Why Dr AQ Khan still matters
Listen to article
This nation dearly misses you, Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan. You are remembered with deep respect and gratitude for gifting Pakistan the nuclear capability that has enabled the country to stand firm in its strategic defence. Your true worth was once again realised when India reacted like a raging elephant after the Pahalgam terrorist attack on 22 April, hastily accusing Pakistan without presenting any credible evidence.
India launched an irresponsible and disproportionate response under a self-declared operation misleadingly named — Sindoor — after a false-flag activity. Civilian areas were targeted through air strikes conducted with drones and fighter jets. Pakistan's government and armed forces exercised the right to self-defence with remarkable professionalism and restraint.
In response, the Pakistan Air Force not only defended our airspace but also humbled Indian military arrogance. The so-called superior Rafael jets failed to make an impact, while Pakistan's air defence successfully brought down three aircraft, including a MiG-21, and challenged the capabilities of the Su-30s. This defeat led to a sarcastic reinterpretation of Rafale in India — RAW Fail.
India was taken aback by Pakistan's measured yet precise retaliation, which directly hit Indian military installations and air defence targets. The professionalism and precision of the PAF silenced the aggressive posturing of the Indian military, often dubbed the "mad elephant". The United States had to intervene to de-escalate the skirmishes, which were dangerously close to triggering a nuclear confrontation in South Asia.
It is because of Dr AQ Khan's contributions that Pakistan today possesses a credible deterrent. His work has empowered the nation to stand tall in the face of external threats and deter aggression through strength. Though Pakistan may not match India in economic size, conventional military strength or war equipment on paper, it remains resolute and capable of defending its sovereignty under any circumstance.
All honour and tribute go to Dr AQ Khan — the man who gave Pakistan the power to respond to threats on an equal footing.
Let us now compare Pakistan and India in terms of military capability across the three branches — Army, Navy and Air Force — and evaluate their strengths in terms of war equipment and strategic positioning.
India stands as the fourth-strongest military power in the world, while Pakistan is ranked 12th. India's total military strength is said to be nearly three times more than Pakistan's. It also possesses much more military arsenal than Pakistan does.
Silencing the guns of a hegemonic India became possible when Pakistan declared itself a nuclear power capable of retaliation. This strategic milestone was achieved on 28 May 1998, when Pakistan conducted nuclear tests in the hills of Chagai — a moment now commemorated as Youm-e-Takbeer.
At the heart of this historic moment was the unparalleled contribution of Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan — the father of Pakistan's nuclear programme. A metallurgist with rare expertise, Dr AQ Khan had a singular mission: to make his homeland invincible. His relentless efforts transformed Pakistan from a security-dependent nation into a nuclear power with credible deterrence.
The genesis of this nuclear journey lies in the painful memory of the 1971 war and the dismemberment of the country. It is no coincidence that then Prime Minister of Pakistan Zulfikar Ali Bhutto — who famously stated, "we will eat grass, even go hungry, but we will get one of our own [nuclear bomb]" — laid the foundation of Pakistan's nuclear ambition.
The humiliation of 1971 was a turning point. Pakistan realised that conventional military parity with India would never be enough. Nuclear deterrence was no longer a choice — it had become a strategic necessity.
Today, we must ask ourselves: Are we doing enough to honour the sacrifices and genius that made this feat possible? Are we investing in science and technology beyond military applications? Are we preserving our national dignity not only through strength but also through progress?
And in the end, we must not forget Dr AQ Khan's heartfelt words: "My biggest regret is working for this nation."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
40 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Water — not a bargaining chip
Listen to article In international diplomacy, some agreements are too foundational to tamper with. The Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), signed in 1960, is one such rare pillar of stability between Pakistan and India. It has stood wars, diplomatic tensions and political changes. Now, however, with an alarming twist, India has unilaterally "held it in abeyance", an expression of elasticity with potentially disastrous results. This is not just a bureaucratic manoeuvre. It is an affront to legal norms, a threat to regional peace, and most gravely, a dangerous suggestion that water, the source of life, is now a bargaining chip. Water is not optional for Pakistan. With more than 80% of its agricultural output relying on the Indus River system, and with already dwindling per capita water availability, any disruption to this flow is an existential threat. The provinces of Punjab and Sindh, which form the country's breadbasket, would face drought, economic paralysis and civil unrest. The consequences would not be limited to economic losses as it would increase inequalities, fuel provincial tensions and make an already unstable situation in the political arena much more complex. The legal basis of the Indian claim of the treaty being in abeyance is weak and the first in history. There is no provision in the IWT allowing a suspension and anyway what due process has been adopted by India in its regard under the Vienna Convention on Law of Treaties. Under Article 57 of the Convention, a treaty may be suspended only by mutual consent or within the framework of the treaty itself and neither of these applies here. Article 60 does allow for suspension if a material breach occurs which India has no proof of. In essence, India has invented a legal grey area to justify a political decision. It is a breach not only of treaty obligations but of the basic principles of international law. To turn water into a pressure tactic is to reduce a humanitarian and ecological concern into a geopolitical lever. And once that precedent is set, it becomes dangerously difficult to undo. If water is fair game in power politics, what comes next? This is why the global community cannot afford to stay neutral. South Asia is already one of the most water-stressed regions. Climate change is causing shrinking glaciers and monsoons slackening, and has been speeding the dearth of platforms. The IWT despite all its shortcomings was a paradigm of collaboration on common resources. Such an undermining not only destabilises Pakistan, but also sends the signal to other riparian basins in Africa, Latin America and Central Asia that a unilateral weaponisation of water security is possible. Pakistan must act, but not recklessly. Although there is nothing wrong with citing India's shift as a possible casus belli, it has to first make all the diplomatic attempts. That involves appealing to the Security Council of the UN under Chapter VII of the UN Charter that specifically provides the possibility of interfering when there is a threat of peace. Water, especially when controlled by one nuclear power over another, constitutes exactly that kind of threat. The P5 states must be reminded of their 1998 commitment to intervene if South Asia's stability is at risk. That moment is now. This is not merely about sovereignty or national pride. It is about redefining what should be off-limits in conflict. Civilian water access cannot be a pawn in strategic calculus. Pakistan's response must reinforce this principle, legally and morally. Because if this treaty falls, the damage will go far beyond the Indus Basin — it will corrode the very idea of principled diplomacy. Water sustains life; it should never be used to choke it. The IWT is not a perfect document, but it is a symbol of what diplomacy can achieve even between enemies. To treat it as a bargaining chip is to abandon that legacy and to gamble with peace itself.
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
India fails both militarily and diplomatically against Pakistan: Bilawal
PPP Chairman and former foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari addresses PPP rally in Karachi after successfully leading a diplomatic mission to US and Europe. Photo: Courtesy PPP/ Facebook Listen to article Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari asserted that after suffering a humiliating defeat on the battlefield, India also failed in its diplomatic campaign against Pakistan abroad, while Islamabad's narrative prevailed on the international stage. Bilawal led a delegation to United States and Europe, appointed by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, to present Islamabad's perspective on the recent conflict with India. The visit aimed to secure international support, especially from the European Union, to help prevent further escalation between the two nuclear-armed neighbours. 'میں اس دورے کے دوران پاکستان کا امن کا پیغام، کشمیر کا پیغام، سندھو کا پیغام اور دہشتگردی کے متعلق ہمارا موقف اقوام متحدہ، امریکہ، برطانیہ اور یورپی یونین کے سامنے لے کر گیا۔ بھارت کوشش کر رہا تھا کہ وہ جنگ کے میدان میں تو ہم سے جیت نہیں سکا تو بیانیہ کی جنگ اور سفارتی سطح پر… — PPP (@MediaCellPPP) June 20, 2025 Speaking after returning from the successful tour in Karachi following a warm welcome on Friday, Bilawal emphasised the delegation's efforts in conveying Pakistan's message on peace, Kashmir, the Indus Waters Treaty, and counter-terrorism during visits to New York, Washington DC, London, and Brussels. He noted that during the conflict with India, although the former was 'seven times larger', Pakistan's armed forces achieved a 'humiliating defeat' for their adversary — a feat he said filled the country with pride. PPP chairman said Islamabad had overcome India's efforts to undermine it at the diplomatic level, adding that the country won the diplomatic battle through tireless efforts. "India tried to succeed where it failed on the battlefield — by defeating Pakistan on the narrative and diplomatic fronts — but I want to tell you that even on that front, Pakistan emerged victorious and India failed." Read More: 'No military solution to Pak-India disputes' He asserted that Pakistan stood on the side of truth, while India relied on falsehood — a contrast that, he said, was evident in the international media, where Pakistan's narrative gained traction and India's failed to resonate. Recalling the last month's skirmish with neighboring country, he said that Pakistan's armed forces had shot down six Indian jets — a denial initially issued by India, but later conceded a month later. Highlighting that Kashmir has remained Pakistan's most important issue since partition, he stressed that Pakistan raised its voice for Kashmir everywhere. 'Before the war, India's stance was that Kashmir was a bilateral matter. Now they must recognise that it is no longer an internal issue but an international one.' پاکستان پیپلزپارٹی کے چیئرمین بلاول بھٹو زرداری امریکہ، برطانیہ اور یورپی یونین کے کامیاب سفارتی دورہ کے بعد وطن واپسی کے موقع پر استقبال کیلئے آئے شرکاء کے پرجوش نعروں کا خیرمقدم کررہے ہیں۔@BBhuttoZardari #ProudOfBilawal — PPP (@MediaCellPPP) June 20, 2025 He also referred to US President Donald Trump's comments, saying the US was prepared to facilitate talks between Pakistan and India to resolve the Kashmir dispute — a 'historic success,' he said. Turning to Pakistan's water security, he warned that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's threat to restrict the flow of the River Indus — described as an unprecedented move — would not go unchallenged. 'When it comes to the Indus, the PPP will lead the charge, whether domestically or internationally,' he said. 'بھارت کو سندھ طاس معاہدے کو ماننا پڑے گا، جس کے تحت چھ میں سے تین دریا پاکستان کے ہیں اور باقی بھارت کے حوالے ہیں، بھارت کے پاس دو آپشنز ہیں یا تو وہ عالمی قوانین کو تسلیم کرتے ہوئے سندھ طاس معاہدے پر عمل کرے اور اگر وہ ایسا نہیں کرتا تو پاکستان ایک اور جنگ کرئے گا اور پھر یہ چھ… — PPP (@MediaCellPPP) June 20, 2025 He issued a stern warning to India: 'You have two options: either abide by international law and the Indus Waters Treaty, which allocates three rivers to Pakistan and three to India, or face another war — and all six rivers will be ours.' Bilawal also questioned why domestic political actors, whom he blamed for inciting hate and division, were silent in the face of India's water threat, insisting that these politicians had long been funded by India and accused them of raising sectarian slogans in Balochistan and Sindh. 'The people of Sindh will never forgive these political orphans for their silence today,' he added, referring to their apparent inaction over the river threats and water security concerns.
Business Recorder
8 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Netizens troll Macron's post about Rafale jet reminding of Pak-India skirmish
French President Emmanuel Macron, posted a French-made Rafale fighter jet with the caption 'European friends, you have a call,' on X on Friday, leading netizens especially within Pakistan to comment below, remind readers of the recent fate of the aircraft between the India-Pakistan skirmish. Macron, in his defense is urging Europe to strengthen its arsenal and reduce reliance on the United States. However, users were quick to comment below the post, reminding users of the recent skirmish between India and Pakistan, where Pakistan Air Forces (PAF) shot down 3 Rafale jets with the help of Chinese-made J-10 fighter jets, leaving India humiliated. Memes continue: Pakistanis celebrate air dominance over India on social media
