Quincy residents sue mayor over controversial Catholic saint statues for new public safety building

Fifteen religious and non-religious Quincy residents are suing Mayor Thomas Koch over recently discovered plans to install controversial Catholic patron saint statues on the front of the city's new public safety building.
The lawsuit, which was filed in Norfolk County Superior Court with the help of the ACLU of Massachusetts on May 27, claims that the statues violate a clause in Article 3 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights stating that 'all religious sects and denominations ... shall be equally under the protection of the law; and no subordination of any one sect or denomination to another shall ever be established by law.'
The lawsuit also alleges that Koch unilaterally decided to commission the statues, and that he and other city officials kept the plans out of the public eye for years. Meanwhile, hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars were allocated for the statues' creation without the approval of the City Council, the suit argues.
Despite 'widespread' opposition to the statues from Quincy residents and local faith leaders of various religious affiliations and beliefs, plans for the statues' installation appear to be moving forward, according to the lawsuit.
'The City has abandoned its constitutional duty to remain neutral on matters of faith,' ACLU Senior Counsel Heather Weaver said in a Tuesday press release. 'The new public safety building will be home to many critical government services, but the moment they walk in the door, Quincy residents who do not share the City's favored religious beliefs will get the message that they are not welcome.'
Koch's office did not respond to a request for comment on Thursday.
Plans for the new public safety building date back to 2017 when the Quincy City Council first approved money to pay for its design, according to the lawsuit. Between 2019 and 2022, the city council approved over $280 million for the project.
At some point during the development and planning of the building, it was decided that two 10-foot-tall bronze statues of Saint Michael the Archangel and Saint Florian — which are the Catholic patron saints of police and firefighters, respectively — should be commissioned with the intent of having them adorn the façade of the public safety building.
'Many aspects of the building were discussed at length during public meetings. However, at no point during any of the numerous City Council meetings during which funding for the public safety building was discussed or voted on was the public notified of the plan to install statues of Catholic saints on the front of the building,' the lawsuit reads.
'Nor was the potential for public art of any kind — patron saints or otherwise — contemplated by or included in public plans or drawings of the buildings from the time of the building's approval until February 2025."
Instead, the public first learned about the statues through an article published in the local newspaper, The Patriot Ledger, on Feb. 8, according to the lawsuit.
During a Feb. 24 City Council meeting, Chris Walker — Koch's chief of staff — stated that the decision to commission the statues 'was ultimately and only the mayor's decision.'
When asked why the statues weren't shown to city councilors when they approved funding for the building during various meetings between 2017 and 2022, Koch said that large projects such as this sometimes 'evolve,' and that the idea 'wasn't on the table' when councilors cast their votes," according to the Feb. 8 Patriot Ledger article.
Of Quincy City Council's nine members, two told The Patriot Ledger they had no knowledge of the statues before the newspaper contacted them about it, according to the Feb. 8 article. One councilor 'had heard something about it but didn't participate in the plans,' one said they were previously aware of the plans and five did not respond to requests for comment.
During the Feb. 24 City Council meeting, Ward 1 Councilor Dave McCarthy — in whose district the new public safety building will be located — said he was told of the plan for the statues 'a long time ago.' Though over 200 residents attended the meeting to object to the statues, McCarthy also said he believed the statues would 'bless our first responders' and that he hoped they 'might say a little prayer before they go out on duty.'
'As the statues were neither discussed in public meetings nor subject to a public procurement process nor otherwise disclosed to the public prior to February 8, it is unclear how or by whom Councilor McCarthy and some other the members of the City Council were made aware of the plan in advance of the February 8 article,' the lawsuit reads.
Ward 5 City Councilor Dan Minton — a 40-year veteran of the Quincy Police Department — wrote in a Feb. 9 Facebook post that he did not know about the statues before the Feb. 8 article and expressed concerns about the installation.
'Generally, people don't want to enter a police station — it is usually something bad that has happened, ranging from an act of violence to a simple parking ticket. The statue may not be a welcoming presence to someone already ill at ease," he wrote.
As of April 2025, the city has made eight payments totalling over $760,000 in public funds to pay for the statues, according to the lawsuit. The total cost of the installation is expected to come to $850,000.
While Catholics often call upon patron saints when praying on behalf of specific causes, other denominations and religions — including many protestant and nondenominational Christian faiths — reject the veneration of saints.
Community members of many different faiths and beliefs oppose the statues, according to the lawsuit. The plaintiffs in the case include Quincy residents who identified themselves as Catholic, Unitarian Universalist, Jewish, atheist and humanist, among other religious identities.
Similarly, in an April 4 statement from Quincy Interfaith Network, 19 faith leaders of a range of religious affiliations said they had 'grave concerns' about the statues.
'No single religious tradition should be elevated in a publicly funded facility. Erecting these statues sends a message that there are insiders and outsiders in this community. We are confident this is not the message our City or our first responders want to send,' the statement reads.
In addition to concerns about government entities showing religious preference, Councilor Minton, the 19 faith leaders and some of the lawsuit's plaintiffs took issue with the depiction of Saint Michael in the commissioned statue. As is commonplace with depictions of this saint, he is shown standing triumphantly over a demon.
'The violence portrayed on a heroic scale of St. Michael the Archangel is especially frightening and conjures images of police violence, which is contrary to Quincy Police Dept's mission of public safety,' the citizen petition against the statues reads.
The lawsuit asks the court to find that the use of public funds to pay for the statues violates state law. It also requests that a judge issue injunctions barring Koch and the city from spending additional taxpayer dollars on them or displaying them on or near the new public safety building.
The citizen petition was submitted to the mayor over 100 days ago, but he has yet to respond to it, according to Change.org.
The statues are expected to be available for installation around Labor Day, according to the lawsuit. The public safety building is set to open to the public in October 2025.
District 7 candidates debate land use, White Stadium at Boston forum
Springfield to remember June 1, 2011 tornado on anniversary
Springfield opens new football field at Putnam Vocational Technical Academy
Central Mass. firefighter arrested on child sexual abuse material charges
Mass. man and woman face kidnapping charge after teen reports being locked in closet
Read the original article on MassLive.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

CBS News

29 minutes ago

• CBS News

Wisconsin and NIL collective sue Miami, allege tampering and NIL inducements to land football player

The University of Wisconsin and its NIL collective VC Connect filed a joint lawsuit on Friday against the University of Miami, alleging it knowingly induced one of the Badgers' football players to abandon a lucrative name, image and likeness contract to play for the Florida this upcoming season. Allegations of tampering rarely get to this level and the 23-page lawsuit, which was filed in state court in Wisconsin and obtained by The Associated Press, is unusual. Depending on its resolution, it could have a a wider impact on future NIL deals across college athletics. The player in question in the filing is referred to only as "Student-Athlete A." But the case summary describes facts that line up with the situation involving cornerback Xavier Lucas, who last December announced his plans to enter the transfer portal. Shortly afterward, Darren Heitner, who has been representing Lucas, indicated that Wisconsin was refusing to put Lucas' name in the portal and that it was hindering his ability to talk with other schools. In January, Heitner announced that Lucas would be playing for Miami this fall. The situation is fallout from the rapid changes engulfing college athletics, specifically a combination of two things: Athletes went to court and won the ability to transfer with much more freedom and the 2021 NCAA decision clearing the way for them to strike NIL endorsement deals now worth millions of dollars. That has changed the recruiting landscape and forced the issue of contracts and signed commitments to the fore. "Indeed, student-athletes' newfound NIL rights will be rendered meaningless if third parties are allowed to induce student-athletes to abandon their contractual commitments," a portion of the lawsuit reads. Miami and Lucas were in talks before transfer decision, Wisconsin says Wisconsin said in January that it had credible information that Miami and Lucas made impermissible contact with each other before the former Badgers cornerback decided to transfer. Wisconsin and VC Connect allege that the inducement for Lucas to attend Miami happened within days of him entering his NIL agreement to play for the Badgers, and that they incurred substantial monetary and reputational harm. The lawsuit seeks unspecified monetary damages and "a declaration that Miami's conduct directed towards Student-Athlete A constituted tampering." A message left with the University of Miami seeking comment was not immediately returned. In a text message Friday, Heitner declined to comment on the lawsuit but he said that Lucas still plans to attend Miami and play football. Wisconsin said it had the support of its leadership and the Big Ten Conference in filing the lawsuit, noting its commitment to "ensuring integrity and fundamental fairness in the evolving landscape of college athletics." "While we reluctantly bring this case, we stand by our position that respecting and enforcing contractual obligations is essential to maintaining a level playing field," the statement said. "In addition to our legal action, we will continue to be proactive to protect the interests of our student-athletes, our program and the broader collegiate athletics community. Lucas, who is from Pompano Beach, Florida, had 12 tackles, an interception and a sack as a freshman for Wisconsin last season. Heitner said that Lucas hasn't received any money from Wisconsin and therefore owes no money to the school. Heitner also argued that Wisconsin had violated an NCAA bylaw by not entering Lucas into the transfer database within two business days of the player's request. Wisconsin issued a statement at the time saying it hadn't put Lucas' name in the portal because he had entered a two-year binding NIL agreement. In April, the surprise transfers of brothers Nico and Madden Iamaleava from Tennessee to UCLA prompted fresh questions about contracts and buyouts. Nico Iamaleava, who led Tennessee to the College Football Playoff last season, walked away from a reported $2.4 million NIL contract. Arkansas freshman quarterback Madden Iamaleava entered the portal after spring practices wrapped up. Arkansas athletic director Hunter Yurachek released a statement indicating he would support efforts by the Razorbacks' NIL collective to enforce buyout clauses in athlete contracts. Iamaleava reportedly had a contract valued at $500,000 upon signing with Arkansas.

Yahoo

33 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Federal judge blocks Trump effort to keep Harvard from hosting foreign students

WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge on Friday blocked the Trump administration's efforts to keep Harvard University from hosting international students, delivering the Ivy League school another victory as it challenges multiple government sanctions amid a battle with the White House. The order from U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs in Boston preserves Harvard's ability to host foreign students while the case is decided, but it falls short of resolving all of Harvard's legal hurdles to hosting international students. Notably, Burroughs said the federal government still has authority to review Harvard's ability to host international students through normal processes outlined in law. Harvard sued the Department of Homeland Security in May after the agency abruptly withdrew the school's certification to host foreign students and issue paperwork for their visas, skirting most of its usual procedures. The action would have forced Harvard's roughly 7,000 international students — about a quarter of its total enrollment — to transfer or risk being in the U.S. illegally. New foreign students would have been barred from coming to Harvard. The university said it was experiencing illegal retaliation for rejecting the White House's demands to overhaul Harvard policies related to campus protests, admissions, hiring and more. Burroughs temporarily had halted the government's action hours after Harvard sued. Less than two weeks later, in early June, President Donald Trump tried a new strategy. He issued a proclamation to block foreign students from entering the U.S. to attend Harvard, citing a different legal justification. Harvard challenged the move, saying the president was attempting an end-run around the temporary court order. Burroughs temporarily blocked Trump's proclamation as well. That emergency block remains in effect, and Burroughs did not address the proclamation in her order Friday. 'We expect the judge to issue a more enduring decision in the coming days,' Harvard said Friday in an email to international students. 'Our Schools will continue to make contingency plans toward ensuring that our international students and scholars can pursue their academic work to the fullest extent possible, should there be a change to student visa eligibility or their ability to enroll at Harvard.' Students in limbo The stops and starts of the legal battle have unsettled current students and left others around the world waiting to find out whether they will be able to attend America's oldest and wealthiest university. The Trump administration's efforts to stop Harvard from enrolling international students have created an environment of 'profound fear, concern, and confusion,' the university said in a court filing. Countless international students have asked about transferring from the university, Harvard immigration services director Maureen Martin said. Still, admissions consultants and students have indicated most current and prospective Harvard scholars are holding out hope they'll be able to attend the university. For one prospective graduate student, an admission to Harvard's Graduate School of Education had rescued her educational dreams. Huang, who asked to be identified only by her surname for fear of being targeted, had seen her original doctoral offer at Vanderbilt University rescinded after federal cuts to research and programs related to diversity, equity and inclusion. Harvard stepped in a few weeks later with a scholarship she couldn't refuse. She rushed to schedule her visa interview in Beijing. More than a month after the appointment, despite court orders against the Trump administration's policies, she still hasn't heard back. 'Your personal effort and capability means nothing in this era,' Huang said in a social media post. 'Why does it have to be so hard to go to school?' An ongoing battle Trump has been warring with Harvard for months after the university rejected a series of government demands meant to address conservative complaints that the school has become too liberal and has tolerated anti-Jewish harassment. Trump officials have cut more than $2.6 billion in research grants, ended federal contracts and threatened to revoke Harvard's tax-exempt status. On Friday, the president said in a post on Truth Social that the administration has been working with Harvard to address 'their largescale improprieties" and that a deal with Harvard could be announced within the next week. 'They have acted extremely appropriately during these negotiations, and appear to be committed to doing what is right,' Trump's post said. Trump's administration first targeted Harvard's international students in April. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem demanded that Harvard turn over a trove of records related to any dangerous or illegal activity by foreign students. Harvard says it complied, but Noem said the response fell short and on May 22 revoked Harvard's certification in the Student and Exchange Visitor Program. The sanction immediately put Harvard at a disadvantage as it competed for the world's top students, the school said in its lawsuit, and it harmed Harvard's reputation as a global research hub. 'Without its international students, Harvard is not Harvard,' the lawsuit said. The action would have upended some graduate schools that recruit heavily from abroad. Some schools overseas quickly offered invitations to Harvard's students, including two universities in Hong Kong. Harvard President Alan Garber previously said the university has made changes to combat antisemitism. But Harvard, he said, will not stray from its 'core, legally-protected principles,' even after receiving federal ultimatums. ___ Collin Binkley has covered Harvard for nearly a decade — most of the time living half a mile from campus. ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at Collin Binkley And Albee Zhang, The Associated Press

Fox News

34 minutes ago

• Fox News

Issa floats constitutional amendment to let Congress, SCOTUS remove president after Biden health 'cover-up'

Rep. Darrell Issa on Friday suggested that the House should consider taking up a constitutional amendment to make it easier to remove a president who is unable to perform the job in response to the alleged cover-up of former President Joe Biden's declining mental state. Issa, R-Calif., who is a member of the House Judiciary Committee, said that actions taken by Biden administration officials to keep Americans in the dark about his health show that the provisions in the 25th Amendment may be insufficient. That amendment allows the Vice President and the Cabinet to remove a president from his role if he is "unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office." "The initiation was always intended to be the vice president and the cabinet based on the assumption that they would take their oath and their observation seriously and that they were closest to the president to know if that event was needed," Issa told Fox News. "It now looks as though their impartiality can be questioned." Issa added: "If that's the case, the other two branches need to be brought in in some way into the process of asserting that the president may be unable to perform his duties and determining that in a fair and, if necessary, public way." The other two branches in this case would likely be Congress and the Supreme Court. Issa's comments come as the House Oversight Committee is set to interview three Biden administration officials next week about the former president's decline. Former Domestic Policy Council Director Neera Tanden will meet with the committee Tuesday. Former Assistant to the President and Senior Advisor to the First Lady Anthony Bernthal will meet with the committee Thursday. Former White House Physician Dr. Kevin O'Connor will testify under subpoena on Friday. The committee also has interviews scheduled with former administration officials Annie Tomasini and Ashley Williams. And it's seeking interviews with several officials in the Biden inner circle, including former Chief of Staff Ron Klain and former Senior Advisor to the President for Communications Anita Dunn. Also among the questions investigators will have is whether any Biden officials used the autopen to authorize executive actions without the president's permission. The results of that investigation, according to Issa, could help inform exactly how to write this potential constitutional amendment. "What Chairman Comer is doing is extremely important because he's basically doing the fact-finding for the Judiciary Committee, which is going to undoubtedly take up a possible amendment to the 25th Amendment," Issa said. There is a very high threshold to amend the Constitution – a two-thirds vote in each chamber and ratification by three-quarters of states. So, if an amendment does materialize from the Judiciary Committee, it would face a tough road to make it through Congress, even with unified Republican control. But Issa says it's worth making an effort to improve the system. "Since it didn't work, we have to ask, is there another way to make it work better in the future?" he asked.