logo
12-hour work shift in IT? Karnataka govt faces backlash over proposal

12-hour work shift in IT? Karnataka govt faces backlash over proposal

The Karnataka government's proposal to amend existing labour laws and extend working hours in the IT, ITeS, and BPO sectors to 12 hours a day has triggered widespread criticism from employee unions and ignited debate across social media.
In a meeting held on Wednesday by the state's Labour Department with industry stakeholders and trade unions, it was suggested that the Karnataka Shops and Commercial Establishments Act be amended to permit a longer workday. At present, the Act limits work to a maximum of 10 hours per day, including overtime.
The Karnataka State IT/ITES Employees Union (KITU) strongly opposed the proposal, describing it as a "form of modern-day slavery" and accusing the government of prioritising corporate profits over workers' rights. The union warned that enabling 12-hour shifts could lead to a two-shift system replacing the current three-shift system, potentially rendering one-third of the workforce redundant.
'This amendment will normalise inhuman conditions. It's not about productivity, it's about appeasing corporate bosses by turning workers into machines,' said KITU leader Suhas Adiga to news agency PTI after attending the meeting alongside fellow unionist Lenil Babu.
KITU argued that such a move would erode work-life balance, worsen mental health issues, and further entrench job insecurity in the IT sector. Citing the State Emotional Wellbeing Report 2024, the union highlighted that 90 per cent of corporate employees under the age of 25 already suffer from anxiety.
The union also pointed to global trends, noting that many countries are now recognising the negative effects of extended work hours and are enacting laws to establish the "right to disconnect" as a fundamental employee right.
Narayan Murthy hours: Internet trolls 12-hour workday proposal
As news of the government's proposal spread, social media erupted with memes and commentary. Many memes and jokes involved Infosys co-founder Narayana Murthy, who last year controversially advocated for a 70-hour workweek and criticised the concept of work-life balance.
One user dubbed the proposed 12-hour shifts as "Narayana Murthy hours", another wrote, 'Narayana Murthy laughing in the corner after hearing that the Karnataka government plans to increase work hours to 12 hours per day for IT workers'.
During the CNBC-TV18 Global Leadership Summit last year, Murthy had argued that as a developing country, India cannot afford the luxury of reduced working hours. He said that hard work and dedication were essential to achieve economic growth, remarking, 'We first have to get a life, then we can worry about work-life balance'.
Despite the uproar, the Karnataka government has not issued an official clarification on the proposed changes or whether they will move forward with the legislative amendment. Meanwhile, KITU has called for collective resistance from all employees in the sector.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Supreme Court To Hear Plea Seeking 27% OBC Quota Implementation In Madhya Pradesh
Supreme Court To Hear Plea Seeking 27% OBC Quota Implementation In Madhya Pradesh

NDTV

timean hour ago

  • NDTV

Supreme Court To Hear Plea Seeking 27% OBC Quota Implementation In Madhya Pradesh

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday agreed to urgently list a petition seeking implementation of 27% reservation quota for Other Backward Classes or OBC communities in Madhya Pradesh. A partial working day bench of Justices Ujjal Bhuyan and Manmohan agreed to hear next week the plea mentioned in court today. The petition moved by members of the OBC community in the state seeks implementation of a law passed by the legislative assembly of Madhya Pradesh in 2019, which increased the OBC quota from 14% to 27%. The plea states the state government has been denying benefit of increased quota for the OBCs based on the stay given to an MBBS student for a postgraduate medical entrance test by the Madhya Pradesh High Court. Earlier, the Congress had accused the BJP-led Madhya Pradesh government of deliberately not implementing the law (which increased OBC quota from 14 to 27%) passed by the Congress government in 2019, citing "legal hurdle". An ordinance was brought by the erstwhile Congress government on March 8, 2019, seeking to increase the OBC quota in jobs and admissions in educational institutions to 27 per cent from 14 per cent. However, the same was challenged by the MBBS student. The Madhya Pradesh High Court stayed the implementation of the ordinance for the entrance test of the postgraduate medical exam. However, in July 2019, the state assembly passed legislation to replace the ordinance. The petition moved by members of OBC community in the state, claims that despite Madhya Pradesh having 50% OBC population, the reservation quota remains only 14%. The plea further says that Madhya Pradesh government arbitrarily failed to implement the Act to extend the benefit of the said amendment in nearly all recruitment processes. What Happened Before 2019 Before 2019, Madhya Pradesh had reservation of 14 per cent for the OBC, 20 per cent for ST, and 16 per cent for SC, totalling 50 per cent. The enhanced OBC quota has raised total reservation to 63 per cent, breaching the 50 per cent quota ceiling. On March 19, 2019, the High Court stayed the increased 13 per cent more OBC reservation, which led to the suspension of many recruitment processes. Later, a formula which included 87 per cent existing reservations plus 13 per cent reserved was introduced to continue exams while holding the disputed 13 per cent seats separately until a final verdict. In 2024, all pending petitions regarding OBC reservation hike (around 70 in total) were transferred from the High Court to the Supreme Court. Till the final decision is made, recruitments are continuing based on the 87:13 formula. This law was neither challenged in any court nor was any stay granted by the court on its implementation, the plea argues. "It is respectfully submitted that the said legislation has neither been struck down nor declared unconstitutional by any court of law. In fact, no interim order has been passed by this court or High Court of Madhya Pradesh for restraining the enforcement of the law," states the petition. The plea further states that the enforcement of the law is restrained only on the basis of legal opinion of the office of Advocate General of Madhya Pradesh by the executive and pending litigation before court. However, the plea argues that there is a presumption of constitutionality in laws passed by the state assembly, and such laws must be implemented even if they are facing challenges in court.

Centre extends last date to apply for Chief Information Commissioner's post in CIC
Centre extends last date to apply for Chief Information Commissioner's post in CIC

Hindustan Times

time2 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Centre extends last date to apply for Chief Information Commissioner's post in CIC

New Delhi, The Central government on Friday extended the last date to apply for the chief information commissioner's post in the transparency watchdog Central Information Commission till this month end. The Personnel Ministry had last month sought applications from eligible candidates for the post. The last date to receive the application was June 20. "It has now been decided, with the approval of the competent authority, to extend the last date of receipt of the applications for appointment of Chief Information Commissioner in Central Information Commission up to 30th June, 2025 ," said an order from the Personnel Ministry. The terms and conditions and other eligibility criteria of the service of the chief information commissioner shall remain the same, it said. The Central Information Commission , mandated to decide appeals and complaints under the Right to Information Act, is headed by a chief information commissioner and can have a maximum of 10 information commissioners . Besides Chief Information Commissioner Heeralal Samariya, two ICs are presently working in the commission. Former IAS officer Samariya is going to complete his term later this year. The chief information commissioner, according to the RTI Act, shall hold office and shall not be eligible for reappointment. No chief information commissioner shall hold office after attaining the age of 65 years, it says. Born on September 14, 1960, Samariya was sworn in as the chief information commissioner by President Droupadi Murmu on November 6, 2023. The RTI Act provides that the chief information commissioner "shall be a person of eminence in public life with wide knowledge and experience in law, science and technology, social service, management, journalism, mass-media or administration and governance".

Google trains Veo 3 AI video generation model using YouTube content: Report
Google trains Veo 3 AI video generation model using YouTube content: Report

Business Standard

time2 hours ago

  • Business Standard

Google trains Veo 3 AI video generation model using YouTube content: Report

Google has reportedly been using YouTube content to train its artificial intelligence (AI) models, including Gemini and the Veo 3 video and audio generator. According to a report by CNBC, a YouTube spokesperson confirmed that Google relies on its bank of YouTube videos to train its AI models. However, the spokesperson added that Google does not use each and every single video on YouTube but only uses a subset of its videos for training purposes. The report further claims that many creators whose videos might have been used in this matter remain unaware that their content has been used without their consent or any compensation. Creators were never notified? As per YouTube, this information has been conveyed to creators previously, but, as per experts who talked to CNBC, it is not widely understood by creators and media organisations that the US technology giant trains its AI models using its video library (YouTube). Earlier last year, in September, YouTube in a blog stated that the content uploaded on the platform could be used to 'improve the product experience … including through machine learning and AI applications.' A huge disadvantage here is that creators who have uploaded videos on YouTube have no way of opting out from letting Google use it to train AI models, which is something that its competitors, like Meta offers. Surprisingly, YouTube allows created to opt out from sharing their content with third-party companies to train their AI models. As per YouTube, there are around 20 billion videos on the platform, and out of them, how many are being used to train Google AI models is unclear at the moment. CNBC cited experts as saying that even if Google uses one per cent of those videos, then it would amount to around 2.3 billion minutes of content, which is 40 times more of the training data that is being used by competing AI models for training. The report claimed that CNBC talked to a number of leading creators and IP professionals, and it found out that none of them were apparently aware or had been informed by YouTube about the possibility of their content being used to train Google's AI models. Why does it matter YouTube, using user-uploaded videos to train AI, has raised concerns, especially after Google unveiled its powerful Veo 3 video generator. The tool can create fully AI-generated cinematic scenes, including visuals and audio. With around 20 million videos uploaded to YouTube daily by creators and media companies, some fear their content is being used to build technology that might one day rival or replace them. CNBC cited experts as saying that even if Veo 3's results don't directly copy existing content, the AI-generated output can power commercial products that may rival the very creators whose work helped train it, without their permission, credit, or payment. This no-way-out trap begins as soon as a creator uploads a video on YouTube, as by doing so, the person agrees to YouTube having a broad license to the content. What does the past record show According to The New York Times, Google has reportedly transcribed YouTube videos to train its AI models. Mashable India points out that this practice raises legal concerns, as it may infringe on creators' copyrights. The use of online content for AI training has already led to lawsuits related to licensing and intellectual property. Other players like Meta and OpenAI have also faced heat for using intellectual property to train their AI models without having the consent from creators or authors.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store