Tesla Autopilot Trust Crisis: Phantom Braking Fallout
Imagine cruising down the highway in your Tesla, sun glinting off the dash, when-without warning-your car slams the brakes at 70 mph. No obstacle, no alert, just a jolt that leaves your heart pounding. For thousands of Tesla owners in the U.S. and Australia, this isn't a hypothetical-it's a terrifying reality fueling a wave of lawsuits against the electric automaker.
In 2022, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) logged 758 complaints about Teslas suddenly decelerating for no reason on American highways (NHTSA ODI, 2022). Drivers describe their vehicles "slamming the brakes" out of nowhere, with one shaken owner telling reporters, "It just slammed the brakes". These aren't isolated glitches. U.S. District Judge Georgia Alexakis recently gave the green light to a class-action lawsuit, citing allegations that Tesla knowingly withheld warnings about this dangerous defect.
Tesla's phantom braking woes aren't confined to the U.S. In Australia, 10,000 owners have joined a Federal Court class action, accusing Tesla of misleading claims about Autopilot's safety and reliability. Plaintiffs allege that even with hands on the wheel, their cars decelerate without cause, creating "rear-ender nightmares." One driver recounted a "scary ride" after nearly being hit by a truck when his Tesla braked unexpectedly.
Tesla's Autopilot and Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) systems are designed to protect, using radar and cameras to scan the road. But for many, these systems are "ghost-braking"-slamming on the brakes for hazards that aren't there. NHTSA's ongoing investigation (PE 22 002) is focused on 2021–22 Model 3 and Model Y vehicles, with up to 416,000 cars potentially affected (NHTSA, 2022). For drivers, it's more than a glitch-it's a betrayal by the very technology meant to keep them safe.
The U.S. lawsuit alleges Tesla knew about phantom braking complaints as early as 2015 but kept drivers in the dark-possibly to avoid recalls or regulatory scrutiny. Judge Alexakis allowed claims of fraudulent concealment and unjust enrichment to proceed, cutting only insurance-related allegations. The central question: Did Tesla profit by selling a feature it knew could fail when drivers needed it most?
Paying extra for Autopilot is supposed to buy peace of mind-a digital co-pilot watching your back. But every phantom brake erodes that trust, turning confidence into caution. As one owner put it, "It feels like abandonment by a digital co-pilot." For many, Autopilot's promise of safety now comes with a side of anxiety.
Tesla isn't alone. Automakers like Mercedes, GM, and Ford are also racing to perfect driver-assist tech, but the stakes are high. A recent IIHS study found that many Level 2 systems struggle to keep drivers engaged and accountable (IIHS, 2024). In the world of EVs and automation, credibility is everything. Once lost, it's hard to win back.
With lawsuits gaining steam on two continents and hundreds of thousands of drivers affected, the phantom braking crisis is forcing a reckoning. Is this just a feature failure or a breach of trust that could reshape how we view automation in our cars?
At 70 mph, does your car still have your back or is it ready to slam the brakes without warning? Share your story below, and let's start a conversation about the future of trust in our vehicles.
Have you experienced phantom braking in your Tesla or another car? Comment below or share this story with friends-because the next chapter in this saga may affect every driver on the road.
Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why PayPal Stock Is a Screaming Buy for the Second Half of 2025
PayPal stock (PYPL) has had a bumpy ride since 2020. The stock more than doubled in 2020 and continued its good run in the first half of 2021. However, PYPL ended that year in the red, meeting the same fate for the next two years. 2024 was a welcome break for PayPal investors as the 'law of averages' finally caught up with the stock, and it gained a respectable 39%, outperforming the S&P 500 Index ($SPX) after three consecutive years of underperformance. Cut to 2025, and PYPL stock has already lost nearly 20% and is yet again massively underperforming the broader market, which has recovered from its April lows. I see the recent fall in PayPal stock as a good buying opportunity, as we'll explore in this article. Dear Tesla Stock Fans, Mark Your Calendars for June 30 The 'Golden Era' for Tesla Starts June 22. Should You Buy TSLA Stock First? This Options Tool Can Show You How to Trade Tesla Stock Ahead of Robotaxi Day Markets move fast. Keep up by reading our FREE midday Barchart Brief newsletter for exclusive charts, analysis, and headlines. PayPal started the year on a strong note but fell sharply after its Q4 2024 earnings. While the company posted better-than-expected revenues and profits for the quarter, and its guidance came in ahead of estimates, slowing growth at Braintree, its subsidiary focused on card processing, dampened sentiment. The tariff chaos did not help, as fintech companies, including Affirm (AFRM) and PayPal, slumped in April amid concerns that tariffs could lead to a recession, hurting their business. Both these stocks have not yet recovered to their 2025 highs, even as tariff worries have greatly (if not fully) subsided. While these are short-term headwinds, PayPal is facing some structural challenges in the form of higher competition across nearly all its business verticals. For instance, its branded checkout is facing intense competition from Apple Pay (AAPL) and Google Pay (GOOG), while the non-branded business faces competition from companies like Stripe. The P2P business is also facing competition from Zelle and Cash App (XYZ). The competition has negatively impacted PayPal's topline, which is now growing in single digits. With rising competition, digital payment companies have been feeling pressure on their take rate (the fees they charge for processing the transaction), and PayPal's operating margins have fallen. While I find corporate turnarounds a cliché, PayPal is a legit turnaround story under the new CEO, Alex Chriss, who is working on profitable growth. The strategy has shown results, and the company has had five consecutive quarters of profitable growth. PayPal has also made a foray into digital advertising, capitalizing on the vast consumer data that it possesses. The company is also using artificial intelligence to personalize experiences for customers. PayPal is transforming into a 'commerce company' from a mere payment company, and aspires to be a bridge connecting its over 400 million users to the merchants on the platform. During the Investor Day earlier this year, Chriss said that the pivot could help PayPal deliver annual adjusted earnings per share (EPS) growth of over 20% in the future. The investing thesis for PayPal is three part. The first is the turnaround and transformation, which is a work in progress The initial stages of this turnaround have been promising. The second is, of course, valuation, as PayPal's current forward price-earnings (P/E) multiple of 13.5x is well below the S&P 500 Index. Also, despite the slowdown, the company's bottom line is still growing, and the P/E-to-growth multiple of 1.13x looks quite attractive. Finally, PayPal is a free cash flow powerhouse despite all the challenges, and expects to generate between $6 billion-$7 billion of free cash in 2025. The company has been using the bulk of this cash flow to repurchase its shares and intends to spend $6 billion on buybacks this year. Given PayPal's current market cap of just over $66 billion, the buybacks will theoretically help boost its EPS by high single digits. PayPal's cash engine is not expected to slow down anytime soon, and it intends to use between 70%-80% of its free cash flows toward repurchases over the medium term, which should help propel its EPS growth in low-teens, if not higher. The company's balance sheet is also quite formidable, and it holds more cash and investments than the debt it owes. Overall, I find PayPal stock a no-brainer at these levels and am adding to my existing position in the company. While it is no longer the kind of growth story it was a few years back, there is a lot of comfort in these valuations, and the turnaround can help lead to a re-rating. Sell-side analysts also see decent upside in PYPL stock, and its mean target price of $80.50 is 17.4% higher than the June 18 closing price. The overall Street sentiment is mixed, though, and of the 44 analysts covering the stock, 16 have a 'Strong Buy' rating while three rate PYPL as a 'Moderate Buy.' 21 analysts rate PayPal as a 'Hold' while the remaining four rate it as a 'Strong Sell.' On the date of publication, Mohit Oberoi had a position in: PYPL, AFRM, GOOG, AAPL. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
3 of the Best Luxury Cars of 2025 Cost Less Than $45K
Luxury cars don't always come with a six-figure price tag. Acura Integra, Tesla Model 3, and Audi A4 deliver sleek styling, premium features and strong performance for under $45,000. Discover Next: Find Out: If you want an upscale ride without overspending, these three cars are worth a closer look. Price: $34,195 to $39,195 Miles Per Gallon: 26 to 29 miles in the city, 36 miles on the highway Drive Type: FWD Power: 200 hp at 6000 rpm Acura Integra is considered to be a sporty, luxury hatchback with 18-inch wheels and has an option for a six-speed manual transmission. The interior offers faux leather seats with faux suede inserts, an 8 to 12-way adjustable driver's seat with a four-way adjustable passenger seat and a generous 24 cubic-foot cargo area. Add the Technology package for a 9.0-inch infotainment display and wireless smartphone charging. The car's powertrain warranty covers six years or 70,000 miles, which is more than the Integra's competitors. Complimentary scheduled maintenance is offered at two years or 24,000 miles. Read More: Price: $44,130 Miles Per Gallon: 145 in the city, 128 on the highway Drive Type: RWD Power: 295 hp at 7000 rpm Tesla Model 3 Long Range RWD is a luxury electric compact sedan with a driver-assist system that has earned a spot on the Car and Driver Editors' Choice List for 2025. One improvement Tesla has made to the Model 3 is moving its turn signals to the steering wheel. Also, the gear shift is now on the display screen. The interior is unlike any other car on the market due to its simple design that's dominated by the extra-large touch screen secured in the middle of the dashboard, which controls almost all the functions except for those located on the steering wheel. Even with the interior being streamlined, there are many areas for storage, and the trunk space provides ample room for up to 15 carry-on suitcases. For rear passengers, there's an 8-inch touchscreen for climate control and entertainment options, including arcade games, Netflix and YouTube. The Model 3 has a Powertrain warranty that covers eight years or 100,000 miles, but no complimentary scheduled maintenance. Price: $44,100 Miles Per Gallon: 26 in the city, 36 on the highway Drive Type: AWD Power: 201 hp at 4200 rpm Audi A4 is a luxury small car that was made for the daily driver, which is now in its last year of production. The myAudiapp remote engine start is now featured on all trims of the A4. Its leather upholstered interior has a sunroof, spacious rear seating, 12 cubic feet of trunk space and a 10.1-inch touchscreen for infotainment. Adding the Premium Plus trim will allow the driver to experience many features, including a powerful Bang and Olufsen 19-speaker audio system and the Virtual Cockpit with an awesome digital gauge display. A4's Powertrain warranty covers 4 years or 50,000 miles. However, there's no complimentary scheduled maintenance included. More From GOBankingRates Are You Rich or Middle Class? 8 Ways To Tell That Go Beyond Your Paycheck This article originally appeared on 3 of the Best Luxury Cars of 2025 Cost Less Than $45K
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Shane Van Gisbergen Takes Jab at Red Bull Over Liam Lawson Demotion
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. NASCAR driver Shane van Gisbergen made a joke about Red Bull Racing's brutal driver handlings. Gisbergen got his maiden win in Mexico over the past weekend after struggling in his first full-time NASCAR Cup Series season. He only made the top ten once in the first 15 races. He struggled to adapt to the ovals that feature so prominently in the American racing series. Shane Van Gisbergen, driver of the #88 Safety Culture Chevrolet, celebrates after winning the NASCAR Cup Series Viva Mexico 250 at Autodromo Hermanos Rodriguez on June 15, 2025 in Mexico City, Mexico. Shane Van Gisbergen, driver of the #88 Safety Culture Chevrolet, celebrates after winning the NASCAR Cup Series Viva Mexico 250 at Autodromo Hermanos Rodriguez on June 15, 2025 in Mexico City, Mexico. Photo byGisbergen - a New Zealander sponsored by Red Bull - started in pole position in the Mexico City Cup Series race. His win was anything but smooth; he battled shifting conditions due to the inconsistent rain and a never-ending series of caution flags. Despite all of the challenges, Gisbergen managed to pull off the win, staying calm, cool, and collected throughout the race. After his landmark win, he thanked Trackhouse Racing for their continued support of him despite his struggles. He made a cheeky remark about the support he received during his downturn in form, comparing it to what Red Bull offered fellow New Zealander Liam Lawson. "I'm glad I didn't drive for Red Bull F1 after how the first few rounds went," van Gisbergen joked after the race. "[Team boss] Justin [Marks] has been amazing, supporting me and just giving me all the time I need and not putting pressure on [me]. It's been really cool." Red Bull's F1 team decided to axe Lawson after only two races, a drastic decision that followed a series of underwhelming results. When Lawson made an Instagram post back in March about his removal from Red Bull, van Gisbergen left a message under the post saying, "Prove em Wrong!" The 36-year-old New Zealander mentored his fellow countryman and backed Lawson through different racing series. While trying to make it in America, van Gisbergen still monitored Lawson's progress. "The way he's gotten to F1 has been a little difficult the last couple of years. But seeing him get this opportunity full-time now, I'm just stoked and so proud," he said back in December. "You've got to be versatile, which is something I've always tried to do by driving a bunch of different cars. It helps you when it comes to something new in the setup, something technical, or even with the weather changing. You've got to be able to adapt straight away. "Liam's been exceptional at that. Even when F1 wasn't working out, he did DTM and other racing that I think has really helped him."
