Saks Global Report: Intent to Spend on Luxury Softens
America's luxury consumers are down on the economy — and that's no surprise to Saks Global.
On Tuesday, the retailer detailed the results of the latest Saks Global Luxury Pulse survey to WWD, getting into the heads of luxury consumers. The survey found that optimism about the economy continues to decline, driven by economic uncertainty and market volatility.
More from WWD
Saks Said to Pursue Joint Venture to Expand Bergdorf Goodman
Saks Global Hits 'Turning Point,' According to CEO Marc Metrick
Saks Secures $350M in Financing to 'Fortify' Balance Sheet
Fielded from April 24 to April 28, the Luxury Pulse indicated that America's affluent have been affected by market volatility and flip-flopping tariffs, are worried about a possible recession and are increasingly discerning when spending on luxury. The quarterly survey gathered responses online from 1,248 U.S.-based luxury consumers over age 18 during a time when many of the tariffs in U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war had been paused, starting a 90-day period of negotiation.
Among luxury consumers, the top five concerns are the general social and political climate, a potential recession, personal financial security, stock market volatility and ongoing global conflict.
'We've been doing these surveys for a few years and this is another one of those market declines,' said Emily Essner, president and chief commercial officer of Saks Global. 'This is a meaningful decline.'
But the situation isn't entirely bad. 'While we saw a decline in how consumers felt about the macro environment, we also saw optimism about their personal finances.' The luxury spending is more tied to how consumer feel about the macro environment, rather than their personal finances, she said.
In addition, 'When we think about higher-income spenders, they are last in, first out,' Essner said, meaning, they're the last group to put the reins on spending during challenging economic times, and the first to rev up their spending when the economy rebounds.
'There is still a desire to spend for moments that are special,' Essner said, referring to holidays, birthdays and other special occasions.
While the survey showed economic sentiments declining, Essner did suggest that attitudes could have changed for the better since the survey was taken in April. Saks' next Luxury Pulse, to be taken during the summer, could tell a different story from the latest one.
'The most important thing is to understand where their heads are at,' Essner said. The Luxury Pulse, she said, is an important tool for that, helping Saks executives plan and forecast their business.
Given the shifting attitudes among consumers, Essner said the company has to work harder to convey the value, timeliness and high quality of the fashion products it sells and to emphasize that much of the assortment contains 'investment pieces' meaning they'll last well into the future and are not trendy.
In addition, given the state of mind of the luxury consumer, personalization has become an even more important part of the Saks Global strategy, Essner said. Asked if Saks will be more promotional, Essner replied, 'We wouldn't anticipate significantly changing our approach.'
While acknowledging that consumers do get more motivated to shop during strong promotions, Essner said that, 'In the end, our strategy is to be decreasing promotionality overall,' and to be more 'targeted' with promotions.
Essner also acknowledged that given the dynamic nature of the macro environment and consumer attitudes, planning becomes more challenging. 'It's definitely hard to think six to eight months down the road,' she said.
She also said there were no indicators that luxury consumers were shifting discretionary dollars to areas such as travel and entertainment at the expense of fashion.
Among the key findings from the Luxury Pulse:
The luxury consumer's intent to spend on luxury has softened compared to recent surveys, with 47 percent planning to spend the same or more on luxury in the next three months. This represents the lowest level since tracking by Saks began in April 2023, and a decline of 11 percentage points compared with the prior survey.
Twenty-eight percent of respondents reported feeling optimistic about the economy, which is a decline of 13 percentage points compared with the prior survey fielded in January 2025 and a decline of 17 percentage points compared with the survey fielded in April 2024.
Luxury consumers are feeling significantly less calm about the economy, with 32 percent feeling calm, representing a decline of 13 percentage points compared with the prior survey and down 22 percentage points compared with the same time last year.
Despite a decrease in optimism about the economy, the majority of luxury consumers remain optimistic about their personal finances. Sixty-seven percent of those with an income of $200,000 or more said they feel prepared when it comes to their personal finances.
'As the expert on the luxury consumer, we know that uncertainty in the macro environment impacts their intent to spend on luxury. With that in mind, we believe it's our responsibility as the largest multibrand luxury retailer in the world to adapt to the uncertainty by demonstrating the value of our experience and quality of our luxury assortment,' Essner said in a prepared statement.
Formerly known as the Saks Luxury Pulse, following the completion of Saks Global's acquisition of Neiman Marcus and Bergdorf Goodman in December, the survey's scope broadened and it was rebranded as the Saks Global Luxury Pulse. Revenues at the Saks banner fell 20 percent last year, which the company blamed on 'disrupted inventory flow' while Neiman Marcus was down 2 percent. Saks Global also includes the Saks Off 5th offprice business.
Best of WWD
Macy's Is Closing 66 Stores in 2025 — Here's the List, Live Updates
Inside the Demise of Lord & Taylor
COVID-19 Spikes Elevate Retail Concerns
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fast Company
22 minutes ago
- Fast Company
How oil prices are faring after U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear sites
Global markets appeared to take the U.S. strike against nuclear targets in Iran in stride as investors watched Monday to see how Iran will react. The price of oil initially jumped more than 2%, fell and then regained about half that much. U.S. stock futures edged lower and share benchmarks in Europe and Asia also were mostly lower. The attacks on three Iranian sites raised the stakes in the war between Israel and Iran and left questions about what remains of Tehran's nuclear program. It also increased the possibility that Iran might retaliate, potentially disrupting shipping through the narrow Strait of Hormuz, a waterway through which much of the world's crude oil passes. The big unknown is what Iran will do, analysts said. The price of Brent crude oil, the international standard, was up 1.2% at $77.91 per barrel. U.S. benchmark crude climbed 1.3% to $74.79. The future for the S&P 500 was little changed, while that for the Dow Jones Industrial Average was down 0.1%. Treasury yields were steady. In Europe, Germany's DAX lost 0.5% to 23,230.54 and the CAC 40 in Paris fell 0.6% to 7,541.25. Britain's FTSE 100 shed 0.2% to 8,761.53. Overall, there was no sign of panic. 'I believe what we are thinking is or the thinking is that it is going to be a short conflict. The one big hit by the Americans will be effective and then we'll get back to sort of business as usual, in which case there is no need for an immediate, panicky type of reaction,' said Neil Newman, managing director of Atris Advisory Japan. The conflict began with an Israeli attack against Iran on June 13 that sent oil prices yo-yoing and rattled other markets. Closing off the Strait of Hormuz would be technically difficult but it could severely disrupt transit through it, sending insurance rates spiking and making shippers nervous to move without U.S. Navy escorts. As a major oil producer, Iran may be reluctant to close down the waterway, which is used to transport its own crude, mostly to China. Oil is a major revenue source for the regime. 'The situation remains highly fluid, and much hinges on whether Tehran opts for a restrained reaction or a more aggressive course of action,' Kristian Kerr, head of macro strategy at LPL Financial in Charlotte, North Carolina, said in a commentary. Speaking to Fox News on Sunday, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said disrupting traffic through the strait would be 'economic suicide' and would elicit a U.S. response. 'I would encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them about that because they heavily depend on the Strait of Hormuz for their oil,' Rubio said. When asked about that at a routine briefing in Beijing, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun told reporters in Beijing that 'China is willing to strengthen communication with Iran and relevant parties to continue playing a constructive role in promoting de-escalation' of the conflict. 'The Persian Gulf and its adjacent waters are important international channels for cargo and energy trade. Maintaining security and stability in this region serves the common interests of the international community,' he said. Tom Kloza, chief market analyst at Turner Mason & Co said he expects Iranian leaders to refrain from drastic measures and oil futures to ease back after the initial fears blow over. Disrupting shipping would be 'a scorched earth possibility, a Sherman-burning-Atlanta move,' Kloza said. Writing in a report, Ed Yardeni, a long-time analyst, agreed that Tehran leaders would likely hold back. 'They aren't crazy,' he wrote in a note to investors Sunday. 'The price of oil should fall and stock markets around the world should climb higher.' Other experts weren't so sure. Countries are not always rational actors and Tehran could lash out for political or emotional reasons, said Andy Lipow, a Houston analyst who has covered oil markets for 45 years. 'If the Strait of Hormuz was completely shut down, oil prices would rise to $120 to $130 a barrel,' Lipow said. That would translate to about $4.50 a gallon at the pump and hurt consumers in other ways, he said. Much of East Asia depends on oil imported through the strait. Taiwan's Taiex fell 1.4% while the Kospi in South Korea slipped 0.2%. In Tokyo, the Nikkei 225 edged 0.1% lower, with gains for defense contractors, oil companies and miners helping to make up for broad losses. 'The U.S. strike on Iran certainly is very good for defense equipment,' Newman of Atris Advisory said, noting that both Japan and South Korea have sizable military manufacturing hubs. Australia's S&P/ASX fell 0.4%. Hong Kong's Hang Seng regained lost ground, climbing 0.7%, while the Shanghai Composite index picked up 0.7%.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The Top 5 Analyst Questions From Teradyne's Q1 Earnings Call
Teradyne's first quarter results landed in line with Wall Street's revenue expectations, but market reaction was negative following the earnings release. Management attributed the quarter's year-over-year sales growth to demand in its semiconductor test (Semi Test) business, particularly for mobile system-on-chip (SoC) testers, as well as increased activity in AI accelerator testing. CEO Greg Smith clarified that mobile demand was driven by supply chain transitions rather than an end-market recovery, and noted that the company's memory business secured a new high bandwidth memory (HBM4) test win. While product mix benefited gross margins, management pointed to ongoing challenges in the robotics segment and a generally cautious near-term outlook due to persistent uncertainty around customer capital spending. Is now the time to buy TER? Find out in our full research report (it's free). Revenue: $685.7 million vs analyst estimates of $683.9 million (14.3% year-on-year growth, in line) Adjusted EPS: $0.75 vs analyst estimates of $0.62 (21.7% beat) Adjusted EBITDA: $166.3 million vs analyst estimates of $144.9 million (24.3% margin, 14.8% beat) Revenue Guidance for Q2 CY2025 is $645 million at the midpoint, roughly in line with what analysts were expecting Adjusted EPS guidance for Q2 CY2025 is $0.53 at the midpoint, below analyst estimates of $0.53 Operating Margin: 17.6%, up from 13% in the same quarter last year Inventory Days Outstanding: 116, up from 88 in the previous quarter Market Capitalization: $13.84 billion While we enjoy listening to the management's commentary, our favorite part of earnings calls are the analyst questions. Those are unscripted and can often highlight topics that management teams would rather avoid or topics where the answer is complicated. Here is what has caught our attention. Krish Sankar (TD Cowen) asked how tariffs are affecting customer order patterns. CEO Greg Smith responded that pushouts are mainly from automotive and industrial customers, while mobile demand remains stable for now. C.J. Muse (Cantor Fitzgerald) probed for full-year gross margin expectations. CFO Sanjay Mehta explained that margin variability will depend on product mix and top-line trends, and management is not providing full-year guidance due to uncertainty. Timothy Arcuri (UBS) inquired about the timing and impact of the record robotics order. Smith clarified that shipments are spread across Q1 and Q2, with no immediate extension into the second half. Priyanka Thapa (JPMorgan) asked whether tariffs have shifted customer preferences to non-U.S. suppliers. Smith replied that tariffs have not led to a loss of competitive positioning or caused customers to switch vendors. Shane Brett (Morgan Stanley) questioned what would drive renewed demand in the NAND memory testing market. Smith pointed to mobile phone volume growth and evolving AI-enabled device requirements as key factors. Looking ahead, the StockStory team will be watching (1) how global trade policy developments and tariffs influence customer spending and order timing, (2) whether Semi Test and memory growth can offset continued softness in robotics and product test, and (3) progress on new product initiatives such as silicon photonics testing and enterprise robotics automation. Shifts in customer capital spending and execution on cost controls will also be critical indicators. Teradyne currently trades at $86.92, up from $76.83 just before the earnings. Is the company at an inflection point that warrants a buy or sell? Find out in our full research report (it's free). The market surged in 2024 and reached record highs after Donald Trump's presidential victory in November, but questions about new economic policies are adding much uncertainty for 2025. While the crowd speculates what might happen next, we're homing in on the companies that can succeed regardless of the political or macroeconomic environment. Put yourself in the driver's seat and build a durable portfolio by checking out our Top 6 Stocks for this week. This is a curated list of our High Quality stocks that have generated a market-beating return of 183% over the last five years (as of March 31st 2025). Stocks that made our list in 2020 include now familiar names such as Nvidia (+1,545% between March 2020 and March 2025) as well as under-the-radar businesses like the once-small-cap company Exlservice (+354% five-year return). Find your next big winner with StockStory today. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Wall Street Journal
2 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
Iran Has an Oil Card to Play. So Does the U.S.
This is an online version of Spencer's Markets A.M. newsletter. Get investing insights in your inbox each weekday by signing up here—it's free. With oil prices rising after the U.S. decision to bomb Iran, investors are quickly analyzing the nightmare scenario: an Iranian closure of the Strait of Hormuz, the world's main energy shipping artery. Oil prices could hit triple digits in that event.
