
Swedish government plans to ease mortgage rules to help first-time buyers
STOCKHOLM: Sweden's government said on Tuesday it planned to ease mortgage rules to help first-time buyers and those without capital for a deposit to get into the housing market.
Under the plan, people wanting a mortgage will be able to borrow up to 90 per cent of the value of their property, up from the current 85 per cent.
A current requirement for the heaviest borrowers to pay back 3 per cent of their loan each year will be dropped.
The new rules are expected to be introduced at the start of next year.
"The new proposals will make it easier, for example, for first-time buyers and young families to get onto the property ladder," Housing Minster Andreas Carlson said.
"At the same time, we have taken into consideration financial stability through measures to hold back indebtedness."
The proposal broadly reflects recommendations in a white paper last November.
Critics have said that tough mortgage rules, introduced after the financial crisis of 2008-9, are necessary to reduce risks in the banking system.
Swedish home-owners are among the most highly indebted in Europe, with debts of around 180 per cent of disposable income, down from a peak of around 200 per cent in 2021.
Most mortgages are floating rate, making households sensitive to interest rate changes and amplifying swings in the economy.
The government said it also planned to strengthen the central bank's role in macroprudential oversight.
The central bank will take over responsibility for setting the level of banks' countercyclical financial buffer, which has up to now been set by the Financial Supervisory Authority.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
11 hours ago
- The Sun
Malaysian timber exports may gain edge in US market, says FRIM forest products director
KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia's timber exports may gain a competitive edge in the US market due to higher tariffs imposed on regional rivals such as Vietnam and Indonesia. Vietnam, once a leading furniture exporter in the region, now faces tariffs as high as 46% compared with Malaysia's import levy of 24%, Forest Research Institute Malaysia (FRIM) director of forest products division Wan Tarmeze Wan Ariffin said. 'US President Donald Trump imposed higher tariffs on Vietnam probably because they're afraid China might use Vietnam as a manufacturing hub' to bypass American trade restrictions,' he told Bernama. The United States is the largest buyer of Malaysian furniture, accounting for over half of furniture exports. However, the tariffs announced on April 2 have been paused for 90 days till early July to allow America's trading partners to negotiate for lower tariffs. 'If they don't impose high tariffs on Vietnam, China could exploit that route. So, on paper, the advantage actually lies with us (Malaysia),' he said. In 2022, Malaysia exported timber and timber products worth RM7.73 billion to the US. This was an increase from RM3.76 billion in 2018. Malaysia's timber exports worldwide include furniture, logs, veneer, plywood and medium-density fibreboard. Asked on the challenges faced by the timber industry, Wan Tarmeze said Malaysia's furniture sector primarily relies on processed wood rather than solid timber, with wood-based materials accounting for up to 85% of inputs in the making of the furniture. Wan Tarmeze said the ongoing Iran-Israel military conflict is not expected to have a direct impact on Malaysia's timber exports. Nevertheless, post-conflict reconstruction could open up new market opportunities and raise demand for Malaysian timber. 'Wars often lead to widespread destruction, but once the situation stabilises, there's usually a surge in demand for rebuilding – including homes and infrastructure,' he said. When asked how Malaysia can position itself as a high-value timber exporter rather than a volume-based player, he said the shift ultimately depends on the industry players themselves. 'This has been a long-standing conversation as Malaysia is still heavily reliant on the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) model, manufacturing timber products for others without having its own strong, internationally recognised brands. 'Take IKEA for example, which is a Swedish brand while Italy has its own well-known brand names, but Malaysia has yet to produce a brand that stands out globally,' Wan Tarmeze said. OEM refers to manufacturing products for other brands, whereas original brand manufacturers (OBM) involves developing and marketing products under one's own brand name. Wan Tarmeze said that despite the government's repeated calls for the industry to move from being OEM to OBM, the shift has yet to happen. 'The issue is not about identity but branding, and without branding we can't build value. 'The truth is Malaysia tends to shy away from copying, but we should be more open to learning from others, even 'stealing' ideas in the sense of adapting best practices and making them our own,' he said.


New Straits Times
a day ago
- New Straits Times
Malaysia's timber exports may gain edge due to higher US tariffs on competitors
KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia's timber exports may gain a competitive edge in the American market due to higher tariffs imposed on regional rivals such as Vietnam and Indonesia. Vietnam, once a leading furniture exporter in the region, now faces tariffs as high as 46 per cent compared with Malaysia's import levy of 24 per cent, Director of Forest Products Division, Forest Research Institute Malaysia (FRIM) Wan Tarmeze Wan Ariffin said. "US President Donald Trump imposed higher tariffs on Vietnam probably because they're afraid China might use Vietnam as a manufacturing hub" to bypass American trade restrictions," he told Bernama. The US is the largest buyer of Malaysian furniture, accounting for over half of furniture exports. However, the tariffs announced on April 2 have been paused for 90 days till early July to allow America's trading partners to negotiate for lower tariffs. "If they don't impose high tariffs on Vietnam, China could exploit that route. So, on paper, the advantage actually lies with us (Malaysia)," he said. In 2022, Malaysia exported timber and timber products worth RM7.73 billion to the US. This was a steady increase from RM3.76 billion in 2018. Malaysia's timber exports worldwide include furniture, logs, veneer, plywood and medium-density fibreboard. Asked on the challenges faced by the timber industry, Wan Tarmeze said Malaysia's furniture sector primarily relies on processed wood rather than solid timber, with wood-based materials accounting for up to 85 per cent of inputs in the making of the furniture. Geopolitical tensions may create opportunities He said the ongoing Iran-Israel military conflict was not expected to have a direct impact on Malaysia's timber exports. Nevertheless, post-conflict reconstruction could open up new market opportunities and raise demand for Malaysian timber. "Wars often lead to widespread destruction, but once the situation stabilises, there's usually a surge in demand for rebuilding – including homes and infrastructure," he said. Calls for shift from OEM to OBM in timber exports When asked how Malaysia can position itself as a high-value timber exporter rather than a volume-based player, he said the shift ultimately depends on the industry players themselves. "This has been a long-standing conversation as Malaysia is still heavily reliant on the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) model, manufacturing timber products for others without having its own strong, internationally recognised brands. "Take IKEA for example, which is a Swedish brand while Italy has its own well-known brand names, but Malaysia has yet to produce a brand that stands out globally," he said. OEM refers to manufacturing products for other brands, whereas original brand manufacturers (OBM) involves developing and marketing products under one's own brand name. Wan Tarmeze said that despite the government's repeated calls for the industry to move from being OEMs to OBMs, the shift has yet to happen. "The issue is not about identity but branding, and without branding we can't build value. "The truth is Malaysia tends to shy away from copying, but we should be more open to learning from others, even "stealing" ideas in the sense of adapting best practices and making them our own," he said.


The Sun
a day ago
- The Sun
Sweden parties back govt's defence spending hike
STOCKHOLM: Sweden's government said Thursday it had gained the support of all parties in parliament for a massive boost in defence spending, as the United States pressures Europe take more responsibility for security. The 300 billion kronor ($31 billion) boost over the next decade, first announced in March and due to be finalised in forthcoming budget decisions, will be the nation's biggest rearmament push since the Cold War. The Nordic country dropped two centuries of military non-alignment and applied for NATO membership after Russia's full invasion of Ukraine in 2022, becoming the alliance's 32nd member in March last year. US President Donald Trump has demanded NATO allies commit to spending five percent of GDP on defence, and members will try to reach a deal at a meeting next week. The Swedish investment -- which will bring defence spending to 3.5 percent of GDP by 2030, up from the current 2.4 percent -- will be financed through loans, Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson told a press conference. Flanked by government colleagues and representatives of other parties, she praised everyone for standing 'united' on a plan that is expected to raise Sweden's debt-to-GDP level by three percentage points. Defence Minister Pal Jonson told the same press conference the 'broad consensus' was 'virtually unique' in the world. The Nordic country drastically slashed defence spending after the Cold War ended but reversed course following Russia's 2014 annexation of Crimea. 'To put it bluntly, (the investment) is also about making sure that our children and grandchildren don't have to learn to speak Russian,' Svantesson said. NATO chief Mark Rutte is urging members to commit to 3.5 percent on direct military spending by 2032, and an additional 1.5 percent on broader security-related expenditure.