Denmark to push for Ukraine's EU membership during presidency
European and Danish flags fly at the Danish Parliament Christiansborg in Copenhagen, Denmark, June 3, 2025. Denmark takes over the EU presidency on July 1, 2025. Ritzau Scanpix/Mads Claus Rasmussen via REUTERS ATTENTION EDITORS - THIS IMAGE WAS PROVIDED BY A THIRD PARTY. DENMARK OUT. NO COMMERCIAL OR EDITORIAL SALES IN DENMARK.
COPENHAGEN - Denmark will continue preparing Ukraine for EU membership in the face of Hungary blocking negotiations, when the Nordic country takes over the presidency of the European Council from July 1, its European affairs minister said on Thursday.
"Unfortunately, Hungary is blocking and we are trying to put as much pressure there as we can and also do everything we can to make Ukraine continue with the necessary reform work," European affairs minister Marie Bjerre told a press conference in Copenhagen.
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has strongly opposed providing NATO military and EU aid to Ukraine, saying the country's EU membership would destroy Hungarian farmers and the wider economy.
Ukraine had already initiated the necessary reforms and is ready to speed up the negotiations.
"When we get to the point where we can actually open the specific negotiation chapters, we can be ready to close them very quickly," Bjerre said.
Denmark will also seek to reach agreement among EU nations on the bloc's planned 2040 climate goals.
The European Commission plans to propose in July a legally binding target to cut EU countries' emissions by 90% by 2040, from 1990 levels.
Faced with pushback from governments, however, Brussels is assessing options including setting a lower target for domestic industries, and using international carbon credits to make up the gap to 90%. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
17 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Iran rules out nuclear talks under fire, sources say Qatar met energy majors
Iran launched a new barrage of missiles at Israel early on June 20. PHOTO: REUTERS DUBAI/JERUSALEM - Iran said on June 20 it would not discuss the future of its nuclear programme while under attack by Israel, as Europe tried to coax Tehran back into negotiations and the US considers whether to get involved in the conflict. A week into its campaign, Israel said it had struck dozens of military targets overnight, including missile production sites, a research body involved in nuclear weapons development in Tehran and military facilities in western and central Iran. Iran launched a new barrage of missiles at Israel early on June 20, striking near residential apartments, office buildings and industrial facilities in the southern city of Beersheba. After air raid warnings later that day, Israeli media said initial reports pointed to missile impacts in Tel Aviv, the Negev and Haifa. World oil markets are on high alert for any strikes that hit energy facilities in Iran or elsewhere in the Gulf which affect supplies. Qatar held crisis talks this week with energy majors after Israeli strikes on Iran's huge gas field, which it shares with Qatar, an industry source and a diplomat in the region told Reuters. Doha was asking firms to raise US, UK and European governments' awareness of increasing risks to global gas supply, they said. QatarEnergy did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The White House said on June 19 that President Donald Trump would decide on US involvement in the conflict in the next two weeks, citing the possibility of negotiations involving Iran in the near future. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said there was no room for negotiations with the US 'until Israeli aggression stops'. But he was due to meet European foreign ministers in Geneva for talks at which Europe hopes to establish a path back to diplomacy over Iran's nuclear programme. Two diplomats said before the meeting with France, Britain, Germany and the European Union's foreign policy chief that Mr Araqchi would be told the US is still open to direct talks. Expectations for a breakthrough are low, diplomats say. A senior Iranian official told Reuters that Tehran was ready to discuss limitations on its uranium enrichment and that the European's role was now more prominent because Iran is unwilling to engage with the US while under fire from Israel. But any proposal for zero enrichment - not being able to enrich uranium at all - will be rejected 'especially now under Israel's strikes', the official said. Israel began attacking Iran on June 13, saying its longtime enemy was on the verge of developing nuclear weapons. Iran, which says its nuclear programme is only for peaceful purposes, retaliated with missile and drone strikes on Israel. Israel is widely assumed to possess nuclear weapons. It neither confirms nor denies this. Israeli air attacks have killed 639 people in Iran, according to the Human Rights Activists News Agency, a US-based human rights organisation that tracks Iran. The dead include the military's top echelon and nuclear scientists. In Israel, 24 civilians have been killed in Iranian missile attacks, according to authorities. Both sides say they are attacking military and defence-related targets. An Iranian news website said a drone had struck an apartment in a residential building in central Tehran on June 20, but did not give details. Israel's strikes on Iran's nuclear installations so far pose only limited risks of contamination, experts say. But they warn that any attack on the nuclear power station at Bushehr could cause a nuclear disaster. Israel says it is determined to destroy Iran's nuclear capabilities but that it wants to avoid any nuclear disaster in a region that is inhabited by tens of millions of people and produces much of the world's oil. The meeting in Geneva was due to start on the afternoon of June 20. The Swiss city is where an initial accord was struck in 2013 to curb Iran's nuclear programme in return for sanctions being lifted. A comprehensive deal followed in 2015. Mr Trump pulled the US out of the agreement in 2018. A new series of talks between Iran and the US collapsed when Israel started attacking Iran's nuclear facilities and ballistic capabilities on June 12. Mr Trump has alternated between threatening Tehran and urging it to resume nuclear talks. His special envoy to the region, Steve Witkoff, has spoken to Mr Araqchi several times since last week, sources say. Western and regional officials say Israel is trying to shatter the government of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Katz said he had instructed the military to intensify attacks on 'symbols of the regime' in the Iranian capital Tehran, aiming to destabilise it. Iran has arrested an 'agent' of Israel's foreign spy agency Mossad who was sending information on Iranian air defence installations to Israel using WhatsApp messaging, Iran's state broadcaster said. Iranian opposition groups think their time may be near, but activists involved in previous protests say they are unwilling to unleash mass unrest with their nation under attack, and Iranian authorities have cracked down hard on dissent. Iranian state media reported rallies in several cities, describing them as rallies of 'rage and victory,' and 'solidarity and resistance.' REUTERS Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Straits Times
17 minutes ago
- Straits Times
British Parliament votes in favour of assisted dying, paving way for historic law change
Protesters against the legislation held up placards that said 'let's care not kill' and 'kill the Bill not the ill' in London, on June 20. PHOTO: REUTERS British Parliament votes in favour of assisted dying, paving way for historic law change LONDON - Britain's Parliament voted on June 20 in favour of a Bill to legalise assisted dying, paving the way for the country's biggest social change in a generation. In the vote, 314 lawmakers were in favour, while 291 were against the Bill, clearing its biggest parliamentary hurdle. The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) law would give mentally competent, terminally ill adults in England and Wales with six months or less left to live the right to choose to end their lives with medical help. The vote puts Britain on course to follow Australia, Canada and other countries, as well as some US states, in permitting assisted dying. Supporters say it will provide dignity and compassion to people suffering, but opponents worry that vulnerable people could be coerced into ending their lives. The Bill now proceeds to Britain's upper chamber, the House of Lords, where it will undergo months of scrutiny. While there could be further amendments, the unelected Lords will be reluctant to block legislation that has been passed by elected members of the House of Commons. Prime Minister Keir Starmer's Labour government was neutral on the legislation, meaning politicians voted according to their conscience rather than along party lines. Mr Starmer had previously said he was in favour of allowing assisted dying. Opinion polls show that a majority of Britons back assisted dying. June 20's vote followed hours of emotional debate and references to personal stories in the chamber, and followed a vote in November that approved the legislation in principle. The vote took place 10 years after Parliament last voted against allowing assisted dying. Opponents of the Bill had argued that ill people may feel they should end their lives for fear of being a burden to their families and society, and some lawmakers withdrew their support after the initial vote in 2024, saying safeguards had been weakened. The 314 to 291 vote for the Bill compared to November 2024's result, which was 330 to 275 in favour. In the original plan, an assisted death would have required court approval. That has been replaced by a requirement for a judgement by a panel including a social worker, a senior legal figure and a psychiatrist, which is seen by some as a watering down. The Labour lawmaker who proposed the Bill, Mr Kim Leadbeater, said that the legislation still offered some of the most robust protections in the world against the coercion of vulnerable people. Hundreds of campaigners both in favour and against the legislation gathered outside Parliament on June 20 to watch the vote on their mobile phones. Those in favour chanted 'my decision, my choice', holding up posters that said 'my life, my death' and photos of relatives who they said had died in pain. Those against the legislation held up placards that said 'let's care not kill' and 'kill the Bill not the ill'. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
18 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Inside the leaked phone call threatening to bring down Thailand's government
Thai PM Paetongtarn Shinawatra, accompanied by Lieutenant-General Boonsin Padklang, whom she had disparaged in the leaked phone call, visiting an army base near the Cambodian border on June 20. PHOTO: REUTERS - It was an undignified breach of diplomatic protocol and personal confidence between world leaders that arguably has no clear precedent – at least in terms of its power to embarrass, and potentially unseat, a sitting government. The damaging leak of her 17-minute phone conversation with Cambodian senate president Hun Sen has left Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra clinging to a crumbling ruling coalition, her position written off as untenable by most political analysts. Mr Hun Sen , Cambodia's former strongman leader, in recording the conversation and then disseminating the audio clip, likely had domestic political calculations at the front of his mind, analysts say. These include bolstering the position of his son and current prime minister Hun Manet and, amid rising nationalist sentiment, demonstrating that his country remained uncowed in its renewed military spat along the border it shares with its larger neighbour. But in tipping Ms Paetongtarn's Pheu Thai Party-led government into turmoil, unwittingly or otherwise, Mr Hun Sen's actions are likely to invite a more assertive posture from Thailand following the brief border skirmish on May 28 that saw one Cambodian soldier killed. 'The Pheu Thai government, if it does remain in power, is now boxed in when it comes to Cambodia: it can no longer afford to be seen as weak and deferential to Hun Sen and Hun Manet,' said Mr Ken Lohatepanont, a political analyst and doctoral candidate at the University of Michigan. 'I would expect that the military will now have greater latitude to pursue its desired course of action in the future,' he added. Dr Thitinan Pongsudhirak, a political science professor at Chulalongkorn University, said it was now tantamount to the Thai army being given 'a blank cheque' to manage the border dispute how it saw fit, after Ms Paetongtarn, the daughter of former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra, had previously been seen by critics as being too soft on the issue. 'Thailand is now at risk of escalating the border dispute because of Paetongtarn's mistake,' he said. On June 20, Ms Paetongtarn travelled to an army base near the Cambodian border in a show of support for Thai troops, accompanied by the region's army commander, Lt-Gen Boonsin Padklang, whom she had disparaged in the leaked phone call with Mr Hun Sen. Her trip came as conservative pro-monarchist groups, including supporters of the 'yellow-shirt' movement that protested against Mr Thaksin when he was in office, said they planned to intensify demonstrations demanding Ms Paetongtarn's resignation. It was also made as the conservative United Thai Nation Party was reported by local media on June 20 as being poised to quit the government – which would tip the ruling coalition into a parliamentary minority – unless Ms Paetongtarn stepped down, after just 10 months as prime minister. The 38-year-old political novice assumed power in August 2024 at the head of an uneasy post-election coalition between her Pheu Thai Party and a clutch of pro-military parties which were part of the conservative establishment whose distrust and rivalry with Mr Thaksin's political movement had dominated Thailand's political landscape for much of the past two decades. It remains unclear how an initial excerpt of the leaked June 15 call first surfaced online and then was swiftly picked up by Cambodian and Thai media outlets. Mr Hun Sen denied leaking the audio, but was quick to confirm its veracity. He said in a social media post that the call with Ms Paetongtarn had been recorded 'to avoid any misunderstandings' and that he had shared the audio clip with about 80 Cambodian officials. He subsequently posted the full recording to his official Facebook page on June 18. In the call, Ms Paetongtarn is heard pleading with the former Cambodian leader to help resolve border tensions between the two South-east Asian nations that she said were proving damaging to her government. Addressing Mr Hun Sen as 'uncle', Ms Paetongtarn appeared to blame the Thai army for inflaming tensions and referred to them as 'the opposite side'. She urged Mr Hun Sen to ignore comments from Lt-Gen Boonsin, who she said merely wanted to 'appear cool'. Ms Paetongtarn initially said her words were merely part of a 'negotiation tactic' but on June 19 issued a public apology for her remarks and slammed Mr Hun Sen for recording the call without her knowledge and leaking it. 'In diplomatic protocol terms, leaking a phone call like this is obviously a breach of the privacy that you would expect between leaders,' said Ms Susannah Patton, the director of the South-east Asia Programme at the Lowy Institute, an Australian think tank. 'That being said, Paetongtarn was definitely naive not to foresee that it could be revealed in some way,' she noted. 'The deferential form of address to Hun Sen, the appearance of selling out her own army commander, and repeated calls on Cambodia to de-escalate which made her look weak – it's very damaging,' Ms Patton added. Mr Hun Sen's actions are likely to be especially galling to the Shinawatra clan, given the long and close association between the two political families. Mr Hun Sen was the first foreign leader to visit Mr Thaksin in February 2024, following the latter's return to Bangkok after a 15-year self-imposed exile. 'Hun Sen is answerable to Cambodian public pressure. He needed to take the Thai army to task, and in doing so, he has spun this gambit with Paetongtarn,' said Dr Thitinan. 'He's willing to burn that relationship (with the Shinawatras) to get what he wants for domestic consumption,' he added. As the army commander in charge of Thailand's border response with Cambodia, Lt-Gen Boonsin has cultivated a high profile with his bellicose remarks towards opposing troops. In an interview with local news outlet The Standard published prior to his meeting with Ms Paetongtarn on June 20, he urged the Prime Minister to be 'mindful' and to support the national interest in dealing with the border dispute. 'Any reconciliation is likely to only occur at the surface level,' Mr Lohatepanont said of the pair's meeting. 'The call's contents revealed very clearly that Pheu Thai does not trust the military, but having it revealed so publicly ironically ensures that they will now have to be deferential to the military,' he said. Philip Wen is regional correspondent at The Straits Times, covering South-east Asia from his base in Bangkok. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
