Trump officials are vowing to end school desegregation orders. Some parents say they're still needed

FERRIDAY, La. (AP) — Even at a glance, the differences are obvious. The walls of Ferriday High School are old and worn, surrounded by barbed wire. Just a few miles away, Vidalia High School is clean and bright, with a new library and a crisp blue 'V' painted on orange brick.
Ferriday High is 90% Black. Vidalia High is 62% white.
For Black families, the contrast between the schools suggests 'we're not supposed to have the finer things,' said Brian Davis, a father in Ferriday. 'It's almost like our kids don't deserve it,' he said.
The schools are part of Concordia Parish, which was ordered to desegregate 60 years ago and remains under a court-ordered plan to this day. Yet there's growing momentum to release the district — and dozens of others — from decades-old orders that some call obsolete.
In a remarkable reversal, the Justice Department said it plans to start unwinding court-ordered desegregation plans dating to the Civil Rights Movement. Officials started in April, when they lifted a 1960s order in Louisiana's Plaquemines Parish. Harmeet Dhillon, who leads the department's civil rights division, has said others will 'bite the dust.'
It comes amid pressure from Republican Gov. Jeff Landry and his attorney general, who have called for all the state's remaining orders to be lifted. They describe the orders as burdens on districts and relics of a time when Black students were still forbidden from some schools.
The orders were always meant to be temporary — school systems can be released if they demonstrate they fully eradicated segregation. Decades later, that goal remains elusive, with stark racial imbalances persisting in many districts.
Civil rights groups say the orders are important to keep as tools to address the legacy of forced segregation — including disparities in student discipline, academic programs and teacher hiring. They point to cases like Concordia, where the decades-old order was used to stop a charter school from favoring white students in admissions.
'Concordia is one where it's old, but a lot is happening there,' said Deuel Ross, deputy director of litigation for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund. 'That's true for a lot of these cases. They're not just sitting silently.'
Debates over integration are far from settled
Last year, before President Donald Trump took office, Concordia Parish rejected a Justice Department plan that would have ended its case if the district combined several majority white and majority Black elementary and middle schools.
At a town hall meeting, Vidalia residents vigorously opposed the plan, saying it would disrupt students' lives and expose their children to drugs and violence. An official from the Louisiana attorney general's office spoke against the proposal and said the Trump administration likely would change course on older orders.
Accepting the plan would have been a 'death sentence' for the district, said Paul Nelson, a former Concordia superintendent. White families would have fled to private schools or other districts, said Nelson, who wants the court order removed.
'It's time to move on,' said Nelson, who left the district in 2016. 'Let's start looking to build for the future, not looking back to what our grandparents may have gone through.'
At Ferriday High, athletic coach Derrick Davis supported combining schools in Ferriday and Vidalia. He said the district's disparities come into focus whenever his teams visit schools with newer sports facilities.
'It seems to me, if we'd all combine, we can all get what we need,' he said.
Others oppose merging schools if it's done solely for the sake of achieving racial balance. 'Redistricting and going to different places they're not used to ... it would be a culture shock to some people," said Ferriday's school resource officer, Marcus Martin, who like Derrick Davis is Black.
The district's current superintendent and school board did not respond to requests for comment.
Federal orders offer leverage for racial discrimination cases
Concordia is among more than 120 districts across the South that remain under desegregation orders from the 1960s and '70s, including about a dozen in Louisiana.
Calling the orders historical relics is 'unequivocally false,' said Shaheena Simons, who until April led the Justice Department section that oversees school desegregation cases.
'Segregation and inequality persist in our schools, and they persist in districts that are still under desegregation orders,' she said.
With court orders in place, families facing discrimination can reach out directly to the Justice Department or seek relief from the court. Otherwise, the only recourse is a lawsuit, which many families can't afford, Simons said.
In Concordia, the order played into a battle over a charter school that opened in 2013 on the former campus of an all-white private school. To protect the area's progress on racial integration, a judge ordered Delta Charter School to build a student body that reflected the district's racial demographics. But in its first year, the school was just 15% Black.
After a court challenge, Delta was ordered to give priority to Black students. Today, about 40% of its students are Black.
Desegregation orders have been invoked recently in other cases around the state. One led to an order to address disproportionately high rates of discipline for Black students, and in another a predominantly Black elementary school was relocated from a site close to a chemical plant.
The Justice Department could easily end some desegregation orders
The Trump administration was able to close the Plaquemines case with little resistance because the original plaintiffs are no longer involved — the Justice Department was litigating the case alone. Concordia and an unknown number of other districts are in the same situation, making them vulnerable to quick dismissals.
Concordia's case dates to 1965, when the area was strictly segregated and home to a violent offshoot of the Ku Klux Klan. When Black families in Ferriday sued for access to all-white schools, the federal government intervened.
As the district integrated its schools, white families fled Ferriday. The district's schools came to reflect the demographics of their surrounding areas. Ferriday is mostly Black and low-income, while Vidalia is mostly white and takes in tax revenue from a hydroelectric plant. A third town in the district, Monterey, has a high school that's 95% white.
At the December town hall, Vidalia resident Ronnie Blackwell said the area 'feels like a Mayberry, which is great,' referring to the fictional Southern town from 'The Andy Griffith Show.' The federal government, he said, has 'probably destroyed more communities and school systems than it ever helped.'
Under its court order, Concordia must allow students in majority Black schools to transfer to majority white schools. It also files reports on teacher demographics and student discipline.
After failing to negotiate a resolution with the Justice Department, Concordia is scheduled to make its case that the judge should dismiss the order, according to court documents. Meanwhile, amid a wave of resignations in the federal government, all but two of the Justice Department lawyers assigned to the case have left.
Without court supervision, Brian Davis sees little hope for improvement.
'A lot of parents over here in Ferriday, they're stuck here because here they don't have the resources to move their kids from A to B," he said. 'You'll find schools like Ferriday — the term is, to me, slipping into darkness."
___
The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

News24

9 hours ago

• News24

SA schools are failing — but new research from Nigeria offers hope

A new working paper from Nigeria offers a glimpse of what an artificial intelligence-augmented education might look like. In Benin City, researchers ran an experiment in nine ordinary public schools. The intervention was modest, but the results were anything but, says Johan Fourie. Anyone who occasionally opens a South African newspaper will know the story: most of our public schools are failing. But for those who have grown numb to these stories, a few numbers should still jolt you awake. Four out of five Grade 4 learners cannot read for meaning in any language. One in four learners will repeat Grade 10. One in five teachers is absent on Mondays and Fridays, and one in three are absent at the end of the month. These are not new problems. I distinctly remember sitting in a development economics class in the early 2000s, wrestling with the challenge of South Africa's poor education outcomes. Back then, the prevailing hope was that these were teething issues: a temporary hangover from the transition to democracy, soon to be fixed by a public school system finding its feet. I was optimistic that steady investment and reform would deliver the turnaround we needed. But two decades of painfully slow progress have forced me to reconsider. I now find myself firmly in the voucher camp. The idea is straightforward: instead of allocating government funding directly to schools, each child would receive a voucher – say, R20 000 per year – which they could use to enrol at the school of their choice, public or private. The logic is that real choice, backed by state support, would foster healthy competition between schools, driving up quality far more quickly than our current approach. If anything is going to shake us out of this rut, it is giving families the power to choose. But ideas like that rarely get off the ground, not because they lack merit, but because there are too many vested interests determined to block any radical change. Powerful groups stand to lose if old certainties are upended, and so real reform is strangled before it even begins. Any solution to our education crisis must, somehow, find a way to keep almost everyone on board – at least at the start. So let me offer one solution. A new working paper from Nigeria offers a glimpse of what an artificial intelligence-augmented education might look like. In Benin City, researchers ran an experiment in nine ordinary public schools: invite students in for after-school English lessons, but with a twist. Instead of a chalkboard, each child sat at a computer, learning English with the help of ChatGPT-4. The intervention was modest – just 12 sessions over six weeks – but the results were anything but. By the end, students who attended the AI-supported classes outperformed their peers by more than 0.3 standard deviations on the final assessment. That might sound modest, but it equates to nearly two years' worth of typical learning gains. Crucially, these were not just superficial improvements in digital skills or answering AI-generated trivia. The most significant gains were in English itself. The researchers found that students who participated in the AI tutoring also scored much higher on their standard end-of-year English exams – the same exams taken by all students, covering the entire year's curriculum. As the authors put it, the impact of the intervention extended well beyond the brief six weeks of the programme. In simple terms: a short burst of AI-assisted tutoring delivered learning improvements that our traditional schooling system has failed to achieve in years. There are subtleties worth noting. The programme benefited all students, regardless of their starting point, but the strongest effects were seen among those who had performed better before, and among girls, who started with lower scores but made up ground. The more sessions a child attended, the bigger the gains: the researchers estimate that a full year of AI-augmented tutoring could boost achievement by up to two standard deviations, a remarkably large effect. And the real surprise: it was almost absurdly cheap to run. When the researchers did the maths, they discovered the programme yielded the equivalent of more than three years of schooling for every $100 spent, an efficiency that leaves traditional interventions in the dust. For a country, or even a continent, grappling with limited resources and a rapidly urbanising population demanding education, results like these shift the boundaries of what's possible. If one study is not enough to convince you, then let me add a second, meta-analysis study, published just last month in Nature Humanities & Social Sciences Communications. The authors summarise the results of 44 research papers reporting the impact of ChatGPT on learner improvement. Their conclusion? The 'calculated effect size indicates a large positive impact'. In short: yes, ChatGPT boosts education outcomes significantly. So, if I were to advise the Minister of Basic Education, here's what I would recommend we implement tomorrow: make free AI tutors available to every child in a public school. The early evidence is persuasive enough that, for once, this is a bet worth taking. But I suspect it won't be nearly so straightforward. The Minister will inevitably run into the same old obstacle: vociferous, well-organised teacher unions with plenty of political clout. Sensing that AI tutors might expose just how poorly their members have been performing, the unions will do everything possible to block implementation. They'll point out, quite rightly, that Large Language Models can hallucinate, but quietly sidestep the mounting evidence that many teachers in under-resourced schools are just as likely to get things wrong. They'll insist that education is about more than rote learning; it's about instilling values, fostering citizenship, and shaping the next generation. In theory, this is correct, but in practice, it rings hollow when so many teachers struggle to attend a full week of lessons. When pressed, unions will argue, as they have before, that wider factors in the classroom prevent teacher success, yet they remain reluctant to experiment with alternative approaches that might address these very issues. The result is all too familiar: rhetoric about the sanctity of education, and resistance to anything that might unsettle the status quo. So, here's a second proposal for the Minister: bring the teacher unions on board by paying them to help implement AI tutors in a random selection of schools across the country. Guarantee the salaries of all teachers for the next five years as part of this national pilot. No one loses out, and everyone has the chance to see what works. Even better, equip the participating teachers with their own AI tutors, allowing them to develop new skills alongside their students. At the end of five years, if education outcomes show no improvement, the programme can be cancelled. But if the results match those from Nigeria, with a clear and substantial boost, then it should become the new standard everywhere. AI tutors could also help address another looming crisis: as the teaching workforce ages and fewer young people choose the profession, South Africa is heading for a serious teacher shortage. AI will not displace the need for a human in the classroom, but it can ease the load, allowing larger classes without sacrificing personalised support. This is already happening: South African company Mindjoy is building AI tutors that deliver adaptive content, real-time feedback, and 24/7 personalised learning, while automating routine tasks to free up teachers for deeper engagement. Instead of the old classroom model, imagine dynamic learning spaces where students of all ages learn at their own pace, guided by teachers and AI working together. The future of education could be both more flexible and more effective – if we have the imagination and political courage to build it. If we accept that four out of five children still leave primary school unable to read for meaning, that thousands of teachers are absent on any given day, and that a quarter of learners are repeating grades, we are simply condemning another generation to disappointment. Clinging to the status quo is a decision, one that chooses failure by default. But if we treat technology as the ally it can be, and summon just a fraction of the ambition our children deserve, there is no reason why South Africa's schools must remain at the bottom of the rankings. The numbers can change, if we do.

Yahoo

18 hours ago

• Yahoo

Pro-Palestinian protest leader defiant despite US deportation threat

Mahmoud Khalil, one of the most prominent leaders of US pro-Palestinian campus protests, pledged Saturday to keep campaigning after he was released from a federal detention center. "Even if they would kill me, I would still speak for Palestine," Khalil said as he was greeted by cheering supporters at Newark airport, just outside New York City. Khalil, a legal permanent resident in the United States who is married to a US citizen and has a US-born son, had been in custody since March facing potential deportation. He was freed from a federal immigration detention center in Louisiana on Friday, hours after a judge ordered his release on bail. The Columbia University graduate was a figurehead of student protests against US ally Israel's war in Gaza, and the Trump administration labeled him a national security threat. "Just the fact I am here sends a message -- the fact that all these attempts to suppress pro-Palestine voices have failed now," said Khalil, who is still fighting his potential expulsion from the United States. He spoke alongside his wife Noor Abdalla, who gave birth to the couple's first child while Khalil was in detention, as well as Democratic congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. "Mahmoud Khalil was imprisoned for 104 days by this administration, by the Trump administration, with no grounds and for political reasons, because Mahmoud Khalil is an advocate for Palestinian human rights," Ocasio-Cortez said. "This is not over, and we will have to continue to support this case," she added. Khalil, who was born in Syria to Palestinian parents, is not allowed to leave the United States except for "self-deportation" under the terms of his release. He also faces restrictions on where he can travel within the country. President Donald Trump's government has justified pushing for Khalil's deportation by saying his continued presence in the United States could carry "potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences." Beyond his legal case, Khalil's team fears he could face threats out of detention. "We are very mindful about his security, and the irony is that he is the one being persecuted," Baher Azmy, one of his lawyers, told AFP. "But he is committed to peace and because he is rejecting US government policy he is under threat," Azmy added, without elaborating on any security measures in place for Khalil and his family. gl/bjt/acb

CNN

19 hours ago

• CNN

Mahmoud Khalil met with cheers at airport in New Jersey

A crowd erupted into cheers for Mahmoud Khalil, his wife and child as they arrived at Newark Airport on Saturday following Khalil's released on bail from a Louisiana ICE detention center, more than three months after he was arrested outside his apartment on Columbia University's campus. CNN's Gloria Pazmino was at the airport for his arrival, which included the presence of Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.