
South Africa Has Too Many Retail Stores, Pick n Pay CEO Says
(Bloomberg) -- South African retailers are opening too many new stores, putting their financial viability at risk, according to Pick n Pay Stores Ltd. Chief Executive Officer Sean Summers.
The top five retailers in Africa's most-industrialized economy opened more than 700 stores last year, according to company filings. They have set up 230 already this year.
'South Africa is about to equal, or squeak past, the US on the square meter per capita of retail,' Summers said in an interview after unveiling the company's earnings. 'If you've got retailers who are prepared to just open stores at any cost, then a shopping center works. But I would question the medium-to-long-term wisdom' of the strategy, he said.
The National Treasury last week lowered its economic growth forecast over the next three years to an average of 1.6% from 1.8% previously for the continent's biggest economy, partly due to the trade turmoil unleashed by US President Donald Trump.
'Sales densities in South Africa must be much lower than in the US because obviously per capita spending in South Africa is well below the US,' said Charles Allen, a London-based analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence. 'It does make you wonder how people eventually are going to justify the return on the investment.'
Pick n Pay, which just completed the first year of multi-year recovery plan, is also trying to grow its business by targeting the lower-income market. The grocer has closed numerous outlets where there was no prospect of them returning to profitability, even as competitors such as Shoprite Holdings Ltd. sustain the pace of new store openings.
While annual sales at Pick n Pay's discount Boxer outlets rose 13%, revenue for its core Pick n Pay South Africa segment, which accounts for about two-thirds of group sales, increased only 1.9%, the company reported earlier Monday.
Sign up here for the twice-weekly Next Africa newsletter, and subscribe to the Next Africa podcast on Apple, Spotify or anywhere you listen.
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
FBI and Canadian cybersecurity agency warns: Chinese hackers attacking telecom services in Canada
Representative Image Canada's cybersecurity agency , the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security, has issued a warning that Chinese-backed hackers are likely responsible for a recent attack that compromised telecommunications infrastructure in the country. The agency confirmed that three network devices registered to a Canadian company were compromised in these attacks. In a joint bulletin (as seen by Bloomberg) released this week with the US Federal Bureau of Investigation ( FBI ), the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security urged Canadian organisations to strengthen their networks against the threat posed by Salt Typhoon , a hacking group with documented links to the Chinese government. The warning emphasises the ongoing risk and the need for immediate action to protect critical infrastructure. What Canada's cybersecurity agency said about the recent hacking incident 'The Cyber Centre is aware of malicious cyber activities currently targeting Canadian telecommunications companies. The responsible actors are almost certainly PRC state-sponsored actors, specifically Salt Typhoon,' the agency said, referring to the People's Republic of China, reports Bloomberg. The agency also noted that separate investigations showing overlaps with indicators linked to Salt Typhoon indicate the cyber campaign 'is broader than just the telecommunications sector.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo According to the agency, the hackers will 'almost certainly' continue attempting to infiltrate Canadian organisations — particularly telecom providers — over the next two years, the report adds. Beijing has consistently rejected US claims linking it to Salt Typhoon, a group first reported by The Wall Street Journal last year. In January, the US imposed sanctions on a Chinese company for allegedly being 'directly involved' in the cyber intrusions , along with China's Ministry of State Security. 6 Awesome New Features Coming in Android 16!


Mint
6 hours ago
- Mint
NATO Offers to Tweak 5% Spending Goal to Win Spanish Approval
(Bloomberg) -- NATO has offered to tweak key language on ambitious defense spending targets to help win support from holdout Spain, before leaders of the military alliance gather on Tuesday. The draft statement to be adopted at the June 24-25 summit will be changed to 'allies' commit to spending 5% of GDP on defense from 'we' commit, according to people familiar with the talks. The adjustment would introduce a nuance that could provide more flexibility to the commitment, said the people, who requested anonymity to discuss private considerations. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez has voiced opposition to the 5% target — calling it unreasonable and counterproductive for his nation — earning the scorn of US President Donald Trump who derided Spain on Friday as a 'low payer' who should step up on defense. North Atlantic Treaty Organization members will meet in The Hague against the backdrop of Trump's dramatic insertion of the US into Israel's attacks on Iran, and as Europe awaits his decision on US troop levels in the region amid Russia's war against Ukraine. NATO allies have stepped up pressure on Spain to fall in line over the spending target, after persuading skeptics including Italy and Belgium to come around. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte is negotiating directly with Sanchez, Bloomberg has reported. Spanish government officials declined to comment on the new language. Sanchez has offered to increase defense expenditure to 2.1% of GDP but faces pushback at home, including from allies in his government. While Rutte initially proposed a 2032 date for reaching the spending target, the latest draft pushes that back to 2035. His wish to see mandatory yearly increases has also been stripped, which should make the process easier for spending laggards. NATO's existing target calls for member countries to spend 2% of GDP on defense. Under the new target, 1.5% would go to broader defence-related spending such as cybersecurity as well as infrastructure for moving troops and military equipment. The agreed criteria are broad enough that all allies should be able meet that part of the plan quickly, according to the people. The increase in core defense spending to 3.5% from 2% will be much harder to deliver. As part of its routine process, NATO will review the kit and troops it deems necessary in 2029. The price tag attached to its capabilities could be tweaked at that point, potentially providing some breathing room for the lowest spenders such as Spain. Washington has been pushing for an unprecedented defense expenditure increase, arguing that European allies must take responsibility for their own security. 'I don't think we should, but I think they should,' Trump said late Friday about reaching the 5% goal, introducing some last minute uncertainty after the US previously said it would commit to the target. --With assistance from Daniel Basteiro. More stories like this are available on

Hindustan Times
7 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Iran hints at Strait of Hormuz closure. How will it impact Indian crude imports?
Amid its ongoing conflict with Israel and the US, Iran has hinted it may close the Strait of Hormuz, which lies between Iran and its Gulf Arab neighbours. The passage facilitates the daily supply of about a fifth of the world's oil, Bloomberg reported. (File photo) Oil tankers pass through the Strait of Hormuz,(REUTERS) Not just global, the closure of this strait may impact India's energy security as well, some experts have said. Tehran indicated the strait's closure for shipping after the US military struck three of Iran's key nuclear facilities. When asked about the closure, Iranian foreign minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi said, "A variety of options are available to Iran." Will closure hurt India? About 40 per cent of India's supplies are sourced from Middle East nations such as Iraq, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Kuwait. These countries export crude oil to India through the Strait of Hormuz. About 2 million barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil, a significant portion of India's total imports, is sent through the passage. While there is a significant portion that India sources from the Middle Eastern countries, there is still less likelihood of a big impact on its oil supply if the strait is shut, news agency PTI reported. This is because India mostly imports Russian oil which uses the Suez Canal, Cape of Good Hope, or the Pacific Ocean for its passage, and not the Strait of Hormuz. Qatar, India's principal gas supplier, also does not use the Strait of Hormuz for supplies. Similarly, India's other sources for LNG supply in Australia, Russia and the US would also not be impacted by the strait's closure. Impact on imports from Saudi, Iraq India's crude oil imports from Iraq, and to an extent from Saudi Arabia, will be impacted if the Strait of Hormuz is closed, said Dr Laxman Kumar Behera, Associate Professor at Special Centre for National Security Studies at JNU. Besides, if the Strait of Hormuz is closed even briefly, it will impact oil markets significantly, a recent analysis by the International Energy Agency showed. "With geopolitical and economic uncertainties affecting oil producers and consumers alike, oil supply security remains high on the international energy policy agenda," it said. Nearly 30 per cent of global oil and one-third of the world's LNG (liquefied natural gas) use the Strait of Hormuz for their passage. Its closure could have significant global repercussions, including costlier rerouting of oil shipments and an impact on the currencies of the countries in the region. Will Iran shut Strait of Hormuz? Ever since the Israel-Iran conflict began on June 13, Iran has hinted at closing the Strait of Hormuz. Apart from the Iranian Foreign Minister, Mohammad Javad Hosseini, the deputy chief of mission at the Iranian embassy, had also said closing the Strait of Hormuz is an option. Despite this, a prolonged Strait of Hormuz disruption is very unlikely. The Strait of Hormuz not only deals with exports of Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Kuwait and Qatar, but also of Iran itself. China is the number one importer of Iranian oil at 47 per cent of its seaborne crude, reportedly accounting for over three-quarters of its oil exports. Hence, while the Strait of Hormuz closure stands to impact global oil markets, it also would prove counterproductive for Iran. Iran, which is already in a geopolitical conflict with Israel and the US, is likely to risk international military escalation with this key passage closure.