South Korea counts on shipbuilding to ease US tariff woes
Already hit by sector levies on steel and car exports, Seoul is laser-focused on negotiations over a 25 percent country-specific tariff that has been suspended until July 8.
AFP takes a look at what's going on:
Why shipbuilding?
In the 1970s, South Korea's military leader president Park Chung-hee accelerated the country's heavy industry, designating sectors such as steel and shipbuilding "strategically important" and rolling out state subsidies.
At the same time, POSCO was founded -- now one of the world's largest steel producers -- and conglomerate Hyundai built its shipyard in southeastern Ulsan, which started to grow rapidly.
European rivals struggled to keep pace.
Sweden's Kockums Shipyard filed for bankruptcy in 1987 -- and in a symbolic shift of global shipbuilding power, Hyundai acquired its 140-metre (460-foot) Goliath crane for one dollar. It now towers over southern Ulsan.
In the 1990s and 2000s, South Korean shipbuilders such as Hyundai Heavy Industries and Samsung Heavy Industries ramped up investment in research and development, backed by generous government subsidies.
The country secured a competitive edge in high-value-added vessels, including LNG carriers, very large crude carriers, and offshore platforms.
Now, South Korea ranks as the world's second-largest shipbuilding nation, trailing only behind China.
Is it important?
South Korea's exports hit a record high in 2024, with analysts pointing to shipbuilding as one of the key drivers.
The sector accounted for nearly four percent of total exports and grew by almost 20 percent from the previous year -- reaching $25.6 billion.
Shipbuilding directly employs around 120,000 workers -- roughly one percent of the country's total workforce -- with indirect employment significantly higher in industrial hubs like Ulsan.
Industry data shows so far this year, new orders have exceeded 13 trillion won ($9.4 billion).
In March, Hanwha Ocean secured a landmark $1.6 billion contract to build LNG carriers for Taiwan's Evergreen Marine, one of the largest single orders in the sector this year.
- Why is it a 'bargaining chip'? -
Trump has showed "significant interest in South Korea-US shipbuilding cooperation," said South Korea's trade, industry and energy minister Ahn Duk-geun in April.
Like the Europeans, the US shipbuilding industry has lagged behind South Korea and China, and as a result, the sector is seen as a "highly important bargaining chip in trade negotiations," he added.
At an APEC finance ministers' meeting in South Korea in May, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer met Chung Ki-sun, vice chairman of HD Hyundai, the country's largest shipbuilder, before he met Seoul's top officials.
"South Korea's shipbuilding and defence industries see a window of opportunity," said Kim Dae-jong, a professor at Sejong University.
How does it help the US?
Greer also met with the CEO of Hanwha Ocean, the first non-American company authorised to carry out a dry-dock maintenance of a US Navy vessel.
The move last September was seen as significant as it signalled that Washington sees South Korea, where it already has 28,000 US troops stationed, as a strategic defence hub.
With worries growing about China's expanding naval fleet and potential conflict in the Taiwan Strait, the US has begun seeking reliable overseas shipyards to support its operations in the Asia-Pacific region.
The global market for ship maintenance, repair, and overhaul is projected to exceed $60 billion annually, according to industry estimates.
Any problems?
Despite multi-billion-dollar contracts, data suggests South Korea's shipbuilding industry is losing ground in the global race.
China dominates with South Korea's market share dropping, according to industry data.
Demand for eco-friendly vessels is rising, and the government need to overhaul regulations "to support the development of next-generation eco-friendly vessels," Rhee Shin-hyung, a professor at Seoul National University, told AFP.
South Korea's woeful demographics also make staffing hard. In Geoje -– home to Samsung Heavy Industries -– the number of residents in their 20s and 30s has nearly halved in recent years.
Orders are down in 2025 which hints that "the shipbuilding boom may end sooner than the market anticipated," warned Rhee.
Global ship orders between January and April fell by almost half the volume recorded during the same period last year.
Shipbuilders have been enjoying a "supercycle" but unfortunately the "peak is expected to be lower and the boom shorter-lived compared to the past," Nam Chul, vice president at HD Hyundai Heavy Industries, told AFP.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
28 minutes ago
- Euronews
Energy in Europe is also at stake as Israel-Iran conflict escalates
Rising European energy prices are among the many risks of the current geopolitical crisis, which threatens to block one of the world's most important fuel shipping routes. Coupled with the trade war sparked by US tariffs, there are fears that the crisis may also drag down the global economy. The World Bank is expecting 2.3% growth for this year, after a 2.8% reading in 2024. Since Israel launched airstrikes against Iran's military and nuclear infrastructure on 13 June, oil prices have surged by more than 10% globally. High prices and supply disruptions, coupled with the implications of the trade war, are threatening to lower production globally. Markets are pricing in risks to the global oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) supply. Iran is controlling the highly strategic Strait of Hormuz, through which a third of global seaborne oil and a fifth of global LNG shipments travel. If that gets blocked, prices could skyrocket beyond $100. Currently, a barrel of crude oil is traded for more than $75, and international Brent is around $77. 'I do not expect that the strait is going to be closed,' Dr. Yousef Alshammari, President of the London College of Energy Economics, said to Euronews Business. He added: 'It is simply because Iran needs the Strait of Hormuz open for ships to go through for its clients, India and China.' However, even when it is not closed, the passage has already impacted prices due to the risks associated with the crisis. Some oil tankers have refused to go through. According to the FT, the world's largest publicly listed oil tanker company Frontline said it would turn down new contracts to sail through the Strait of Hormuz. Meanwhile, 'insurance companies are likely to charge more currently, while Qatar is trying to delay its LNG shipments going through the Strait,' added Alshammari. Natural gas fields in the region are also attracting attention. Iran shares the largest natural gas field in the world, the South Pars field, with Qatar. The liquefied natural gas (LNG) coming from this region is vital for the rest of the world, including Europe. Inflation and businesses: How Europe is impacted Though the EU has adequate supplies of LNG at the moment, the bloc's dependence on global LNG makes it vulnerable to geopolitical shocks as it is lowering its dependence on Russian gas. As the market weighed the recent risk of supply disruptions, European gas prices climbed significantly. The primary benchmark for European gas prices, the Dutch TTF (Title Transfer Facility) rose to a three-month high, nearing €41/MWh Friday at midday in Europe. Europe's imports from Qatar are providing nearly 10% of its LNG needs. Other countries in the region, including Egypt, also export LNG to Europe. However, after the 7 October 2023 Hamas attack, Israel closed down part of its own production, forcing Egypt to stop LNG shipments and prompting a spike in European natural-gas prices. Europe currently has a number of natural gas suppliers. Norway was the top supplier of gas to the EU in 2024, providing over 33% of all gas imports. Other suppliers included the United States, Algeria, Qatar, the UK, Azerbaijan and Russia. The largest LNG importing countries in the EU include France, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands and Belgium. If shipments from Qatar are impacted, Belgium, Italy and Poland are the most impacted, as the country supplies 38-45% of their LNG imports, according to the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA). The good news is that demand for gas is usually at its lowest level in Europe at this time of the year. Even so, the hotter-than-usual weather across the bloc is boosting demand for cooling, which could increase the need for energy in the coming weeks. 'Spikes in energy prices push up inflation, and can have a knock-on effect on the central bank's policy,' Alshammari said. Central banks, including the US Fed and the Bank of England, have stopped short on cutting interest rates as the uncertainty is rising. If they see that inflation is more persistent in the near term, and that — in the case of the ECB and the BoE — the 2% target is floating away, further monetary tightening could squeeze the economy with higher costs for borrowing and investment. "As a result of the Ukraine War, there was a pivot from the EU in particular to get their liquefied natural gas, their LNG gas, not from Russia but from producers including Qatar,' Marco Forgione, Director General of the Chartered Institute of Export and International Trade, told Euronews. He added that anything constraining the transit of liquefied natural gas will have a quick impact on the EU, 'particularly in the manufacturing sector'. Oil demand is the highest in summer, partially due to industrial activity. But current supply constraints and higher prices could further squeeze manufacturing. For European businesses, who are already facing heightened trade tensions linked to US tariffs, facing the current complications is "like playing four-dimensional chess', Forgione said. He predicted that sudden spikes in oil prices and depressed shipping rates may result in significant consumer price increases, supply shortages, and shrinkflation. This is where a product shrinks in size but the price remains the same. Global market implications Iran's energy infrastructure is in the crosshairs of the conflict. The country is the ninth-largest oil producer globally. At full capacity, the country produces 3.8 million barrels of oil a day, according to the US Energy Information Administration. But due to Western sanctions, Iran's oil exports are mainly shipped to China and India. Iran exports 1.5 million barrels per day, providing 10% of China's oil imports. If the world's second-largest economy, China, is deprived of this import, it could impact its economy as it is forced to source this from elsewhere, meaning prices could skyrocket. The potential geopolitical consequences of the Iran-Israel conflict are leaving markets on edge, and it seems volatility is here to stay. Meanwhile, Europe's role in the conflict remains to be seen. 'My biggest worry is that it turns out to be a wider conflict, involving European countries, UK and France. This is the scenario that nobody wants to see happen,' added Alshammari.
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
Trump's decision to strike Iran marks his riskiest foreign policy gamble
With his unprecedented decision to bomb Iran's nuclear sites, directly joining Israel's air attack on its regional arch foe, U.S. President Donald Trump has done something he had long vowed to avoid - intervene militarily in a major foreign war. The dramatic US strike, including the targeting of Iran's most heavily fortified nuclear installation deep underground, marks the biggest foreign policy gamble of Trump's two presidencies and one fraught with risks and unknowns. Trump, who insisted on Saturday that Iran must now make peace or face further attacks, could provoke Tehran into retaliating by closing the Strait of Hormuz, the world's most important oil artery, attacking US military bases and allies in the Middle East, stepping up its missile barrage on Israel and activating proxy groups against American and Israeli interests worldwide, analysts said. Such moves could escalate into a broader, more protracted conflict than Trump had envisioned, evoking echoes of the 'forever wars' that America fought in Iraq and Afghanistan, which he had derided as 'stupid' and promised never to be dragged into. 'The Iranians are seriously weakened and degraded in their military capabilities,' said Aaron David Miller, a former Middle East negotiator for Democratic and Republican administrations. 'But they have all sorts of asymmetric ways that they can respond... This is not going to end quick.' In the lead-up to the bombing that he announced late on Saturday, Trump had vacillated between threats of military action and appeals for renewed negotiation to persuade Iran to reach a deal to dismantle its nuclear program. A senior White House official said that once Trump was convinced that Tehran had no interest in reaching a nuclear agreement, he decided the strikes were 'the right thing to do'. Trump gave the go-ahead once he was assured of a 'high probability of success', the official said – a determination reached after more than a week of Israeli air attacks on Iran's nuclear and military facilities paved the way for the US to deliver the potentially crowning blow. 03:39 Nuclear threat remains Trump touted the 'great success' of the strikes, which he said included the use of massive 'bunker-buster bombs' on the main site at Fordow. But some experts suggested that while Iran's nuclear program may have been set back for many years, the threat may be far from over. Iran denies seeking a nuclear weapon, saying its program is for purely peaceful purposes. 'In the long term, military action is likely to push Iran to determine nuclear weapons are necessary for deterrence and that Washington is not interested in diplomacy,' the Arms Control Association, a non-partisan US-based organisation that advocates for arms control legislation, said in a statement. 'Military strikes alone cannot destroy Iran's extensive nuclear knowledge. The strikes will set Iran's program back, but at the cost of strengthening Tehran's resolve to reconstitute its sensitive nuclear activities,' the group said. Eric Lob, assistant professor in the Department of Politics and International Relations at Florida International University, said Iran's next move remains an open question and suggested that among its forms of retaliation could be to hit 'soft targets' of the U.S. and Israel inside and outside the region. Iranian reaction to the US strikes on its nuclear sites 01:16 But he also said there was a possibility that Iran could return to the negotiating table – 'though they would be doing so in an even weaker position' – or seek a diplomatic off-ramp. In the immediate aftermath of the US strikes, however, Iran showed little appetite for concessions. Iran's Atomic Energy Organization said it would not allow development of its 'national industry' to be stopped, and an Iranian state television commentator said every U.S. citizen or military member in the region would now be legitimate targets. Early on Sunday, Iran's foreign ministry issued a statement warning that Tehran 'considers it its right to resist with all its might against U.S. military aggression.' Karim Sadjadpour, an analyst at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, posted on X: 'Trump indicated this is now the time for peace. It's unclear and unlikely the Iranians will see it the same way. This is more likely to open a new chapter of the 46-year-old US-Iran war than conclude it.' 'Regime change' Some analysts suggested that Trump, whose administration has previously disavowed any aim of dislodging the Iranian leadership, could be drawn into seeking 'regime change' if Tehran carries out major reprisals or moves to build a nuclear weapon. That, in turn, would bring additional risks. 'Beware mission creep, aiming for regime change and democratisation campaigns,' said Laura Blumenfeld, a Middle East analyst at the Johns Hopkins School for Advanced International Studies in Washington. 'You'll find the bones of many failed US moral missions buried in Middle East sands.' Jonathan Panikoff, a former U.S. deputy intelligence officer for the Middle East, said Iran's leadership would quickly engage in 'disproportionate attacks' if it felt its survival was imperilled. But Tehran will also have to be mindful of the consequences, he said. While actions such as closing the Strait of Hormuz would pose problems for Trump with the resulting higher oil prices and potential US inflationary impact, it would also hurt China, one of Iran's few powerful allies. At the same time, Trump is already facing strong pushback from congressional Democrats against the Iran attack and will also have to contend with opposition from the anti-interventionist wing of his Republican MAGA base. Trump, who faced no major international crisis in his first term, is now embroiled in one just six months into his second. Even if he hopes US military involvement can be limited in time and scope, the history of such conflicts often carries unintended consequences for American presidents. Trump's slogan of 'peace through strength' will certainly be tested as never before, especially with his opening of a new military front after failing to meet his campaign promises to quickly end wars in Ukraine and Gaza. 'Trump is back in the war business,' said Richard Gowan, UN director at the International Crisis Group. 'I am not sure anyone in Moscow, Tehran or Beijing ever believed his spiel that he is a peacemaker. It always looked more like a campaign phrase than a strategy.'
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
US operation against Iran in detail: bombs, planes and missiles used
The operation, which marks a significant escalation in tensions, has resulted in Iran's nuclear programme being hit "substantially" with full details to emerge. The US attack was executed with military precision using B-2 Spirit strategic bombers and Tomahawk cruise missiles launched from naval platforms. According to information provided by Fox News' reporter Sean Hannity, following direct conversations with President Donald Trump, the operation employed between five and six bunker buster bombs dropped from B-2 bombers, exceeding initial estimates of only two bombs for the mission. The facilities attacked included the nuclear facilities at Natanz and Estefan, which were neutralised by 30 Tomahawk missiles launched from a distance of approximately 640 kilometres. The main target was the Fordow plant, which is considered a cornerstone of Iran's nuclear programme and which, according to sources quoted by Fox News, "was completely destroyed". This information was backed up by US President Trump himself, who tweeted that "Fordow is gone". US military deployment In the weeks leading up to the attack, the US deployed a considerable military force to the Middle East. This deployment included the aircraft carrier USS Nimitz, Air ForceF-16, F-22 and F-35 fighters, in addition to the B-2 bombers that took part in the operation. Several B-2 bombers took off for the Pacific after completing the mission, having left Iranian airspace by the time of the official announcement. President Trump has been clear about US targets in the region. In remarks reported by Fox News, he said: "We're not looking for a ceasefire. We're looking for total and complete victory. I repeat, you know what the victory is: no nuclear weapons". This statement underscores the US' determination to completely eliminate Iran's nuclear capabilities, beyond seeking temporary agreements or ceasefires. Military arsenal used: Technical analysis of missiles and bombs The bunker buster bombs used in the operation represent the latest technology in deep penetration weaponry. These weapons are specifically designed to neutralise fortified underground targets, such as Iranian nuclear facilities. Technical characteristics: The 30 Tomahawk missiles used in the attack represent the gold standard in long-range cruise missiles for the US Navy. Tomahawk specifications: The use of five to six bunker buster bombs indicates the involvement of three B-2 Spirit bombers, each capable of carrying two high-penetration bombs. B-2 capabilities: Regional and global implications This strike marks a turning point in US foreign policy towards Iran and sets a significant precedent in the fight against nuclear proliferation. The destruction of key facilities such as Fordow represents a significant setback for Iran's nuclear programme, which has been the target of international sanctions and nuclear diplomacy for more than a decade. The operation also demonstrates the US' ability to execute long-range precision strikes against highly defended targets, using its most advanced military technology. At this point Iran could either escalate its attacks into war or sign a peace and nuclear technology non-proliferation agreement as Trump initially sought.
