Israeli drone strike in Southern Lebanon leaves one injury
Shafaq News/ An Israeli drone targeted a vehicle in the southern Lebanese town of Alma al-Shaab near the Israeli border injured one person on Thursday, according to the Lebanese Ministry of Health.
Israeli Army's Spokesperson, Avichay Adraee confirmed the attack in a post on X, saying that the targeted is 'a Hezbollah terrorist.'
#عاجل هاجم سلاح الجو قبل قليل إرهابيًا من حزب الله عمل في منطقة علما الشعب في جنوب لبنان
— افيخاي ادرعي (@AvichayAdraee) April 3, 2025
An earlier Israeli airstrike on the Bint Jbeil road injured two civilians, the ministry said.
In the last two days, Israeli forces shot and injured a Lebanese citizen, identified as M.A., in the southern town of Odaisseh. They also fired at a Renault Rapid vehicle, though no additional casualties were reported. Meanwhile, Israeli military vehicles stationed in Al-Labouna, east of Naqoura, advanced toward Ras Naqoura, accompanied by bulldozers. The forces constructed an earth barrier, blocking the road near the Jal Al-Allam site, which overlooks Naqoura and Alma al-Shaab.
These strikes come days after Israeli forces bombed the capital, Beirut, killing four people, including a woman. It was the second such strike on Beirut in the past week since a ceasefire with Hezbollah took effect in November.
Additionally, Hezbollah condemned the escalating "US-Israeli aggression," describing it as part of a broader "US-Israeli axis" targeting the region. The group highlighted that the Israeli attacks on Lebanon, combined with 'ongoing US pressures and the complicity of American envoys pushing Israeli demands ', form part of a broader strategy to escalate hostilities against the country.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Iraqi News
32 minutes ago
- Iraqi News
Iraq leads diplomatic push to de-escalate Iran-Israel war
Baghdad ( – In the face of a spiraling regional crisis following US and Israeli strikes on Iran, Iraq has launched a high-stakes, two-pronged strategy to protect its own stability and lead a diplomatic push for de-escalation. From emergency leadership meetings in Baghdad to spearheading key initiatives at international conferences in Istanbul, Iraq is actively working to shift from a potential battlefield into a proactive peacemaker. Unifying the home front Hours after US strikes targeted Iranian nuclear sites on Sunday, June 22, 2025, Iraq's top leadership convened for an emergency summit in Baghdad. The meeting brought together the 'Four Presidencies'—President Abdul Latif Rashid, Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al Sudani, Parliament Speaker Mahmoud Al-Mashhadani, and Head of the Supreme Judicial Council Faiq Zidan—along with leaders of the ruling political coalitions. According to informed sources, the urgent session aimed to formulate a unified Iraqi position on the dangerous escalation. The key objectives were to devise measures to protect Iraq from the conflict's fallout and to develop a diplomatic mechanism to 'defuse the crisis,' fearing a slide into a wider regional or even global war. Leading the diplomatic charge in Istanbul While leaders unified at home, Iraqi Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein led a diplomatic marathon in Istanbul, attending an Emergency Meeting of Arab Foreign Ministers—held at Iraq's request—and the 51st Session of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) Council of Foreign Ministers from June 20-22. At these crucial gatherings, Minister Hussein warned that the escalation posed a threat to the entire region, not just Iran, and stressed the need for collective action. He put forward a key proposal: the formation of a joint, open-membership contact committee tasked with opening communication channels to reduce tensions and halt the attacks. This Iraqi initiative was a diplomatic success, first being adopted by the Arab League and subsequently approved by the OIC member states. The final 'Istanbul Declaration' from the OIC condemned the destabilizing attacks on Iran, Syria, and Lebanon, reflecting the core of Iraq's proposal. Minister Hussein reinforced this multilateral effort with a series of vital bilateral meetings on the sidelines of the conferences. He met with: Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan: Discussed both the regional escalation and critical bilateral files, including Iraq's water rights and the resumption of oil exports via Ceyhan. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi: Held two separate meetings to discuss the repercussions of the strikes and the importance of activating the new contact committee. Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdel Aty: Received praise for Iraq's de-escalation initiative. Uzbek and Syrian Counterparts: Discussed the need to end the war and focus on political solutions, with Hussein emphasizing Iraq's direct vulnerability due to its shared border and history with Iran. Through this coordinated domestic and international effort, Iraq is signaling a clear strategic shift. Rather than being a passive victim of regional power plays, Baghdad is actively leveraging its diplomatic relationships in a determined bid to pull the Middle East back from the brink of a devastating, wider conflict.
Shafaq News
an hour ago
- Shafaq News
UAE slams Israeli aid request over Iran war
Shafaq News/ Israel has requested financial assistance from Gulf and European countries to support its war against Iran, Anwar Gargash, diplomatic advisor to United Arab Emirates President Mohammed bin Zayed, revealed Monday. In a post on X, Gargash criticized what he described as the 'audacity' of Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, who had approached the Gulf States along with Germany, France, and the United Kingdom seeking contributions to fund Israel's military campaign, characterizing the request as emblematic of 'moral bankruptcy.' بلغت وقاحة وزير المالية الإسرائيلي سموتريش حدّ الدعوة لتمويل خليجي (وألماني وفرنسي وبريطاني) لحرب إسرائيل على إيران. دول الخليج أدانت الهجوم ودعت للحل الدبلوماسي حرصًا على استقرار المنطقة وشعوبها.مثل هذا الطرح ليس إلا إفلاسًا أخلاقيًا من متطرف لا يدرك عواقب التصعيد. — د. أنور قرقاش (@AnwarGargash) June 23, 2025 Condemning the ongoing hostilities, Gargash pushed for a diplomatic solution, emphasizing the importance of safeguarding regional stability and protecting civilian lives. Despite normalizing ties with Israel through the Abraham Accords in September 2020, the United Arab Emirates has strongly condemned Israel's recent military actions against Iran, calling them a ''violation of international law.'' Beyond formal diplomacy, Abu Dhabi and Tehran maintain significant economic and demographic connections, with trade between the UAE and Iran reaching about $6.23 billion in 2024.
Shafaq News
an hour ago
- Shafaq News
From Iran's fire to Iraq's streets: US strike raises war stakes
Shafaq News/ A sudden American military intervention has added a new layer of complexity to the escalating war between Israel and Iran—one whose consequences will become clearer with Iran's anticipated response. The US airstrikes, launched early Sunday on Iranian nuclear sites in Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, raised fears of a broader regional war that could engulf neighboring countries, including Iraq. President Donald Trump described the strikes as "spectacular military success,' while Tehran condemned them as 'a blatant act of aggression and a violation of international law,' vowing retaliation. As the region braces for Iran's next move, analysts warn that the trajectory of the conflict now hinges on the scale and nature of that response—whether it remains calculated or ignites open confrontation. Iraq: Neutral No More? In Baghdad, the escalation has triggered alarm. First Deputy Head of the Iraqi Parliament's Security and Defense Committee, Karim Abu Souda, urged a firm policy of nonalignment. ' Iraq has no role in the war between Israel and our neighbor Iran,' he told Shafaq News. 'It's vital to stay out of this to protect our stability and avoid turning the country into a battlefield.' Yet that neutrality is under pressure. Politician Aed al-Hilali warned that US involvement risks dragging Iraq into the fray. 'We're standing at a dangerous crossroads,' he expressed to our agency. 'The [Iraqi pro-Iranian] armed factions ' threats are not mere statements. They indicate the real possibility of Iraq becoming a frontline in this escalating conflict.' About 2,500 American troops remain deployed in Iraq under the mandate of supporting Iraqi forces and the Global Coalition against ISIS. Pro-Iran Groups Monitor US Role While some factions in Iraq have stayed silent, others have hinted at readiness to act. Sheikh Kazem al-Fartousi, spokesperson for Kataib Sayyid al-Shuhada, declined to comment on the US strikes but affirmed Iran's right to defend itself. 'The war hasn't stopped,' he told Shafaq News. From Yemen, Ansarallah (Houthis) political bureau member Abdullah Mohammed al-Naami confirmed unwavering support for Tehran. 'Since day one, we've stood with Iran,' he said in an interview with our agency. 'If the US throws itself into the fight, we're prepared to strike American warships in the Red Sea.' Al-Naami argued that Tehran and its allies are responding to aggression, not provoking it. 'The Axis is acting in self-defense. The decision to end this war lies with the aggressor.' All Eyes on Iran International relations analyst Hussein Shaito believes Washington intended the strikes to demonstrate action without triggering a point of no return. 'The US aimed to show it was curbing Iran's enrichment efforts, but avoided destroying the facilities completely to leave room for diplomacy,' he shared with our agency. Washington, Shaito added, likely anticipates a limited Iranian response—perhaps targeting US naval assets or regional bases. 'The scope of Iran's retaliation will determine whether the situation spirals further.' Ahmed al-Yasiri, Head of the Australian Arab Center for Strategic Studies, echoed that view. 'The US strike has deepened the crisis. Whether it becomes a regional war depends entirely on Iran's response,' he noted in remarks to Shafaq News. 'If Iran hits US bases or shuts key maritime routes — the Strait of Hormuz or Bab al-Mandeb — the conflict will explode. For now, though, it's still under control.' The Strait channels 18 to 19 million barrels of oil, condensates, and fuel daily—nearly a fifth of global consumption—alongside around 11 billion cubic feet of liquefied natural gas. Any disruption would rattle global markets, inflate shipping costs, and deepen energy insecurity worldwide.
