prime minister used to be an eminent the UK was asked to allow American jets to use the British base at Diego Garcia, or help with refuelling planes on their way to any Iranian target, the government would want to be confident there is a solid legal argument that justifies the is already a political row over publishing the advice with an understanding the attorney general has expressed the uninitiated, this is a very well-worn political track. Opposition parties say legal advice must be published in full. Governments say no. Lawyers and politicians, who are not giving the actual verdict, argue about it very publicly. In the end, international law is subject to all sorts of interpretation, what a former senior minister describes as "fungible" - in other words, it's far from is already what one source described as "loose blabber" about the legal advice this the politics of the moment normally comes first, and the prime minister of the day must political backdrop for No 10 is risky. Labour contends with the mythology around Tony Blair's decision to go into Iraq with George Bush, seen by many in the modern party as a decision too to be seen to support Israeli military action stirs a long-standing streak of anti-Israeli feeling on the that to profound concern about what is separately going on in Gaza right now, and it creates another candidates already swiped seats, and nearly took more from Labour in the general election. Sign up for the Off Air with Laura K newsletter to get Laura Kuenssberg's expert insight and insider stories every week, emailed directly to you. Highlighting the plight of Gazans is clearly not the same as objecting to Israeli or American action against Iran. But issues can blur, and add to the volume of angry conversations inside the party about the Middle former senior minister, around during the Iraq conflict told me, "it would save us an awful lot of bother if you could get the Americans not to have our fingerprints on it".But, if the White House asks, "I'd swallow hard and say, 'OK'".Can you imagine Sir Keir Starmer saying no to Trump to help stop Iran creating a nuclear bomb? Can you imagine Sir Keir stepping into a Middle East conflict if it can be avoided?The answer to both can't be the same. The White House has pressed pause while Trump mulls his options, but America joining Israel to destroy Iran's nuclear programme remains an UK has huge interests in the security of Iran and the wider Middle East – whether oil, trade, intelligence, or military bases. Those questions for Sir Keir might be real before too long. BBC InDepth is the home on the website and app for the best analysis, with fresh perspectives that challenge assumptions and deep reporting on the biggest issues of the day. And we showcase thought-provoking content from across BBC Sounds and iPlayer too. You can send us your feedback on the InDepth section by clicking on the button below.