Canada Transport Minister Freeland slams B.C. Ferries deal with Chinese company
B.C. Ferries has drawn the ire of federal Transportation Minister Chrystia Freeland for its decision to contract a Chinese state-owned shipyard to build four new vessels for its passenger fleet.
Freeland also expressed concerns about security risks related to the contract.
In a letter to B.C.'s Transportation Minister Mike Farnworth released Friday afternoon, Freeland expressed her "great consternation and disappointment" with the ferry operator.
"I am dismayed that B.C. Ferries would select a Chinese state-owned shipyard to build new ferries in the current geopolitical context," Freeland wrote.
Earlier this month, B.C. Ferries said the winning bidder on the contract is China Merchants Industry Weihai Shipyards. No Canadian companies bid on the ships, according to B.C. Ferries.
But Freeland said, given the value of the contract and the amount of taxpayer money provided to B.C. Ferries' operations, she would have expected Canadian companies to be involved in the bid process.
"I am surprised that B.C. Ferries does not appear to have been mandated to require an appropriate level of Canadian content in the procurement or the involvement of the Canadian marine industry," she wrote.
Freeland said China has imposed "unjustified tariffs" on Canadian goods, including 100 per cent tariffs on canola oil, meal and pea imports and a 25 per cent duty on Canadian aquatic products and pork.
She asked her provincial counterpart to share what it will do to address potential threats to security, including cybersecurity, and determine how B.C. Ferries will lessen "the risks that vessel maintenance and spare parts may pose."
"I would like your assurance that B.C. Ferries conducted a robust risk assessment, and I expect them to engage with the relevant provincial and federal security agencies and departments to mitigate any security risk."
WATCH | Farnworth worries about B.C. Ferries contract:
Transportation minister concerned over B.C. Ferries' construction deal with Chinese shipyard
9 days ago
Duration 2:06
Freeland said the federal government has a long record of providing financial support to B.C. Ferries, including a federal subsidy of $37.8 million in 2025-26 dating back to a 1977 agreement.
The letter went on to say the Canada Infrastructure Bank is providing the ferry operator with a $75-million loan to finance the purchase of four zero-emission ferries and install charging infrastructure
Freeland asked Farnworth to confirm "with utmost certainty" that no federal funding would be used to acquire the new ferries.
In an emailed statement late Friday, Farnworth said he has spoken to Freeland about the need to bolster the province's shipbuilding sector.
"B.C. has the skilled labour — a partnership with the federal government, provincial governments, and industry is essential for Canadian shipyards to expand physical capacity to build commercial vessels on both coasts," he said.
The B.C. Ministry of Transportation said it is reviewing Freeland's letter.
B.C. Ferries' response
Jeff Groot, executive director of communications with B.C. Ferries, said Weihai Shipyards was selected following a rigorous and transparent procurement process.
"It was the strongest bid by a significant margin," he said in an emailed statement.
Groot said Canadian companies have acquired around 100 vessels built at Chinese shipyards over the last decade.
"Globally, only a few shipyards have the capacity to deliver complex passenger ferries on the timelines and budgets required."
Groot said B.C. Ferries has been working with Transport Canada since before the contract was signed, and with Public Safety Canada on safety and security issues.
"Also, sensitive systems will be sourced separately and independently certified before the vessels enter service. B.C. Ferries intends that all of our IT networks will be procured from within Canada and installed on the ship by B.C. Ferries' own personnel," Groot said.
He added a full-time B.C. Ferries oversight team will be on site at the shipyard.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
35 minutes ago
- National Post
Opinion: Canada has put up with Khalistani terrorists for long enough
By Ujjal Dosanjh and Joe Adam George Monday, June 23, marks the 40th anniversary of the bombing of Air India Flight 182 — the deadliest terrorist attack in Canadian history, and the most lethal act of aviation terrorism in the world prior to 9/11. The bombing left 329 people dead, including 268 Canadians. The investigation into the attack is still ' active and ongoing,' and is considered 'one of the most complex domestic terrorism investigations' undertaken by the RCMP. Article content Despite two separate inquiries finding that Khalistani terrorists in Canada had masterminded the attack, the perpetrators managed to walk away largely unscathed, much to the despair of the victims' families and the frustration of India. To this day, they are venerated as heroes by their fellow extremist ideologues. Article content Article content The Khalistanis form part of a Sikh extremist separatist movement that aims to establish an independent state of Khalistan carved out of India. Although it continues to rally a small but outspoken minority of Sikhs, the movement holds virtually no appeal among Sikhs in India or the majority of Canada's Sikh community. Article content The U.K. government-commissioned Bloom Review, which was released in 2023, revealed that Khalistani activists had exploited government ignorance, threatened and intimidated Sikhs, indoctrinated and recruited young people and solicited funds from Sikh temples to advance their agenda. Article content The review warned the British government that, 'The subversive, aggressive and sectarian actions of some pro-Khalistan activists and the subsequent negative effect on wider Sikh communities should not be tolerated.' Article content Yet Canada's political class choose to disregard those warnings. Politicians of all stripes continue to commit the cardinal sin of ignoring India's concerns and legitimizing Khalistanis by conflating them with the broader Sikh community. They repeatedly indulge them, hoping to boost their electoral fortunes, given the substantial sway the Sikh vote holds in many ridings throughout the country. Article content Article content For decades, Canadian Khalistanis have been an enduring national security and diplomatic liability to New Delhi, which accuses them of engaging in organized crime and acts of terrorism, both in India and abroad, under the guise of a religious political movement. Article content During a public hearing of the foreign interference inquiry last year, CSIS members testified that Khalistani elements in Canada — with covert backing from Pakistan's spy agency, Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) — were attempting to undermine Indian interests in the country, confirming a longstanding allegation by New Delhi.
Globe and Mail
39 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
2 No-Brainer Retail Stocks to Buy Right Now
Investors have become nervous about the retail sector due to a host of concerns. These include the impact of tariffs on consumer spending and a potential recession. You can see the effect on stock prices. The S&P 500 Retail Composite has lost 1.8% this year through June 18. During this time, the S&P 500 index gained 1.7%. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » That makes this a good time for investors with a long-range view to examine retail sector stocks. These two stocks head the list for those who can tune out the short-term noise. 1. Home Depot Home Depot (NYSE: HD) generates the highest sales among home improvement retailers. Its nearly 2,350 stores produced about $160 billion in sales for the latest fiscal year, which ended on Feb. 2. Its nearest competitor, Lowe's, has roughly 1,750 stores that had about $84 billion in sales. Home Depot's large size confers certain advantages. These include its ability to offer a wide breadth of products at attractive prices. But its business is tied to the broad economy and housing market. People will put off major construction during difficult economic times. With high prices for basic items making consumers cautious along with high interest rates dampening demand for projects, Home Depot's top-line growth has suffered. Fiscal first-quarter same-store sales (comps) fell 0.3% for the period ended on May 4. Management expects comps to gain a tepid 1% for the year. The short-term sales picture doesn't look great, and tariffs add another level of uncertainty. However, people will return to buying homes, which they often remodel. Similarly, existing homeowners will do major construction projects at some point out of necessity or desire. Once they do, it seems likely homeowners and contractors will shop and spend more at Home Depot. The stock's price fell 1.9% over the last year through June 18, lagging the S&P 500 index's 9% gain. Home Depot's shares trade at a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 24, about the same level as a year ago. However, that's lower than the S&P 500's 29 P/E multiple. 2. Target Target (NYSE: TGT) has also seen sales affected by the same macroeconomic forces and tariff policies. These may affect short-term sales and costs even further. And the company's top line has also been hurt by boycotts following management's decision to pull back on diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. The combination caused fiscal first-quarter comps to drop 3.8%. Lower traffic was responsible for 2.4 percentage points of that, and decreased spending accounted for the balance. The period ended May 3. But management has taken steps, albeit delayed, to rectify the situation and alleviate the boycotts. This includes having discussions with various groups. Between boycotts and economic uncertainty, it's not too surprising that management lowered its earnings expectations for the year. It currently projects adjusted earnings per share of $7 to $9, down from the $8.80 to $9.80 range management provided when Target reported fourth-quarter results. The company earned $8.86 a share in fiscal 2024. Nonetheless, I'm not concerned about the larger economic forces hurting long-term performance. At some point, consumers will feel comfortable spending more money. When they do, they'll undoubtedly turn to Target for its differentiated and exclusive merchandise. Patient investors can take advantage of the situation by purchasing the stock at an attractive valuation. Target's share price has dropped more than 33% in the last year. The stock's P/E has declined from 16 to 10 during this time. Should you invest $1,000 in Home Depot right now? Before you buy stock in Home Depot, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Home Depot wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $659,171!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $891,722!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is995% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Big grocery wants Ontario to lift ban on 'private label' wine, beer
Social Sharing Premier Doug Ford's next move to reform alcohol retail in Ontario could be allowing supermarket chains to sell their own private-label wine and beer, such as Costco's Kirkland Signature brand. The government recently began consulting with the industry about making further changes to Ontario's rules on booze sales. As part of the consultations, big grocery is lobbying for Ontario to end its ban on supermarkets selling their own-brand alcohol products, CBC News has learned. Current provincial regulations prohibit grocery stores from selling any brands of beer or wine in which they have "a direct or indirect financial interest." Small wineries in the province fear the consequences of lifting that ban. "Allowing private label wine in grocery, big box and convenience stores would be a severe blow to Ontario's wine industry," said Michelle Wasylyshen, president and CEO of Ontario Craft Wineries, which represents more than 100 wine producers. WATCH | How the LCBO makes money for the Ontario government: Here's how the LCBO brings in $2.5 billion for Ontario annually 11 months ago Duration 3:40 The LCBO earns nearly 80 per cent of its revenue from its retail outlets, all currently closed by strike, the corporation's latest annual report shows. CBC's Mike Crawley breaks down how the LCBO currently turns a profit and how things are expected to change with the Ford government's reforms — including the premier's plan to sell select alcohol in Ontario convenience and grocery stores. Wasylyshen says while craft wineries deeply value their working relationship with the grocery stores, Ontario's private-label ban needs to stay in place so that locally-produced wines are not pushed out by the big supermarket chains. "This is a black and white issue for us, backed by data and previous experience. There is no grey zone," she said in an email to CBC News. B.C. also bans private-label sales Canada's other major wine-producing province, British Columbia – where it's a $3.75 billion-a-year industry – also bans supermarkets from selling their own brands. The Retail Council of Canada, which represents all the large supermarket and big-box chains including Costco, Loblaws, Walmart and Sobeys, says its members in Ontario are interested in selling their own brands of alcohol. "Private label increases competition, lowering prices for customers, because brewers and vineyards need to indirectly compete with the lower retail prices of private label brands," said Sebastian Prins, the Retail Council's director of government relations for Ontario, in an email to CBC News. Prins says the province's wine industry would remain protected by provincial regulations requiring supermarkets to allocate certain portions of shelf-space to Ontario-made products. He also says private-label sales could benefit grape growers in Ontario because the retailers would be looking for new sources for their wine. But with cross-border trade tensions remaining high, and the LCBO currently not stocking U.S. products, a spokesperson for Ford says private-label sales are not currently planned as part of the government's modernization of alcohol retailing. 'Supporting Ontario growers' is Ford's priority "Our priority right now is supporting Ontario growers and supporting Ontario-made products," said Ford's director of media relations, Grace Lee. The push on private-label sales comes less than a year after Ford sped up the timeline for allowing convenience stores to sell beer, wine and ready-to-drink cocktails. That move is costing taxpayers at least $612 million, including $225 million of compensation paid to the mega-breweries that own The Beer Store for the expanded retail competition. In April, Ford announced a shift in pricing rules so that convenience stores now get their products supplied at a 15 per cent discount from the LCBO's retail price, giving them a potentially higher margin on wine and beer than grocery stores, whose discount remains at 10 per cent. The Retail Council and the Canadian Federation of Independent Grocers wrote a joint letter to Ford last month asking for a number of changes to the province's booze marketplace, including the ability to sell private-label alcohol. The chain and independent supermarkets also raised concerns about the mandate that all grocery stores selling beer and wine must start accepting returns of empty cans and bottles in 2026, a requirement not imposed on convenience stores.
