What does a Taiwanese commander's presence at US drill mean for future military ties?
The appearance of a senior Taiwanese officer at a military exercise in Alaska has attracted widespread attention on the island, where many see it as a signal that there may be closer defence cooperation with the United States in the future.
Advertisement
Analysts said the move also suggested the US would stick to its security commitments despite US President Donald Trump's transactional approach towards Washington's allies in the region.
The exercise, Red Flag Alaska 25-2, is one of the US Air Force's largest annual air combat drills designed to sharpen coordination between regional allies.
This year's edition, conducted over two weeks from June 12, brings together 1,500 personnel and 70 aircraft from the US, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines and other countries.
Taiwan did not take part in the drills, but Major General Wu Chia-hsing, head of the air force's flight training division, joined the exercise as an observer.
Advertisement
A photograph released by the Pentagon-supported Defence Visual Information Distribution Service (DVIDS) showed Wu in a suite standing alongside uniformed senior officers in front of two F-22 stealth fighters and a C-17 transport aircraft at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Alaska.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
26 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
US attacks on Iran stoke debate over Trump's presidential power: ‘this is not our fight'
US President Donald Trump's bombardment of three sites in Iran quickly sparked debate in Congress over his authority to launch the strikes, with Republicans praising Trump for decisive action even as many Democrats warned he should have sought congressional approval. Advertisement 'Well done, President Trump,' Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina posted on social media. Alabama Senator Katie Britt called the bombings 'strong and surgical'. The Senate Armed Services Committee chairman, Roger Wicker of Mississippi, said Trump 'has made a deliberate – and correct – decision to eliminate the existential threat posed by the Iranian regime'. The instant divisions in the US Congress reflected an already swirling debate over the president's ability to conduct such a consequential action without authorisation from the House and Senate on the use of military force. While Trump is hardly the first US president to go it alone, his expansive use of presidential power raised immediate questions about what comes next, and whether he is exceeding the limits of his authority. 'This was a massive gamble by President Trump, and nobody knows yet whether it will pay off,' said Rhode Island Senator Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee. Advertisement Democrats and a few Republicans said the strikes were unconstitutional and demanded more information in a classified setting. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York said that he received only a 'perfunctory notification' without any details, according to a spokesperson.
The Standard
an hour ago
- The Standard
Iran's Atomic Energy Organization says it will not allow nuclear development to stop
Iranian flags are displayed on the National Mall near the U.S. Capitol as part of a demonstration organized by activists who support regime change by the people of Iran, in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 20, 2025. (Reuters)
The Standard
2 hours ago
- The Standard
Quotes: World leaders react to US attack on Iran
A television screem displays news after the address to the nation by U.S. President Donald Trump in which he said that a "very successful attack" on three nuclear sites had been carried out in Iran, in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 21, 2025. (Reuters)
