Morgantown sales tax revenue surpasses $10 million in FY 2025

May 8—MORGANTOWN — The city of Morgantown collected more than $10 million in sales taxes in the current fiscal year.
It's the first time collections have reached eight digits since the city utilized Home Rule to implement the additional 1 % tax in 2020.
Earlier this week, Morgantown City Council approved a resolution amending the city's projected sales tax revenue to reflect an increase of $490, 694.51 in the 2025 fiscal year, bringing the total to $10, 090, 694.51.
That number represents a new high-water mark for sales tax collections and an increase of $196, 096.54 over the 2024 fiscal year.
"You're more than welcome when you can come and you can tell us we're not dealing with negatives, we're dealing with positives, " Councilor Bill Kawecki told Finance Director Jon Ferguson. "To put things in perspective, this money is not just a gift, it's pretty much allocated to various activities that we have ongoing. You mentioned the pension plan, but also I think it helps to take care of some of the employee health insurance that we had to dip into funds to cover, if I'm not mistaken."
The enabling legislation mandates tax revenues be distributed in the following manner: 25 % for recreational facilities and services operated by BOPARC ; 25 % for the purpose of reducing the unfunded actuarial accrued liability of the city's police and firefighter pension funds ; 25 % for capital improvement projects within the city ; and 25 % to be allocated at the discretion of Morgantown City Council into the city's general fund or used to supplement the funding going to the three uses listed above.
Ferguson confirmed that the additional revenue going into the city's general fund would offset some of the $1.45 million the city "temporarily borrowed " from its general fund in January to cover increases in the cost of the city's self-funded insurance plan.
While the sales tax revenues topped the $10 million threshold in the 2025 fiscal year, it's expected they may drop by up to 10 % in FY 2026.
The upcoming spending plan conservatively anticipates just over $9 million in sales taxes. If that number holds, it would be the lowest full-year collection, by a considerable margin, since the city implemented the tax.
The reduction comes down to the state implementing a more precise method of determining what businesses are located within a municipality, resulting in the probability that some businesses located on the periphery of the city have been collecting Morgantown sales taxes and remitting them to the state for distribution despite not being within the city's boundaries.
Historical sales tax collections by the city of Morgantown include:—$5, 457, 116.46 for fiscal year 2021. This represented two quarters of collections.—$9, 541, 906.24 for fiscal year 2022. The city budgeted $6 million.—$9, 464, 938.11 for fiscal year 2023. The city budgeted $8.8 million—$9, 894, 597.97 for fiscal year 2024. The city budgeted $9.56 million—$10, 090, 694.51 for fiscal year 2025. The city budgeted $9.6 million.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

CBS News

12-06-2025

• CBS News

Home rule special election questioned by Colorado county voters, as well as developer backing

Debate over home rule in Douglas County is heating up, with residents set to vote on the matter in less than two weeks. A special election will ask voters if they want the county to create their own home rule charter and who should serve on a charter commission. If voters say yes to home rule in the special election, the commission will craft a charter that will be voted on in November. CBS County leaders say that charter could free the county from strict state laws and increase local control over things such as taxes, gun laws and immigration enforcement. Douglas County residents should already have received their special election ballots. That June 24 election is costing the county about $500,000, and many are asking why it needed to happen so quickly. "I've never seen such backlash across party lines in the county," said Barrett Roth, a Douglas County resident. "If you rush, we don't have time to ask questions of the people that matter and can influence our votes." When Barrett Roth first heard about home rule, he wasn't sure how to feel. "I think, like everyone else, I was kind of shocked, and had to learn a lot about it," Roth said. And learn more he did. Reading through campaign finance reports, Roth found the "Yes on Local Control" campaign had received $110,000 in donations. Westside Property Investment Company, the developer behind Dawson Trails, contributed $10,000. Ventana Capital, which has numerous projects underway in the county, contributed $50,000, far surpassing any previously recorded donation under their name. Ventana is also involved in litigation with the city of Castle Pines over the city council's denial of a proposed McDonald's. "Why would a land developer be interested in home rule? If it's for all these liberal versus conservative policies, it's clearly for a land grab," Roth said. CBS Colorado reached out to both companies to ask why they supported the campaign. Westside had "no comment," and Ventana did not respond. "There are four committees that are set up in favor of home rule. I actually don't know all these people. So I don't know," County Commissioner George Teal told CBS Colorado. "We will have greater control of how we set the tax base for businesses under home rule. Maybe that's their interest." Teal says he doesn't know why the developers support home rule, but that the charter could give the county more local control over zoning and exempt them from some state development statutes. "We're pursuing home rule to put ourselves in a legal position here, as a legal entity of the state of Colorado, to have more local control," Teal said. "When you talk about public safety, you talk about having more control over our taxes and being able to lower taxes when we want to as we need to. And then when it comes to being able to work with other government agencies, home rule gives us far greater control with how we interact with other levels of government here in America." Other donors to the pro home rule campaign include "The Cundy Harbor Irrevocable Trust," which contributed $50,000, Teal's wife Laura Teal, who contributed $100, and Laura Tonner, who contributed $100. Tonner is married to Sean Tonner of Renewable Water Resources, the water developer behind a controversial plan to bring water from the San Luis Valley to Douglas County. On the other side, "Stop the Power Grab", a group opposing home rule, has received a total of $30,000 from hundreds of donors, including local Democratic politicians. Roth is a member of the group. He feels the promises being made about home rule are misleading. Metropolitan State University of Denver professor Dr. Robert Preuhs previously told CBS Colorado home rule does grant more policy-making authority to counties, but it may not be so easy to disregard state laws. Legal battles may ensue after controversial decisions to determine whether the matter is truly a local or a state concern. "The county commissioners will tell you that home rule will allow them to supersede state law," Roth said. "They've talked about how they can pass laws on gun safety, on abortion rights, on plastic bag fees, and try to battle the state. Well, the battles will take place in court." "As long as it is not a matter dealt with in state law, the home rule county does have the ability to legislate," Teal said. Roth feels home rule will waste taxpayer money on legal battles and the special election. "We're going to have an election in November 2025, so just in a few months, they could have placed it on the ballot for free in just a few months," Roth said. "But, instead, they're rushing it over the summer to the tune of $500,000 of taxpayer money. That's real money." "Right now, the cost of the election is coming in at just under $500,000," Teal said. "Average cost of a home in Douglas County is $800,000, so for less than the average cost of a home here in the county, we get to chart our own course and have that legal mechanism under the state constitution for complete local control." Roth was also upset to receive a white book from the county on the home rule measure that did not include an opposing viewpoint. "They're essentially putting out campaign literature on taxpayer dime," Roth said. The county says they have pro-con statements on their home rule webpage. "I do think home rule is the right thing to do, and I certainly encourage everyone to vote yes," Teal said. As the election draws near, tensions are running high over the county's future. "Often, the community feels very divided. If you talk to people, they feel pretty united that this is being rushed," Roth said. "It's a waste of money. It's something no one asked for, and I do think it's going to fail pretty substantially." One week before the special election, the county will hold one last town hall to answer any remaining questions. The town hall will be online at 6 p.m. June 17. Saturday, a "No Kings" protest held in Castle Rock will also protest the home rule initiative locally.

Dominion Post

07-06-2025

• Dominion Post

City creating second safe surrender site, cutting taxes for some small businesses

MORGANTOWN — The city of Morgantown is taking advantage of a recent change in state code to create the city's second safe surrender site. Safe surrender sites are designated locations at which newborns up to 30 days old can be dropped off while maintaining the anonymity of the person surrendering the child. In April 2024, Morgantown opened West Virginia's second Safe Haven Baby Box at the Norwood Fire Station. Earlier this year, the West Virginia Legislature expanded the allowable surrender sites beyond fire departments to include police departments, sheriff's departments and EMS facilities. In response, the city of Morgantown is looking to add the Morgantown Public Safety Building – home of the Morgantown Police Department – as a designated site. Unlike the Norwood setup, which includes dedicated infrastructure known as a 'baby box,' built directly into the fire station, a baby dropped at the Public Safety Building will be handed to a police officer. 'The police department, who is there 24-7, feel comfortable that they would be able to have policy and procedures to follow state code and be able to accept an infant less than 30 days old and get it to the nearest hospital facility,' Assistant City Manager Emily Muzzarelli said. 'It likely would go to the police supervisor … but it still requires the same anonymity. The person does not have to give their name or any information should they not want to.' Morgantown City Council recently passed the first reading of an ordinance creating a new section of code pertaining to the safe surrender sites. Safe surrender guidelines were previously under the city's fire code as fire stations were the only allowable locations under the law as it was passed by the West Virginia Legislature in 2023. In other business, council has passed on first reading amendments to the city's business license and business and occupation tax provisions. During its most recent session, the Legislature passed House Bill 2451, which eliminates the need for municipal business licensure as well as business and occupation tax liability for some businesses. City Attorney Ryan Simonton explained that in order to be eligible for the business license exemption, a business must be a sole proprietorship or independent contractor; cannot have a permanent physical location within the city; and must generate annual revenue below $2,500. In order to be exempt from business and occupation tax liability, a business must generate gross annual revenue below $2,500. Business and occupation taxes – or B&O taxes – are taxes charged by municipalities on business activity within the city. 'If they have $2,501 in revenue, they do have to pay taxes on that full amount,' he said. If adopted upon second reading on June 17, the changes will take effect at the July 1 start of the new fiscal year.

CBS News

29-05-2025

• CBS News

Home rule town hall leaves a Colorado community frustrated

Residents in Douglas County are learning more about what a home rule charter could mean for them. Back in March, Douglas County Board of County Commissioners took the first step to become a home rule charter. There are still a number of steps, including two elections. In June, voters will decide if they want home rule and would pick people for a charter commission. If that moves forward, voters will decide in November whether to approve the charter. If it's implemented, Douglas County would become the fifth home rule county in the state. Weld, Broomfield, Denver and Pitkin counties are also home rule. CBS Tuesday night, Douglas County held a town hall for the community to share more about the home rule charter process and answer questions. It was a long-awaited night, as many community members had questions about the process. But the short meeting ended with tension, and many residents left with more questions than answers. As county commissioners attempted to end the hour-long town hall, they were met with shouts of protest and boos. "Why the rush?" one community member called out. "You really like to hear yourself talk. What about the community?" another shouted to Commissioner George Teal. "Why don't you extend the meeting?" a resident asked. "We do expect order in this room. I will ask the sheriff's office to get involved," Commissioner Abe Laydon responded. "Take us to jail!" one woman shouted. The high tensions came after nearly 9,000 people tuned in online and in person to the town hall, expecting the opportunity to ask questions about home rule, but only about six questions were taken. "I'm disgusted, very disgusted. The lack of respect for the voters of Douglas County is just incredible," said state Congressman Bob Marshall (D-Highlands Ranch). "The meeting was too short," said Mark Custer, a Highlands Ranch resident. "They only answered a few questions." County leaders broke down the nine-step process of developing a home rule charter, which they say would allow the county to write its own rules and free it from strict state laws governing immigration, taxes and collective bargaining. "I am in favor of home rule because I don't like what's happening at the statehouse in Denver. I feel like the Democrats are pushing whatever they want," said Janet Zoetewey, a Castle Rock resident. "Even though there's a majority of Republicans in Douglas County, I feel like our voice is being taken away more and more and more, and it doesn't matter. To me, home rule gives us a chance to have a little more of a voice, a little more autonomy in our county." But critics say that isn't a guarantee. "If they get in a fight with the state, they will lose," Marshall said. "But they intend to get into perpetual litigation with the state, and they're going to spend millions of dollars and lose all these. But they'll be able to take care of their special interest supporters. Home rule could be a good thing, could be a bad thing, but the way they're doing it is very, very bad. It's secretive." Less than a month ahead of the special election where voters will say yes or no to home rule, many are leaving the town hall with strong opinions on the county's future. "I like the idea of home rule 'cause I'm in favor of it because of the crazies in the legislature," Custer said. "We need to have more control. This will give us tools to fight against the crazies in the state." "I like what's happening in Douglas County and what's been here," Zoetewey said. "I don't want to see Denver chipping away by making us build high-rise apartments or low-income housing to get more people, probably more Democrats, into our county." "I'm the mom of nine kids. You know what I don't have time for? Fighting this nonsense," said Kelly Mayr, a Highlands Ranch resident. "Other elections, if we're not successful, two years later or four years later, we get another opportunity. We don't get another opportunity to do this. This is permanent. This could take decades to undo the harm that could be caused." Those who still have questions can find more information on the Douglas County Home Rule page. At the bottom, there is a form where residents can submit feedback on home rule. In the special election, voters will be asked if they support home rule. Then, they will be asked to vote for members of the 21-person charter commission who will draft the charter. Candidates for the charter commission: District 1: Matthew M. Lunn David Weaver Mary H. Lynch Emily Roth Suyat Jack Hilbert Jason Hamel Darren Weekly October Ann Levy Jack Gilmartin Toby Damisch Laura Hefta Irene Bonham Julie Gooden Bart Dorscheid District 2: Jennifer E. Green Kevin Leung Jae Mundt Charles O'Reilly Julien Bouquet Barrett Rothe Juli Watkins Max Brooks Tom J. Wiens Tim Dietz Douglas John Gilbert Dave Gill District 3: Robin Webb Lora Thomas Michael Lees Priscilla Rahn Bob Marshall Sudee Floyd Frank McNulty Alicia Jean Vagts Monica A. Wasden Matthew Burcham Ted Harvey Susan Meek Lee Hudson Frame Daniel Brown Gordon B. "Spud" Van De Water SuJeanne Foster At-large: Steve Johnson Kevin Van Winkle Abe Laydon Angela Thomas George Teal Mindy Bandimere-Jordan Steven Arthur Boand Ballots for the special election will be mailed in early June. The special election is June 24. If voters say yes, the commission will craft a charter, and that charter will be voted on by residents in the November general election. If successful, the charter will go into effect Jan. 1, 2026.