Health leader condemns ‘black service, not NHS service' received by mother

A health leader has condemned racial inequalities in the health service, saying that his mother received a 'black service, not an NHS service' as she died.
Lord Victor Adebowale, chairman of the NHS Confederation, described the death of his 92-year-old mother as 'undignified'.
His mother Grace, who worked as an NHS nurse for 45 years, died in January of suspected lung cancer.
But her cancer was not detected until after she died.
Her case highlights systemic racial disparities in healthcare, Lord Adebowale said.
'I just think there are too many situations where people that look like me and shades of me don't get the service,' he said.
In an emotional speech, Lord Adebowale told the NHS ConfedExpo conference in Manchester: 'It was not the dignified death that we would have wanted for her. It wasn't the death she deserved.
'So it makes me clear about the need to address the inequity. I think she got a black service, not an NHS service.
'So I have to address the inequity that still exists within the NHS, in terms of the experiences that people who look like me continue to receive.
'It just hasn't got any better.'
He went on: 'It is not acceptable that someone who looks like me, on average waits 20 minutes longer in A&E than white patients.
'To achieve an inclusive, equitable NHS we need an inclusive equitable culture from top to bottom.'
Mrs Adebowale emigrated from Nigeria to Scotland in the 1950s.
Lord Adebowale, who grew up in Wakefield, said that he did not want to blame anyone, but he said that he wanted to highlight a 'systematic problem'.
'She lived to the age of 92 and you may think, 'well, she had the good old innings', but for a lot of those years she was in some discomfort, and it looks like she died from cancer,' he told reporters.
'It's still the case that if you look like me, you're more likely to discover that you've got cancer in A&E, and that that for me is it's an example of two different services.
'I used the phrase 'black service'… you only have to look at the stats – across all the major disease categories that we talk about, black people have a worse experience and worse outcomes – we've known that for years, I'm not saying anything new.
'My mother is an episodic example of a systematic problem.
'We've got a cancer programme, we've got a cancer we've had targets for diagnostics, and pathways, and yet, people like my mother…'
Lord Adebowale, who established the NHS Race and Health Observatory in 2021 to try and tackle inequalities experienced by black and minority ethnic patients in healthcare, went on: 'I just think there are too many, too many situations where people that look like me and shades of me don't get the service.
'What I'm talking about is a systemic problem exampled by what I have experienced a my mum, and I think she represents a lot of other mums out there and lots of other people out there.'
Asked about his comments about a 'black service', Lord Adebowale went on: 'Why did I (say) it? Because I'm sick of it not changing like everyone else, and I'm close enough to it to know that it happens.
'I could have stood there and give you a load of stats, and you wouldn't be talking to me.
'And my mum, I think, God bless her, I think she would have wanted me to say it.'
He added: 'The disproportionate poor services that too many poor people and too many black people experience, that's what I'm sick of.'
He said there was nothing in his mother's medical records to suggest she had cancer, adding: 'She went to A&E in a poor condition.
'My sister described a hospital that was really struggling when she went in, she had to argue for mum to get a room.
'It was a very busy day. There had to be a negotiation to find a space, which you shouldn't have to do, but that's what happens when people are under pressure.'
He added: 'We haven't got to the bottom of it, and that's why I'm not blaming anybody, and I don't want to, but I can talk about my experience and my observation of what happened to my mum.
'How does that happen? I know it does happen. People have chronic diseases and people don't know and they die of them – I know it's more likely to happen if you're black, it's also more likely to happen if you're poor.
'It's all part of the same story. I used to own story to illustrate a bigger problem, which is systemic.'
On his mother, whose full name was Grace Amoke Owuren Adebowale and who worked in various nursing sectors including mental health, acute care and maternity, he said: 'If you a nurse it is what you are, it's what you're born to do.'
Commenting on Lord Adebowale's remarks, Professor Habib Naqvi, chief executive of the NHS Race and Health Observatory, said: 'We extend our sincere condolences, thoughts and support to Lord Victor and the Adebowale family.
'The loss of a beloved family member is extremely difficult. We thank Victor for the candour in sharing his personal testimony.
'The NHS Race and Health Observatory continues to support healthcare organisations in implementing meaningful change for ethnic minority patients, communities, and members of the healthcare workforce.'
Kate Seymour, from the charity Macmillan Cancer Support, said: 'Stories like Grace Amoke Owuren Adebowale's highlight the heartbreaking reality for some when it comes to accessing cancer care in this country.
'It is categorically unacceptable that some people with cancer are having worse experiences simply because of who they are or where they live.'
An NHS spokesperson said: 'Everyone – no matter their background – should receive the best NHS care possible.
'That's why we are working across the NHS to ensure that happens – from improving access to cancer diagnosis and treatment, to expanding health checks for Black and Asian communities and increasing uptake of blood pressure and cholesterol medication in under-served groups.
'But we know there is much more to do, and tackling health inequalities will form an important part of the upcoming 10 Year Health Plan.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Guardian

21 minutes ago

• The Guardian

All babies in England to get DNA test to assess risk of diseases within 10 years

Every baby in England is to have a DNA screening to avoid fatal diseases and receive personalised healthcare as part of the government's £650m investment in DNA technology, it has been reported. Within a decade, every newborn will undergo whole genome sequencing, which assesses the risk of hundreds of diseases and is expected to form part of the government's 10-year plan for the health service. Wes Streeting, the health secretary, told the Telegraph the advances in genomics would allow people to 'leapfrog' killer illnesses and receive 'personalised' health care. He said: 'The revolution in medical science means that we can transform the NHS over the coming decade, from a service which diagnoses and treats ill health to one that predicts and prevents it. 'Genomics presents us with the opportunity to leapfrog disease, so we're in front of it rather than reacting to it.' Streeting added: 'With the power of this new technology, patients will be able to receive personalised healthcare to prevent ill health before symptoms begin, reducing the pressure on NHS services and helping people live longer, healthier lives.' All new parents are now offered a blood spot test for their babies, normally when the child is five days old, to check whether they have any of nine rare but serious conditions. The newborn's heel is pricked to collect a few drops of blood on a card that is sent away to be tested. Along with a greater focus on prevention, the 10-year plan is expected to include Streeting's other 'shifts' in the NHS, from hospitals towards more community-focused care and from analogue to digital services. Last week the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, announced that the government would increase NHS funding by £29bn a year in real terms over the next three years. A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'Our 10-year health plan will be published soon and will set out details for a range of initiatives to advance the NHS and make it fit for the future.' In October, the NHS in England announced it was to screen 100,000 newborn babies for more than 200 genetic conditions in a world-first scheme aimed at bolstering early diagnosis and treatment.

The Independent

an hour ago

• The Independent

Every baby's DNA ‘to be screened' on the NHS in bid to detect and prevent disease

All babies could have their DNA mapped to test for future illnesses under a plan unveiled by the government, it has been reported. Labour is set to pour £650 million into DNA technology in an effort to treat serious illnesses before they become a problem. In comments first reported in the Daily Telegraph, health secretary Wes Streeting said new technology in areas such as genomics would help 'leapfrog' illnesses. The outlet says, within a decade, every baby will undergo whole genome sequencing as part of the drive. The investment in genomics is expected to support the Government's 10-year plan for the NHS, which will see a greater focus on technology and prevention. Mr Streeting said: 'The revolution in medical science means that we can transform the NHS over the coming decade, from a service which diagnoses and treats ill health to one that predicts and prevents it. 'Genomics presents us with the opportunity to leapfrog disease, so we're in front of it rather than reacting to it.' Mr Streeting has previously spoken about his desire to make the NHS more preventative, reducing rates of serious illness and saving money in the process. The plan is also likely to see a greater role for artificial intelligence and other technologies to predict illness and allow treatment or medication to be offered much earlier. He added: 'With the power of this new technology, patients will be able to receive personalised healthcare to prevent ill health before symptoms begin, reducing the pressure on NHS services and helping people live longer, healthier lives.' Along with a greater focus on prevention, the Government's 10-year plan is expected to include Mr Streeting's two other 'shifts' in the NHS. That will see a shift away from hospitals towards more community-focused care, and from analogue to digital services. It follows Chancellor Rachel Reeves' announcement that the Government would increase NHS funding by £29 billion per year in real terms over the next three years as it tries to cut waiting lists in line with its election promises.

Times

an hour ago

• Times

Streeting should stand firm in face of doctors' risible demands

No country can claim to be in the forefront of democracy and development unless it can ensure the health of its citizens. Whatever its woes — and they are many — the National Health Service does keep most Britons in better health than many people on other continents. Partly that is thanks to pioneering excellence in medical ­research. And partly it is the result of a long ­tradition of top surgeons and physicians whose skills underpin specialist units attracting doctors from overseas. The consultants know it. They are proud of it. And, to their discredit, they are ready nowadays to exploit it. NHS consultants earn, on average, £145,000 a year. It may not be the salary of an investment banker. But it is considerably more than most people are paid. And there is ample opportunity to supplement this salary with private practice and filling in as a locum at the going rate of £200 an hour. Consultants have been awarded a pay ­increase of 4 per cent for the coming year, a figure above inflation. The British Medical Association, the doctors' union, has described this as an ­'insult'. It insists that a pay rise of 35 per cent over the next three years is needed to restore consultant pay to 2008 levels in real terms. Otherwise, the BMA says, it will support a strike if an 'indicative ballot' shows that this is what senior doctors want. The consultants' claim is risible. It is not only unaffordable in today's straitened times and given the parlous state of NHS finances; it is based on the threat of holding the health, and sometimes the lives, of thousands of patients to ransom. It is a maximalist demand, backed by possible strike action, similar to the bullying approach of the rail unions. Consultants ought to be able to see that their claim has far less validity or public support than the claims by nurses and resident — once known as junior — doctors. They, too, insist that their pay needs to catch up with what they once enjoyed. They, too, risk losing public sympathy, following earlier strike action. But millions of Britons have seen their take-home pay fall in recent years. Comparisons do not help consultants. Famously, Aneurin Bevan, the architect of the NHS, bought off consultants opposed to his ­proposals for a state scheme, saying that he had 'stuffed their mouths with gold'. And since 1948 they have enjoyed this well-funded quasi-independence from state control, with generous state pensions. They have also enjoyed the fruits of expensive training, provided largely by the state in Britain's medical schools. Doctors, like everyone nowadays, are obliged to pay back their tuition fees — but many will not do so for years. An alarming number will never do so; on qualification they look for more lucrative contracts abroad, often in Australia. As a result Britain has partly depended on an inflow of doctors trained overseas, largely in India, a situation benefiting neither country. In the long term, the tight restriction on the numbers enrolling in medical schools should be eased; a developed country should never risk a doctor shortage. Also in the long term, doctors, ­especially consultants, should be compelled, by legislation if necessary, to devote a defined period of their careers to the NHS and serve in areas of greatest need. Other countries make provision for nationwide coverage. The immediate challenge, however, is pay. Wes Streeting, the health secretary, is holding talks with the BMA. He must stand firm in resisting its absurd new demands.