Can you guess how many days Melania Trump actually spent at the White House?
Credit: Instagram/@melaniatrump
The role of the First Lady has traditionally included much more than ceremonial duties. From supporting national initiatives to being a steady presence at the White House, the first lady is expected to help the president both symbolically and practically as the country's leading hostess and a key public figure.
But Melania Trump has always approached the position differently—and sources say her latest time in the White House reflects just that.
— KUWTTRUMPS (@KUWTTRUMPS)
According to a recent report by The New York Times, Melania Trump has spent fewer than 14 days at the White House since President Donald Trump returned to office on January 20, 2025. Two sources familiar with the matter told the outlet that even that figure might be 'generous.'
The Times quoted historian and first lady expert Katherine Jellison, who said, 'We haven't seen such a low-profile first lady since Bess Truman, and that's going way back in living human memory, nearly 80 years ago.'
Operation Sindoor
'Did not want to...': Pak def min gives absurd excuse for army's failure to withstand Op Sindoor
Blackouts, sirens & Pak's failed attacks: 10 things that happened in the last 36 hrs
'1971 war was not remotely as terrifying': Residents of border areas shell-shocked
While Melania has made a few appearances during her husband's second term, they've been rare. Just yesterday, she made one of her rare public appearances, attending a White House event honoring the late Barbara Bush. On Thursday, May 8, Melania welcomed reporters and guests to the East Room of the White House for the unveiling of a U.S. Postal Service stamp commemorating the former first lady, who would have turned 100 this June.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Nagelpilz-Durchbruch schockiert Experten in Dresden
Heilratgeber
Weiterlesen
Undo
In recent months, she has also appeared beside President Trump at Pope Francis's funeral—a day before her 55th birthday—and during the annual White House Easter Egg Roll on the South Lawn. Yet, for the most part, she's remained largely out of the spotlight.
Her absence isn't entirely new. During President Trump's first term, Melania famously stayed behind at Trump Tower in Manhattan to avoid disrupting their son Barron's school schedule.
And ahead of her husband's second term, she made it clear that she would divide her time between the White House, their Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, and New York City as Barron began his freshman year at NYU.
c
In a January 13 interview with Fox & Friends, she said: 'I will be in the White House. And when I need to be in New York, I will be in New York. When I need to be in Palm Beach, I will be in Palm Beach. My first priority is to be a mom, to be a first lady, to be a wife.'
Unlike more politically involved first ladies such as Michelle Obama and Dr. Jill Biden, Melania has consistently taken a more private approach to the role. Her most notable political appearances during the Trump presidency include speeches at both the 2016 and 2020 Republican National Conventions. Her brief appearance at the 2024 GOP convention marked one of the few times she publicly supported her husband during the campaign.
Melania was noticeably absent from President Trump's many court appearances, including his recent five-week-long criminal hush money trial. She reemerged recently in a series of Fox News interviews and cryptic social media posts promoting her upcoming memoir, Melania.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
Netizens slam Pakistan's 'hypocrisy' and 'servility' over Trump Nobel nomination after Iran strikes: 'What greater betrayal could there be to Muslims'
Pakistan's Shahbaz Sharif The Pakistani government and its powerful military establishment are facing a wave of public backlash after formally recommending US President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, a move that drew widespread condemnation following the US airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. Pakistan's deputy prime minister and foreign minister Ishaq Dar sent a letter to the Nobel Committee in Norway, crediting Trump's 'decisive diplomatic intervention' during the recent India-Pakistan standoff. But the recommendation triggered a storm on social media after Trump ordered attacks on Iran's Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan nuclear sites, an operation he called a 'historic moment' and one that escalated regional tensions. On X (formerly Twitter), users accused the Pakistani government of appeasing its 'master.' One user mocked, 'Pakistanis, beware! After the attack on Iran, PM Shehbaz might not only award Trump the Nobel Peace Prize, but also Tamgha-e-Jurat, Tamgha-e-Shujaat, Tamgha-e-Basalat, Tamgha-e-Imtiaz, and perhaps even the Nishan-e-Haider!' Veteran journalist Ameer Abbas recalled that PML-N leader Khawaja Saad Rafique had once likened Trump to Genghis Khan and Hitler. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo 'Now, the same government nominates him for the Nobel Peace Prize. Who is orchestrating such shameful and cowardly decisions?' he asked. Raheeq Abbasi, political analyst and columnist, noted the irony, 'Trump, who vetoed the Gaza ceasefire 8 times and is protested across the West for war crimes, is being nominated for a Nobel by the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Is there no sense of honour left?' The backlash cut across ideological lines. Some users accused the military establishment of calling the shots. 'The uncrowned kings are ready to sell out the nation whenever they please,' wrote Major (R) Asim. Another user, Jarjees Ahmad, called out the 'supreme level of hypocrisy', 'We're nominating someone involved in the massacre of Palestinians while claiming to stand with Iran.' Aamir Khan added, 'What greater betrayal could there be to Muslims, our country, and the people of Pakistan?' The Pakistani government has yet to respond officially to the criticism.
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
Iran-Israel war escalation to impact India' s trade with West Asia, say experts
Any further escalation of the ongoing war between Iran and Israel will have wider implications for India 's trade with West Asian countries, including Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, and Yemen, say experts. They said that the war has already started impacting India's exports to Iran and Israel. The US attacked three sites in Iran early Sunday, inserting itself into Israel's war aimed at destroying the country's nuclear programme in a risky gambit to weaken a longtime foe that prompted fears of a wider regional conflict as Tehran accused Washington of launching "a dangerous war". by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Many Are Watching Tariffs - Few Are Watching What Nvidia Just Launched Seeking Alpha Read Now Undo "We are in for big trouble now because of this war. It will have a cascading effect on India's trade with West Asian countries," Mumbai-based exporter and founder chairman of Technocraft Industries India Sharad Kumar Saraf said. Saraf said that his company is also holding back consignments to both these countries. Technocraft Industries manufactures drum closures, nylon and plastic plugs, capseal closures, and clamps. Live Events "There will be a cascading effect of this war," he added. Another exporter said that the Indian traders community is already reeling under the impact of the Israel-Hamas conflict and involvement of Yemen-backed Houthis' attack on shipping vessels in the Red Sea. Due to that, shipping lines from India were taking consignments from the Cape of Good Hope, encircling the African continent. Now, because of the Iran-Israel war, another key trading route - the Strait of Hormuz - is getting affected. "This route will hit the movement of oil tankers. I have a feeling that oil tankers will find new routes but that will push crude oil prices. It will have implications on inflation as crude oil prices are the mother of all prices," Saraf said. Think tank Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) said that a wider regional escalation could threaten India's much larger trade with the broader West Asian region, including Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, and Yemen, where Indian exports total USD 8.6 billion and imports stand at USD 33.1 billion. "Any disruption to shipping lanes, port access, or financial systems in this corridor would severely impact India's trade flows, inflate freight and insurance costs, and introduce fresh supply chain risks for Indian businesses," GTRI Founder Ajay Srivastava said. India's exports to Iran stood at USD 1.24 billion in FY2025, with key items including Basmati rice (USD 753.2 million), banana (USD 53.2 million), soya meal (USD 70.6 million), Bengal gram (USD 27.9 million), and tea (USD 25.5 million). Imports stood at USD 441.8 billion last fiscal. With Israel, India's exports stood at USD 2.1 billion and USD 1.6 billion in imports in 2024-25. He said that the ongoing US-Israel strikes on Iran and the threat of wider conflict could significantly disrupt this trade. Payment channels already strained by US sanctions may face further blockages, while heightened shipping risks in the Gulf could drive up insurance costs and delay shipments. "Perishable exports like rice, bananas, and tea are especially vulnerable. A prolonged conflict could dampen Iranian demand and squeeze Indian exporters, particularly in the agricultural sector," Srivastava said. GTRI said that a key concern is the potential disruption to the Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly 60-65 per cent of India's crude imports transit. "Any blockade or military escalation in this vital maritime corridor would severely impact India's energy security, drive up oil prices, and trigger inflationary pressures at home," it added. India enjoys deep historical, cultural, and economic ties with Iran, once a major crude oil supplier and views Iran's Chabahar Port as a strategic gateway to Afghanistan and Central Asia, providing crucial connectivity while bypassing Pakistan. Yet India also maintains robust relations with the US, Israel, and Gulf Arab states, each now directly or indirectly involved in the unfolding confrontation, Srivastava said. India's crude oil and half of its LNG imports pass through the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran has threatened to close. This narrow waterway, only 21 miles wide at its narrowest point, handles nearly a fifth of global oil trade and is indispensable to India, which depends on imports for over 80 per cent of its energy needs. The Strait of Hormuz, which lies between Iran to the north and Oman and the United Arab Emirates to the south, serves as the main route for oil exports from Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, and the UAE. Many liquefied natural gas (LNG) shipments, especially from Qatar, also pass through the strait. According to the Delhi-based economic think tank, any closure or military disruption in the Strait of Hormuz would sharply increase oil prices, shipping costs, and insurance premiums, triggering inflation, pressuring the rupee, and complicating India's fiscal management. The present conflict that began with an attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, has brought cargo movement through Red Sea routes to a halt due to attacks by Houthi rebels on commercial shipping. Last year, the situation around the Bab-el-Mandeb Strait, a crucial shipping route connecting the Red Sea and the Mediterranean Sea to the Indian Ocean, escalated due to attacks by Yemen-based Houthi militants. Around 80 per cent of India's merchandise trade with Europe passes through the Red Sea, and substantial trade with the US also takes this route. Both these geographies account for 34 per cent of the country's total exports. The Red Sea Strait is vital for 30 per cent of global container traffic and 12 per cent of world trade. Based on the tariff war impact, the World Trade Organisation ( WTO ) has already said that global trade will contract 0.2 per cent in 2025 as against the earlier projection of 2.7 per cent expansion. India's overall exports had grown 6 per cent on year to USD 825 billion in 2024-25. This year it is expected to cross USD 900 billion. Snapping the two-month rising trend, India's exports declined by 2.17 per cent year-on-year to USD 38.73 billion in May due to a fall in petroleum goods' shipments.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'There is no red line' US hasn't crossed, says Iran's foreign minister; declares diplomacy dead after America strikes on nuclear sites
Israeli President Isaac Herzog on Sunday expressed gratitude to US President Donald Trump for carrying out military strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, calling it a "decisive moment" between the axis of terror and that of hope. Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi declared on Sunday that the United States has crossed 'the most dangerous red line' by launching overnight strikes on key Iranian nuclear sites, warning that diplomacy is no longer on the table and that the US bears full responsibility for what comes next. 'There is no red line left that the US hasn't crossed,' Araghchi told reporters in Istanbul. 'The last and most dangerous one was what happened only last night when they crossed a very big red line by attacking nuclear facilities.' He added, 'The door to diplomacy should always be open, but this is not the case right now.' This marks the first official Iranian response since US President Donald Trump announced that American B-2 bombers, supported by submarine-launched Tomahawk missiles, had struck Iran's Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan nuclear sites. Trump claimed the sites were 'completely and fully obliterated,' calling it a 'historic moment' and warning Tehran that 'there will either be peace or there will be tragedy for Iran.' The Atomic Energy Organization of Iran confirmed the sites had been hit but insisted that the program 'cannot be stopped.' The IAEA said there was no sign of radiation leakage but would continue to monitor the situation. Iran's foreign ministry accused Washington of 'betraying diplomacy' and launching 'a dangerous war.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 40세 넘고 PC만 있으면? 이 게임 완전 내 거임! Hero Wars 플레이하기 Undo It vowed to respond with 'full force.' 'The warmongering, lawless administration in Washington is solely and fully responsible for the dangerous consequences and far-reaching implications of its act of aggression,' Araghchi said. Shortly after the US strikes, Iran launched 40 missiles at Israel, injuring over 80 people and damaging several buildings. Israel retaliated with fresh strikes on military targets in western Iran. The Israeli military has reported being on high alert for a prolonged conflict. Meanwhile, global leaders have raised alarm. UN Secretary-General António Guterres called the situation 'a dangerous escalation,' warning of a growing risk of catastrophic regional war. Despite warnings from Tehran, Trump defended his decision as necessary to halt Iran's nuclear ambitions, which the US and Israel argue remain a threat even as Tehran denies pursuing a bomb. Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praised Trump's action, calling it 'bold' and 'historic.'
