logo
Chan Chun Sing meets Timor-Leste president, foreign defence leaders

Chan Chun Sing meets Timor-Leste president, foreign defence leaders

Yahoo31-05-2025

SINGAPORE – Defence Minister Chan Chun Sing met several of his counterparts on the sidelines of the 22nd Shangri-La Dialogue on May 30, and reaffirmed Singapore's friendly bilateral defence ties with their countries, the Ministry of Defence said.
The minister called on Timor-Leste President Jose Ramos-Horta, and they exchanged views on regional security developments and ways to enhance bilateral defence cooperation, said Mindef.
Mr Chan also met Malaysian Defence Minister Mohamed Khaled Nordin, and both ministers reaffirmed the warm and longstanding bilateral relationship. They discussed regional security issues and cooperation between their countries in multilateral platforms such as the Asean Defence Ministers' Meeting (ADMM), ADMM-Plus and the Five Power Defence Arrangements.
'Singapore and Malaysia's defence establishments interact regularly across a wide range of activities, including bilateral and multilateral exercises, visits, professional exchanges, and cross-attendance of courses,' said Mindef. 'These interactions strengthen mutual understanding and professional ties.'
In a meeting Mr Chan had with Brunei's Minister at the Prime Minister's Office and Minister of Defence II Haji Awang Halbi Haji Mohd Yussof, they discussed bilateral cooperation as well as engagement through multilateral platforms such as the ADMM and ADMM-Plus.
Singapore's and Brunei's militaries have regular interactions through high-level visits, professional exchanges, cross-attendance of courses and bilateral exercises, which strengthen ties and enhance professionalism, said Mindef. Both countries will mark the 50th anniversary of defence relations in 2026.
Mr Chan also met Philippine Secretary of National Defence Gilberto Teodoro Jr, and they expressed their commitment to continue working together through the ADMM and ADMM-Plus meetings. They also discussed avenues to further defence cooperation between their countries.
In addition, Mr Chan met French Minister of the Armed Forces Sebastien Lecornu. Mr Chan expressed appreciation for France's support for the Republic of Singapore Air Force training at Cazaux Air Base since 1998. Both ministers also exchanged views on security priorities and geopolitical developments, said Mindef.
The two defence ministers had earlier on May 30 signed three agreements to expand cooperation between Singapore and France in emerging and advanced areas of defence technology, such as quantum and artificial intelligence.
The ceremony was witnessed by Prime Minister Lawrence Wong and French President Emmanuel Macron, who is on a state visit to Singapore.
The state visit comes as Singapore and France mark 60 years of diplomatic relations.
During the visit, PM Wong and Mr Macron upgraded bilateral relations to a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership, the Republic's first with a European country.
Mr Chan's meetings took place at the Shangri-La Hotel, where regional and global defence leaders have gathered for the annual Shangri-La Dialogue, Asia's premier security summit.
The dialogue, being held from May 30 to June 1, brings together defence ministers, military chiefs and security experts from around the world to discuss key security issues in the Asia-Pacific region.
Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction
Discover how to enjoy other premium articles here

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I moved 22 hours away to start a new job. A couple I met by chance took me in, and now they're like family to me.
I moved 22 hours away to start a new job. A couple I met by chance took me in, and now they're like family to me.

Business Insider

time11 hours ago

  • Business Insider

I moved 22 hours away to start a new job. A couple I met by chance took me in, and now they're like family to me.

When thinking about family, whether they are distant relatives or close loved ones, we rarely would consider outsiders, let alone strangers. But that hasn't been my experience. While it may sound like a lot of work, making new genuine connections can be easy; sometimes it's as simple as finding a common interest with a person. As random as it might sound, that's exactly how I was able to meet a lovely couple at a cable store in Nebraska. For someone who had just moved 1,500 miles away from my hometown of Virginia to work as a journalist for the local news station, the last thing I ever expected I'd do is talk to strangers. But in retrospect, everyone was a stranger, including my new coworkers. Leaving my family was harder than I expected After a 22-hour drive from Virginia Beach to Kearney, my parents and I had finally made it to our destination, and all that I could think about the entire way, as we reached each city limit sign was "What have I done?" My parents were about to drop me off in the middle of nowhere. "Why aren't they stopping me?" I thought as we got closer. It was bittersweet — celebrating a huge accomplishment, stepping into my career, all while getting emotional at each restaurant during the road trip. It wasn't until then that I realized the importance of spending time with family. The smallest things made me cry: watching my dad go up to the breakfast buffet at Shoney's for seconds and thirds, and seeing my mom ask for French vanilla coffee creamer. I contemplated telling them just to take me back home, but I had to commit to my decision. We worked together to get me settled in my new town Picking up my keys from the apartment leasing office seemed to be the only thing that could cheer me up — sure, I was sad, but who wouldn't feel accomplished moving out of their parents' house? They were set to fly back home that following Monday, so helping me get settled was our main goal for the next few days. Everywhere we went, it felt as though we stood out as a Black family in Kearney. But like most talkative dads, mine didn't care, and he'd have small talk about sports with random people to get a feel of the environment. Setting up my cable service was a priority. Little did I know, it would be a turning point for me. As we were choosing cable plans, my dad started chatting with a white couple who were also setting up their services. They began telling us the ins and outs of living there — helpful information that I needed to know. A few people shared insights with me on the area, but to hear it from actual residents made a huge difference. As a Black woman in her early 20s moving to a strange place, the couple made me feel welcome. They were aware that I relocated for work and shared that their daughter had also just moved for college, so we had something in common. Assuming that the connection was just a one-off situation where I'd never hear from them again, they proved me wrong. My mom and the man's wife became Facebook friends, which made me even more comfortable with the idea of reaching out. After all, the connection was completely normal, just two mothers posting about how much they love their kids. Eventually, our relationship blossomed After months of living in Kearney, finally accepting that I needed a wholesome bond to make me feel at home, I decided to take the couple up on an offer to go to church together. And there I was on a Sunday morning with people I met at a cable store. Was I nervous? Of course. But about 20 minutes into the service, it hit me that there are genuinely good people in the world. So when they invited me out for brunch afterwards, there was no hesitation in my mind — I even rode with them to the restaurant. On the ride, they shared more details about the area, helping me to become more acquainted with my environment. They made me feel comfortable, and at home, something I needed at the time. Since moving back to Virginia, our relationship has been limited to Facebook updates, but at least I know that I will always have family in Nebraska.

Iran unsure it can trust US after Israeli strikes: top official
Iran unsure it can trust US after Israeli strikes: top official

The Hill

time11 hours ago

  • The Hill

Iran unsure it can trust US after Israeli strikes: top official

Iran's foreign minister told NBC News Friday that Tehran was not sure it could trust the United States in the wake of numerous Israeli attacks on Iran. The airstrikes from Israel, which have targeted Iranian military and nuclear facilities, came just days before American officials were scheduled to hold nuclear talks mediated by Oman. The U.S. has said it was not involved in the operation, although Trump was notified of the strike beforehand by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. In the interview, Araghchi suggested that the United States was not legitimately interested in diplomacy and was only using the talks as a 'cover' for future attacks. 'They had perhaps this plan in their mind, and they just needed negotiations perhaps to cover it up,' Araghchi said. 'We don't know how we can trust them anymore. What they did was in fact a betrayal to diplomacy.' 'We're not prepared to negotiate with them anymore, as long as the aggression continues,' he added. The State Department did not immediately return a request for comment. Araghchi's comments mark another deterioration in the chances for diplomacy between the United States and Iran, and come as President Trump is weighing a strike on the country that could damage one of its most significant nuclear facilities that is still standing after Israel's attacks. Trump has repeatedly said that he hopes for a diplomatic solution and does not want to involve the United States in another war in the Middle East. But he also approved of an airstrike in private, the Wall Street Journal reported, although he held off on giving a final order. Now, Trump has attempted to give himself more room for negotiations, saying that he will make a decision within two weeks. Nuclear talks between Iranian, German, French, and British diplomats are now occurring in Geneva, although they did not produce any breakthroughs on their first day. During the interview, which occurred after the end of the talks on Friday, Aragchi said that Israel had to halt its attacks in order to continue negotiations, and that he was unwilling to give up uranium enrichment entirely. 'This is an achievement of our own scientists. It is a question of national pride,' he said.

Trump leaves Washington weighing pending Iran plans
Trump leaves Washington weighing pending Iran plans

The Hill

time13 hours ago

  • The Hill

Trump leaves Washington weighing pending Iran plans

Evening Report is The Hill's p.m. newsletter. Sign up here or using the box below: Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here PRESIDENT TRUMP left Washington for his Bedminster, N.J., golf club for the weekend, as Israel and Iran traded strikes for an eighth day. Trump will attend a fundraiser on Friday night, with plans to receive intelligence briefings over the weekend in Bedminster. The president will depart for next week's NATO summit in the Netherlands on Monday, after saying he'll make a decision within the next two weeks about whether the U.S. will intervene in the Israel-Iran war. Trump said Friday if the U.S. does get involved, it would probably be limited to air strikes. 'I'm not going to talk about ground forces,' Trump told reporters. 'The last thing you want to do is ground force.' Officials from Europe and Iran huddled in Geneva on Friday in search of an off-ramp. Foreign ministers from Germany, France and the United Kingdom met with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, with the Europeans encouraging Iran to drop its nuclear ambitions. The Associated Press reports that the meeting provided hope of further talks, but no concrete breakthrough. Araghchi said Iran will not negotiate while it's under attack. 'In the current situation, as the Zionist regime's attacks continue, we are not seeking negotiations with anyone,' he said in an interview that aired Friday on Iranian state television. Trump said Friday he wouldn't call on Israel to stop its airstrikes because they're winning the war. 'I think it's very hard to make that request right now,' Trump said. 'If somebody is winning, it's a little bit harder to do than if somebody is losing, but we're ready, willing and able, and we've been speaking to Iran, and we'll see what happens. We'll see what happens.' French President Emmanuel Macron said diplomats would make a 'comprehensive, diplomatic and technical offer of negotiation,' arguing that Israel won't be able to accomplish its goal of dismantling Iran's nuclear program all by itself. 'No one can seriously believe that this threat can be met with (Israel's) current operations alone,' he said. 'Why? Because there are some plants that are highly protected and because today, no one knows exactly where's the uranium enriched to 60%. So we need to regain control on (Iran's nuclear) program through technical expertise and negotiation.' The U.S. is capable of dropping a 'bunker buster' bomb that penetrates the mountains where Iran's nuclear program is hidden, although Trump's two-week ultimatum is meant to buy time for a nuclear deal with Iran. Politically, Trump is torn between the anti-war MAGA faction and traditional Republicans, who are eager to intervene. Some Democrats, including Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.), are eager to see the U.S. intervene to annihilate Iran's nuclear program. Others are heartened by Trump's restraint. 'The fact that we're not reading about a U.S. attack on Iran right now actually gives me a little bit of comfort,' Rep. Jim Himes (Conn.), the top Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, said in an interview with Jim Acosta. Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) said on CNN that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu 'has always wanted to drag the United States into a war with Iran.' Rep. Yassamin Ansari (D-Ariz.) mocked Trump's two-week deadline. 'What a joke,' she posted on X. 'We're dealing w/ a reality show dictator who uses Truth Social to notify/terrify a city of 10M people to evacuate + then says the decision on war will be 'made within two weeks.'' 'I don't know how the US ever recovers from this blow to our credibility in the world,' she added. 💡Perspectives: • Washington Examiner: If the U.S. did attack, would it work? • Foreign Affairs: The right path to regime change in Iran. • Responsible Statecraft: Israel is luring the U.S. into a trap. • The Wall Street Journal: MAGA's misguided isolationists. • Fox News: Army celebration a startling split-screen for angry Dems. Read more: • Trump administration monitoring possible Iran-backed cells in U.S. • Satellite images reveal Trump's dilemma over Iran nuclear complex. • Russia warns of 'Chernobyl-style catastrophe'. • Will Israel's interceptors outlast Iran's missiles? • Spain rejects NATO's anticipated 5% defense spending proposal. CATCH UP QUICK NEWS THIS AFTERNOON President Trump's agenda bill hit rough waters late this week, with the Senate Parliamentarian ruling that key provisions must be stripped from the bill if Republicans hope to bypass a Democratic filibuster. Elizabeth MacDonough, the Senate parliamentarian, ruled that provisions in the bill run afoul of the Byrd Rule and must be taken out for the legislation to pass by a simple majority vote using the budget reconciliation process. Republicans do not expect to get any support from Democrats for Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' so it's up to the GOP to ensure the legislation adheres to Senate rules for the special procedural fast track. The Hill's Alexander Bolton reports that the offending provisions fall under the jurisdiction of the Senate committees on Banking, Environment and Public Works and Armed Services: • The bill would have placed a funding cap on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which would have cut $6.4 billion from the agency. • MacDonough ruled against language cutting $1.4 billion in costs by reducing the pay of Federal Reserve staff, cutting $293 million by reducing the Office of Financial Research funding, and cutting $771 million by eliminating the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. Sen. Jeff Merkley (Ore.), the ranking Democrat on the Senate Budget Committee, said the provisions 'will need to be stripped from the bill' if Republicans hope to pass the legislation on their own. 'As much as Senate Republicans would prefer to throw out the rule book and advance their families lose and billionaires win agenda, there are rules that must be followed and Democrats are making sure those rules are enforced,' he said. Republicans have a 53-47 majority in the Senate. If the provisions remain in place, they'd have to muster 60 votes for passage. MEANWHILE… Senate fiscal hawks, including Sens. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), Rick Scott (R-Fla.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah), are demanding more spending cuts to reduce the deficit. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) has already said he'll oppose the bill because of spending and the debt levels. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) has a tough needle to thread, as he's been wooing Sens. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), who say spending cuts to Medicaid have gone too far. There's also the matter of how quickly to phase out Biden-era green energy tax credits, which is further dividing Republicans. Thune, who hopes to bring the bill to the floor for a vote next week, can only afford three GOP defections for the bill to pass. It's the same dynamic Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) faced in the House, where changes to satisfy one conservative faction created a rift with a different faction. Now, House Republicans from blue states are digging in, saying the Senate's changes to the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap are unacceptable. 'We're not accepting that,' Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.), a member of the SALT caucus, told The Hill on Thursday. 'That's the reality. Never gonna vote for that bill.' 💡Perspectives: • The Hill: Is the US in a debt-fueled national death spiral? • The Hill: How Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' stacks up against his 2017 tax bill. • The Atlantic: Democrats must confront their gerontocracy. • American Prospect: The scheme to scramble your nest egg. • Compact: The long, slow death of development. ON TAP Here's who's talking Sunday… NewsNation's 'The Hill Sunday': Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) and Rep. Sean Casten (D-Ill.). CNN's 'State of the Union': Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.). Fox's 'Fox News Sunday': Sens. Mike Lee (R-Utah) and Tim Kaine (D-Va.). CBS's 'Face the Nation': Kaine; Reps. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.); Israeli Ambassador to the U.S. Yechiel Leiter; retired Gen. Frank McKenzie. NBC's 'Meet the Press': Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.). MSNBC's 'The Weekend': Sen. Peter Welch (D-Vt.). IN OTHER NEWS Vice President Vance is traveling to Los Angeles on Friday to meet with the National Guard troops and U.S. Marines that President Trump deployed to quell protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. Vance will tour operations and mobile command centers, and give brief remarks to military officials and Marines, the White House said. The anti-ICE protests in Southern California, which were at times marred by looting, vandalism and clashes with police, have largely abated. Still, tempers are running hot between California's Democratic leadership and the Trump administration over Trump's move to deploy thousands of California National Guard troops to keep the peace. The president also dispatched hundreds of U.S. Marines. A federal appeals court ruled late Thursday that Trump could keep the National Guard deployed in Los Angeles, for now, after the move was challenged by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in court. 'We emphasize, however, that our decision addresses only the facts before us. And although we hold that the President likely has authority to federalize the National Guard, nothing in our decision addresses the nature of the activities in which the federalized National Guard may engage,' the appeals panel wrote in its 38-page decision. Trump celebrated the ruling on social media: 'The Judges obviously realized that Gavin Newscum is incompetent and ill prepared, but this is much bigger than Gavin, because all over the United States, if our Cities, and our people, need protection, we are the ones to give it to them should State and Local Police be unable, for whatever reason, to get the job done,' he posted on Truth Social. The Hill's Zach Schonfeld reports: 'Though the 9th Circuit's decision marks a victory for Trump in the legal battle, it may be short-lived. U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer, who issued last week's decision invalidating the deployment, is set to hold a hearing Friday on whether to issue an indefinite injunction.' Separately, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) pushed back on claims made by the Los Angeles Dodgers that the baseball team had turned away ICE agents who had 'requested permission to access the parking lots.' ICE called the allegations 'false.' Rather, DHS said Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 'vehicles were in the stadium parking lot very briefly, unrelated to any operation or enforcement.' 'This had nothing to do with the Dodgers,' DHS said. Also on Friday, the Trump administration gave California a 60-day deadline to overhaul its sex education program or risk losing federal funding. ELSEWHERE… Rahm Emanuel, former President Obama's chief of staff, appears to be inching closer to running for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2028. 'I have something I think I can offer,' Emanuel said on CNN. 'But I haven't made that decision.' Emanuel, who has fashioned himself as a blunt truth teller, has criticized Democrats for being 'weak and woke.' Democrats are seeking a new identity after their sweeping losses and the nation's rightward shift in 2024. Hillary Clinton's former campaign chief Patti Solis Doyle told Mark Halperin that the Democratic Party is 'leaderless,' 'message-less,' and 'agenda-less.' 'We don't have any alternative ideas to the president and the Republicans right now,' she said. 'So, you know, I'm concerned, to say the least.' Democratic strategist James Carville said Thursday that part of the party's problem was that they acted as if Trump's base of working class voters 'didn't exist.' A similar debate is happening among factions on the right about how the Republican Party has changed in the age of Trump. Former Vice President Pence warned in a new essay that the conservative movement is being threatened by a 'populist fervor' and the 'transformation into the anti-woke movement.' 'An existential identity crisis now grips the American right,' Pence wrote in the essay, which was co-authored by a founder of the Heritage Foundation conservative think tank. 'A political movement once united by a commitment to limited government, moral order, and a robust defense of American ideals now appears fractured, its purpose clouded by populist grievances and ideological drift.' 💡Perspectives: • The Liberal Patriot: How everyday Americans can create healthier politics. • Gideon's: An anti-mandate for NYC's next mayor? • Whole Hog Politics: Land of Lincoln? Not so much for Red America. • Wall Street Journal: Is rioting acceptable? If so, how much? • L.A. Times: How Trump could sabotage L.A.'s World Cup and Olympics. Read more: • 'Heartbroken' Minnesota lawmaker, wife share details of attack. • Judge rejects 'Duffy Directive' tying grants to immigration cooperation. • Man arrested after GOP congressman run off the road, threatened. • NYPD investigating car bomb threat against mayoral candidate Mamdani. • Man charged with attempted kidnapping of Memphis mayor. Thanks for reading! Stay up to date with News Alerts from The Hill here. See you next time.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store