Surtax spending turning into real balancing act
BOSTON (SHNS) – Lawmakers will need to reconcile questions about the right balance for income surtax spending, in more way than one, when they take up Gov. Maura Healey's proposal to deploy about $1.3 billion in unspent revenue from the new levy on wealthy households.
When legislators gathered Thursday to review Healey's plan (H 55), a pair of western Massachusetts lawmakers voiced frustration that the transportation spending in the bill skews heavily toward the MBTA, contending the split is not 'fair' to residents outside the Boston-based transit agency's service area.
Democrat Sen. Jo Comerford of Northampton and Republican Rep. Todd Smola of Warren each pressed administration officials about the roughly $780 million allocated for the T in the bill, contrasted with significantly smaller balances available for regional transit authorities and microtransit in less populous areas.
'When this proposal came out, we all in western Massachusetts heard from people that this didn't look like equity or anything close to equity,' Smola said at a Joint Ways and Means Committee public hearing in Boston. 'We've tossed that term around loosely, but these numbers are tough.'
'This decision was made at the ballot,' he added about the surtax, which voters approved for education and transportation investments. 'I accept that, and I think we all have to accept that, but the breakdown of these funds is a really, really difficult pill for a lot of people to swallow in other parts of the state.'
MBTA funding accounts for more than half of the balance in Healey's bill. The money would help replenish the T's savings, which the agency drained last year to sustain a hiring blitz, and workforce and safety spending.
Healey's fiscal 2026 annual budget also seeks to use new surtax dollars to significantly boost state aid for the agency, aiming to mostly close the massive budget gap the MBTA faces starting July 1.
Administration and Finance Secretary Matthew Gorzkowicz told lawmakers the supplemental budget 'does look disproportionately unfair to western Mass.' on its own, but he urged them to weigh it alongside the annual budget and a five-year, $1.5 billion Chapter 90 bill (H 53).
Those three legislative vehicles combine to form a broader transportation funding plan that Healey deputies have estimated would inject $8 billion over the next decade.
'You should be able to go back to western Mass. with a lot of confidence in what we're proposing here. Out of an $8 billion transportation plan, nearly $5.6 billion of it is outside of the MBTA. Only 25% of that plan is really going towards the MBTA,' Gorzkowicz said, soon adding, 'The vast majority of the proposal, when taken holistically across all the items that we filed, is a very thoughtful plan.'
Comerford contended, however, that even when combining surtax spending on transportation in the supplemental and annual budgets, the vast majority of dollars would go to the T instead of the state's 15 regional transit authorities that serve other communities.
'With this as it is, I think I can't go home and say this, that we have a commitment through Fair Share dollars, which our voters in western Massachusetts campaigned hard for — I just don't think it's super fair currently,' she said.
Comerford also referenced another earmark the T has long enjoyed. 'In western Massachusetts, we're aware that we pay a penny of our sales tax for the MBTA, and most of my people will never ride it,' she said.
Transportation Secretary Monica Tibbits-Nutt told Comerford that administration officials 'want to be having this conversation over the next fiscal year' about grant programs, funding and technical assistance for RTAs.
'But Secretary, if we wait a year, we will be yet one more year behind with no service in these towns that are declining population at a pretty significant rate,' Comerford replied.
Healey proposed using a much larger chunk of the one-time pot — about $857.5 million — on transportation, leaving $462.5 million for education investments that range from early education and care, the special education circuit breaker reserve and career technical education grants.
Officials have said they believe the skew in that measure will balance out prior surtax spending, which has leaned more toward education. That idea already has the support of top House Democrats.
'Given that many of the worthy programs that have been funded in the annual budget process have been in the education sector, it is entirely appropriate that the majority of these one-time funds in this round be spent in the transportation sector of our economy,' House Ways and Means Committee Chair Aaron Michlewitz of Boston said at the start of Thursday's hearing. 'When the Fair Share amendment was pitched to the voters of the commonwealth in 2022, it was presented to be distributed evenly between education and transportation funding. This supplemental budget will allow us to fulfill that commitment.'
It's not clear if Senate Democrats agree with the approach. Michlewitz's counterpart, Sen. Michael Rodrigues of Westport made no mention in his opening remarks of supporting — or opposing — a more transportation-heavy approach. He called for the money to be spent 'in a regional, equitable manner.'
A spokesperson for Senate President Karen Spilka of Ashland did not directly answer when asked if she supports the idea of directing more of the one-time surtax money toward transportation.
'Investing in education and transportation is critical if we want to continue to make Massachusetts a great place to live and work,' spokesperson Gray Milkowski said. 'The Senate President will continue to hear from members and residents from around the state about the needs in both areas, and ensure the Senate's version of the surtax supplemental budget appropriately balances investments in each.'
American Federation of Teachers Massachusetts President Jessica Tang told the committee her union is pleased with what Healey proposed, but provided a litany of other surtax investments the state could make to blunt the impact of cuts from the federal government and deal with education financing headaches at the state level.
She suggested about $1 billion in education-focused investments the union would support and urged lawmakers to pursue other 'new sources of revenue.'
'Due to the revenue from the Fair Share amendment, we are better positioned than most states to weather the current storm and for our commonwealth to continue to lead by taking critical steps to fill the gaps and do whatever we can to prevent further harm, while continuing to enact proactive measures,' Tang said. 'Considering the level of uncertainty we have across sectors, with the cuts and threats to critical programming we're hearing from the White House, we also urge you to take action early this session to identify new sources of revenue and ways the state can invest and ensure economic security for all, including passing the corporate fair share bill, also known as the GILTI bill.'
The Raise Up Massachusetts coalition, which backed the surtax push and increases to the minimum wage, is prioritizing a bill (H 3110 / S 2033) from Rep. Carlos González and Sen. Jason Lewis that would increase the share of excess foreign profits (based on a federal government formula called Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income or GILTI) that could be taxed by the state from 5% to 50% to match New England neighbors.
Sen. Paul Feeney raised the GILTI tax proposal, mentioning challenges communities in his district face to pay for education services. He said he has 'always been a supporter' of the idea and asked Mass. Taxpayers Foundation President Doug Howgate whether the state ought to start thinking about new revenue sources.
Howgate responded by pointing at rates of growth in revenues and spending.
'Pick whatever revenue structure you want, pick whatever tax rates you want — they're going to grow, if you're lucky, at 3 to 4% a year. And one of the challenges we're facing now in MassHealth, challenges we're facing in a number of areas of spending, is that the spending is growing by more than 3 or 4% a year. And to me, that's a structural issue that is going to require a lot of hard conversations for all of us about how to get our arms around those cost growth factors,' he said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
25 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Florida Democrats look to stop the bleeding during annual political conference
A question loomed over Democratic party leaders and volunteers on Saturday as they pumped hip hop through the speakers at the Seminole Hard Rock Hotel and Casino Hollywood: can Florida Democrats find a way to win next election season? Democrats in Florida have faced stinging losses on the ballot, especially over the past six years. Some point to fundraising issues as the cause. Others point to shrinking voter registration numbers. At Leadership Blue, an annual Democratic conference, several elected officials and party leaders agreed on one thing: they have a messaging problem, and President Donald Trump might help them solve it. Democrats mentioned immigration, tariffs and potential cuts to healthcare as issues that have caused division in Florida districts that voted Republican. Deportations in South Florida were central to the discussion, with issues like revoking Temporary Protected Status, instating travel bans and targeting immigrants who have not committed crimes roiling Hispanic communities. 'I think what's happening from the federal government being compounded by the state government, in terms of immigration, gives us an opening,' said Samuel Vilchez Santiago, chairman of the Orange County Democrats. Last year, Trump and Florida Republicans put a message out that they were for the working class, said Santiago, who is Venezuelan-American. He said Hispanic communities in Florida, many of which helped the Republican Party win competitive districts in Miami-Dade County, believed Trump would deliver on promises to lower the cost of living. But Democrats say Trump has failed to deliver, and they plan to take advantage of it. Those unfulfilled promises, combined with growing negative sentiment toward immigration enforcement, may give them an edge during next year's midterms, Santiago said. Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, who paid a visit to Leadership Blue, felt the same. Beshear, a Democratic governor in a red state, thinks Florida Democrats have a way to portray themselves as people that can bring change. 'What you'll start seeing is people who don't just feel regret, but they feel betrayal,' Beshear said, speaking about Trump's campaign promises. 'Because someone who told them they were focused on them is now telling them their kids have too many toys.' As a whole, though, some admit they could have done better with reaching out this past election cycle. Millie Herrera, a longtime Democrat and part of the party's budget and finance committee, thinks the party could improve in reaching out to every Hispanic community in Florida. Herrera, who is Cuban-American, thinks it's time to organize locally and year-round, rather than just during election season. In her Hialeah community where she runs a small business, she said she often hears Hispanic people say that Trump had promised to only deport criminals. The Democrats knew that wasn't true, she said, but failed to communicate that. This time, she is confident they will do better. 'We have always been for working people,' Herrera said. 'We have always been for immigrant communities. Maybe what we need to concentrate in our message is reminding them who has been there for us.' Present at Leadership Blue and handing out blue jolly ranchers to attendees, David Jolly, the former Republican congressman who announced his run for governor of Florida as a Democrat on June 5, said Florida is ready for a change and ready to build a coalition that leads with democratic values. While previously acknowledging Democrats have failed voters in the past, Jolly is hopeful Florida is ready for a change: A Democrat governor. 'This is a Democratic party that is united, and united to win,' Jolly said. Recent ups and downs Wins have been hard to come by for Florida Democrats. In April, Democrats witnessed defeats in two special elections for Florida congressional seats despite creating a stir by outraising Republican candidates. But even in defeat, Democrats celebrated because they outdid their previous numbers in both districts, viewed as deep-red and won in November by Trump by over 30 points. Josh Weil and Gay Valimont, running to representdistricts on the eastern coast of Florida and Pensacola, respectively, narrowed the gap to under 20 points each in their races. At the time, Republican Party of Florida Chairman Evan Power likened the Democrats' campaigns to 'setting millions of dollars on fire.' But Democrats see it differently. Because they overperformed, Santiago said, it's a sign that grassroots fundraising is the right path for the party. Weil raised around $15 million, with the majority of it coming from donations that were $200 or less. Weil, who launched his campaign for the U.S. Senate last week, said the last couple of years have been tough. As a public school teacher and single father navigating the rising costs of living, he said Floridians are unsatisfied. 'People are really disappointed in what they have right now, particularly in our red districts here in Florida,' Weil said. But becoming competitive again in Florida will be a challenge. Florida Democrats have increasingly lost ground in a state that was once considered purple. Over the past six years, Republicans have won by wider and wider margins in elections for both state and national office. The 2018 midterms were the last to deliver something resembling success for the Florida Democrats. They gained two Congressional seats, seven Florida Legislature seats and one statewide seat — with current party Chairwoman Nikki Fried winning the race for commissioner of agriculture. Since then, Republicans have surged in the state, securing super-majorities in the Florida Legislature, expanding GOP dominance in the Florida congressional delegation and ending the days when Florida was known as the nation's largest swing state. Trump and Gov. Ron DeSantis — who likes to compare the Florida Democratic Party to roadkill — both won their most recent races in the state by double digits. In November, Miami-Dade County voted Republican for the first time in a presidential election since 1988. Alongside Miami-Dade, other left-leaning metro areas in the state swung red as well: Hillsborough County, Pinellas County, Duval County and Osceola County. Pouring salt on the wound, state Sen. Jason Pizzo, who served as the Senate Democratic leader in the Florida Legislature, told his colleagues earlier this year that he was changing his party affiliation, saying the Democratic Party is 'dead' in Florida. Pizzo now says he'll run for governor as an independent candidate. Still, Fried — who said Pizzo's resignation as party leader was 'one of the best things to happen to the party in years' — said Democrats in Florida are united and the party's message is succinct. She said she wants people to know that the Democrats are not giving up on them. Despite disdain or criticism from former members of the party, Fried said the party embraces a culture of respect where everyone is welcome, feels seen, is listened to and has a say. 'We talk with one voice, and we really have created a coalition in our state that people feel like you don't have to always agree with everybody inside the party,' Fried said. 'That's what the benefit of being a Democrat is — we are a big tent, which means there's going to be different sides of the spectrum.'
Indianapolis Star
36 minutes ago
- Indianapolis Star
I'm here to challenge you and hopefully earn your trust
By now you may have read my two latest columns on the death penalty and solar farms, and wondered where I'm coming from as the newest member of the opinion section at IndyStar. Before I came to the newsroom, I worked for the Indiana Senate as a press secretary for the Republican caucus. Those reading that from the left or right might incorrectly assume that means I'm here to spout Republican talking points. The truth is, my drive for moral consistency and fairness means I'm unafraid to take positions you might not expect. I'm not here to make cheap shots, deliver hot takes or adopt stances that will leave any reader feeling complacent. Investigative and opinion journalism has played a vital role in expanding my worldview and challenging my thinking in the past, and I hope to provide a similar challenge to my readers, regardless of partisan leanings. While I'm here, I hope to stay true to that goal and gain your trust. Trust has never been so important at a time when the average person in our state probably feels abandoned by legacy media and disconnected from their community. Anyone can easily find a near-constant influx of doom-and-gloom, sensationalist punditry and incomplete narratives on social media, but long-term exposure can make them feel voiceless and weak. Local media has an imperative to validate itself and provide people with a valuable connection to their local communities, where they have the greatest ability to make a difference. Throughout my time in health care, education and public relations, I saw local media drive many important conversations this way. During my time as an investigative journalist, while managing a small news outlet, I was shocked by the outsized influence it had on the city and state. When reporting and investigative work is complemented by thought-provoking commentary with a connection to the local community, a newsroom's impact can stretch far beyond its readers. This is something IndyStar has been successful at for years, thanks to my boss, James Briggs, the other excellent people in our newsroom, and IndyStar's parent company, Gannett, which continues to invest in our opinion section. As IndyStar continues to evolve to make sure it represents and meets the needs of the city and state it serves, I'm excited to be a part of it and hit the ground running. I hope my readers will reach out to let me know what issues matter most to them.
Los Angeles Times
40 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Accounting Firm Growth Spurned by Acquisitions, Global Expansion and New Services
For Southern California's many accounting firms, acquisitions have been a means of expansion as the industry consolidates to streamline operations and enhanced technology. Over the past year, a flurry of acquisitions has also been supplemented by new offerings, such as legal services and global expansion with employees in foreign countries that provide services to support U.S. operations. One of the largest mergers of the past year was CBIZ's $2.3-billion acquisition of Marcum LLP, which closed on November 1. The combined firm is expected to have combined annualized revenue of approximately $2.8 billion. Smaller firms have also been the targets of acquisition as aging partners seek exit plans and firms utilize artificial intelligence and offshore resources to optimize operations. It's a trend that mirrors the wider business climate, according to Aldrich CPAs + Advisors. The firm conducted a survey of more than 100 owners and executives at private companies in California, Oregon and Washington and found that 61% received at least one unsolicited offer to be purchased within the past 12 months, and nearly a quarter of those surveyed received three or more unsolicited offers. Competition to acquire accounting firms has been fierce, but local firms have been able to execute mergers despite interest from national firms. In October, GHJ Accounting, Tax and Advisory Firm acquired Los Angeles-based GGF, which provides audit, tax and consulting services to entrepreneurial businesses and individuals. 'We are proud to integrate GGF into the GHJ family to strengthen our ability to deliver exceptional value to our clients. Their strong client relationships and tailored approach make them a perfect strategic fit for our firm,' said Tom Barry, GHJ managing partner, in a statement. Firms are also expanding by adding new services beyond traditional audit and tax advisory. Two firms quickly took advantage of an Arizona Supreme Court ruling in 2021 that allowed nonlawyers to have an economic interest in law firms under the state's Alternative Business Structure program. The Arizona Supreme Court granted a special license to Big Four firm KPMG to operate a law firm in February. In addition to KPMG, Aprio acquired Radix Law, a Scottsdale-based firm, and launched Aprio Legal in February under the alternative business structure. However, a state law proposed in California may limit the impact of the Arizona ruling. Assembly Bill 931 would prohibit California attorneys from sharing legal fees with out-of-state firms operating under alternative business structures such as those that exist in Arizona and Utah, where non-lawyers, including private equity firms and corporations, may invest in or own law firms. Aprio's addition of a law firm complements its nationwide acquisition spree that included Woodland Hills firm Kirsch Kohn & Bridge in November. The Kirsch Kohn & Bridge acquisition added five partners and more than 30 local professionals. Nationally, it has expanded its footprint with firms in Atlanta, Austin, Baltimore, Denver and Chicago. Plus, it added cybersecurity firm Securitybricks. Firms have also expanded their reach globally by opening new offices worldwide to support operations. For example, Weaver credited its West Coast growth partly due to long-term progress reflected by the firm's global footprint and official expansion into India. It opened four new offices since the beginning of 2025 in India: Kochi, Coimbatore and Bengaluru opened in January, while Weaver's Chennai office opened in March. At Long Beach-based Windes, local tax partner Guy Nicio, who serves on the firm's board of directors, leads its growing Philippines team, which provides employee support and client services. HCVT continued to invest in its Armenia operations, reinforcing a commitment to build infrastructure that supports future growth.
