Drivers warned their cars and wages could be seized over $160 million in unpaid fines
Drivers in one Aussie state are being told to cough up or risk getting their wages and cars seized after it emerged a staggering $160 million in seatbelt and mobile phone fines remains unpaid.
Queensland motorists have 28 days to pay a seatbelt fine. Failure to take action within this period results in the matter being referred to the State Penalties Enforcement Registry (SPER), which can then initiate strict enforcement measures.
Data shared with Yahoo News Australia by SPER, a division of Queensland's Revenue Office, shows the number of unpaid fines has increased significantly from 28,210 in 2019 to 56,162 in 2024. In that time, the total balance owed surged from $9,076,430 to $50,957,449 — a more than a fivefold increase.
The most dramatic spikes occurred between 2022 and 2024, with the balance rising from $13.8 million in mid-2022 to $50.9 million by the end of 2024. Speaking to Yahoo, a SPER spokesperson urged Queensland drivers to take fines seriously.
"Seatbelts must be worn properly to avoid serious injury and save lives. Most people do the right thing and pay. However, if they don't, the unpaid fine is referred to SPER for collection," the spokesperson said.
In the state, the penalty for not wearing a seatbelt is a $1,209 fine and four demerit points for both drivers and passengers aged 16 years or older – but it's about to go up to $1,250. Drivers are responsible for ensuring all passengers under 16 are properly restrained and may be fined for each unrestrained or incorrectly restrained passenger.
In addition to the unpaid seatbelt fines data also shows unpaid mobile phone-related fines referred to SPER massively spiked in recent years, in both the number of debts and the total amount owed.
More expensive road fines coming for millions
Driver cops $322 fine in common road rule misconception
Outrage over $500 fee, cars impounded for common act
From 2019 to 2021, figures remained relatively stable, fluctuating between 19,963 and 22,434, with balances around $7.5 million to $9.7 million. But a major surge occurred between 2021 and 2022, with the number of debts skyrocketing from 20,754 to 85,390, and the total balance jumping almost tenfold from $9.7 million to $87.9 million. Unpaid mobile phone fines reached 102,623 by the end of 2024, and the outstanding balance swelled to $109.8 million.
Like the seatbelt-related fines, these include handwritten and camera-detected fines and apply to Queensland, interstate and overseas debtors.Tough action taken against drivers who refuse to pay their debt
The spokesperson explained a whole range of enforcement measures could be taken if people actively avoid paying what they owe. "Where people continue to avoid paying their debt, SPER will take enforcement action, including seizure and sale of their vehicle or other property, suspending their driver licence, and garnisheeing their wages or bank accounts," they said.
The spokesperson says enforcement action comes "at the end of a long process where people have had multiple opportunities" to deal with their debt. Those experiencing financial hardship were encouraged to reach out to discuss payment options.
The high level of unpaid fines could indicate that current penalties are not effective in changing driver behaviour. If a significant number of people are failing to pay their seatbelt fines, it might suggest the financial penalty is not a strong enough deterrent.
The sheer volume of unpaid fines could also be an indicator that many drivers simply cannot afford to pay, in the midst of the ongoing cost of living crisis. It has been argued penalties might disproportionately impact low-income individuals rather than effectively change behaviour.
Yahoo has questioned the state's Transport and Main Roads (TMR) Department for their view on the matter. And while a spokesperson demonstrated a willingness to look into the query, no response had been received at the time of publishing.
Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@yahoonews.com.
You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Upturn
11 hours ago
- Business Upturn
Is ‘North Shore' returning for season 2? Everything we know so far
North Shore , the Aussie crime show, grabbed viewers with its juicy murder plot and sweet Sydney Harbour scenery. You've got Joanne Froggatt as Abigail Crawford, a tough UK Trade Minister, and John Bradley as Detective Max Drummond, a Brit cop teaming up with an Aussie partner to crack the case of Abigail's daughter Sophie's death. Since it dropped on Network 10 in Australia in May 2023 and hit ITVX in the UK in December 2024, fans are dying to know: Is Season 2 happening? Here's everything we know so far. Is North Shore Season 2 Happening? As of June 2025, Network 10 and Paramount+ haven't said yes or no to North Shore Season 2. There's a glimmer of hope, though. Back in August 2023, the Nilsen Report claimed filming was set to start in Sydney that October, with Beach Road Pictures, ITV Studios, and Screen Australia in the mix. But no one's followed up with hard news, so we're left hanging, wondering if it's a go or a bust. Season 1 pulled a 6.8/10 on IMDb, and fans loved Froggatt and Bradley's chemistry, plus the crime-meets-drama vibe. Some weren't stoked about slow pacing or side characters who didn't shine, which might weigh on the decision. Until we hear more, it's all guesswork. North Shore Season 2 Potential Release Date No Season 2 confirmation means no release date yet. If that October 2023 filming rumor panned out, they might've wrapped by early 2024. Going by how long Season 1 took, we could see new episodes by late 2025 or early 2026. North Shore Season 2 Potential Plot Season 1 dug into Sophie's murder, with Max and Aussie cop Meg Driscoll (Kirsty Sturgess) unraveling political dirt and dark secrets. It tied up the main case but left some questions. No official plot for Season 2 yet, but here's what might go down: New Case, Same Duo: Max and Meg, with their Brit-Aussie banter, could tackle another Sydney murder, maybe tied to some shady international deal. Old Clues: Season 1 dropped hints about dodgy businessman Lloyd Macklin and a mystery caller tipping off Max and Abigail. Those could spark a new mess. Real Feelings: Abigail's still hurting from her loss, and Max's got issues with his partner, Anna, which could add depth to a fresh case. Mike Bullen, who made Cold Feet , knows how to blend grit and heart, so expect any new season to pack a punch. Ahmedabad Plane Crash
Yahoo
14-06-2025
- Yahoo
New laws with up to $80,000 fine that many don't know is illegal: 'Happening weekly'
A leading Aussie lawyer is urging the public to take note of a fast-growing trend he now sees on a "weekly" basis — warning it could cost you thousands in fines or even land you behind bars, with penalties climbing as high as $80,000 in some regions. Avinash Singh has seen firsthand how the growing trend is taking hold, particularly among young people and those involved in the drug trade. "Most of those carrying knives either wrongly believe they are allowed to for self-defence. Or, they know they cannot carry knives for self-defence but do so anyway, because the consequences of not carrying a knife are more severe than being caught with one," Singh told Yahoo News Australia. He said that while some young people claim they carry knives to feel safe, especially in certain areas, self-defence is not considered a reasonable excuse under the law. "People who carry knives should be aware that the new laws are intended to significantly increase the penalties for these offences, including jail time," Singh, Principal Lawyer at Astor Legal, warned. The warning comes after police arrested a 15-year-old boy in NSW this week, after an alleged knife incident at Macquarie Park on June 9. He stands accused of chasing three people with a machete near a shopping centre bus stop. On Wednesday, police shot a teen girl after she allegedly wielded a knife and made threats outside a Townsville pub in Queensland. Every Australian jurisdiction has laws prohibiting the carrying of knives without a lawful reason, and penalties have become significantly tougher in 2025. In New South Wales, carrying a knife without a lawful excuse carries a maximum penalty of four years' imprisonment and a fine of $4,400. From September, the penalties in Victoria will increase, with offenders facing up to two years behind bars and fines of $30,700. In Queensland, knife possession can land you a year in prison and a fine of up to $6,452. The state has also made it illegal to sell knives to anyone under 18, with the change coming into effect on September 1, 2024. Western Australia has some of the most severe monetary penalties, with individuals facing up to three years' imprisonment and fines reaching $36,000. In South Australia, knife carrying can lead to six months' imprisonment and a $2,500 fine, while Tasmania is moving to increase penalties to three years' imprisonment and fines of up to $20,100, up from the current $10,050. Meanwhile, in the Northern Territory, the maximum penalty is one year in prison or a $37,000 fine. But the Australian Capital Territory imposes the toughest sanctions of all. Those caught with a knife can be sentenced to five years' imprisonment and slapped with a fine of up to $80,000. Singh said the laws have tightened considerably in 2025, with most states now empowering police to conduct warrantless searches and use metal detectors "wanting" where they reasonably suspect someone may be carrying a knife. "Enhanced education, particularly for young people, would be a positive step. Schools should consider adding a course so that young people are aware of the consequences of carrying knives and that self-defence is not a legal defence," he said. Singh explained that under the law, the only reasonable excuses for carrying a knife include things like: needing it for work or training; using it for food preparation (such as camping or hunting); for religious purposes; for a lawful sport or recreational activity; for lawful exhibitions or collections; or as part of wearing an official uniform. "We have represented a number of minors accused of carrying knives — generally from lower socio-economic areas — carrying knives for self-defence. Unfortunately, a lot of these young people have been assaulted and/or threatened themselves," Singh said. "They feel that reporting the matter to police after the fact will do them little good, particularly if they are seriously injured or even killed. As such, they often feel that they have to carry a knife to protect themselves." But Singh says the legal system doesn't allow for this kind of reasoning. In the eyes of the law, a fear of harm — even if justified — is not a defence for possession. Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@ You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.
Yahoo
12-06-2025
- Yahoo
$13,296 blow for EV drivers as major incentive could soon be scrapped: 'Would not buy'
Generous tax subsidies for electric vehicles (EVs) could soon be phased out as the federal government tries to rein in spending. EV drivers have been able to save thousands of dollars thanks to Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT) exemptions and other incentives. Sydney resident Tom Gao told Yahoo Finance these tax breaks were the main reason he jumped on the EV bandwagon when he bought his first Tesla. Productivity Commissioner chairwoman Danielle Wood has indicated it could be on the chopping block to make way for cheaper initiatives. 'We have a whole range of policies at both federal and state level to try and reduce carbon emissions,' she said on the ABC's 7.30 programme. Tesla driver backs $13,000 cash boost for EV drivers as popular rebate under fire ATO, Centrelink warning over $100 million Powerball lottery win Aussie teen's job paying $300 per hour without a uni degree 'Each of those has sort of an implicit cost per tonne of abatement. Some of those we've said in the past are pretty high, things like fringe benefit tax subsidies for EVs.' The tax break was introduced by Anthony Albanese in 2022 and was designed to boost the number of EVs on Aussie roads. That has definitely been achieved. According to the Australian Automobile Association, there were 6,752 battery-powered electric vehicles (BEVs) sold in the first quarter of 2022. Fast-forward to the first quarter of 2024, there were 25,552 sold. BEV sales have dropped off since then as plug-in hybrids became more popular due to being the best of both worlds between a battery and internal combustion engine (ICE).You can deduct the cost of an electric vehicle if: The EV was worth less than $91,387 The car was bought with a novated lease A novated lease allows an employee to buy a new or used car and have their employer cover the cost of lease repayments to an agreed financial supplier. The employer makes the repayments to the leasing company out of the employee's pre-tax salary in a salary sacrifice arrangement, which reduces the employee's taxable income. For example, if a worker secured a $68,000 EV through a novated lease through their company, they could save around $13,296 thanks to the exemption. As many as 100,000 people have taken up the tax break so far, according to the National Automotive Leasing and Salary Packaging Association. "I would not be buying an EV if FBT exemption is removed," Goa told Yahoo Finance, who feared there would be a "significant drop in EV purchases" if it was scrapped. "If you look at uptake of EVs in countries like Norway, it's completely driven by government incentives," the Sydney driver said. "That's the case across the world." The government ended the FBT exemption for plug-in hybrids at the end of March this year. The Productivity Commission is currently reviewing the tax break ahead of a government summit in August. It's set to release a report on its findings before that meeting in a few months. Treasury had forecast the FBT exemption policy would only cost taxpayers $55 million in the 2024-25 financial year. But figures from the Institute of Public Accountants found it cost closer to $560 million per year. The Commission estimated in 2023 that the policy cost between $987 to $20,084 per tonne of carbon abatement. This means the government is spending that much money for every tonne of carbon emissions it has helped prevent. That reportedly makes it the most expensive climate policy on the government's balance sheet by a long shot. For comparison, the next most expensive policy at a federal level is the discounted excise for E10 petrol, which is $128 to 274 per tonne of carbon abatement, according to the Australian Financial Review. While Gao has enjoyed the benefits of the policy, even he admitted it was an "outrageously" generous handout and bordered on being "extremely fair" for ICE drivers. While the FBT exemption for EV drivers might get scrapped, the Commission could suggest allocating the money towards broader emissions reductions strategies. This could include expanding the carbon emissions cap to additional sectors like road transport and electricity. During the 2025 election campaign, Peter Dutton said the Coalition would axe the exemption if his party won. The promise sparked major concerns in the EV community, with Electric Vehicle Council CEO Julie Delvecchio saying she was "extremely disappointed and confused". 'The electric car discount has been helping thousands of workers finally afford to buy an electric vehicle. When Australians make the switch to an EV, they stand to save up to $3,000 per year on fuel and maintenance costs, but the biggest roadblock is the upfront cost," she said. "The FBT exemption has been helping to lower that barrier. "The Australians who're set to lose out most are those in outer suburbs, who have embraced the electric car discount in droves. "People living in the outer suburbs and regional communities — who typically drive longer distances — are finally able to access the savings that EVs offer, thanks to this discount." She said the exemption had been "highly effective" at getting more EVs on the road and getting rid of it could "stall progress toward cleaner, cheaper-to-run transport".
