Czechs sign record nuclear deal but questions remain
The deal is crucial for the EU member country of 10.9 million people, relying on nuclear power produced by the southern Dukovany and Temelin plants for 40 percent of its electricity consumption.
KHNP beat EDF in a tender last year to supply the two units for Dukovany, and Czech Prime Minister Petr Fiala insisted its bid was "better in all criteria assessed".
Prague expects construction to begin in 2029 and the first new reactor launched in trial operation in 2036.
But the biggest contract signed by a Czech state company since the country became independent in 1993 is currently under the scrutiny of both a Czech court and the European Commission.
EDF delayed the deal by months as it questioned the transparency of the tender in a complaint at the Czech antitrust office and later in court.
The deal was signed in great haste and online, just hours after a court rejected the EDF complaint and returned it to a lower-instance court which is due to pass its verdict on June 25.
But EDF has also contested alleged state support for KHNP, illegal in the EU, in a complaint to the European Commission.
"Chances that KHNP will not build the units in the end are still considerable, despite the signature," Petr Barton, a data economist at the Datarun analytical platform, told AFP.
"The European Commission is investigating the Korean bid. The Czech government knows about it... and yet it has signed," Barton said, labelling the Czech side's decision to sign as "most daring".
EDF declined to comment on its chances to thwart the deal.
'Several potential risks'
The crucial argument for Prague was the low price offered by KHNP -- some 200 billion Czech koruna ($9 billion) per unit, but Barton said the EU is worried it was reduced by a Korean state subsidy.
"A Czech consumer would be happy to have electricity subsidised by a foreign country, but the European Union forbids this," Barton said.
"So we are in for lengthy proceedings, shame over the signature which took place after the EU's warning, and in the end the deal may not materialise at all," he added.
A day after the signature, Czech Industry and Trade Minister Lukas Vlcek told Czech Radio there were "several potential risks" to the deal.
"Let's not be naive. We have to overcome the obstacles systematically, patiently, step by step," said Vlcek, adding he was in "close contact" with the European Commission.
He added however that the EDF complaints cannot affect the contract between Prague and KHNP, which "is simply valid".
'A complex legal problem'
But Jiri Gavor, who leads the Association of Independent Energy Suppliers, voiced doubts.
"From the Czech point of view, it is a done deal. But unfortunately for the Czech side or the construction itself, I don't think it will resolve all problems," Gavor told AFP.
He said the EU probe posed a much bigger threat than the Czech court dealings which will hardly overthrow the signature.
"There are legal doubts... what will happen if the European authorities decide EDF is right, and on the other hand you have a signed contract?" he added.
"I don't dare estimate the legal impact on the project. I think it will constitute a rather complex legal problem. And certainly a most unpleasant one," said Gavor.
Barton said Prague will also have to ask the EU for a go-ahead on a Czech government subsidy for the construction in a so-called notification.
The EU has already approved this, but the government then changed the financing model and has had to ask for the permit again.
"And it's not certain if they will get it, especially as the Korean bid is under scrutiny. And you can't pay for the construction without a notification and you can't expect the Koreans to build it for free," Barton said.
© 2025 AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
35 minutes ago
- Euronews
Israel, Iran trade fresh strikes as conflict enters ninth day
The conflict between Israel and Iran has entered its ninth consecutive day, with reports of strikes emerging from both countries overnight. It comes after a meeting between European foreign ministers and their Iranian counterpart, Abbas Araghchi, in Geneva on Friday yielded no concrete results, with Araghchi ruling out further talks on Iran's nuclear programme until a ceasefire is agreed. Aragchi arrived in Istanbul early on Saturday for a meeting of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), according to media reports. Meanwhile, Israeli defence minister Israel Katz said that another commander from the Iranian Revolutionary Guards had been killed overnight. Euronews brings you rolling coverage and updates throughout the day.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Von der Leyen's return as China hawk ends talk of diplomatic reset
Summer has arrived in Brussels with a new trend: the doves are out, the hawks are in. After weeks of telegraphing signs towards a diplomatic rapprochement with China, or at least a thaw, Ursula von der Leyen made an abrupt volte face at the G7 summit with a broadside attack against Beijing's "pattern of dominance, dependency and blackmail" vis-à-vis its trading partners, including the European Union and the United States. "China has largely shown its unwillingness to live within the constraints of the rules-based international system," von der Leyen said in her intervention. "While others opened their market, China focused on undercutting intellectual property protections, massive subsidies with the aim to dominate global manufacturing and supply chains," she went on. "This is not market competition – it is distortion with intent." The president of the European Commission declared, point blank, that the source of "the biggest collective problem" in the global trading system lay in China's accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001. Beijing's entry into the WTO has been highly controversial as it opened international markets to a wave of low-cost exports. The admission is linked to the so-called "China shock" and a decline in manufacturing jobs in both the EU and the US. At the G7 summit, von der Leyen warned a "new China shock" was underway. It was a gloves-off denunciation that laid bare the state of mind of the Commission chief, her mounting displeasure and exasperation. In many ways, it was a return to the hawkish stance of her first mandate, during which she famously promoted the concept of "de-risking" to slash vulnerable dependencies that China could exploit. Beijing was quick to hit back at von der Leyen's invective. Guo Jiakun, the spokesperson of the Chinese Foreign Affairs Ministry, called her remarks "baseless" and "biased". Guo, however, did not miss the chance to offer a new olive branch. "China stands ready to increase communication and coordination with the EU, properly handle trade differences, and achieve win-win and shared prosperity," he said. "That said, we firmly oppose any attempt to hurt China's right to development or even assert one's own interests at China's expense." The reset that never was The conciliatory attempt fits in with Beijing's "charm offensive", as diplomats call it, towards the bloc in response to the disruptive policies of US President Donald Trump, who has imposed punitive tariffs on allies and adversaries alike. Sensing an impending rupture in the Western alliance, China has made several overtures to curry favour with Brussels, including lifting controversial sanctions on lawmakers, ahead of a much-anticipated EU-China summit in late July. Last month, Chinese President Xi Jinping hailed the 50th anniversary of bilateral relations as an opportunity to "open up a brighter future" in diplomacy. Von der Leyen replied: "We remain committed to deepening our partnership with China. A balanced relationship, built on fairness and reciprocity, is in our common interest." But in her G7 intervention, delivered with Trump in the room, this commitment was conspicuous by its absence. Instead, she let the hawk fly free and wild. At the core of her speech was Beijing's recent decision to restrict the sales of seven rare earth materials, which she said amounted to "weaponising" trade. China holds a quasi-monopolistic position over rare earths, the 17 metallic elements that are essential for building cutting-edge technologies. The country commands roughly 60% of the world's supply and 90% of the processing and refining capacity. Although the restrictions have eased in recent days, von der Leyen cautioned "the threat remains" and called on the G7 to close ranks to pile extra pressure on China. Rare earths are just the tip of an iceberg made up of commercial disputes that have driven a stark wedge between Brussels and Beijing. The past few years have seen the bloc impose steep duties on China-made electric vehicles, exclude Chinese companies from public tenders of medical devices, label Huawei and ZTE as "high-risk suppliers" of 5G networks, and launch investigations into suspicious uses of industrial subsidies. Brussels has also accused Beijing of engaging in large-scale campaigns of foreign information manipulations and interference (known as FIMI), hacking into state agencies, fuelling military tensions in the Taiwan Strait, violating the human rights of the Uyghur population and acting as the "key enabler" of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Despite loud pleas from Europeans, Xi Jinping has doubled down on his "no-limits" partnership with Vladimir Putin, causing dismay and outrage across the continent. By offering no significant concessions and sticking to its long-standing practices, China has missed the opportunity offered by von der Leyen after Trump's inauguration, says Noah Barkin, a visiting senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund. "Von der Leyen's unvarnished criticisms of China at the G7 summit are a response to Beijing's intransigence. Unless China shows a willingness to address Europe's concerns, the summit in July is unlikely to produce any deliverables of substance," Barkin said. "The likelihood is that tensions between the EU and China will continue to grow. The closing of the US market to Chinese products will lead to a diversion of exports into Europe, increasing the threat to European industry. And the withdrawal of US support for Ukraine will turn China's support for Russia into an even bigger problem for Europe." Keeping it real Although von der Leyen has earned plaudits for her clear-eyed, matter-of-fact assessment of EU-China relations, her views have not become universally accepted by member states, the true guardians of political power. In April, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez flew to Beijing, held a bilateral meeting with President Xi and made a plea to turn the page on the confrontational approach. "Spain is in favour of more balanced relations between the European Union and China, of finding negotiated solutions to our differences, which we have, and of greater cooperation in areas of common interest," Sánchez said. The Spaniard's words immediately caught the attention of Brussels and sent speculation of a diplomatic reset into overdrive. But Alicja Bachulska, a policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR), says the buzzy discourse was never credible. "Hopes of a possible reset, if any, were mostly projected by those who do not see eye-to-eye with von der Leyen's Commission," Bachulska told Euronews. "This Commission seems quite consistent in explaining its approach towards China and how it sees the threats, the challenges, and the very limited opportunities for cooperation with China under current conditions." Politics, of course, come with economics attached. For many countries, particularly those export-oriented, China remains an extraordinarily valuable market of 1.4 billion people, despite the multiple obstacles and hurdles that European companies face when doing business. With Trump threatening a whopping 50% tariff on the bloc if trade talks fail, having a cushion to fall onto is considered indispensable to avoid – or at least mitigate – the potential ravaging impact. Trade will be at the very top of the agenda at the EU-China summit, with both sides looking forward to having something to announce. Brussels is keen to put an end to China's probes into brandy, pork and dairy products, which it considers unjustified. But as the date nears, hopes for a trade breakthrough that can make a tangible difference on the ground and relieve some of the tensions are fading, as von der Leyen's hardened tone at the G7 demonstrated. "It's about being realistic: we still see China as a partner, competitor and rival," a senior diplomat said, speaking on condition of anonymity. "We have to be perhaps more confident about our interests, what we can do to pursue them better, but also act when actions are taken that threaten the stability of our continent." A diplomat from another country kept a cool head to lower expectations ahead of the summit, arguing China's alliance with Russia and campaigns of foreign interference remain "serious" and "disturbing" factors with no sign of improvement. "If you want to really deepen ties with us, that's impossible if, at the same time, you behave like this," the diplomat said. "The EU needs to stand up for its own interests, no matter who's in the White House."
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
Live: Israel strikes missile storage and launch sites in Iran
21/06/2025 - 06:59 22 arrested for links to Israeli spy services since start of conflict Police in Iran's Qom province said Saturday that 22 people "linked to Israeli spy services" had been arrested since June 13, Fars news agency reported. "22 people were identified and arrested on charges of being linked to the Zionist regime's spy services, disturbing public opinion, and supporting the criminal regime," the agency stated, citing the head of police intelligence in Iran's Qom province. 21/06/2025 - 06:58 Diplomatic breakthrough elusive as Israel-Iran war stretches into second week Hours of talks aimed at de-escalating fighting between Israel and Iran failed to produce a diplomatic breakthrough as the war entered its second week with a fresh round of strikes between the two adversaries. European ministers and Iran's top diplomat met for four hours Friday in Geneva, as President Donald Trump continued to weigh U.S. military involvement and worries rose over potential strikes on nuclear reactors.
