SEC withdraws proposed rules on ESG disclosures, shareholder submissions

This story was originally published on ESG Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily ESG Dive newsletter.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has abandoned the rulemaking process for regulations requiring enhanced disclosures for ESG and similarly labeled funds and altering the shareholder proposal and resubmission process, the agency announced in an agenda update Thursday.
The two rules were among 14 Biden-era agency proposals the SEC withdrew last week. The agency also stopped defending its climate risk disclosure rule in court this spring, as intervening states have looked to take up the case and continue the rule's defense in court.
The ESG disclosures rule was considered among the most endangered Biden-era regulations related to climate and environmental, social and governance policies under President Donald Trump. Other regulations on the list have also faced pushback, including a Department of Labor rule allowing retirement plan managers to consider ESG factors, a rule that DOL recently announced it would rescind and remake.
The SEC first proposed the rule to require enhanced disclosures from investment advisers and companies on ESG practices in May 2022, and Congressional Democrats had urged the SEC to finalize its anti-greenwashing rule for ESG funds under the prior administration. The final rule was initially expected in April 2024, pushed to October 2024 and ultimately went unreleased before the change in administration.
The rule would have required investment advisers and companies to make additional disclosures about their ESG strategies and practices in their prospectuses, annual reports and brochures; implemented a comparable disclosure approach for investors to easily compare ESG funds; and required environmentally-focused funds to disclose their portfolio greenhouse gas emissions, according to an agency fact sheet.
Congressional Democrats had pressed former SEC Chair Gary Gensler to finalize the rule as an anti-greenwashing complement to the agency's amendments to the Investment Company Act's Names Rule. Enforcement for the Names Rule — which requires funds with an objective like 'sustainability' in their name to invest 80% of its assets towards that goal — has since been pushed back to June 2026 and December 2026 for companies with more than $1 billion in net assets and companies whose assets fall under that threshold, respectively.
Following the change in federal leadership, House Republicans asked the SEC to rescind the ESG rule, along with the Names Rule, among a list of requested Biden-era regulatory recissions. Other rules that appeared on the list were also rescinded June 12, including the SEC's cybersecurity risk management, strategy and governance disclosures rule.
The agency proposed its update to the shareholder proposal and resubmission process in July 2022, which would have replaced a rule from the prior Trump administration's SEC that raised thresholds for stocks required to submit a proposal to company boards among other changes. A judge in the federal district court for Washington, D.C. recently dismissed a lawsuit from responsible investing groups challenging the Trump administration's 2020 rule.
Gensler's SEC had proposed revising bases by which a company board could have a shareholder proposal excluded based on the reason that a submission had been substantially implemented, is duplicative or is being resubmitted, according to a fact sheet on shareholder proposals.
With the lawsuit challenging those higher thresholds dismissed and the rulemaking process to alter the shareholder process withdrawn, the SEC appears cleared to return to its 2020 position on shareholder proposal process.
Recommended Reading
The ESG, climate rules at stake under a second Trump term

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

28 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Guide to dollar-cost averaging: Use this strategy to build wealth over time

Dollar-cost averaging is a popular investing strategy that entails buying new investments at regular intervals, such as once a month. If you have a 401(k), you're already dollar-cost averaging with every paycheck. But you can also use the practice in a typical brokerage account, individual retirement account (IRA) or any other type of investing account. You can implement the strategy manually or set your brokerage account to automatically invest at regular intervals. Dollar-cost averaging is one of the easiest techniques to boost your returns without taking on extra risk, and it's a great way to practice buy-and-hold investing. Dollar-cost averaging can be especially beneficial for people who want to set up their investments and deal with them infrequently. Here's what dollar-cost averaging is and how to use it to maximize your investment gains. Dollar-cost averaging is the practice of putting a fixed amount of money into an investment on a regular basis, such as monthly or even bi-weekly. Over time, the strategy allows you to spread out when you buy — which means you'll do so at market lows and highs — averaging your purchase prices. Because you're always investing the same amount of money, when prices are lower, you'll buy more shares, and when they're higher, you'll buy fewer shares. It's the opposite of timing the market, which entails trying to predict in which direction prices are headed next risking losses if stock prices fall. By setting up a regular buying plan when the markets (and you) are calm, you'll avoid this psychological bias and take advantage of falling stock prices when everyone else becomes scared. If you have a 401(k) retirement account, you're already practicing dollar-cost averaging, by adding to your investments with each paycheck. You're also already using the strategy if you reinvest your dividends, since those payouts are invested back into the market at regular intervals, likely each quarter. Imagine an employee who earns $3,000 each month and contributes 10 percent of that to their 401(k) plan, choosing to invest in an S&P 500 index fund. Because the price of the fund moves around, the number of shares purchased isn't always the same, but each month $300 is invested. The table below shows this example over a 10-month period. Month Contribution Price of fund Shares bought Shares held Total value 1 $300.00 $100.00 3 3 $300.00 2 $300.00 $97.50 3.08 6.08 $592.80 3 $300.00 $101.30 2.96 9.04 $915.75 4 $300.00 $85.45 3.51 12.55 $1,072.40 5 $300.00 $91.23 3.29 15.84 $1,445.08 6 $300.00 $93.20 3.22 19.06 $1,776.39 7 $300.00 $96.50 3.11 22.17 $2,139.41 8 $300.00 $100.54 2.98 25.15 $2,528.58 9 $300.00 $101.43 2.96 28.11 $2,851.20 10 $300.00 $105.00 2.86 30.97 $3,251.85 You can see that the value of the employee's investments went up 8.4 percent on their $3,000 in total contributions, despite the fund only increasing 5 percent over the period. That's because the employee was able to buy a greater number of shares when the price was lower, taking advantage of the market volatility. MORE: Bankrate's list of the best online brokers It can depend on your specific situation, but dollar-cost averaging has been a successful way for many people to invest over time. The question is about whether you should time your purchases based on market conditions or just buy consistently over time using the dollar-cost averaging method. Timing the market has proven to be very difficult and most people are better off with a consistent investment plan. Another issue is that most people are investing money as they earn it, likely through a workplace retirement plan such as a 401(k). Dollar-cost averaging makes sense here because you're investing what you can as soon as it's available to be invested. However, if you inherited a large sum of money, say $100,000, you wouldn't want to spread that out to be invested over years. In that scenario, it's best to get it invested relatively quickly, but you could still spread out purchases over a few months to take advantage of potential volatility. Dollar-cost averaging can make sense for a lot of investors, but it does come with some downsides: Waiting to buy can mean missing opportunities. In a market that generally rises over time, you'll likely be better off being fully invested as soon as possible. But because most people are saving and investing as they earn money, dollar-cost averaging is the next best option. Your investment choices determine performance. If you're dollar-cost averaging into a poor investment, the strategy in which you bought in (dollar-cost averaging) won't be able to boost your investment's performance. The approach works best with broad-based funds such as an S&P 500 index fund, which has performed well over long time periods. There are two ways that you can set up dollar-cost averaging for your account: manually and automatically. If you opt for the manual route, you'll just pick a regular date (monthly, bi-weekly, etc.) and then go to your broker, buy the stock or fund and then you're done until the next date. If you opt to go the automatic route, it requires a little more time upfront, but it's much easier later on. Plus, it will be easier to continue buying when the market declines, since you don't have to act. While setting up your automatic buying may seem like a chore, it's actually easy. Almost any broker can set up an automatic buying plan, so use Bankrate's reviews of the major players to find brokers that provide other features such as great customer service and educational tools. Here are the steps to make dollar-cost averaging fully automatic. First, you'll want to determine what you're buying. Do you want to buy stock? Or will you go with an exchange-traded fund (ETF) or mutual fund? If you opt to buy an individual stock, it's more likely to fluctuate significantly than a fund is. But it may be difficult to find a brokerage that allows you to buy stocks on autopilot. If you buy a fund, it should fluctuate less than an individual stock and it's also more diversified, so your portfolio likely won't drop as much if any single stock in the fund declines a lot as it would if you only invested in that stock. Less-experienced investors usually opt for a fund, and some of the most diversified funds are based on the Standard & Poor's 500 index. This index includes hundreds of companies across all major industries, and it's the standard for a diversified portfolio of companies. If you want to buy an S&P index fund, here are some of the top choices. In either case, you'll need to note the ticker symbol for the security; that's the short-hand code for the stock or fund. So, you've made your choice of investment. Now see if your broker will allow you to set up an automatic purchase plan for that investment. If so, then you're ready to move on to the next step. However, some brokers allow you to set up an automatic plan only with mutual funds. In that case, you might consider opening another brokerage account that allows you to do exactly what you want. There are other solid advantages to having multiple brokerage accounts, too, and you can usually get a lot of value by having multiple accounts. Now that you've got a broker who can execute your automatic trading plan, it's time to figure out how much you can regularly invest. With any kind of stock or fund, you want to be able to leave your money in the investment for at least three to five years. Since stocks can fluctuate a lot over short periods, try to allow the investment some time to grow and get over any short-term declines in price. That means you'll need to be able to live only on your uninvested money during that time. So starting with your monthly budget, figure how much you can devote to investing. Once you have an emergency fund in place, how much can you invest and not need? Even if it's not a lot at first, the most important point is to begin investing regularly. Dollar-cost averaging is now cheaper than ever, since all major brokers now charge no commissions on stock and ETF trades and the best brokers for mutual funds allow you to skip the fees for thousands of mutual funds. That means you really can start with any amount of money and begin building your nest egg. You can set up the automatic trading plan at your broker using the ticker symbol for the stock or fund, how much you want to purchase on a regular basis and how often you want the trade to execute. The exact process for setting this up varies by broker, but these are the basics that you'll need in any case. If you have further questions, your broker can help. And if your stock or fund pays dividends, it can be a good time to set up automatic dividend reinvestment with your broker. Any cash dividend will be used to purchase new shares, and you can often even buy fractional shares — putting the whole value of the dividend to work, rather than having it sit for a long time in cash earning little or next to nothing. So even as soon as the next dividend, your dividend will be earning dividends. MORE: Bankrate's list of the best robo-advisors Dollar-cost averaging is a simple way to help reduce your risk and increase your returns, and it takes advantage of a volatile stock market. If you set up your brokerage account to buy stocks or funds automatically and regularly, then you can sit back and do the things you love, rather than spend your time investing. In investing, you can often get better results with less effort. Note: Bankrate's Brian Baker and Mallika Mitra contributed to an update of this article. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

CNBC

28 minutes ago

• CNBC

Some lawmakers in both parties question the legality of Trump's Iran strikes

WASHINGTON — Several members of Congress in both parties Saturday questioned the legality of President Donald Trump's move to launch military strikes on Iran. While Republican leaders and many rank-and-file members stood by Trump's decision to bomb Iran's major nuclear enrichment facilities, at least two GOP lawmakers joined Democrats across the party spectrum in suggesting it was unconstitutional for him to bomb Iran without approval from Congress. "While President Trump's decision may prove just, it's hard to conceive a rationale that's Constitutional," Rep. Warren Davidson, R-Ohio, who usually aligns with Trump, said on X. "I look forward to his remarks tonight." Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., said in response to Trump's social media post announcing the strikes: "This is not Constitutional." Massie introduced a bipartisan resolution this week seeking to block U.S. military action against Iran "unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or specific authorization for use of military force against Iran" passed by Congress. In brief remarks from the White House on Saturday night, Trump defended the strikes but did not mention the basis of his legal authority to launch them without Congress' having given him that power. Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., reacted in real time during a speech in Tulsa, Oklahoma, slamming Trump's actions as "grossly unconstitutional." "The only entity that can take this country to war is the U.S. Congress. The president does not have the right," Sanders told the crowd, which broke out in "no more war!" chants. Some Democrats called it an impeachable offense for the president to bomb Iran without approval from Congress. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., said Trump's move is "absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment." "The President's disastrous decision to bomb Iran without authorization is a grave violation of the Constitution and Congressional War Powers," she said on X. "He has impulsively risked launching a war that may ensnare us for generations." Rep. Sean Casten, D-Ill., said on social media: "This is not about the merits of Iran's nuclear program. No president has the authority to bomb another country that does not pose an imminent threat to the US without the approval of Congress. This is an unambiguous impeachable offense." Casten called on House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., to "grow a spine" and protect the war powers reserved for Congress. Johnson said Trump respects the Constitution as he sought to lay the groundwork to defend his decision to act unilaterally. "The President fully respects the Article I power of Congress, and tonight's necessary, limited, and targeted strike follows the history and tradition of similar military actions under presidents of both parties," he said in a statement. Johnson's remarks, along with support for Trump's move offered by Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., indicate that Trump may have sufficient political cover to avoid blowback from the Republican-controlled Congress. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said Trump "failed to seek congressional authorization for the use of military force and risks American entanglement in a potentially disastrous war in the Middle East." But he stopped short of labeling the military action illegal or unconstitutional. House Minority Whip Katherine Clark, D-Mass., was more direct on the legal question. "The power to declare war resides solely with Congress. Donald Trump's unilateral decision to attack Iran is unauthorized and unconstitutional," said Clark, the No. 2 Democrat. "In doing so, the President has exposed our military and diplomatic personnel in the region to the risk of further escalation." Appearing Saturday night on MSNBC, Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., who co-authored the resolution with Massie, wondered whether the anti-war voters who support Trump would back his move. "This is the first true crack in the MAGA base," he said, noting that Trump's rise in the 2016 primaries was aided by his move to slam President George W. Bush for the Iraq war.

Boston Globe

32 minutes ago

• Boston Globe

Senators Markey and Warren decry Trump's Iran strikes as unconstitutional

'Only Congress can declare war — and the Senate must vote immediately to prevent another endless war,' Warren said. Fellow Massachusetts Senator Ed Markey agreed, calling the strike 'illegal' for having lacked congressional approval. He said in a statement that Saturday's attack may set back Iran's nuclear ambitions, but added that not only can the country 'rebuild its program,' it 'will now be highly motivated to do so.' 'A diplomatic solution remains the best way to permanently and verifiably prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon,' Markey said. Chants of 'No More War' broke out at a Bernie Sanders rally in Tulsa, Okla., after the Vermont Senator read Trump's 'alarming' social media post announcing the strikes. 'The American people do not want more war, more death,' he said. Advertisement Massachusetts Peace Action, a Cambridge-based advocacy group, called for state leaders to speak out. The organization specifically called on Congressional leaders to pass the war power resolutions filed by Senator Tim Kaine and Representative Thomas Massie to prevent further US military action. 'We call on Massachusetts political leaders to speak out strongly against President Trump's lawless military adventure,' the organization wrote on Saturday night, shortly after the US attack on Iran. Brian Garvey, the organization's executive director, said an 'emergency event' was being planned outside Park Street Station at 1 p.m. Sunday, in protest of the strikes. Advertisement 'This direct attack by the United States on Iran a dramatic escalation by President Trump,' Garvey said in a phone call Saturday night. 'It's incredibly dangerous, it's unnecessary, and frankly, it's illegal.' Garvey said the founding fathers were explicit in giving Congress the power to declare war, adding that this is 'not how the government is supposed to work.' 'It is perhaps especially terrible because this is a president who ran saying he was going to seek peace,' he said. 'Back in 2016, he said the Iraq War was a big fat mistake. I fear that what he is leading us into could be even worse than that debacle and quagmire.' Garvey said he was 'fearful' for the US service members stationed in the Middle East, and 'outraged' that the strikes threatened their safety. Camilo Fonseca can be reached at