Only regime change will stop Iran making a nuclear weapon
Only regime change will completely neutralise the threat that Iran will develop nuclear weapons, however successful 'Operation Midnight Hammer' may have been, though it will cement support for Trump domestically, an expert on foreign policy has told Euronews.
Euronews interviewed Jacob Kirkegaard, senior fellow at the Bruegel Institute, on the American air strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Kirkegaard said the attacks might eventually bring the world closer to closer to the end, as Iran has very limited tools to escalate the situation.
According to the expert, Iran could choose to retaliate against either US bases by killing a number of US troops, or against the crude oil facilities, either by hitting the transportation through the Strait of Hormuz or some of the facilities in the Gulf Arab neighbours of Iran.
But Kirkegaard said he thought both options "a low probability" because Iran today is "at a nearly historically weak military position".
According to the expert, Iran's proxies, like Hamas, Hezbollah, or the Houthis, are weakened and the US could join a broader military campaign if Iran hits American targets.
"This is the risk that the Iranians know that Trump has proven he's actually willing to pull the trigger. And they need to take it seriously. I don't think we're headed for more escalation, but on the other hand, does this bring a negotiated peace settlement or a return to an agreed international nuclear surveillance, sort of a JPCOA 2.0, any nearer? The risk is that I think the US and the European countries are now going to want a more intrusive JPCOA that Iran may or may not agree to. So I think the possibility of an accelerated peace move is there, but it is absolutely no certainty," he said.
Iran might still be able to produce a nuclear bomb
Kirkegaard said that for the moment, nobody knows how much damage the Iranian nuclear sites have suffered. If the Natanz and Isfahan sites are disabled, "this will make weapons-grade uranium enrichment more difficult", he said.
"But that may not matter very much. Because the latest data from the International Atomic Energy Agency suggested that Iran had about 400 kilos of enriched uranium, up to 60 percent. That is, if further enriched, more than enough to produce a nuclear weapon, provided you have the technical know-how to do so, weaponize it. We don't know if Iran has that, but what it means is that destroying these facilities, even if they are successfully destroyed, isn't going to destroy the Iranian nuclear program."
With a possibly large amount of highly enriched uranium hidden in the country, Iran may still be capable of building a nuclear bomb, he said.
"Iran remains a nuclear threshold power, maybe not quite as near as it was 24 hours ago, but a country that could, if the regime decided to go all out to produce a bomb, might very well still be capable of doing so."
He added that as a result, there is no military solution for the Iranian programme unless there is a regime change in the country.
Trump will be remembered as a president who bombed Iran
Kirkegaard said that despite Trump's aspiration to be a peacemaker in Ukraine, he will be remembered as the president who bombed Iran.
"He's going to forever be the US President who bombed Iran. So whenever he's criticized by certainly the more hawkish elements of the US political firmament... he will always have, 'look, I bombed Iran'. What did Obama do? What did Biden do? What did even Bush do?"
Trump will thereby deter criticism within the MAGA camp, according to the analyst, and he will certainly not cross the red line of sending troops to Iran.
"The only thing where I think he will remain inhibited, but he's no more inhibited than any other president, is that you're not gonna have boots on the ground. You're not going to have a US actual invasion of Iran, which obviously would be a disaster for everyone involved. He knows that he's not gonna do that. But he has shown to the people who call him TACO and thought he was gonna chicken out, he showed them."
Europe is irrelevant in the conflict
Jacob Kirkegaard said Europe will be irrelevant in the conflict, but many leaders on the continent are happy that Israel, together with the US, is destroying Iran's nuclear and missile programme.
"I think we have to say that the brief window of European diplomacy that we had on Friday with the meeting in Geneva went nowhere. The Iranians told the E3 foreign ministers that they are not interested in pursuing a deal that will freeze completely all nuclear enrichment. The reality is that Europe is irrelevant in this conflict. "
The analyst added that Europe is also deeply split on the issue, and many leaders are quietly celebrating.
"Friedrich Merz told German television that Israel is doing Europe's dirty work by striking Iran. There's no doubt that Europe secretly is very happy that Iran's ballistic missile and drone production capacity appears to be significantly degraded by Israel. "
Striking Iran is directly weakening Russia, which is Europe's main strategic threat.
"While nobody's going to praise Netanyahu publicly in Europe, the reality is that Friedrich Merz was right. But many European governments will obviously feel differently publicly or otherwise. And that alone will prevent Europe from taking a united stance that condemns Europe to irrelevance. It's really that simple."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
an hour ago
- LeMonde
The Heritage Foundation sets its sights on Europe
Behind the thick velvet curtains of the Cercle de l'Union Interalliée, a lavish Parisian club on Rue du Faubourg-Saint-Honoré, a high-profile political reception was taking place, just a stone's throw from the Elysée presidential palace. Ties were mandatory for the guests who, on the evening of May 26, gathered to soak up "the future of conservatism in France and in the West," as promised by the invitation card. The host was an American, unknown to the French public, who holds a piece of the United States' destiny in his hands. Kevin Roberts presides over the powerful Heritage Foundation, the most influential conservative think tank in the orbit of Donald Trump's "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) movement. It paved the way for Donald Trump's return to power by providing him with the highly radical Project 2025, the unofficial blueprint for his term in office. Bald, wearing a pin of Heritage's Liberty Bell-inspired logo on his jacket, Roberts, 50, displayed the articulateness of a university professor. Born in southern Louisiana, he has been one of the most zealous ideologues of Trump's second presidency, determined to "burn" everything – he has a penchant for radical metaphors – in order to reshape America into a nationalist and reactionary version of itself. Since 2021, he has led the Heritage Foundation and its 350 employees. The historian by training earns nearly $1 million a year in this role. He is a regular at Mar-a-Lago, Trump's residence, and has developed a genuine friendship with JD Vance, the 40-year-old nationalist-Catholic vice president, who is idolized by the far right on both sides of the Atlantic. Roberts is above all one of the unofficial envoys for a major objective of Trump's second term: weaving a network with "civilizational allies in Europe," as the US State Department put it in a strategic memo published on May 27. The document mentions the Trump team's intent to promote their vision of a "shared cultural heritage," stretching from Paris to Warsaw. At the end of May, Roberts traveled to France for the first time, with that very goal in mind.
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Exclusive: Israel blasts EU report claiming Gaza human rights breaches
Israel has blasted the EU-Israel Association Agreement (EUSR) review, saying 'this report and its conclusions should not be taken seriously or used as a basis for any future actions or conversations', in a letter from the country's foreign ministry to the EU seen by Euronews on Sunday. 'Decency would dictate addressing the report's shortcomings and dismissing it in its entirety,' the letter, sent to the Commission and External Action Service, concludes. The EU-Israel Association Agreement review released on Friday said that Israel's actions in the Gaza Strip indicate a breach of the human rights provisions contained in its Association Agreement with the European Union. The issue is set to be considered by foreign ministers meeting on Monday. Citing a collection of findings by independent international organisations, the highly anticipated review from the bloc's diplomatic service said it found "indications" that Israel breached its human rights obligations with actions in Gaza. The breach stems from Israel's offensive on Gaza and the stringent conditions applied to the deliveries of humanitarian aid, which have stoked fears of widespread famine among Palestinians living in the densely populated enclave. In the letter seen by Euronews, the Israeli foreign ministry expressed its 'astonishment' that the report disregarded 'our detailed response to the questions submitted to us'. The letter starts with a presentation of what it calls 'the strategic reality Israel is facing', detailing how it is 'fighting a war on seven fronts.' 'It is against this backdrop – Israel's combat with a host of brutal enemies - that the EUSR was tasked with doing a 'rush job', compiling a biased and extremely one-sided summary of many anti-Israeli voices and documents into a so-called 'honest report' for the Member States of the EU,' the letter states. The Israeli foreign ministry letter focuses on what it calls 'two failures' of the EUSR report, claiming that it 'fails to take into account the context' and 'crucial facts' the October 7 attacks followed by 'the ongoing attempt by Iran and its proxies to bring about the annihilation of the Jewish state'. 'A report that opens with an admission that it lacks the ability to verify its own statements, or even the mandate to address the numerous terror attacks by Palestinians against Israel, cannot be taken seriously,' the letter says. The letter claims that the EUSR report 'fails morally' by neglecting to address any damage inflicted on Israeli civilians' by Hamas' control of the Gaza strip and its actions against Israelis, including what it calls 'the proven complicity of UN bodies such as UNRWA.' 'The report aims to deny Israel's right to defend itself against terrorism. It does not cite any of the many positive actions undertaken by Israel in the humanitarian field and neglects to mention the continuous refusal by Hamas of a US-brokered hostage deal (the 'Witkoff Proposal') which Israel has agreed to,' the letter says. Secondly, the Israeli foreign ministry letter claims that the EUSR report also 'fails methodologically'. No opportunity to defend itself, Israel claims 'Israel was not given an opportunity to defend itself against the extreme accusations mounted on it. Regretfully, even a person facing dismissal from a job, receives more leeway to state his or her case, than the complete disregard the EUSR has shown toward the objective facts and evidence of the State of Israel," the letter claims. The EUSR did not adhere to due process, it alleges, choosing not to engage Israel in dialogue over the report. The EUSR also did not allow Israeli information to be included in the report; and in fact, even when Israel thoroughly detailed its position in communication– offering detailed answers on several topics - the information presented was neither added nor addressed in the report,' the letter states. The letter insists on 'Israel's Compliance with International Law', and claims that 'a simple dialogue with Israeli authorities could have made these facts clear. Israel is a democratic state abiding by IHL and international law, while fighting to survive in a region void of democracy and full of terrorism and radicalism. Its actions should be judged fairly and honestly, a process at which the report in question has failed.' 'Throughout the war against Hamas, Israel has facilitated the transfer of large quantities of humanitarian aid into Gaza, even under fire,' the letter says in response to the EUSR report, which speaks about the blockade of humanitarian assistance, military strikes against hospitals, the forced displacement of the Palestinian population, mass arrests, arbitrary detentions, the expansion of settlements, which are illegal under international law, in the Occupied Territories, and the violence committed by settlers. According to the EUSR report, the violations are described as numerous and serious. The internal review exercise was launched last month at the request of 17 countries, led by the Netherlands, to determine whether Israel was still complying with Article 2 of the Association Agreement, which states bilateral relations "shall be based on respect for human rights and democratic principles, which guides their internal and international policy and constitutes an essential element of this agreement". The Israeli foreign ministry response concludes that the EUSR report 'is absurd and reflects an unprecedented process directed at a democratic state in the midst of war,' and that it 'completely ignores the circumstances, as well as the substantive comments and responses provided by Israel.' The stern response by Israel's foreign ministry appears to echo the statements made by Israel's ambassador to the EU and NATO Haim Regev, on Thursday 19 June. In an interview with Euronews, ambassador Regev was clear and firm about his government's current interactions with the European Union on the crisis with Iran and about Israel's actions in Gaza, saying 'we hear different tones, but at the end of the road we see and we feel the support.' The Israeli government has 'a continuous and intensive interaction' with the top EU institutions in Brussels, but 'of course it is complicated when it comes to have one position in the Union composed of 27 member states,' the Israeli diplomat said. 'There is a war right now and Israel is actually leading this war against Iran, that this is the war also for the benefit, for the long run of Europe. So this is not the time right now to examine or to push things or to try to put obstacles in the Israel-EU relations," Regev concluded. The Commission and External Action Service have been approached for comment.
Euronews
3 hours ago
- Euronews
Iran launches wave of missiles at Israel following US attack
Iran launched a wave of more than 40 missiles at northern and central Israel, leaving at least 86 people injured. The attack came just hours after Israel and the United States launched a coordinated attack on Iran, which included the bombing of three of its nuclear sites. Israel's health ministry reported that of those who arrived at hospitals, two people were moderately wounded and 77 others were in good condition. Israeli local media reported residential areas in Tel Aviv and the central town of Nes Ziona being struck. Tel Aviv's Deputy Mayor Haim Goren said that hundreds of homes were damaged in the attacks. Meanwhile in the northern city of Haifa, an IDF spokesperson said an Israeli air defence interceptor malfunctioned and crashed during the Iranian attack, causing damage and lightly wounding several people. Israel and Iran have been exchanging fire ever since Israel launched an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities on June 13. So far, at least 25 people have been killed in Israel, according to Israeli local media. In Iran, at least 430 people have been killed in Israeli strikes, according to the country's Health Ministry.
