The anger of the Leeds maternity families

Photo by Kelly Hill / Millennium Images, UK
It was November 2020 when Fiona Winser-Ramm first raised safety concerns about maternity services in Leeds to the healthcare watchdog. Her daughter, Aliona Grace, had died at Leeds General Infirmary in January that year, 27 minutes after she was born.
An inquest into the death in 2023 found a 'number of gross failures of the most basic nature that directly contributed to Aliona's death'. The family experienced 'neglect by the midwives', and a 'gross failure in care'. Aliona should not have died. So today's (20 June) decision by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to rate the maternity care provided by Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (LTHT) as 'inadequate' is bittersweet.
'I've been waiting five and a half years for this moment,' Fiona tells the New Statesman. And while she feels 'vindicated', she is also deeply angry. She questions how many babies might have been saved had the CQC listened when she – and others – first raised concerns, years ago. 'As far as we're concerned, the CQC have failed catastrophically in their regulatory duties to safeguard the public,' she says.
Today's CQC findings are based on unannounced inspections of the maternity units at Leeds General Infirmary and St James's University Hospital in December 2024, following, it said, 'concerns received from whistleblowers, people using the services and their families about the quality of care being delivered'.
The regulator has demanded LTHT make 'immediate improvements' after finding there was a shortage of staff, as well as staff being reluctant to raise concerns because of a perceived 'blame culture' at the Trust, incomplete record-keeping, and staff not having 'meaningful interactions with the people they cared for'.
The CQC's director of operations in the north, Ann Ford, said the concerns of families and whistleblowing staff had been 'substantiated' during the inspection and 'posed a significant risk to the safety of women, people using these services, and their babies'. It was, she said, 'concerning that appropriate investigations weren't always carried out after incidents had taken place, meaning staff couldn't always learn from them to help prevent them from happening again.'
But this is not good enough for many families. Just months after Aliona Grace's damning inquest finding in 2023, the CQC inspected both Leeds maternity units and rated them 'good' – much to Fiona's disbelief. 'It was pure bleach in our wounds,' she says. How could the regulator have read all that came out in the case and believed there were no major problems?
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
Fiona and her husband, Daniel, are now connected with more than 100 other families who say they too received poor maternity care from the LTHT. In a statement, some of those families say today's findings 'only just scratch the surface of the known issues [and] are only a fraction of the failings and problems that bereaved and harmed families in Leeds experienced during their care and the care of their babies'. The families argue 'safety failings have not appeared out of nowhere in the last two years', but have been 'systemic for 5-10 years, if not more'.
A BBC investigation in January suggested that the deaths of at least 56 babies could have been prevented at the Trust between 2019 and 2024. The families believe there is plenty of blame to go around: the individuals – Fiona says some of the staff involved in Aliona's birth are facing fitness-to-practise hearings, yet are still working in the meantime. As well as systemic failings within LTHT: that it has 'been aware of deep-rooted failings in maternity services for years and have relied on grieving and traumatised families staying silent or isolated, to evade accountability'. And finally, there's the regulator. 'I think the CQC are also responsible for the deaths of perfectly healthy children as well,' Fiona Winser-Ramm told the New Statesman.
In a statement, the CQC's Ford said that the inspection of Leeds in 2023 had been focused specifically on safety and leadership. 'We found some areas where the trust needed to improve and we made that clear, but we also identified some good practice,' she explained. Since then, the regulator had 'received a number of concerns from families and staff' which, alongside its own 'risk monitoring', prompted December's inspections. Action has already been taken to ensure safe staffing levels, she said, and maternity services at LTHT will continue to be closely monitored. Ford added that the CQC was working hard to continue to improve how the organisation listened to and involved 'people who use services when we assess quality and safety'.
In response to CQC's 'inadequate' ratings, the chief executive of Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Professor Phil Wood, said he was 'extremely sorry to the families who have lost their babies when receiving care in our hospitals'. He sought to reassure any new parents planning to have their baby in Leeds that the Trust was 'absolutely committed to providing safe, compassionate care' and that the 'vast majority' of 8,500 births each year are 'safe and positive experiences for our families'. Wood said he recognised the Trust needed to be 'better at listening to our staff and acting on their concerns' and that he was sorry it had 'fallen short'. Improvements to maternity services are already underway, he said, including the recruitment of 55 midwives since autumn 2024.
This is not the first time the CQC has been accused of failing to act on staff or family concerns. The regulator has been mentioned in each of the major maternity scandal reports of the past decade. Bill Kirkup's 2015 review into the deaths of babies at Morecambe Bay detailed how the CQC had declined to investigate maternity incidents in 2009 'principally on the grounds that the five incidents were deemed unconnected… but also because it was not thought that there were systemic problems'.
This was not the case. In 2022, Kirkup's investigation into maternity care at East Kent lamented that the regulator had given maternity services 'a less stringent rating' of 'requires improvement' when the Trust's overall grade was 'inadequate'. Unfortunately, Kirkup wrote, 'This implied that problems in maternity care were not as bad as elsewhere, not only downplaying the very significant problems that had existed for several years, but also deflecting attention to those areas seen as higher priorities.'
And at Shrewsbury and Telford, where it's thought 1,500 women and babies were harmed or died between 2000 and 2019, in as late as 2015 the CQC judged maternity services to be 'good'.
The former midwife Donna Ockenden, who led the inquiry into the Shrewsbury and Telford units, wrote that her team was 'concerned' that some of the findings of reviews carried out by the CQC and others 'gave false reassurance about maternity services at the Trust, despite repeated concerns being raised by families'. It was her view that 'opportunities were lost to have improved maternity services at the Trust sooner'.
For Fiona Winser-Ramm today is 'just the start'. On Tuesday (17 June), she and several other families met with the Health Secretary, Wes Streeting. They want both a full, independent inquiry into Leeds's maternity care, led by Ockenden (who is currently reviewing the cases of more than 2,000 families let down by maternity services in Nottingham) and a national public inquiry into maternity services. The latter must hold people to account and explain how we got to a point at which half of England's maternity units are inadequate or require improvement. Streeting, she says, truly listened and seemed moved. 'He now needs to do the right thing.'
[See also: Labour promised to fix the NHS but seems set on breaking it even more]
Related

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Daily Mirror

43 minutes ago

• Daily Mirror

'My hairdresser told me I had cancer - what happened next changed my life'

With many Brits forgetting daily sun protection and putting their skin at risk of long-term damage, it could be time to step up your SPF game. Abigail Barnes did after a routine hair appointment... It's important to look after your skin all year round, but in the summer it's even more vital to stay on top of your skincare. However, almost half of the UK population (45%) does not apply SPF on most days, putting them at risk of sunburn and skin damage. Dr Susan Mayou, co-founder and consultant dermatologist at Cadogan Clinic ( explains, 'What frequently happens is we get a burst of unexpected UV and people are caught unaware, or maybe it's not that hot but it's quite high UV. In the UK, this happens generally from about April and May onward. People don't realise that they need to be really good about their sun protection.' ‌ A recent survey by The British Skin Foundation revealed that 51% of Brits have experienced accidental sunburn. As well as not being prepared for high UV levels, not remembering to apply SPF to all exposed areas of skin is another contributing factor. ‌ 'People often forget they should put SPF on areas like the V of their chest,' says Dr Mayou. 'They remember their face but they'll be out doing something and forget there are other areas of the body they should have covered. 'Often I see people for a skin check who admit they've been sunburned in these situations. I check their skin for cancer, new moles and new pigmentation that's subsequently developed because, historically, they have often neglected to apply SPF.' Abigail Barnes, 45, a time management coach ( reveals how a skin cancer diagnosis changed her relationship with SPF... 'For a couple of years I'd noticed there was a persistent dry patch on my forehead, but I assumed it must be dry skin or psoriasis, so I thought nothing of it. However, during a trip to the hairdresser in 2019 I mentioned it in passing to my hairdresser, who replied, 'You should get that checked out. It could be cancer or something.' ‌ 'It was a throwaway comment and I felt it was a bit dramatic, but it made me keep a closer eye on it. Then, in 2021, I noticed it had gone from a dry patch to a scab that wouldn't heal. 'I phoned the doctor's surgery and booked an appointment. After sending my GP pictures of the area, I was referred to the dermatology unit and, in May, I underwent a biopsy. 'Two months later I received the news that it was skin cancer and needed to be removed. I couldn't believe it. I had honestly been expecting them to comeback and say it was nothing. 'Even though I had the diagnosis in front of me, it was still hard to take it in – right up until I had the operation in August to get rid of it. Now there's just a faint scar, but I religiously use factor 50 now, regardless of whether it's a sunny day or the middle of winter. 'As well as protecting me from UV rays, there's the anti-ageing benefits, too. Even if I'm not leaving my house, I put factor 50 on. I didn't in the past, but now it's just part of my daily routine.'

Metro

an hour ago

• Metro

This is why it seems like everyone has ADHD right now — including you

It might seem like 'everyone has ADHD right now' – but that couldn't be further from the truth (Picture: Metro) Opening up to a friend after I was diagnosed with ADHD, I voiced my struggles with time blindness, lateness, general disorganisation, and emotional dysregulation. 'But isn't it normal to get a little bit distracted sometimes? I probably have ADHD too, if that's the case' she said to me. My heart sank, feeling both rejected and my life experiences diminished in one simple interaction. I doubt she meant to upset me, but her words stung. There's an increasing perception that having ADHD is becoming a 'trend' or a 'personality quirk.' Just like OCD has been carelessly thrown about as being neat and tidy, ADHD is starting to become synonymous with making seemingly normal, harmless mistakes like misplacing a purse, or being 10 minutes late to a coffee date. As soon as I first read about ADHD in women, I knew that I had it. I once lost my house keys and paid my landlord for another set, only to find them wedged down the back of the sofa when I moved out. I also impulsively switched subjects during my GCSEs, A Levels and university; I had my library card revoked at the age of 10 after I failed to return the books I'd borrowed, and I'd spent my whole life feeling that my brain was simply a little bit different. So, does everyone really have ADHD now? Or are we just being equipped with the tools to navigate our own brains, and connecting with a like-minded community in the process? Have ADHD diagnoses increased in the last few years? In 2023, a study from UCL found that the number of people being diagnosed with ADHD has increased over the last 20 years, but this doesn't mean that 'everyone' has it now. Between 2000 and 2018, there was a twenty-fold increase in ADHD diagnoses, rising to almost fifty-fold in ADHD prescriptions issued to men aged 18-29. Largely owing to medical misogyny that favours research into symptoms in men and boys, women are still largely going undetected: the ADHD Foundation estimates that between 50 and 70% of the 1,000,000 women in the UK living with ADHD are undiagnosed. There might've been an increase in people seeking help for ADHD in recent years, but that doesn't mean that the condition is becoming more common. It still only impacts between 2% and 6% of the world's population. ADHD impacts between 2% and 6% of the population (Picture: Getty Images) Likewise, a 2025 review from King's College London looked at 40 studies across 17 countries and concluded that the prevalence of ADHD (AKA, the number of people living with a condition within a specific timeframe) hasn't increased since 2020. The author, Dr Alex Martin, noted that while much of the media has been concerned about a 'surge' in ADHD diagnoses, both 'assessments and help-seeking' are snowballing – which goes some way towards explaining why it might feel like more people have it now. There are also multiple barriers to diagnosis, including excessive NHS waiting times (as long as eight years in some parts of the UK), and the hefty cost of a private diagnosis, which averages out at £1,200 for adults. For many, self-diagnosis is their only option – and that's valid. Meeting the threshold for diagnosis Getting an ADHD diagnosis isn't an easy task, and psychiatrists certainly aren't handing them out like they're lollipops. To qualify, adults need to align with at least five symptoms on the DSM-5, the framework that's used to detect it. As psychologist and clinical director Dr Angela Pickering tells Metro, various symptoms of ADHD might seem relatable to the general non-neurodivergent public. But what differentiates these symptoms between being a normal part of life and being suggestive of neurodiversity is the frequency with which they happen and how debilitating they are. 'The key difference is that for someone with ADHD, these symptoms are persistent, pervasive and significantly impact their ability to function in daily life, across multiple settings such as work, school and relationships,' Dr Angela explains. ADHD isn't just being 'scatterbrained' or 'disorganised': in Angela's words, it's a 'neurodevelopmental condition rooted in differences in brain structure and function.' And so, a diagnosis doesn't just require checking off a few traits, but a 'detailed evaluation to understand the full context of a person's life and challenges.' As part of an ADHD assessment, psychiatrists will look at the pattern, intensity, and consistency of symptoms over time, even going as far as to ask a parent or family member to testify that their loved one's symptoms have longevity and started before the age of 12. When I was diagnosed in November 2021, I asked my mum to fill out the forms for me. Thankfully, she was able to recall with colour the school reports that were constantly telling me I was bright but needed to pay attention to detail and listen more; the eye tics that saw me blinking multiple times in a row, and my persistently hyperactive nature. I used to enjoy talking so much that I'd ask my parents if I could read my book aloud to them; my room was almost never tidy, and I had trouble paying attention in the classroom, often doodling into the line margins of my exercise books. So at the age of 23, I almost cried when I heard the words: 'you have combined ADHD' from my psychiatrist, as in one short moment, years of suffering were validated. Thankfully, I'd been able to skip the lengthy NHS waiting queue and had the cost of my private diagnosis funded through Right to Choose, so I was diagnosed within a matter of months, rather than years. Do you have ADHD, or is modern life just overwhelming? The reality is that, in the modern world, many of us will be feeling burnt out and overwhelmed by information. So, is it any surprise that we're increasingly distractible? As Dr Andrea explains: 'There's certainly growing evidence that people feel their environment – especially constant exposure to digital devices, social media and multitasking – can reduce attention spans and increase distractibility, even in people without ADHD.' With this in mind, the 'human brain simply didn't evolve to handle the level of information and stimulation we now face daily.' 'But while modern life can make anyone feel distracted, ADHD is a neurodevelopmental condition with symptoms that are consistent, long-standing and impairing across multiple areas of life,' she reminds us. So, whenever I hear people trivialising ADHD, I can't help but feel angry. It's not a quirky personality trait: it's an incredibly debilitating condition, and it's exhausting navigating a world designed by and for neurotypical people. ADHD isn't just losing your wallet or being a little bit 'scatty': it's so much more than that. Neurodiversity is finally in the limelight, and with awareness increasing, so many more people are sharing their stories. No doubt, it's saving lives. But the truth is that awareness without understanding is useless, and to suggest that 'everyone has it' diminishes the experiences of those who actually live with it. And no, it's not a 'superpower.' You don't have ADHD if you just forget your keys sometimes; you're probably just a regular human being living in an increasingly hectic world. Do you have a story to share? Get in touch by emailing MetroLifestyleTeam@ Arrow MORE: I'm desperate to lose my virginity but have a panic attack whenever I come close Arrow MORE: Video games are great for my mental and physical wellbeing – Reader's Feature Arrow MORE: Heston Blumenthal reveals touching wish after emotional moment with son

Daily Mail​

an hour ago

• Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE 'Miracle' side effect of common cosmetic procedure could help millions of Australians - but it'll set you back thousands

More Aussies are splashing the cash for Botox, but the trend isn't just for facial slimming, it's also helping sufferers of a painful medical condition. Nearly five million Australians experience migraines with 7.6 per cent of patients struggling with the debilitating effects more than 15 days a month, a study by Headaches Australia found. Yet despite costing the economy an estimated $35.7billion per year, patients using a procedure proven to reduce the frequency and severity of migraines need to pay out of pocket. Kate Sowden, a nurse and co-founder of Brisbane's BeautyFULL Cosmetic Medical Clinic, has noticed an increase in customers requesting jaw Botox, also known as Masseter Botox, for migraine relief. While she cannot treat migraines, she has noticed that customers who have Botox in their jaw suffer less headaches. 'I first heard about Masseter Botox being associated with migraine relief a few years ago, through both clinical discussions and feedback from patients who noticed their headaches had eased following treatment,' Ms Sowden told Daily Mail Australia. 'Masseter Botox is primarily used to help with jaw tension, teeth grinding and facial slimming, with reports of reduced headache frequency coming as a welcomed side effect.' While Botox is making waves for its medicinal applications, it is still often dismissed as only a cosmetic tool by doctors. 'Awareness has definitely grown in the past 12 to 18 months. Social media, TikTok especially, has played a big role in bringing treatments like Masseter Botox into mainstream conversations,' Ms Sowden said. 'It has helped to move away from the use for aesthetic reasons, to the use for functional benefits. 'Still, many people are surprised to learn that this kind of injectable can potentially help with tension-related symptoms.' Jude Kingston began using Masseter Botox four years ago after suffering an average of one migraine a week. 'Now I get maybe one every six weeks and, for me, the Botox normally lasts about four months,' she told Daily Mail Australia. Despite the success seen in Ms Kingston and several other Masseter Botox patients, the muscle relaxing treatment is not subsidised unless patients see a specialist. 'Cosmetic Botox, including Masseter treatment for jaw tension or aesthetic concerns, is not covered by Medicare or private health insurance in Australia,' Ms Sowden said. 'Only neurologist-administered therapeutic Botox for chronic migraines, offered under specific criteria, may qualify for a Medicare subsidy. 'It's essential that clients seeking medical migraine treatment go through the proper diagnostic channels with a neurologist.' While it's important for patients to ensure they're suited to the treatment, seeing a specialist and meeting the current subsidy criteria is a long and costly process. In order to qualify, patients must have suffered more than 15 days of headache in a month, tried at least three migraine treatments, be managed for medication overuse headache, treated by a neurologist and over 18 years old. Even if they pass eligibility, the Botox must be prescribed and administered by a neurologist. Pricing at Ms Sowden's clinic starts at $400 per session but 'varies based on muscle strength and how many units are required'. The effects of the treatment last between three and five months. 'We've definitely noticed more people enquiring about Masseter Botox in the context of migraines over the past year,' Ms Sowden said. 'Many are either undiagnosed or struggling to find long-term solutions, and come across muscle relaxant options online. 'In a cosmetic clinic like ours, we don't treat migraines medically but we can offer Masseter Botox for clients dealing with jaw clenching, TMJ discomfort, or bruxism.