Trump Says US Should Produce Tech and Tanks, Not T-Shirts and Sneakers

President Donald Trump has reiterated controversial comments made by his cabinet about the need—or lack thereof—for a domestic supply chain for shoes and apparel.
The president's short second term has been defined by persistent tariff upheaval—a shifting strategy that he has said will serve to bring more production back to the U.S., resulting in new jobs and greater self-sufficiency. But as the president was boarding Air Force One in New Jersey on Sunday, he singled out the fashion sector—footwear and clothing—as one the country might do well enough without.
More from Sourcing Journal
Amer Sports Raises 2025 Guidance, Tariffs Not Major Concern
Reshoring Reality: Turning Turmoil into Domestic Opportunity
US Footwear Manufacturers Tell Trump Tariffs Should Fund Onshoring Resurgence
'We're not looking to make sneakers and T-shirts. We want to make military equipment. We want to make big things,' he told reporters. 'I'm not looking to make T-shirts, to be honest. I'm not looking to make socks. We can do that very well in other locations.'
The president said the country's focus should be on chips, computers, tanks and ships—military equipment and technology, rather than soft goods.
The commentary on reshoring echoes a recent statement made by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who also said that the U.S. doesn't necessarily need a 'booming textile industry.'
The National Council of Textile Organizations (NCTO)—and its members—reacted swiftly to the assertion, taking issue with the administration's stance that textiles don't represent a critical industry for America, though they serve manifold military and industrial applications in addition to contributing to the consumer products sector.
'The U.S. textile industry was proud to make lifesaving PPE during the first Trump Administration in response to Covid. The U.S. proudly makes over 8,000 different products to the U.S. military alone to ensure we do not have to rely on foreign adversaries to make essential products. This is a strategically important, relevant, and key industry,' Glas wrote in early May, adding that American makers of man-made fiber, yarns, fabrics, apparel and non-apparel sewn products produced $64 billion in goods last year, exporting $28 billion worth to other countries.
More than 30 manufacturing CEOs and cotton farmers wrote their own letter to the Treasury Secretary, telling him that he was mistaken in believing that there isn't a robust supply chain for such products in the U.S.
American Apparel and Footwear Association (AAFA) president and CEO Steve Lamar said the administration's trade policies—with tariffs at the center—aren't helping domestic producers.
'We agree that tariffs are not the path to scaling up U.S.-made clothing and shoes. As we've said time and time again, tariffs are not the solution to strengthening or growing the 3.5 million American jobs already supported by the apparel and footwear industry,' he said following the president's weekend comments. 'Our domestic labor market simply does not have the labor demands to fulfill manufacturing for an industry that touches every American family.'
With 97 percent of Americans' clothes and shoes imported from across the globe, many at high tariff rates, the administration should focus on 'common sense solutions that can move the needle,' he believes.
Duties on foreign-made products and inputs end up costing manufacturers that rely on them to create finished goods, he argued. And the consumer ultimately pays the price.
There are pressing reasons to bolster the onshoring of certain products, like those to support the armed forces, he said. Lamar pointed to a strengthening of the Berry Amendment, which lays out stipulations for the procurement of military uniforms and certain tactical gear, like boots, as a should-be priority.
'Leveraging existing policies and practical approaches offer a real opportunity to boost U.S. apparel and footwear manufacturing and ensure that our troops are outfitted with goods that are 100-percent made in America,' he said.
The U.S. Footwear Manufacturing Association (USFMA) recently implored the administration to tighten up the law and to pass the Better Outfitting Our Troops (BOOTS) Act in Congress, which would require that all boots worn by all U.S. military personnel be made in America.
'If we truly want to support U.S. manufacturers—many of whom have generations of experience—we should focus on strengthening their capabilities, not burdening them with tariffs,' Lamar added.
Trump made some headway in smoothing over tensions with trade partners on Sunday. The president agreed to extend a 50 percent tariff deadline on goods from the European Union until July 9 (the date that the deferral of reciprocal tariffs on other trading partners across the globe will expire), presumably to allow for the pursuit of a trade agreement in the interim.
'I received a call today from Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, requesting an extension on the June 1st deadline on the 50% Tariff with respect to Trade and the European Union,' Trump Truthed.
Von der Leyen wrote on X that 'Europe is ready to advance talks swiftly and decisively,' and that the trade bloc needs the extension to 'reach a good deal' with the U.S.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

CNN

32 minutes ago

• CNN

Republicans might redraw House maps in Ohio and Texas to try to protect narrow majority

CNN — Facing the possibility of losing control of the U.S. House next year, Republicans are weighing aggressively redrawing congressional districts in two states in hopes of ousting several longtime Democratic lawmakers. In Ohio, a quirk in state law is giving Republican state legislators another run at drawing new lines for the state's 15 congressional districts. The goal would be to knock off two Democratic members of the House, giving the GOP a 12-3 advantage in the state's congressional delegation. State lawmakers could go even further and target a third Democratic seat. In Texas, meanwhile, Republicans are considering whether to hold a special legislative session to undertake a rare mid-decade map-drawing that supporters hope could result in the GOP picking up as many as five additional seats. Democrats need a net gain of just three seats to win the House, raising the stakes for Republicans and President Donald Trump, who could see a Democrat-led House block his legislative agenda and open new investigations of him in the second half of his final term. But redistricting is a double-edged sword: In drawing new lines, both states could also endanger GOP lawmakers by moving safe Republican territory into districts currently represented by Democrats. Adam Kincaid, president and executive director of the National Republican Redistricting Trust, favors an aggressive redistricting approach. 'It's a priority to keep the House, and Republicans should be looking for as many seats as we can get,' he said. The GOP's redistricting gains in 2022 were key to the party flipping the chamber in that election and retaining their majority in 2024, he added. 'There were a handful of seats that weren't politically possible to get before that may be possible now,' he added. 'It makes sense for Republicans to try ahead of 2026.' Redrawing maps is potentially risky for GOP incumbents if 2026 proves to be a favorable year for Democrats. Republicans will have to run in a year when Trump himself is not the ballot, helping to boost conservative turnout. 'It's both a gamble and an opportunity,' said Kyle Kondik, the managing editor of Sabato's Crystal Ball, a newsletter published by University of Virginia's Center for Politics. 'From the White House's perspective, would an aggressive Texas redraw increase their chances of holding the House next year? Yeah, probably. But it wouldn't guarantee anything.' Redistricting generally happens at the start of each decade to account for population shifts and ensure that each congressional and state legislative district holds roughly the same number of people. Some Democrats have denounced the potential rounds of mid-decade map-drawing, arguing that Republicans are trying to rig the process. 'Republicans are exploring further manipulation of egregious gerrymanders in red states like Texas and Ohio for one reason: they are terrified of the voters,' said Marina Jenkins, executive director of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, in a statement. 'It's a brazenly corrupt attempt to shield themselves from accountability at the ballot box and it must be stopped.' A third redistricting battle, meanwhile, is playing out in Wisconsin where two legal actions filed last month are challenging a congressional map that favors Republicans in a battleground state that's narrowly divided along partisan lines. Both cases are before the state Supreme Court, which has a liberal majority. Texas could go after border Democrats All but one Republican member of the Texas congressional delegation won their seats with more than 60% of the vote last November. All 25 GOP-held districts voted for Trump by at least 15 points in 2024, Kondik noted. A new GOP map in Texas is likely to shift voters from safely red districts into ones held by Democrats to help boost the number of Republicans that Texas sends to Congress. Currently, under a 2021 map, Republicans control 25 of the state's 38 House seats. (One safely Democratic seat in the Houston area is vacant following the death of Rep. Sylvester Turner. The current Texas congressional maps are the subject of litigation brought by groups representing Black and Latino voters who contend the lines drawn in 2021 discriminate against voters of color.) Clear targets include Democratic Reps. Henry Cuellar and Vicente Gonzalez, who represent border communities that have shifted to the right in recent years. Trump won both districts in 2024, part of a broader realignment among Latino voters. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, a New York Democrat, argued recently that an aggressive redraw could backfire on Republicans. 'If you make any changes to that map … they are going to endanger four to six Republican incumbents who are serving in the Congress right now,' he said to reporters. 'Be careful what you wish for.' Other Democrats have condemned any effort to change the district lines to further benefit the GOP. 'Texas Republicans should stand by the rule of law and the maps they drew four years ago, or they should finally work with Democrats to draw fair, independent congressional maps,' state Rep. Gene Wu, who chairs the Democratic caucus in the Texas House, said in a statement. 'Anything less is a desperate power grab from a party that knows Texas voters are ready to show them the door.' The White House did not respond to a CNN inquiry about the effort, which has been the subject of recent closed-door meetings in Washington among members of the state's congressional delegation. The state legislature, which finished its regular session earlier this month, is not scheduled to meet again until 2027. But Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has the authority to call special sessions and determine the issues lawmakers will address. Aides to the Texas governor did not respond to CNN inquiries. Last week, Abbott told reporters that he had not 'identified a need for a special session,' according to the Dallas Morning News. The governor, however, did not close the door on the possibility, saying he was reviewing bills from the regular legislative session that could result in vetoes that would require him to summon lawmakers back to Austin to address outstanding matters. Abbott also declined to tell journalists whether Trump had asked him to order a redraw. Ohio GOP looks for as many as three seats In Ohio, the mid-decade redrawing of its congressional districts is an outgrowth of a state law that requires maps approved without bipartisan support to be redrawn after four years. Crafting new maps for next year's midterms will ultimately fall to the Republican-controlled General Assembly. The current map, crafted by a GOP-led legislature in 2022, has 10 Republicans and five Democrats. Two Democratic incumbents are viewed as likely targets of the GOP: Reps. Marcy Kaptur, a veteran lawmaker who represents northwestern Ohio, and Emilia Skyes, whose district includes Akron. Last year, Kaptur eked out a win even as her district went for Trump. Skyes, meanwhile, represents a highly competitive district that former Vice President Kamala Harris barely won. If Republicans choose an even more aggressive approach, a third Democrat, Rep. Greg Landsman, who represents Cincinnati, could be endangered.

Washington Post

37 minutes ago

• Washington Post

Israel-Iran live updates: Trump envoy in correspondence with Iranian officials, White House says

Israel and Iran continued to exchange strikes overnight as the conflict entered its ninth day. President Donald Trump's special envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, remains in 'correspondence' with Iranian officials, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told The Washington Post, though Witkoff did not attend talks between the top diplomats representing Iran, Britain, France, Germany and the European Union in Geneva on Friday. Trump was dismissive of the talks, which ended without a breakthrough: 'Europe is not going to be able to help on this one,' he told reporters. The Council of the Arab League issued a statement condemning Israel's actions in Iran as 'a clear violation of international law and a threat to the security of the region' and calling for a return to negotiations, after a meeting in Istanbul on Friday. 'The only way to resolve crises in the region is through diplomacy and dialogue,' the statement, which was shared by the Jordanian foreign ministry on social media, said. Four days after President Donald Trump abruptly left a summit of global leaders in Canada, calling on civilians to 'evacuate Tehran' and stoking global talk of war, the president on Friday said he still wanted more time to decide.

Washington Post

an hour ago

• Washington Post

Iranians rattled by Israeli strikes as cash runs short and fear spikes

DUBAI — A week of Israeli strikes has upended the lives of Iranians, battering vital infrastructure like fuel depots, airports and public buildings, and shaking the population's confidence that it could remain insulated from conflicts in the wider Middle East. Now, with President Donald Trump warning that U.S. forces could enter the fray if Iran doesn't make significant concessions in nuclear negotiations, Iranians fear that another deadlier, even more destructive phase of the conflict could loom.