Weary border residents in Indian Kashmir struggle to survive
Mohammad Naseem says his neighbours laughed when he borrowed money and built a concrete bunker under his home in a village near the disputed Kashmir border.
But this week when mortar bombs rained in Salamabad, 38 people -- men, women, and children -- huddled in it as about a dozen shells exploded outside in quick succession.
One of them destroyed Naseem's home.
"Many of us would have died had we not moved into the bunker," Naseem, a 34-year-old hotel chef, told AFP.
"We grabbed our children and rushed inside. It got so packed that after some time we felt suffocated, two of our children became unconscious," he said.
"The children had to be hospitalised after daybreak when the shelling stopped."
Other villagers hid behind rocks and bushes on the mountain slopes. Some watched their homes being reduced to rubble.
Deadly confrontations between nuclear-armed India and Pakistan erupted after New Delhi accused Islamabad of backing an April 22 attack on tourists on the Indian-run side of the disputed territory, which killed 26 people.
Pakistan denies the charge.
- 'Our life is worth nothing' -
"We took our children out and went up the mountain slope holding them tightly as bombs exploded around us," Naseer Ahmed Khan, 50, said outside his damaged house on Thursday.
"Our life is worth nothing. At any time entire families could be wiped out," Khan said. "Our children are not able to sleep and we cannot have a meal in peace."
The exchange of heavy fire has destroyed or severely damaged dozens of homes in Uri, about 100 kilometres (66 miles) from the Kashmir capital Srinagar, forcing many to flee to safer areas in towns like Baramulla, about 50 kilometres away.
Sajjad Shafi, a local lawmaker told AFP that about 10 percent of Uri's population -- some 22,000 people -- fled since the latest fighting began.
On Friday, many more were fleeing in buses and trucks provided by the government or driving off in their own cars.
"How can we stay here?" Rubina Begum said outside her destroyed home. "The government should lodge us somewhere safe".
Begum's daughter, Saima Talib, added: "We have nothing left except the clothes we are wearing".
Displaced people are struggling to find food and work and many are now sheltering in government buildings in Uri.
- 'Return empty' -
Mohammad Lateef Bhat, a road construction worker, said: "I work as a labourer with army's border roads organisation but their work also stopped."
"This morning I came to the market looking for work but there is nothing," Bhat said.
Some vegetable sellers briefly set up shop before closing.
Mohammad Bashir was also despondent.
"I came to the market to find some work so I can buy some food for my family (of eight) but there is nothing," Bashir, 60, said.
The death toll from India and Pakistan's biggest clashes in decades passed 50 on Friday with each accusing the other of staging drone attacks in waves.
Farooq Ahmed Khan, 35, a bus driver from Sultandhaki village near the border, said "this fighting has made our life miserable."
Nagni, a rare mixed settlement of Muslims, Hindus and Sikhs, sits on mountain slopes near the Indian army's border headquarters in Uri.
Villagers say 35 of the 50 families there have fled.
Badal, a 22-year-old student who only gave his first name, was cleaning up after his sister's wedding at his freshly painted home.
- 'There should be war' -
He showed a crater caused by a mortar bomb that landed a few metres away on the night of the wedding.
"Luckily there was no loss of life but a lot of damage. What we need.. is bunkers, but there are none".
"This village has always been a target of Pakistani attacks in the past because the (Indian) army headquarters are nearby," said Sahil Kumar, another Nagni resident.
Locals say they are fed up.
"I say there should be a war just to decide where Kashmir goes," said Farooq Ahmed Khan, the bus driver.
"I will also go to fight in that war so that this trouble ends for good," Khan said.
pzb/ach/hmn
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Analysis: The answer to this question is key after Trump's strike on Iran
After the United States' overnight strikes on Iran's secretive nuclear program, the most important question is at least a 'known unknown' – that is, what remains of it. The answer could define the region for decades to come, and be the ultimate arbiter of US President Donald Trump's decision to embark on another conflict in the Middle East. It is also an answer bedevilled by the elliptical and fickle nature of intelligence. On the one hand, public discussion of nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan should have left Tehran unwilling to let all of its nuclear secrets reside there. (Iran has said its program is entirely peaceful, although the UN's nuclear watchdog reported finding uranium particles enriched up to 83% – just short of weapons grade). If, as Israel maintains, Iran's nuclear program has a hidden element, then surely that would not be housed in the same places where UN inspectors roam, and in the case of Fordow, over which there has been a public discussion for days of what American bombs might penetrate its deep caverns. The raw materials needed for a nuclear bomb can be small: 20 kilograms of highly enriched uranium would suffice. The ingredients for several devices would fit into a minivan. This could be hidden anywhere in Iran. The technology needed to create a weapon is fiddlier, and requires human expertise, which Israel has been decimating over both the past 10 days, with strikes targeting key personnel, and also picking off more persistently over the past 10 years. It is hard to imagine Iran suddenly being able to make this leap while under the intense bombardment of Israel's air force, now with the open involvement of the US and its vast surveillance machinery too. But this is an unknown, and Israel cannot have it both ways. If you insist Iran's program is advanced and secretive, then there is also the risk something is happening that you are unaware of. Could Iran have assembled all the elements it needs, or even an atomic bomb, at another site, and just be waiting? Only time will tell. The counterargument is also persuasive. Israel has been able to kill Iran's nuclear scientists and military command as they slept in their homes – specific rooms in apartment blocks hit in the first wave of strikes on June 13. This suggests the wide and impressive penetration of vast parts of Tehran's command structure and its most guarded secrets. No operation is perfect; it is possible Washington and Tel Aviv combined knew a lot. It was not just the mountain fortress of Fordow that was struck, either. It is likely, as the dust clears and satellite images provide greater clarity in the battle damage assessment, that we will learn of targets being hit that we did not know about a week ago. For the opponents of Iran's nuclear ambitions – just about everybody bar a handful of Iranian hardliners – that should provide some comfort. But it is likely the Saturday night strikes did not take out everything – not every expert, or every piece of fissile material. The struggle will now be to chase what is left – to pursue the survivors and look for opportunities if panicked elements of the nuclear project make mistakes as they scatter or pick through the rubble. What will remain will likely be the parts of Iran's program which were unknown, if there are any. Tehran may decide that it would be better to reveal or progress this greatest secret only once the threat of Israeli strikes recedes. Does it make sense to rush it out now, at the height of surveillance and bombardment? Diplomacy may – as Trump has suggested with his overnight post on Truth Social that 'NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!' – now re-emerge. But the face of it has changed entirely compared to a week ago. Iranian officials had hinted to the media it might be willing to give up enrichment during talks in the past week. The demands placed upon it may now center on its ballistic missile program, which US hawks have long demanded be dismantled. That is happening, it seems, at a fast rate already, through its intense use of missiles to target Israel, and as a result of Israeli strikes that claim to have taken out the majority of its launchers. The fact that Iran's wish list for negotiations is now significantly altered – as much of what it's hoped to keep has been destroyed or used – reveals the challenge of this moment to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. His skies are owned by a hostile air force, his nuclear program heavily damaged, and his military infrastructure and command shattered, constantly having to adapt and replace to survive. This limits his immediate, favorable options for a response. Flat-out strikes against US bases will simply augur a violent US retaliation, and may, after this much telegraphing, prove ineffective. Iran has generally turned to asymmetrical responses, to compensate for its smaller budgets and capabilities. We may see this in the capital cities of Europe and in the Strait of Hormuz in the coming days. It needs to both display some sort of deterrent but also de-escalate, in order to survive. But Iran's capacity to see the longer-view, and its strategic patience, will work in its favor. There are no real electoral cycles to beset the Ayatollah's decision-making. The Iranians have time to regroup, and respond when the heat is lower. The United States, however, has a poor track record of success and application in the region. Last night, it gained the dubious distinction of having bombed a full cartographical sweep of nations from Syria through to Afghanistan in just 20 years. But it failed to dislodge the Assad regime of Syria, and despite years of trying were observers when last year's sweeping changes removed one of Iran's main regional proxies. And its longest war, in Afghanistan, ended in stark humiliation. Iraq, too, began with disputed information about weapons of mass destruction, and ended in failure after years of destruction and loss. Iran is not Iraq and last night was not March 20, 2003, when America's ill-fated invasion of that country began. There is no ground element to Trump's ambition in Iran, and its goal was something widely supported by allies, and possibly within reach. But the US' questionable track record and the hubristic atmosphere around Trump's overwhelming use of force, should amplify alarm in the region over the unknowns to come.
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Analysis: The answer to this question is key after Trump's strike on Iran
After the United States' overnight strikes on Iran's secretive nuclear program, the most important question is at least a 'known unknown' – that is, what remains of it. The answer could define the region for decades to come, and be the ultimate arbiter of US President Donald Trump's decision to embark on another conflict in the Middle East. It is also an answer bedevilled by the elliptical and fickle nature of intelligence. On the one hand, public discussion of nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan should have left Tehran unwilling to let all of its nuclear secrets reside there. (Iran has said its program is entirely peaceful, although the UN's nuclear watchdog reported finding uranium particles enriched up to 83% – just short of weapons grade). If, as Israel maintains, Iran's nuclear program has a hidden element, then surely that would not be housed in the same places where UN inspectors roam, and in the case of Fordow, over which there has been a public discussion for days of what American bombs might penetrate its deep caverns. The raw materials needed for a nuclear bomb can be small: 20 kilograms of highly enriched uranium would suffice. The ingredients for several devices would fit into a minivan. This could be hidden anywhere in Iran. The technology needed to create a weapon is fiddlier, and requires human expertise, which Israel has been decimating over both the past 10 days, with strikes targeting key personnel, and also picking off more persistently over the past 10 years. It is hard to imagine Iran suddenly being able to make this leap while under the intense bombardment of Israel's air force, now with the open involvement of the US and its vast surveillance machinery too. But this is an unknown, and Israel cannot have it both ways. If you insist Iran's program is advanced and secretive, then there is also the risk something is happening that you are unaware of. Could Iran have assembled all the elements it needs, or even an atomic bomb, at another site, and just be waiting? Only time will tell. The counterargument is also persuasive. Israel has been able to kill Iran's nuclear scientists and military command as they slept in their homes – specific rooms in apartment blocks hit in the first wave of strikes on June 13. This suggests the wide and impressive penetration of vast parts of Tehran's command structure and its most guarded secrets. No operation is perfect; it is possible Washington and Tel Aviv combined knew a lot. It was not just the mountain fortress of Fordow that was struck, either. It is likely, as the dust clears and satellite images provide greater clarity in the battle damage assessment, that we will learn of targets being hit that we did not know about a week ago. For the opponents of Iran's nuclear ambitions – just about everybody bar a handful of Iranian hardliners – that should provide some comfort. But it is likely the Saturday night strikes did not take out everything – not every expert, or every piece of fissile material. The struggle will now be to chase what is left – to pursue the survivors and look for opportunities if panicked elements of the nuclear project make mistakes as they scatter or pick through the rubble. What will remain will likely be the parts of Iran's program which were unknown, if there are any. Tehran may decide that it would be better to reveal or progress this greatest secret only once the threat of Israeli strikes recedes. Does it make sense to rush it out now, at the height of surveillance and bombardment? Diplomacy may – as Trump has suggested with his overnight post on Truth Social that 'NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!' – now re-emerge. But the face of it has changed entirely compared to a week ago. Iranian officials had hinted to the media it might be willing to give up enrichment during talks in the past week. The demands placed upon it may now center on its ballistic missile program, which US hawks have long demanded be dismantled. That is happening, it seems, at a fast rate already, through its intense use of missiles to target Israel, and as a result of Israeli strikes that claim to have taken out the majority of its launchers. The fact that Iran's wish list for negotiations is now significantly altered – as much of what it's hoped to keep has been destroyed or used – reveals the challenge of this moment to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. His skies are owned by a hostile air force, his nuclear program heavily damaged, and his military infrastructure and command shattered, constantly having to adapt and replace to survive. This limits his immediate, favorable options for a response. Flat-out strikes against US bases will simply augur a violent US retaliation, and may, after this much telegraphing, prove ineffective. Iran has generally turned to asymmetrical responses, to compensate for its smaller budgets and capabilities. We may see this in the capital cities of Europe and in the Strait of Hormuz in the coming days. It needs to both display some sort of deterrent but also de-escalate, in order to survive. But Iran's capacity to see the longer-view, and its strategic patience, will work in its favor. There are no real electoral cycles to beset the Ayatollah's decision-making. The Iranians have time to regroup, and respond when the heat is lower. The United States, however, has a poor track record of success and application in the region. Last night, it gained the dubious distinction of having bombed a full cartographical sweep of nations from Syria through to Afghanistan in just 20 years. But it failed to dislodge the Assad regime of Syria, and despite years of trying were observers when last year's sweeping changes removed one of Iran's main regional proxies. And its longest war, in Afghanistan, ended in stark humiliation. Iraq, too, began with disputed information about weapons of mass destruction, and ended in failure after years of destruction and loss. Iran is not Iraq and last night was not March 20, 2003, when America's ill-fated invasion of that country began. There is no ground element to Trump's ambition in Iran, and its goal was something widely supported by allies, and possibly within reach. But the US' questionable track record and the hubristic atmosphere around Trump's overwhelming use of force, should amplify alarm in the region over the unknowns to come.
News24
2 hours ago
- News24
US airstrikes crossed ‘big red line': Iran foreign minister heads to Russia for Putin meeting
Iran accused the US and Israel of crossing a 'red line' by attacking its nuclear facilities, labelling the strikes a 'grave crime' and a threat to peace. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi announced plans to consult with Russian President Vladimir Putin following the attacks. The strikes have drawn warnings from Turkey about potential global escalation, with fears of catastrophic consequences from the intensifying Iran-Israel conflict. The United States and Israel crossed a major red line in attacking Iran's nuclear facilities, Iran's top diplomat warned on Sunday, saying he was heading to Russia for talks with President Vladimir Putin. FOLLOW LIVE | 'No increase' in radiation after US strikes, Iran targets multiple sites in Israel 'They crossed a very big red line by attacking (Iran's) nuclear facilities,' Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on the sidelines of a meeting of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) in Istanbul. He was speaking just hours after President Donald Trump said that US warplanes struck three Iranian nuclear sites, nine days into an Israeli bombing campaign targeting its nuclear facilities. 'The most dangerous one happened only last night,' Araghchi said, while acknowledging he did not know the full extent of the damage done in the strikes, including one at the underground uranium enrichment facility at Fordo. 'I still do not have exact information about the level of damages, but I don't think it matters... Last night's attack was a grave crime,' he said. 'Through this action, the United States has dealt a serious blow to international peace and security,' he said, vowing that Iran would defend itself 'by all means necessary against... US military aggression'. Araghchi said he would head to Moscow on Sunday and hold talks with Putin on Monday morning. 'I'm going to Moscow this afternoon' to hold 'serious consultations with the Russian president tomorrow', he said. After the strikes, Trump said Iran 'must now agree to end this war'. Iran's FM Abbas Araghchi addressed the US attacks on nuclear facilities, accusing the Trump administration of colluding with Israel to breach Iran's sovereignty, and vowed that Tehran would defend its territory 'by all means necessary.' — Al Jazeera English (@AJEnglish) June 22, 2025 But Araghchi said any demand to return to negotiations was 'irrelevant'. 'The world must not forget that it was the United States which – in the midst of a process to forge a diplomatic outcome – betrayed diplomacy by supporting the genocidal Israeli regime's launch of an illegal war of aggression on the Iranian nation,' he said. 'So we were in diplomacy, but we were attacked... They have proved that they are not men of diplomacy, and they only understand the language of threat and force.' Turkey, which was hosting the weekend OIC summit, warned that the strikes risked escalating the Iran-Israel conflict to a global level that could have 'catastrophic' consequences. 'The ongoing developments could cause the regional conflict to escalate to a global level. We do not want this catastrophic scenario to come to life,' the foreign ministry said in a statement.
