With reporters shot and roughed up, advocates question whether those covering protests are targets

More than two dozen journalists have been injured or roughed up while covering protests against immigration raids in Los Angeles, leading press freedom groups to question whether law enforcement has been deliberately targeting reporters on the story.
Journalists have been pelted with rubber bullets or pepper spray, including an Australian TV reporter struck while doing a live shot and a New York Post reporter left with a giant welt on his forehead after taking a direct hit. A CNN crew was briefly detained then released on Monday night.
The advocacy group Reporters Without Borders said there have been at least 27 attacks on journalists — 24 from law enforcement — since the demonstrations started.
The Committee to Protect Journalists, the First Amendment Coalition and Freedom of the Press Foundation were among the groups to express concern to Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem. In a letter, they said 'federal officers appear to have deliberately targeted journalists who were doing nothing more than their job covering the news.'
Noem hasn't replied, David Loy, legal director of the First Amendment Coalition, said Tuesday. A Noem spokesperson didn't have an immediate comment for The Associated Press.
Experts say the apparent hostility toward journalists, or a disregard for their role and safety, became particularly apparent during demonstrations following the death of George Floyd in 2020. A troubling indication of a decline in press freedom is the rapid escalation of threats journalists face in the United States, said Bruce Shapiro, executive director of the Dart Center for Journalism and Trauma at Columbia University.
While most journalists covering wars receive training and safety equipment, it is apparent that many — particularly freelancers — don't have similar protection when assigned to events like the Los Angeles demonstrations, he said.
'It's not like covering a war zone,' Shapiro said. 'But there are some very specific skills and strategies that people need to employ. The First Amendment is only as strong as the safety of the journalists covering these events.'
On Sunday, Australian journalist Lauren Tomasi was shot in the leg by a rubber bullet while reporting live, with a microphone in her hand, from protests in downtown Los Angeles. Widely circulated video shows her crying out in pain and clutching her lower leg as she and her camera operator quickly move away from a police line. She told 9News later that she was safe and unharmed.
New York Post photographer Toby Canham was overlooking the 101 freeway when he was hit. He spent Monday in the hospital with whiplash and neck pain, and left with a red mark on his forehead. Shortly before he was shot, he said he saw someone throwing a water bottle with liquid at authorities.
'I completely understand being in the position where you could get injured,' Canham said. 'But at the same time, there was no justification for even aiming the rifle at me and pulling the trigger, so I'm a bit pissed off about that, to be honest.'
Ben Camacho, a reporter at the local news website The Southlander, reported being shot twice. 'Unsure of what hit me both times but they hit like a sledgehammer and without immediate warning,' he wrote online. 'Elbow is wrapped with gauze and knee is weak.'
Photojournalist Nick Stern was standing near some people waving a Mexican flags when he was shot in the thigh. He later had emergency surgery. 'I thought it was a live round because of the sheer intensity of the pain,' he told the AP. 'Then I passed out from the pain.'
Lexis Olivier-Ray of L.A. Taco, an alternative independent media platform, thought he was safely positioned with some television crews but instead had pepper balls shot at him. Some reporters may have taken less care: one posted a clip from film he shot about 10 yards (9.1 meters) from a police officer with a rifle pointed at him.
Not all of the incidents involved law enforcement. AP photographer Jae Hong was kicked and hit with sticks by protesters on Monday, his protective gear enabling him to escape injury. A Los Angeles TV reporter and her crew were forced away by demonstrators, one loudly yelling, 'get out of here.'
CNN aired video of its correspondent, Jason Carroll, and his crew with their hands behind their backs being led away from a protest by officers. They were later released.
In many past conflicts, journalists had a measure of protection because opposing sides wanted them to record their side of the stories, Shapiro said. Now many journalists are seen as superfluous by people who have other ways of delivering their messages, or a target by those who want to spread fear, he said.
It illustrates the importance of proper training and protection, he said. For reporters in the middle of the story now, they should plan carefully — being aware of exit routes and safe zones, working in tandem with others and in constant communication with their newsrooms.
'We need everyone from major news outlets to television to citizen journalists,' he said. 'We need them on the street. But we need them to be safe.'
AP correspondent Jake Offenhartz in Los Angeles contributed to this report. David Bauder writes about the intersection of media and entertainment for the AP. Follow him at http://x.com/dbauder and https://bsky.app/profile/dbauder.bsky.social

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Mint

4 hours ago

• Mint

US strikes against Iran not aimed at regime change: Pentagon chief

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said on Sunday that the country's military strikes on Iran's nuclear sites were not meant for regime change plans. The US has sent private messages to Tehran before the strikes, encouraging them to negotiate, Hegseth said. Hegseth also warned Iran against retaliation against the United States, and said US forces were postured to defend themselves, and take action if needed. "This mission was not and has not been about regime change," Hegseth told reporters at the Pentagon. The president authorised a precision operation to neutralise the threats to our national interests posed by the Iranian nuclear program, he said. In what has now been called Operation 'Midnight Hammer', the US strikes included 14 bunker-buster bombs, more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles and over 125 military aircraft. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff US General Dan Cane said at the briefing that initial battle damage assessments indicated that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction, but he declined to speculate whether any Iranian nuclear capabilities might still be intact. The operation pushes the Middle East to the brink of a major new conflagration in a region already aflame for more than 20 months with wars in Gaza and Lebanon and a toppled dictator in Syria. Tehran has vowed to defend itself, and responded with a volley of missiles at Israel that wounded scores of people and destroyed buildings in its commercial hub Tel Aviv. But, perhaps in an effort to avert all-out war with the superpower, it had yet to carry out its main threats of retaliation - to target U.S. bases or choke off the quarter of the world's oil shipments that pass through its waters. The Iranian parliament approved closing the Hormuz strait, a potential choke point for oil shipments, but the country's top security body is required to make a final decision, Iran's press TV reported. Caine said the US military had increased protection of troops in the region, including in Iraq and Syria. This mission was not and has not been about regime change. "Our forces remain on high alert and are fully postured to respond to any Iranian retaliation or proxy attacks, which would be an incredibly poor choice," Caine said. Key Takeaways The US strikes targeted Iranian nuclear capabilities without intentions of regime change. Operation 'Midnight Hammer' involved extensive military resources, indicating a serious commitment to US national interests. The situation remains volatile, with potential for further conflict in the region as Iran weighs its options for retaliation.

The Wire

7 hours ago

• The Wire

US Activist Mahmoud Khalil Released From Detention, Vows To Keep Protesting

Activist Mahmoud Khalil told reporters he would continue protesting against Israel's war in Gaza, as he reached New York following his release from three months detention at a immigration facility The former Columbia University graduate student has become symbol of President Donald Trump 's clampdown on campus protests. "The US government is funding this genocide, and Columbia University is investing in this genocide," he said to some supporters who greeted him at Newark Airport. "This is why I will continue to protest with everyone of you. Not only if they threaten me with detention. Even if they would kill me, I would still speak up for Palestine." Khalil is a legal US resident whose wife gave birth during his 104 days of detention. He said he would also continue to speak up for the immigrants he left behind in the detention center. "Whether you are a citizen, an immigrant, anyone in this land, you're not illegal. That doesn't make you less of a human," he said. AOC welcomes release US Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York joined Khalil at the airport and said his detention violated the First Amendment and was "an affront to every American." "He has been accused, baselessly, of horrific allegations simply because the Trump administration and our overall establishment disagrees with his political speech. "The Trump administration knows that they are waging a losing legal battle. They are violating the law, and they know that they are violating the law." This story was originally published on DW.

Time of India

10 hours ago

• Time of India

‘Grossly unconstitutional': Democrats slam Donald Trump after US strikes on Iran; some call for impeachment

US President Donald Trump is facing a wave of outrage from angry Democrats, with several calling for his impeachment following his decision to bomb Iran's top nuclear facilities. Lawmakers from the left denounced the strikes as unconstitutional and a dangerous overreach of presidential power, reports the New York Post. 'The President's disastrous decision to bomb Iran without authorisation is a grave violation of the Constitution and Congressional War Powers,' said Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY). 'He has impulsively risked launching a war that may ensnare us for generations. It is absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment.' The strikes took place on Saturday, targeting Iran's Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan nuclear facilities. Trump later confirmed that American aircraft had safely returned from the mission. 'Now is the time for peace,' he said, calling the operation a success. But the reaction from Capitol Hill was swift and fierce. Critics across the political spectrum condemned the move, with many pointing out the lack of Congressional approval. Thomas Massie, known for occasionally breaking ranks with Trump, said, 'This is not Constitutional.' Jim Himes, a top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, voiced anger over not being informed in advance. 'According to the Constitution, we are both sworn to defend, my attention to this matter comes BEFORE bombs fall. Full stop,' he posted on X. House Speaker Mike Johnson and some Republican leaders were briefed ahead of time, reports the Post. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries criticised the lack of transparency. 'Trump administration bears the heavy burden of explaining to the American people why this military action was undertaken,' he said, adding that 'Congress must be fully and immediately briefed in a classified setting.' Senator Bernie Sanders called the action 'grossly unconstitutional,' while Sean Casten labelled it an 'unambiguous impeachable offence.' However, not all lawmakers opposed the move. Some praised Trump's decision. 'Iran is the world's leading sponsor of terrorism and cannot have nuclear capabilities,' said Senator John Fetterman. 'This was the correct move.' Republican senator Lindsey Graham said: 'Good. This was the right call. The regime deserves it. Well done." New York Representative Mike Lawler also called it the 'right decision.' 'War has not been declared, however, a Nuclear Iran has been prevented. I fully support the President's decision," Lawler said.