Department blame game leaves SANDF personnel in crumbling facilities
South Africa's military infrastructure is on the verge of total collapse, an MP said in the wake of a joint meeting of two parliamentary oversight committees.
The high-stakes meeting of parliament's portfolio committee on defence and military veterans (PCDMV) and portfolio committee on public works and infrastructure (PCPWI) this week laid bare deep institutional dysfunction and mistrust between the department of defence (DoD) and department of public works and infrastructure (DPWI).
The session aimed to address the stalled devolution of infrastructure maintenance functions from the DPWI to the DoD and the growing crisis in defence facility management across the country.
The meeting was called in response to security concerns and service failures at military bases, many of which are more than a century old and suffering from chronic neglect.
Members heard that some bases house live ammunition depots and sensitive military equipment yet are surrounded by informal settlements due to land invasions that the DPWI, as the legal custodian of state property, has failed to respond to in a timely manner.
'We are sitting on a powder keg'
Chairperson of the PCDMV Dakota Legoete opened the hearing with a stark warning. He said some military bases house ammunition depots and are subject to land grabs by people residing next to these bases. It becomes very difficult to always consult the public works department to say there's a land grab as public works takes six months to respond and by the time they do, squatters need to be provided with alternative land because the law allows for this if they have stayed on the land for over 48 hours.
Defence readiness under fire as MPs grill Armscor over failing navy and air force contracts
MPs from across the political spectrum on Friday interrogated Armscor and the defence department about delays, underfunding and systemic risks ...
Politics
43 minutes ago
The DoD underscored that its lack of custodianship over its own bases prevents it from legally evicting trespassers or initiating critical repairs, making the situation untenable.
DPWI admits to backlogs and budget deficits
The DPWI, represented by deputy minister Sihle Zikalala and senior officials, conceded to a widespread breakdown of infrastructure delivery, pointing to years of underfunding and operational instability.
'In 2016 our budget was R17bn. Today it is R18bn. With inflation and increasing property rates, we are R9bn short of what we should have had,' said Siza Sibande, head of the Property Management Trading Entity (PMTE).
He reported a nationwide infrastructure maintenance backlog of R29bn, with R4bn directly related to defence properties. 'We are struggling with underspending, limited planning capacity and a model where the funds for projects sit with the client departments who then delay payment,' he said.
The department also revealed it was holding R4.171bn in unpaid accounts under a shared savings utility management programme, with the DoD being the largest debtor.
Frustration from defence
Vice-Adm David Maningi Mkhonto, chief of logistics in the DoD, detailed the department's efforts to reclaim control of its infrastructure portfolio, citing a 2018 directive from the standing committee on appropriations.
'The poor state of our facilities is due to DPWI's failure to deliver. Our own works capability is being rebuilt so we can take over key functions,' he said.
So far, emergency repairs and day-to-day maintenance have been devolved as of April 2024. However, rates and taxes, leases and capital projects remain under the DPWI. The DoD claims to have the professional and technical capacity to manage these, noting it has more than 1,000 trained artisans and professionals in infrastructure roles.
Deputy minister of defence Richard Mkhungo reinforced the need for departmental autonomy: 'We are a complex department with security sensitivities. Civilians managing critical infrastructure pose a risk. We do not seek superiority over DPWI, but we do seek independence where it matters.'
Committee members voice concern
Committee members delivered pointed criticism of both departments, with several voicing frustration at the repeated absence of key ministers. The failure of the minister of defence to attend or stay for the duration of crucial meetings was viewed as indicative of a broader lack of respect for parliamentary oversight.
Concerns were raised over the DPWI's track record in managing its responsibilities, with strong views that the department's repeated underperformance had put national security at risk.
The notion that the department of defence should continue relying on a landlord that struggles to maintain essential infrastructure was described as unacceptable, with the implications stretching far beyond administrative inefficiency.
Others highlighted what they saw as the real drivers behind the ongoing dispute — the competition for control over infrastructure budgets rather than a shared commitment to improving service delivery.
There was a call for departments to shift focus from internal power struggles to tangible outcomes. The handling of documentation was also criticised.
Committee members questioned why the DPWI submitted a modified version of its presentation without prior notice, suggesting this undermined transparency and accountability. Similar concerns were directed at the defence department, which introduced legal references during its briefing that were absent from the written materials, leaving members unable to scrutinise the claims properly.
Way forward: A technical working group and political oversight
Despite tensions, both departments agreed to establish a joint technical working group to review project statuses and agree on a path forward.
The DPWI proposed an 'accelerated execution model' using pre-approved contractor panels to improve turnaround times.
The DoD committed to finalising its internal infrastructure management structure by March 2026.
The committee recommended a reversal of the DoD's 2021 moratorium on new infrastructure projects, warning that failure to complete design-stage projects could lead to fruitless and wasteful expenditure.
Legoete concluded the hearing by stressing the urgency of progress. 'This is not a bureaucratic squabble. It is a national security risk. We need performance, not paper pushing — and we need it now.'
Further hearings are expected as the portfolio committees push for executive-level accountability and the resolution of a dispute that has effectively paralysed the maintenance of South Africa's military infrastructure.
DA defence and military veterans' spokesperson Chris Hattingh said in a statement after Wednesday's meeting that immediate political intervention was needed. This, because the DoD and its facilities maintenance arm — the works formation — and minister Dean Macpherson 's DPWI are in 'a destructive stand-off, paralysing infrastructure delivery'. He maintains the DoD/DPWI briefings 'laid bare this dysfunction — a complete breakdown in trust, co-ordination and accountability'.
Both sides are to blame, he says, adding years of DWPI underperformance has left defence facilities in disrepair with minister Angie Motshekga's DoD failing to settle its debts. One of these, according to Hattingh, is the more than R4bn owing for municipal services.
'In 2021 the DoD unilaterally froze all unfunded and planned infrastructure projects, citing excessive delays. The DPWI says this action wasted millions in design costs, now likely to be written off. What followed was a blame game: defence accusing public works of inefficiency and public works accusing defence of financial neglect and unilateralism,' his statement on the meeting notes.
Hattingh concluded that while departments point fingers, 'our soldiers are left to serve in dangerous, crumbling facilities. This is not just a governance failure it is a betrayal of the men and women in uniform.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
13-06-2025
- TimesLIVE
Department blame game leaves SANDF personnel in crumbling facilities
South Africa's military infrastructure is on the verge of total collapse, an MP said in the wake of a joint meeting of two parliamentary oversight committees. The high-stakes meeting of parliament's portfolio committee on defence and military veterans (PCDMV) and portfolio committee on public works and infrastructure (PCPWI) this week laid bare deep institutional dysfunction and mistrust between the department of defence (DoD) and department of public works and infrastructure (DPWI). The session aimed to address the stalled devolution of infrastructure maintenance functions from the DPWI to the DoD and the growing crisis in defence facility management across the country. The meeting was called in response to security concerns and service failures at military bases, many of which are more than a century old and suffering from chronic neglect. Members heard that some bases house live ammunition depots and sensitive military equipment yet are surrounded by informal settlements due to land invasions that the DPWI, as the legal custodian of state property, has failed to respond to in a timely manner. 'We are sitting on a powder keg' Chairperson of the PCDMV Dakota Legoete opened the hearing with a stark warning. He said some military bases house ammunition depots and are subject to land grabs by people residing next to these bases. It becomes very difficult to always consult the public works department to say there's a land grab as public works takes six months to respond and by the time they do, squatters need to be provided with alternative land because the law allows for this if they have stayed on the land for over 48 hours. Defence readiness under fire as MPs grill Armscor over failing navy and air force contracts MPs from across the political spectrum on Friday interrogated Armscor and the defence department about delays, underfunding and systemic risks ... Politics 43 minutes ago The DoD underscored that its lack of custodianship over its own bases prevents it from legally evicting trespassers or initiating critical repairs, making the situation untenable. DPWI admits to backlogs and budget deficits The DPWI, represented by deputy minister Sihle Zikalala and senior officials, conceded to a widespread breakdown of infrastructure delivery, pointing to years of underfunding and operational instability. 'In 2016 our budget was R17bn. Today it is R18bn. With inflation and increasing property rates, we are R9bn short of what we should have had,' said Siza Sibande, head of the Property Management Trading Entity (PMTE). He reported a nationwide infrastructure maintenance backlog of R29bn, with R4bn directly related to defence properties. 'We are struggling with underspending, limited planning capacity and a model where the funds for projects sit with the client departments who then delay payment,' he said. The department also revealed it was holding R4.171bn in unpaid accounts under a shared savings utility management programme, with the DoD being the largest debtor. Frustration from defence Vice-Adm David Maningi Mkhonto, chief of logistics in the DoD, detailed the department's efforts to reclaim control of its infrastructure portfolio, citing a 2018 directive from the standing committee on appropriations. 'The poor state of our facilities is due to DPWI's failure to deliver. Our own works capability is being rebuilt so we can take over key functions,' he said. So far, emergency repairs and day-to-day maintenance have been devolved as of April 2024. However, rates and taxes, leases and capital projects remain under the DPWI. The DoD claims to have the professional and technical capacity to manage these, noting it has more than 1,000 trained artisans and professionals in infrastructure roles. Deputy minister of defence Richard Mkhungo reinforced the need for departmental autonomy: 'We are a complex department with security sensitivities. Civilians managing critical infrastructure pose a risk. We do not seek superiority over DPWI, but we do seek independence where it matters.' Committee members voice concern Committee members delivered pointed criticism of both departments, with several voicing frustration at the repeated absence of key ministers. The failure of the minister of defence to attend or stay for the duration of crucial meetings was viewed as indicative of a broader lack of respect for parliamentary oversight. Concerns were raised over the DPWI's track record in managing its responsibilities, with strong views that the department's repeated underperformance had put national security at risk. The notion that the department of defence should continue relying on a landlord that struggles to maintain essential infrastructure was described as unacceptable, with the implications stretching far beyond administrative inefficiency. Others highlighted what they saw as the real drivers behind the ongoing dispute — the competition for control over infrastructure budgets rather than a shared commitment to improving service delivery. There was a call for departments to shift focus from internal power struggles to tangible outcomes. The handling of documentation was also criticised. Committee members questioned why the DPWI submitted a modified version of its presentation without prior notice, suggesting this undermined transparency and accountability. Similar concerns were directed at the defence department, which introduced legal references during its briefing that were absent from the written materials, leaving members unable to scrutinise the claims properly. Way forward: A technical working group and political oversight Despite tensions, both departments agreed to establish a joint technical working group to review project statuses and agree on a path forward. The DPWI proposed an 'accelerated execution model' using pre-approved contractor panels to improve turnaround times. The DoD committed to finalising its internal infrastructure management structure by March 2026. The committee recommended a reversal of the DoD's 2021 moratorium on new infrastructure projects, warning that failure to complete design-stage projects could lead to fruitless and wasteful expenditure. Legoete concluded the hearing by stressing the urgency of progress. 'This is not a bureaucratic squabble. It is a national security risk. We need performance, not paper pushing — and we need it now.' Further hearings are expected as the portfolio committees push for executive-level accountability and the resolution of a dispute that has effectively paralysed the maintenance of South Africa's military infrastructure. DA defence and military veterans' spokesperson Chris Hattingh said in a statement after Wednesday's meeting that immediate political intervention was needed. This, because the DoD and its facilities maintenance arm — the works formation — and minister Dean Macpherson 's DPWI are in 'a destructive stand-off, paralysing infrastructure delivery'. He maintains the DoD/DPWI briefings 'laid bare this dysfunction — a complete breakdown in trust, co-ordination and accountability'. Both sides are to blame, he says, adding years of DWPI underperformance has left defence facilities in disrepair with minister Angie Motshekga's DoD failing to settle its debts. One of these, according to Hattingh, is the more than R4bn owing for municipal services. 'In 2021 the DoD unilaterally froze all unfunded and planned infrastructure projects, citing excessive delays. The DPWI says this action wasted millions in design costs, now likely to be written off. What followed was a blame game: defence accusing public works of inefficiency and public works accusing defence of financial neglect and unilateralism,' his statement on the meeting notes. Hattingh concluded that while departments point fingers, 'our soldiers are left to serve in dangerous, crumbling facilities. This is not just a governance failure it is a betrayal of the men and women in uniform.'
Eyewitness News
06-06-2025
- Eyewitness News
NCOP adopts ethics report that will see several MPs, Cabinet ministers fined for not disclosing interests
CAPE TOWN - The National Council of Provinces (NCOP) has adopted a joint ethics report that will see several MPs and members of Cabinet fined for not disclosing their interests. The committee's report was earlier adopted by the National Assembly, but required the NCOP's adoption before the penalties of up to R10,000 could be implemented against them. Those who failed to disclose their public and confidential interests include the likes of Deputy Minister of Public Works Sihle Zikalala, as well as Minister in the Presidency Maropene Ramokgopa. The NCOP on Thursday considered the report of the joint committee on ethics and members' interests on non-disclosure of members' interests for 2024. It found several members in contravention of the code of ethical conduct and disclosure of members' interests. Co-chairperson of the committee, Henni Britz, reminded members about some of the penalties imposed on the transgressing MPs. "In respect of the Honourable Sihle Zikalala, the member failed and or neglected to submit both the public and confidential disclosure by the due date of 14 October 2024, and therefore the committee recommends to the House that a penalty of a reprimand in the House, a fine of R10,000 for a first offence be imposed." All nine provinces represented in the NCOP supported the adoption of the report, which means the sanctions against the MPs will now come into effect.
IOL News
02-06-2025
- IOL News
News you should know tonight: Top 5 stories you may have missed on June 2, 2025
Rain expected along the southern and eastern coasts midweek, with most inland areas remaining dry and cold. Good evening, IOL News family! It's Monday, June 2, 2025, and it's time for a wrap of the biggest headlines making waves in South Africa and beyond. Don't forget to join the IOL WhatsApp Channel to stay in tune, informed, and in the know SA weather forecast: Expect cooler temperatures and isolated showers this week South Africa will start the week with calm and stable weather, but the South African Weather Service (SAWS) has confirmed that isolated showers and cooler temperatures are expected to arrive by midweek. To read on, click here. Zuma blasts Ramaphosa's US mission: 'South Africa's problems can't be fixed by outsiders' Former President Jacob Zuma has issued a stinging rebuke of President Cyril Ramaphosa's recent diplomatic visit to Washington, asserting that South Africa should not rely on foreign powers to resolve its domestic challenges. To read on, click here. Here's what you're likely to pay for petrol and diesel from Wednesday, June 04 Fuel taxes are set to increase for the first time in three years, but thankfully a stronger rand will shield South African motorists from fuel price hikes in June. To read on, click here. Public safety alert: Gauteng officials warn of rising dangers in online meet-ups The Gauteng Provincial Legislature's Portfolio Committee on Community Safety has issued a serious warning to the public amid a surge in violent crimes linked to online dating and social media mee-tups, particularly in the Maboneng precinct of Johannesburg. To read on, click here. KZN councillor and wife implicated in alleged corruption on R29bn N3 highway upgrade An exclusive investigation by IOL has uncovered disturbing allegations of corruption and financial misconduct involving a local politician and his wife, linked to the multi-billion rand N3 highway upgrade - a critical infrastructure project connecting Durban and Pietermaritzburg. To read on, click here. Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel. IOL News
