Khamenei and Netanyahu are waging a war of symbols too
The gloves are off and the tweets are on in the
Israel-Iran conflict
that has entered its seventh day. Iran's supreme leader,
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei
, and Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu
are leading the digital charge across social media with evocative symbols from their religious traditions to challenge each other.
Khamenei declared 'the battle begins' in a warning post on Tuesday, hours after US President Donald Trump called for Iran's 'unconditional surrender.'
'In the name of #Haider, the battle begins. Ali returns to #Khaybar with his Zulfiqar,' the 86-year-old Khamenei posted to his 1.5 million followers on X in Farsi, referring to
Shia Islam
's revered figure and the first imam, Ali, who won the Battle of Khaybar with his sword, Zulfiqar.
Khamenei's post framed Iran's attacks as part of a broader religious struggle against Israel.
On the other hand, Israel has called its military operation against Iran "Rising Lion", taking the name from a biblical verse that promises a victorious future for a powerful Israel, and also obliquely referring to the pre-Islamic Revolution Iran.
Live Events
In a post dedicated to the people of Iran, Netanyahu said, 'We are in the midst of one of the greatest military operations in history,
Operation Rising Lion
. The Islamic regime, which has oppressed you for almost 50 years, threatens to destroy our country, the State of Israel."
Both Khamenei and Netanyahu have shared several posts on Twitter (now X), but what stands out is their deliberate use of religious references drawn from history.
Khamenei's Khaybar citation
Khamenei's declaration of battle on Twitter included a reference to Khaybar that was later used by multiple users in their posts as a hashtag.
Khaybar, in the north of Medina, was once home to thousands of Jews who were defeated in a decisive 7th-century battle against the army of Prophet Muhammad. The turning point in the battle came when the Prophet, after earlier attempts to break the stronghold, said, 'Tomorrow I will give the banner to a man who loves God and His Messenger, and God and His Messenger love him. He will conquer it.'
The next day, the Prophet gave the banner to Ali ibn Abi Talib, the first Shia Imam. Ali then led the assault on the fortress of Qamus, Khaybar's most fortified stronghold.
Ali defeated the Jewish commander Marhab using a door as a shield after losing his own. His leadership resulted in the fall of the fort, effectively ending resistance in Khaybar.
The victory marked a strategic and symbolic success for the early Muslim community. In Shia Islam, Ali's role at Khaybar is celebrated as a sign of his divine support.
Netanyahu's lion reference
Khamenei isn't the only one reaching back to religious history. Netanyahu also flipped through holy pages for symbolism, citing phrases – 'Rising Lion' and 'Cyrus the Great' in his posts.
In his message to the Iranian people, Netanyahu said that Israel's conflict was with Iran's Islamic regime, not its people, adding that 'the people of Iran and the people of Israel have been friends since the time of
Cyrus the Great
.'
Cyrus the Great, founder of the first Persian Empire, after conquering Babylon and other cities, allowed the exiled jews to return to Jerusalem and rebuild their Temple.
Netanyahu also used the phrase 'Rising Lion,' drawn from the biblical line 'the people shall rise up as a lion,' in a note placed into a crack of Jerusalem's Western Wall — a gesture that, in hindsight, appeared to signal the impending strikes on Iran. The phrase comes from Numbers 23:24 in the Bible: 'Behold, the people shall rise up as a great lion, and lift up himself as a young lion: he shall not lie down until he eat of the prey, and drink the blood of the slain.'
This verse is part of the first oracle of Balaam, a non-Israelite prophet and diviner, where he foretells the strength and power of Israel, comparing it to a lion that will not rest until it has satisfied its hunger.
The Book of Numbers is the fourth book in the Bible. In this part of the story, the diviner named Balaam, who was a kind of prophet or seer known for his ability to bless as well as curse, is being asked by Balak, a king of Moab, to curse the people of Israel, God's chosen people, because Balak sees them as a threat.
Instead of cursing them, Balaam ends up blessing them, because God tells him only to speak what He commands. This verse is part of one of those blessings, where Balaam describes the strength and power of Israel in poetic, symbolic language. The verse means that Israel will be strong, fearless, and ready for action, just like a lion rising to hunt.
Balaam gives more prophetic speeches, continuing to bless Israel instead of cursing it. He also predicts the downfall of Israel's enemies, including Moab (Balak's people), Edom and others. Most famously, he delivers a prophecy that is often seen as messianic by Jews and Christians: 'A star shall come out of Jacob, and a scepter shall rise out of Israel…'
The phrase "Rising Lion' is also linked to the flag of Iran's pre-Islamic Revolution Shah regime. The flag of the Pahlavi dynasty of the Shah had an emblem of a sword-wielding lion and a sun, both drawn from pre-Islamic past of Iran.
The clash on Twitter between Netanyahu and Khamenei makes it plain: this isn't just a military conflict, but an ideological tug-of-war with no end in sight.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Filing of PILs inappropriate when statutory remedies are available: HC
Chandigarh: The Punjab and Haryana high court has held that invocation of extraordinary jurisdiction by way of a public interest litigation (PIL) is inappropriate and impermissible when a robust and adequate statutory framework already exists for redressal of a particular grievance. "Allowing unfettered recourse to PIL in such instances would amount to a judicial usurpation of legislative foresight and undermine the primary responsibility of the legislature to craft laws. Bypassing these meticulously designed mechanisms through PIL circumvents the intended architecture of grievance redressal and potentially dilutes the role of expert authorities," the high court has said. A division bench comprising Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Sumeet Goel has passed the orders on a petition filed by one Anuj Malik and others. The petitioner sought directions to restrain all online opinion trading platforms, mobile applications, websites, and digital mediums from advertising, promoting, or marketing betting and wagering activities through platforms, including YouTube, X (Twitter), Instagram, Facebook, radio, print media, television, in blatant violation of statutory laws. They argued that despite a robust legal framework in place, the law was being flouted through misleading advertisements and unregulated financial systems. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Brigade Grand Dreams 2025 | 12 Month Payment Holiday* Brigade Group Learn More Undo The petitioners further submitted that if appropriate action was not undertaken, such platforms would continue to dupe gullible users. Responding to the plea, the govt informed that there already exists a legal and statutory framework within which any aggrieved person can approach the authorities concerned for redressal of any grievances, as raised by the petitioner. The govt counsel specifically drew the attention of the court to The Haryana Prevention of Public Gambling Act, 2025, which has been notified from April 9, 2025, and submitted that without adverting to the existing statutory framework, approaching this court by way of PIL amounts to bypassing the legislative mandate. After hearing the matter, the bench disposed of the petition, asking the petitioner to raise his grievance before the authorities concerned in terms of extant laws. BOX 'Unwarranted proliferation of litigation' Encouraging indiscriminate PILs, despite available statutory remedies, leads to an unwarranted proliferation of litigation, a burden on constitutional courts, as well as a judicial docket explosion. These risks transform constitutional courts into primary redressal fora rather than their intended role as ultimate arbiters of constitutional questions. Judicial resources, being scant and precious, must be conserved for matters of genuine public importance MSID:: 121975661 413 |
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Letters to The Editor — June 21, 2025
Wars, a missing UN Countries in West Asia seem to be burning one after the other, leading to a million dollar question. Where is the United Nations? What is it doing? What was an Israel-Palestine issue has now become an Israel-Iran issue. It almost appears as if the United Nations, the Security Council and the International Atomic Energy Agency have delegated authority to Israel to prevent the nuclear programme of Iran and wage war against it. The dangers of the wars spreading and disrupting life across the globe seem to have been lost on these agencies. The UN seems to have become a modern-day Nero. In the 'new world order', there seems to be no role for peace. E.V. Tulasi Rao, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh Now that Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz has openly said that Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei can no longer be allowed to exist, Iran could take this to be a serious challenge and attack Israel with all its mighty force. Israel does not seem to want the wars to an end. The bombarding of the Gaza strip, causing total destruction, seems to point to its aim of wanting to form a Jewish state. It is the primary duty of the UN to intervene and try to bring about a negotiation between all the warring nations. Parthasarathy N., Chennai There seems to be no end to conflict — the Russia-Ukraine war, the Hamas attack on Israel and the retaliation by Israel, and now, the Israel-Iran war. The effect of these wars has severely affected trade and crude prices, thus affecting the economy of many countries. What is surprising is the inability of the UN to intervene. The UN may end up losing its very identity. M.R.G. Murthy, Mysuru Evacuation, optimism Amid the very distressing news from West Asia is a gladdening report — the successful evacuation of Indian students from the war zones (Inside pages, '110 students from war-torn Iran land in New Delhi, via Armenia', June 20). What caught my eye was that many of the students were Kashmiri students, and were waving the tricolour on reaching New Delhi. This raises optimism that at long last, the disenchanted youth of Kashmir are now taking a step closer to endearing themselves to the Indian Republic. Nalini Vijayaraghavan, Thiruvananthapuram No to intolerance The Supreme Court of India's firm stand reaffirming the rights of film-makers and theatre owners, as seen in its direction to the Karnataka government to ensure the screening of Thug Life, is both timely and commendable. In a democracy, artistic freedom must not be held hostage by threats of violence or mob pressure. By underlining the state's duty to protect lawful expression, the Court has not only defended cinema but also upheld the rule of law. Such judgments strengthen the spine of free speech and remind us that intolerance must never dictate what the public can or cannot watch. K. Chidanand Kumar, Bengaluru
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Israel-Iran News Live Updates: Iran FM says ready to 'consider' diplomacy 'once the aggression is stopped'
US President Donald Trump claimed that the United States had taken "complete and total control of the skies over Iran." He further warned Iran's Ayatollah Khamenei saying that "We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding. He is an easy target, but is safe there - We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now. But we don't want missiles shot at civilians, or American soldiers. Our patience is wearing thin. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" The long-simmering tensions between Israel and Iran have exploded into open warfare since Friday, June 13, 2025, marking an unprecedented period of direct military confrontation. Israel initiated a major campaign of fighter jet and drone strikes across Iran, targeting nuclear and military sites, including surface-to-surface missile production facilities, detection radar sites, and surface-to-air missile launchers. Reports indicate strikes on residential areas and fuel depots, with Iran's health ministry reporting at least 224 fatalities and over 1,200 injuries, mostly civilians. Israeli forces have also reportedly killed several top Iranian military commanders and atomic scientists. The IDF claims to have destroyed one-third of Iran's surface-to-surface missile launchers and achieved "full air superiority over Tehran," also striking an Iranian refueling aircraft 2,300 km away. In retaliation, Tehran has launched barrages of missiles and drones, hitting Israeli cities and towns, causing at least 24 deaths and 592 injuries, with a major oil refinery in Haifa among the targets. The IDF confirmed intercepting over 100 Iranian UAVs. The international community, including China, Turkey, and G7 leaders, has urgently called for de-escalation, but both sides remain defiant. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu asserts the offensive aims to thwart "existential" nuclear and missile threats and has not ruled out targeting Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, suggesting it would "end the conflict." The UN's IAEA reported physical damage to an above-ground component of Iran's Natanz uranium enrichment facility but normal external radiation levels, while warning of potential internal contamination. Amidst the crisis, planned nuclear negotiations between Tehran and Washington were called off.
