State house bill restricting speed camera use passes with a vote of 7-5

On Monday, the Louisiana House Transportation, Highways, and Public Works Committee approved a bill designed to limit the use of speed cameras throughout the state.
Republican Senator Stewart Cathey's SB 99 was passed by the House Transportation, Highways, and Public Works Committee on a 7-5 vote. The bill would the limit of use automated traffic enforcement devices across the state.
Specifically, SB 99 would ban red light cameras statewide and limit speed enforcement cameras to designated school zones during specified hours.
KNOE 8 News reported that Cathey has been working to ban automated speed cameras in Louisiana, believing that the devices are unfair to Louisiana, seeing them as a "money grab." He stated that speeding tickets issued by speed enforcement devices are also not enforceable.
'There are zero consequences to not paying a speed camera ticket," Cathey stated in the interview. "It cannot go on your credit. They cannot arrest you. They can't put a lien on anything. Cannot suspend your driver's license. There are no repercussions if you choose not to pay."
Shreveport Democratic Representatives Steven Jackson, Tammy Phelps, and Joy Walters are members of the House Transportation Committee. Jackson voted to advance the bill, while Democratic Shreveport Representatives Joy Walters and Tammy Phelps voted against it.
The bill has been referred to the Legislative Bureau.
Follow Ian Robinson on Twitter @_irobinsonand on Facebook at https://bit.ly/3vln0w1.
More: Should Louisiana ban automated speed enforcement cameras? Lawmakers to vote soon on bill
This article originally appeared on Shreveport Times: House bill to limit speed cameras statewide passes with 7-5 vote

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Chicago Tribune

20 minutes ago

• Chicago Tribune

Appeals court lets President Donald Trump keep control of National Guard troops deployed to Los Angeles

LOS ANGELES — An appeals court on Thursday allowed President Donald Trump to keep control of National Guard troops he deployed to Los Angeles following protests over immigration raids. The decision halts a ruling from a lower court judge who found Trump acted illegally when he activated the soldiers over opposition from California Gov. Gavin Newsom. The deployment was the first by a president of a state National Guard without the governor's permission since 1965. In its decision, a three-judge panel on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously concluded it was likely Trump lawfully exercised his authority in federalizing control of the guard. It said that while presidents don't have unfettered power to seize control of a state's guard, the Trump administration had presented enough evidence to show it had a defensible rationale for doing so, citing violent acts by protesters. 'The undisputed facts demonstrate that before the deployment of the National Guard, protesters 'pinned down' several federal officers and threw 'concrete chunks, bottles of liquid, and other objects' at the officers. Protesters also damaged federal buildings and caused the closure of at least one federal building. And a federal van was attacked by protesters who smashed in the van's windows,' the court wrote. 'The federal government's interest in preventing incidents like these is significant.' It also found that even if the federal government failed to notify the governor of California before federalizing the National Guard as required by law, Newsom had no power to veto the president's order. Trump celebrated the decision on his Truth Social platform, calling it a 'BIG WIN.' He wrote that 'all over the United States, if our Cities, and our people, need protection, we are the ones to give it to them should State and Local Police be unable, for whatever reason, to get the job done.' Newsom issued a statement that expressed disappointment that the court is allowing Trump to retain control of the Guard. But he also welcomed one aspect of the decision. 'The court rightly rejected Trump's claim that he can do whatever he wants with the National Guard and not have to explain himself to a court,' Newsom said. 'The President is not a king and is not above the law. We will press forward with our challenge to President Trump's authoritarian use of U.S. military soldiers against citizens.' The court case could have wider implications on the president's power to deploy soldiers within the United States after Trump directed immigration officials to prioritize deportations from other Democratic-run cities. Trump, a Republican, argued that the troops were necessary to restore order. Newsom, a Democrat, said the move inflamed tensions, usurped local authority and wasted resources. The protests have since appeared to be winding down. Two judges on the appeals panel were appointed by Trump during his first term. During oral arguments Tuesday, all three judges suggested that presidents have wide latitude under the federal law at issue and that courts should be reluctant to step in. The case started when Newsom sued to block Trump's command, and he won an early victory from U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco. Breyer found that Trump had overstepped his legal authority, which he said only allows presidents can take control during times of 'rebellion or danger of a rebellion.' 'The protests in Los Angeles fall far short of 'rebellion,'' wrote Breyer, who was appointed by former President Bill Clinton and is brother to retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer. The Trump administration, though, argued that courts can't second guess the president's decisions and quickly secured a temporary halt from the appeals court. The ruling means control of the California National Guard will stay in federal hands as the lawsuit continues to unfold.

Politico

33 minutes ago

• Politico

Who Pritzker could pick for his No. 2

TGIF, Illinois. Stay safe this weekend. It's gonna be hot. TOP TALKER POLITICAL CHESS: With the state budget signed and the D.C. immigration hearing behind him, Gov. JB Pritzker is focusing on a few big decisions. Will he run for president? Will he seek a third term as governor? And who would his lieutenant governor running mate be if he runs again? Don't expect an answer anytime soon about a presidential run. But in the coming weeks, Pritzker will decide whether to seek re-election. What's next: Democratic candidates for statewide office in 2026 will ask for endorsements from the Cook County Democratic Party during its slating meetings July 17 and 18. As for his No. 2: Even if Pritzker announces he'll go for a third term — and all indications are that he will — we hear he wouldn't name a running mate right away. But that hasn't stopped the buzz about who might step up to the pos that Lt. Gov. Juliana Stratton has held since taking office with Pritzker in 2018. Now that she's running for U.S. Senate in 2026, she wouldn't be able to be on the governor's ticket, too. So, Pritzker would have to name a new running mate. Names that have popped up: Deputy Gov. Andy Manar, state Rep. Jehan Gordon-Booth, former Deputy Gov. Christian Mitchell and Chicago City Clerk Anna Valencia. They all bring something to the table: Manar is the budget maestro in the governor's office. And the central Illinois native is someone Pritzker trusts to carry out his vision for the state should he leave for D.C. Gordon-Booth was a House budgeteer. Mitchell is a former state lawmaker who served during Pritzker's first term, overseeing public safety, energy and infrastructure issues. And Valencia is a City Hall veteran who, like Stratton, is a good retail politician. RELATED Republican Congressman Darin LaHood doesn't rule out a run for governor, by Catrina Barker for The Center Square THE BUZZ La VETO Loca: The Chicago City Council approved a curfew ordinance to control 'teen takeovers,' but Mayor Brandon Johnson said he would veto the measure. 'It would create tensions between residents and law enforcement at a time when we have worked so hard to rebuild that trust,' he said after the vote, adding the measure 'is counterproductive to the progress we have made in reducing crime and violence in our city.' The veto would be the first by a Chicago mayor since 2006, according to WBEZ's Mariah Woelfel. The other side: Ald. Brian Hopkins spoke passionately ahead of the vote about his concern that more needs to be done to stop violent acts that have occurred in his downtown ward. The measure passed 27-22, short of the 34 needed to override a mayoral veto. The Tribune's Jake Sheridan reports Hopkins plans to keep making the case for his ordinance but added he won't be heavy-handed about it. RELATED — The next big battle in City Hall will be about the mayor's plan to raise the grocery tax: Ald. Brendan Reilly (42nd) had hoped to delay the measure this week, but before the Council realized it, the legislation was introduced without calling it a 'grocery tax,' by Crain's Justin Laurence. If you are Brendan Reilly, Playbook would like to hear from you! Email: skapos@ WHERE'S JB No official public events WHERE's BRANDON His schedule didn't make it to our inbox. Where's Toni At Idlewild Country Club in Flossmoor at 5:30 p.m. for the Southland Dinner with the South Suburban Mayors and Managers Association Have a tip, suggestion, birthday, new job or a (gasp!) complaint? Email skapos@ IN THE SPOTLIGHT — Former Illinois Congressman Rodney Davis survived political violence. Now he carries a gun 'to fire back:' The Illinois Republican has been both a victim of political violence and a key player in overseeing the protection of elected officials. 'A survivor of the 2017 congressional baseball shooting where Majority Leader Steve Scalise was badly wounded — Davis was at home plate when the gunman opened fire from behind third base — the former Illinois congressman [now head of government affairs for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce] later became the top Republican on the House Administration Committee, which oversees security arrangements for members of the House of Representatives,' by POLITICO's Ben Jacobs. — The Supreme Court decision to uphold Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for minors drew criticism from MWRD Commissioner Precious Brady-Davis, the first Black openly trans woman appointed and elected to public office in Cook County history. 'I am outraged,' she said in a statement. 'This ruling puts trans children at risk by allowing politics to overrule medical expertise. No court should come between a doctor and their patient. Stripping doctors of their ability to provide life-saving, affirming care is not just bad policy, it's a direct threat to our community's health, safety, and dignity.' BUSINESS OF POLITICS — More confirmation: Rahm Emanuel says 'of course' he's looking at a presidential bid, by Crain's Greg Hinz — FIRST IN POLITICO: The Congressional Black Caucus PAC — which operates with the goal of increasing the number of Black members in Congress — is jumping into the race to replace retiring Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin with an endorsement for Congresswoman Robin Kelly. 'We're excited to continue to grow our representation in the Senate with one of our own,' New York Rep. Gregory Meeks, who chairs the PAC, said in a statement. He added that Kelly is a 'fierce advocate on gun violence prevention, maternal health and health care.' Kelly is locked in a crowded race for the Senate seat along with fellow Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi and Lt. Gov. Juliana Stratton. — In IL-02: Cook County Commissioner Donna Miller's formation of an exploratory committee to run for Congress in the 2nd District has been getting support from elected officials. Here's a list. — Pastor Anthony Williams of south suburban Dolton is gathering support for a 2026 U.S. Senate bid as a Democrat. Williams, who is a trustee at South Suburban College, is a familiar name to the political scene, having run for U.S. Senate in 2022 as a Republican. He says his priorities are to 'bring needed resources to the state of Illinois and address the issue of violence [through] the tools of civility.' — Erin Chan Ding, a twice-elected Barrington school board member, is running for state representative as a Democrat in Illinois' 52nd District. The seat is held by veteran Republican state Rep. Martin McLaughlin. Chan Ding wants to 'invest in public education, make child care affordable, fight for livable wages, protect the environment and steward taxpayer dollars responsibly in Springfield,' according to a campaign statement. — Sports betting powerhouse DraftKings is jumping into electoral politics with a new corporate PAC, by POLITICO's Caitlin Oprysko in our Influence newsletter THE STATEWIDES — Plano, the first Illinois town to recognize Juneteenth, had to move this year's party to Yorkville due to low turnout and social media criticism, by the Tribune's Rebecca Johnson and the Aurora Beacon-News' Molly Morrow — University of Illinois soybean lab took a big hit from Trump cuts, by Miles MacClure for The Hechinger Report — Largest air-supported sports dome in the world is inflated in Springfield, by the State Journal-Register's Claire Grant — 'Starved Rock killer' loses bid to overturn 1961 conviction,: by the Sun-Times' Frank Main CHICAGO — Mayor Brandon Johnson didn't conduct formal national search for CTA head despite claiming otherwise, records show, by the Tribune's Talia Soglin — Gale Street Inn, a Jefferson Park institution, closes for good without any advance word to customers, by Bob Chiarito for the Sun-Times COOK COUNTY AND COLLARS — Chicago Heights crematory shuts down permanently after accusations of mishandling bodies: 'Illinois Comptroller Susana Mendoza, who regulates crematories, announced Tuesday she has permanently revoked Heights Crematory's license through a consent order,' by the Sun-Times' Cindy Hernandez. — East Dundee allows golf carts on village streets, by the Daily Herald's Alicia Fabbre TAKING NAMES — WBBM Newsradio political reporter Craig Dellimore is retiring: His last day in City Hall is today. Here's a looks back at his career, by CBS 2's Jeramie Bizzle. — Ellen Bromagen announced she'll retire from the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. The first vice president and chief operating officer, will step down in February after 36 years of service to the bank. — Lou Sandoval, the president and CEO of the Illinois Chamber of Commerce, will receive the Cuauhtémoc Leadership Award by the National Latino Education Institute at its Fund It Forward fundraiser. — Pope Leo XIV joins White Sox chant in Vatican City, by the Sun-Times' Mitchell Armentrout Reader Digest We asked for must-haves on a picnic. Denise Barreto: 'Charcoal-grilled food, melon/berry melody bowl and strawberry shortcake with fresh whipped cream.' Mark Gruenberg: 'Hot dogs, beverages and people to consume them.' Henry Haupt: 'Family, friends and food! (And no rain!).' Charles Keller: 'When I was young, it was beer, my girl and whatever food she brought. Now, it's just beer, cigars and grilling meat on the driveway.' Ed Mazur: 'Deviled eggs, paper plates and cups, and cold liquid refreshments including 'bug juice.'' Kathy Posner: 'A large suite at the St. Regis, George Clooney and Diet Coke.' Jaimey Sexton: 'Wine. A wine bottle opener. Non-breakable wine glasses. The End.' Patricia Ann Watson: 'Chilled melons, sandwiches, ice teas.' Jennifer Welch: 'Rose' wine, farmers market produce and free movie, music, or theater at a Chicago park.' NEXT QUESTION: What skills make a good lieutenant governor? KEEPING UP WITH THE DELEGATION — ICE imposes new rules on congressional visits: The policy says that ICE field offices are not subject to a federal law that allows members of Congress to make unannounced oversight visits to immigration facilities that 'detain or otherwise house aliens.' The news comes after four Illinois lawmakers tried in vain to enter an immigration processing facility near Chicago, by The New York Times' Michael Gold. — Congressman Brad Schneider said leaders he met with in Middle East don't want Iran to have a nuclear weapon, by the Lake County News-Sun's Steve Sadin THE NATIONAL TAKE — Trump says everything is coming 'in two weeks,' video via Bloomberg — Appeals court blocks Newsom's bid to reclaim control of National Guard from Trump, by POLITICO's Josh Gerstein and Kyle Cheney — Megabill could derail hundreds of planned clean energy projects, by POLITICO's Kelsey Tamborrino and Jessie Blaeser — Black church leaders pressure companies over Trump's anti-DEI push, by POLITICO's Cheyanne Daniels IN MEMORIAM — Former Des Plaines civic leader Rosemary Argus has died: She was a former member of the Mount Prospect Park District board and the Des Plaines City Council, by the Daily Herald's Russell Lissau. EVENTS — Sunday: Lt. Gov. Juliana Stratton headlines the Lake County Women Democratic Women gala where Anna Williams will receive the 'Insist Resist Persist Award.' Details here TRIVIA WEDNESDAY's ANSWER: Congrats to Roger Flahaven for correctly answering that Eugene Debs formed the American Railway Union on June 20, 1892, and within a year, it had 150,000 members. Also: Playbooker and author Richard Joyce has details in his book, 'Spring Valley Is a Mining Town.' TODAY's QUESTION: What Illinois town's name was inspired by the writings of Washington Irving? Email skapos@ HAPPY BIRTHDAY Today: State Rep. Sonya Harper, state Rep. Maurice West, Cook County Circuit Court Judge James Shapiro, communications consultant David Prosperi, former U.S. Secret Service Agent Timothy McCarthy and Benjamin Marshall Society's Jane Lepauw Saturday: Deputy Director of External Relations for DCEO Dan McManus, Acacia Consulting Group President Morgan Harris, Portal Innovations VP of Operations Mike Faulman, government relations pro Chris Kane, Agency H5 CEO Kathleen Sarpy, gallery owner Monique Meloche and former Homeland Security official Timothy Thomas Sunday: Former state Sen. Chuck Weaver, Aileron Communications Account Exec Carlie Hansen, restaurateur Michael Kornick -30-

The Hill

36 minutes ago

• The Hill

How Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill' stacks up against his 2017 tax bill

As Senate Republicans deliberate modifications to the reconciliation budget bill that the House of Representatives passed on May 22, one thing looks increasingly clear. Namely, the all-encompassing bill that President Trump favors will likely be enacted in July, despite protests from some Republican senators on various elements of the package. In that case, it would become the signature legislation of Donald Trump's second term, just as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 was in his first term. So, how do the two bills compare? One of the major accomplishments of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was to make the U.S. corporate tax code competitive with the rest of the world by lowering the marginal tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent. According to economists Kevin Brady and Douglas Holz-Eakin, it did so by making the corporate rate cuts permanent, which proved to be highly successful. They point out that economic growth and business capital spending accelerated after the bill was enacted, and the U.S. did not lose a single multinational headquarters following a decade of large exoduses. The legislation currently being considered, by comparison, is focused on extending cuts in personal tax rates that are set to expire at the end of this year. Proponents claim that if the personal tax rates expire, most Americans will face tax increases that could weaken the economy. Democrats, however, argue that the tax cuts in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act primarily benefit the very wealthy rather than middle-class or lower-income families, and they favor boosting taxes on the wealthy and corporations. Jeff Stein of the Washington Post observes that to counter this, Trump pivoted during the 2024 campaign by proposing new tax cuts that were easier to sell to specific groups of voters. The proposals included an end to taxes on tips, overtime and Social Security, as well as a tax deduction on borrowing costs to buy American-made cars. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) said the Republicans in his chamber expect to deliver on these campaign promises, according to Bloomberg. Stein points out that, in the process, there has been a significant change in the way the Republican leadership views tax policy since Trump's first term. Most of the policies in the 2017 law were developed over the course of many years by think tanks in Washington, with former House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and former Rep. Kevin Brady (R-Texas) serving as the principal architects. Their overriding goal was to simplify the code and lessen distortions without adding to budget deficits. In comparison, the current Republican approach to tax policy is more populist-oriented and designed to provide tax relief to select groups of voters. Politico reports that Republicans are piling on new tax breaks in hopes of boosting tax refunds ahead of next year's midterm elections. The provisions include a larger child tax credit, a larger state and local tax deduction and others that would be made retroactively. One challenge is that the extension of the 2017 tax cuts and the new initiatives are estimated to cost the federal government about $4 trillion over the next 10 years. Accordingly, there is little chance that the budget deficit will be brought under control, with spending cuts of only $1.5 trillion below current projections contemplated over that period. Another concern is that the tax cuts in the bill passed by the House are less oriented to promote long-term growth than the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was. The Tax Foundation estimates that it would increase long-term GDP by only 0.8 percent (not annualized). It states that, 'by introducing narrowly targeted new provisions and sunsetting pro-growth provisions like bonus depreciation and [research and development] expensing, it leaves economic growth on the table.' Senate Republicans are trying to address this by including more permanent business tax cuts and full expensing for equipment and research and development in their version of the bill. The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board argues that one of the most constructive changes in the 2017 bill was letting businesses immediately deduct the full cost of capital outlays rather than spread them out. It boosted capital spending until full expensing was phased out in 2022. Another critique relates to fairness. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities contends that the House bill is skewed to the wealthy, costs more than extending the 2017 tax law and fails to deliver for families. It concludes that instead of changing course and prioritizing people with low and moderate incomes, the tax bill only offers more of the same. When the impact of proposed Medicaid cuts is factored into the equation, the Republican bill is unpopular with the public at large. For example, recent polls undertaken by Quinnipiac, the Washington Post-Ipsos and KFF all show that a plurality of voters oppose the House bill, with many citing the attempt to pare back Medicaid funding. Finally, my take is that Trump is making the same mistake Joe Biden did by believing that all-encompassing legislation is better than more targeted bills that spell out clear policy objectives. The principal difference is that Trump favors a grab-bag of tax cuts and spending cuts, whereas Biden was enamored with massive spending bills. In my book about Trump's economic policies in his first term, my assessment was that investors would respond enthusiastically to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which they did as the stock market rose steadily leading up to its passage. In comparison, the market's response this time is more ambiguous amid confusion about the objectives of the 'big, beautiful bill' and uncertainty about the global trade conflict. Nicholas Sargen, Ph.D., is an economic consultant for Fort Washington Investment Advisors and is affiliated with the University of Virginia's Darden School of Business. He has written three books, including 'Investing in the Trump Era: How Economic Policies Impact Financial Markets.'