The shocking affects of hitting the snooze button in the morning!
A recent study by Mass General Brigham reveals that over half of sleep sessions involve snoozing, averaging 11 minutes of extra rest. Researchers analyzed sleep data from over 21,000 users, finding heavy snooze users exhibit erratic sleep schedules. Experts warn that snoozing disrupts restorative sleep stages, particularly REM sleep, and advise against its use for optimal rest.
O
ften, when someone aims to wake up at 6 a.m., the temptation to steal a few extra minutes of sleep by hitting the snooze button is all too common. It feels like a harmless indulgence.
A few peaceful moments before the day begins. But are those brief moments of rest really doing anything good for the body? A new study suggests that those couple of moments might be doing more harm than good.
A new study led by researchers at Mass General Brigham found that, despite sleep experts warning against using the snooze function on an alarm clock, it's a common practice. The findings are published in
Scientific Reports
.
Though sleep experts recommend against snoozing after a wake-up alarm, the new study found that more than 50% of sleep sessions included snoozing, with users averaging 11 minutes of extra rest.
To understand how people use the snooze function, the researchers analyzed more than 3 million nights of sleep data from over 21,000 users of the Sleep Cycle app. They found that the snooze function was used in nearly 56% of logged sleep sessions.
Around 45% of study subjects hit the snooze button on more than 80% of mornings. These heavy users snoozed, on average, 20 minutes a day.
'Many of us hit the snooze alarm in the morning with the hope of getting a 'little more sleep,' but this widely practiced phenomenon has received little attention in sleep research.
In a global sample we found that more than half of sleep sessions end in a snooze alarm, and users spent an average of 11 minutes in between snooze alarms each morning before waking,' lead author Rebecca Robbins, PhD, in the Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders Medicine at Brigham and Women's Hospital, a founding member of the Mass General Brigham healthcare system said in a statement.
Interestingly, the dependency on the snooze button varied by day of the week. More snooze alarms were used during the typical work week (Monday through Friday), with the lowest snooze alarm utilization on Saturday and Sunday mornings!
The researchers also found that snooze alarm was used less among those
sleeping
five or fewer hours.
This could be because short sleepers are cutting sleep short due to occupational responsibilities, which would require them to wake up and start their day, leaving little time for a snooze. Meanwhile, the heavy users of the snooze alarm (those relying on the snooze alarm on more than 80% of mornings studied) spent on average 20 minutes in between snooze alarms. The researchers noticed that heavy snooze alarm users also showed more erratic sleep schedules than other categories of users.
Covid Strikes India Again: 1,000 Active Cases in the Country, Kerala Tops List | All You Should Know
While many think the snooze button is saving them some sleep, in reality, it is disrupting restorative sleep.
'Unfortunately, the snooze alarm disrupts some of the most important stages of sleep. The hours just before waking are rich in rapid eye movement sleep. Hitting the snooze alarm will interrupt these critical stages of sleep and typically only offer you light sleep in between snooze alarms. The best approach for optimizing your sleep and next day performance is to set your alarm for the latest possible time, then commit to getting out of bed when your first alarm goes off,' Robbins added.
The researchers also noticed that people living in the US, Sweden, and Germany had the highest snooze button use, while those living in Japan and Australia had the lowest.
One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
4 days ago
- News18
Fish Suffer In Pain For 20 Minutes Before Dying Out Of Water, Says New Study
Last Updated: Fish like rainbow trout suffer for up to 20 minutes when killed by air suffocation. Within just a minute of air exposure, they show severe stress and pain, says a new study A recent scientific study has revealed that fish such as rainbow trout, which are killed for human consumption, experience severe pain for two to 20 minutes after being removed from water. This shocking finding was published in the journal Scientific Reports, which examined air asphyxiation, a common method of killing fish, where fish are left to suffocate in the open air. On average, rainbow trout endure moderate to severe pain for 10 minutes during this process. Pain Begins in Just 60 Seconds The study found that within just one minute of being exposed to air, fish begin to show serious signs of stress. This stress response is far more intense than that caused by other common triggers like crowding, handling, or low oxygen levels. Within 60 seconds, fish begin to suffer from hydromineral imbalance, a disruption in the balance of water and minerals in their body, which further increases their pain and discomfort. Ice Slurry Method Causes Even More Suffering In some places, fish are killed by placing them in ice-cold water. However, the study states this method may be even more painful. In ice water, the fish's metabolism slows down, meaning it takes longer for them to lose consciousness. As a result, they stay alive and in pain for a longer time. According to the study, for every dollar spent, it is possible to reduce animal suffering by 1 to 20 hours, making this not just humane, but also highly cost-effective. Co-author of the research, Vladimir Alonso, explained that the study used a scientific model called the Welfare Footprint Framework, which provides a transparent way to assess the well-being of animals. He believes the findings could help policymakers reduce the suffering of the 2.2 trillion unfarmed and 171 billion farmed fish killed globally each year. This research highlights not just the importance of humane treatment for fish, but also the potential for science and policy to work together in making food production less cruel.
NDTV
14-06-2025
- NDTV
Fish Endure Intense Pain Up To 20 Minutes When Killed, New Study Finds
A new study has shown that fish, such as rainbow trout, suffer between two to 20 minutes of intense pain when they are killed for food. The study findings, published in the journal Scientific Reports, focused on a common method of slaughtering fish called air asphyxiation, where fish are deprived of oxygen. It showed that the rainbow trout endures an average of 10 minutes of moderate to intense pain during air asphyxiation. Animal welfare groups have called out this method, stating that it is an inhumane process given the amount of time it takes them to lose consciousness. "As little as 60 seconds of air exposure has been shown to elicit a physiological stress response consistently greater than that triggered by longer-lasting stressor," the study highlighted. "Notably, air exposure is the only stressor capable of causing hydromineral disturbance within such a short time frame. Other stressors (eg, hypoxia, crowding, handling) require longer exposure to elicit comparable responses." The findings also showed that stuffing fish in ice slurry after catching them could cause even greater pain. During this process, the metabolic process of the fish is slowed down while the lower temperatures extend the time to unconsciousness -- inflicting further misery on these organisms. The study suggested that electrical stunning, if implemented properly, could significantly reduce the pain experienced by fish -- potentially averting one to 20 hours of moderate to extreme pain for every dollar spent. "These findings provide transparent, evidence-grounded and comparable metrics to guide cost–benefit decisions and inform slaughter regulation," it stated. The researchers hope that the findings could help improve the welfare of up to 2.2 trillion wild and 171 billion farmed fish killed every year for human consumption. "The Welfare Footprint Framework provides a rigorous and transparent evidence-based approach to measuring animal welfare and enables informed decisions about where to allocate resources for the greatest impact," said Wladimir Alonso, a co-author of the study. "These findings provide transparent, evidence-grounded and comparable metrics to guide cost-benefit decisions and inform slaughter regulations and practices in trout."
Time of India
12-06-2025
- Time of India
Harvard study says Vitamin D may actually slow down aging
What if popping a daily vitamin could help keep you younger—at least at the cellular level? A new study from researchers at Harvard-affiliated Mass General Brigham and the Medical College of Georgia says that vitamin D supplements might actually slow down biological aging. Yes, you read that right. The study, published in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, focused on telomeres—tiny protective caps at the ends of your chromosomes. As we age, these tips wear down, which is linked to age-related diseases like heart problems, certain cancers, and more. The shorter the telomeres, the more worn out your cells are. Now, here's where it gets cool: Researchers looked at data from the well-known VITAL study—a long-term clinical trial where participants were randomly given either vitamin D3 (2,000 IU/day), omega-3 fatty acids (1 g/day), or a placebo. The telomere sub-study followed over 1,000 people (women 55+ and men 50+) for up to four years. The results? Those taking vitamin D had significantly less telomere shortening compared to those on placebo. In fact, vitamin D slowed the rate of cellular aging by what would've been the equivalent of nearly three years! That's a pretty big deal when you're trying to keep your cells (and yourself) feeling young. Omega-3s, on the other hand, didn't seem to make much of a difference in this case—at least not for telomere length. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Perdagangkan CFD Emas dengan Broker Tepercaya IC Markets Mendaftar Undo While more research is always welcome, this study adds to growing evidence that vitamin D does more than just support your bones and immunity. It may also be quietly working behind the scenes to keep your cells younger, longer. 'VITAL is the first large-scale and long-term randomized trial to show that vitamin D supplements protect telomeres and preserve telomere length,' said co-author JoAnn Manson, the principal investigator of VITAL and chief of the Division of Preventive Medicine at Harvard-affiliated Brigham and Women's Hospital and the Michael and Lee Bell Professor of Women's Health at Harvard Medical School. 'This is of particular interest because VITAL had also shown benefits of vitamin D in reducing inflammation and lowering risks of selected chronic diseases of aging, such as advanced cancer and autoimmune disease,' said Manson. 'Our findings suggest that targeted vitamin D supplementation may be a promising strategy to counter a biological aging process, although further research is warranted,' said Haidong Zhu, first author of the report and a molecular geneticist at the Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University. Vitamin D is one of those nutrients that quietly does a ton of important stuff in your body—and most of us don't even realize we're running low on it. Nicknamed the 'sunshine vitamin' because your body makes it when sunlight hits your skin, vitamin D helps your bones stay strong by making sure you absorb enough calcium. Without it, your bones can get weak, brittle, and way more prone to breaking. But that's just the beginning. Vitamin D also supports your immune system—so you're better equipped to fight off colds, flu, and even chronic inflammation. Some studies say it may help improve your mood, too, and there's growing research linking low vitamin D to issues like depression, fatigue, and brain fog. The catch? A lot of us don't get enough sun, especially if we're indoors all day or live in cloudy places. That's where food and supplements come in—fatty fish, egg yolks, fortified milk, or a daily D3 capsule can help fill the gap. Don't ghost your vitamin D. So if you've been slacking on your vitamin D intake (especially if you're not getting much sun), this might be the nudge you needed to start adding it to your daily routine. One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change
