logo
MP Materials Corp. (MP): A Bull Case Theory

MP Materials Corp. (MP): A Bull Case Theory

Yahoo24-04-2025

We came across a bullish thesis on MP Materials Corp. (MP) on wallstreetbets Subreddit Page by Steve_Zissouu. In this article, we will summarize the bulls' thesis on MP. MP Materials Corp. (MP)'s share was trading at $23.19 as of April 21st. MP's trailing and forward P/E were 20.97 and 24.10 respectively according to Yahoo Finance.
The mining industry is entering a pivotal moment, with a unique opportunity emerging as the U.S. government intensifies efforts to secure domestic access to critical minerals like titanium, lithium, and rare earths. This window of opportunity, which aligns with the current administration's strategic priorities, is particularly promising for companies operating within U.S. borders and allied interests. A central player in this unfolding narrative is MP Materials, the only vertically integrated rare earth mining and processing company in the United States. In a major move, MP Materials announced it has ceased shipments of rare earth concentrate to China, citing retaliatory tariffs and national interest. This development is not only a symbolic decoupling from Chinese dependency but also a practical demonstration of the company's increasing self-sufficiency. MP Materials has invested nearly $1 billion to restore a fully domestic rare earth supply chain, with its California refinery already processing half of its production and selling it to non-Chinese markets such as Japan, South Korea, and the U.S. This step underscores MP's operational readiness to pivot entirely away from China and aligns perfectly with a national agenda prioritizing secure, domestic sourcing of critical materials.
Reinforcing this shift is the Biden administration's recent directive under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act, mandating an investigation into critical mineral imports and their impact on national security. The investigation aims to uncover vulnerabilities, assess foreign market manipulation—primarily by China—and recommend trade remedies that could include tariffs and other import controls. This initiative is a strong signal that the administration is committed to reshoring supply chains and protecting strategic sectors, making domestic players like MP Materials prime beneficiaries. The administration's actions further support the idea that purchasing agreements or government-backed contracts may be implemented to stabilize and accelerate domestic production capabilities.
Adding another layer of momentum is a forthcoming U.S.-Ukraine minerals deal, expected to be signed around April 26. The agreement, likely to focus on securing Ukrainian mineral resources for U.S. refining, could provide MP Materials with a significant supply stream to process domestically, enhancing its role in a Western-aligned mineral supply chain. The convergence of these developments—the end of Chinese shipments, regulatory support for domestic resilience, and international sourcing partnerships—places MP Materials at the epicenter of a rapidly evolving critical minerals strategy. While market volatility is expected in the short term, the strategic and structural shifts underway point to upside for investors focused on geopolitically secure, government-supported mining and materials processing in the U.S.
MP Materials Corp. (MP) is not on our list of the 30 Most Popular Stocks Among Hedge Funds. As per our database, 33 hedge fund portfolios held MP at the end of the fourth quarter which was 27 in the previous quarter. While we acknowledge the risk and potential of MP as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns, and doing so within a shorter timeframe. If you are looking for an AI stock that is more promising than MP but that trades at less than 5 times its earnings, check out our report about the cheapest AI stock.
READ NEXT: 8 Best Wide Moat Stocks to Buy Now and 30 Most Important AI Stocks According to BlackRock.
Disclosure: None. This article was originally published at Insider Monkey.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Will skipping ‘Made in China' beat tariff price hikes?
Will skipping ‘Made in China' beat tariff price hikes?

Miami Herald

time27 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Will skipping ‘Made in China' beat tariff price hikes?

For most shoppers, "Made in China" has been a way of life for consumers. The mark is on seemingly everything. That has consumers concerned about how tariffs and trade battles between the United States and China might hit home, literally. If tariffs ultimately act as a tax on consumers – most economists say they do – how can Americans avoid paying higher prices? Stop buying things that were made in China. That's easier said than Trump recently took to Truth Social to say that the United States and China have a deal that's done, pending final approval of leaders from both countries. He said that U.S. tariffs would be set at 55% on Chinese goods, while China's tariffs remain at 10%. Officially, tariff plans with China and other countries are on hold until July 9, but U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has said several times that the 55% tariff "definitely" will not change. Related: Major housing expert predicts huge change to mortgage rates in 2026 While many of the harshest tariff hikes face legal challenges, current U.S. tariff rates are at their highest levels in nearly a century; estimates from the Yale Budget Lab say that's costing the average U.S. consumer an extra $2,500 a year. A recent study by covering consumer sentiment about tariffs shows that nearly two-thirds of Americans believe tariffs will have a negative impact on their personal finances. Just over 40% of respondents said tariffs would "greatly worsen" their personal finances. But even if consumers decide to tackle the China tariff problem by eliminating spending on goods from the country, it doesn't mean they will save money. They also will find the task daunting, if not impossible. That's according to journalist Sara Bongiorni, who tried to live without goods from China for a year back in the early 2000s; the trials and tribulations of her effort became the basis for her book, "A Year Without Made in China." Bongiorni, now an adjunct professor at Louisiana State University, woke up on Christmas morning in 2005 to a house full of stuff, and as she rummaged through it, she realized almost everything was made in China. "I said to my husband, 'Do you think it would be possible to live for a while without things made in China? You want to try that?' He was not very enthusiastic about that idea, but we gave it a whirl." Related: Forget tariffs, Fed interest rate cuts may hinge on another problem Bongiorni didn't set out to make a political statement or to write a book. She was simply hoping "to understand at a personal level, as best we could, how much we relied on things from China in our everyday, ordinary consumer life." In a recent interview on "Money Life with Chuck Jaffe," Bongiorni recounted how her rule was to avoid the words "Made in China," which are only seen on the end consumer product sold to shoppers. That's a low bar, given that countless products are assembled in the United States or in other countries using parts from China. Those goods-like the ones with the Made in China label-will incur increased costs due to tariffs. Bongiorni noted that in certain product categories – notably toys, household gadgets, many types of electronics, coffeemakers, sneakers and footwear, and children's clothing – it was nearly impossible to find items that weren't made in China. Even when she did find rare exceptions, Bongiorni noted that the options often pushed her to higher-end goods, which meant paying more for the purchase, in some cases, more than she would expect to pay now on goods from China with tariffs attached. "I think there were so many things we didn't buy that year because you couldn't find a viable option that wasn't made in China," Bongiorni said. She also noted that, ironically, it's nearly impossible to celebrate a wholly American holiday like July 4th without goods from China, as the small flags, fireworks, parade toys, festive paper goods, and more were made there. Truly trying to avoid all goods from China – including component parts – would be nearly impossible, Bongiorni said, noting that consumers would find themselves with no easy alternatives. "The share of things, ordinary consumer items from China, account for at least 65% of things you find in a typical household," Bongiorni said. "If you push up [prices with tariffs up to 55%], that is a huge impact, especially when we've got inflation and other things going on in the economy. It's a huge thing for most families to have to shoulder that burden." More Tariffs: Aldi plans huge price cut despite tariffs driving costs higherCar buyers should shop these brands for the best tariff dealGeneral Motors makes $4 billion tariff move Bongiorni does think the United States can bring some manufacturing back onshore, but that will have a limited impact because of the breadth and volume of goods coming from China, and the convenience of having those items and getting them cheaply. "I have a hard time thinking that we can lure ourselves off of our connection to China as consumers as a long-term affair," she said, "but also I can see a huge public outcry because this is going to affect people's bottom line every month." While Bongiorni recalls her efforts fondly nearly two decades later, she says she would not want to permanently do without Made in China, even if tariffs raise costs. Avoiding goods from China and finding alternatives was "incredibly time-consuming." And when there were no viable product options, she was willing to go without certain items for a year, but would not want to sacrifice them for a lifetime. "I do think it's interesting to have an awareness of where things come from, and to get a sense to the extent you can to which you are connected to the international economy on that consumer level," said Bongiorni. "I found that enjoyable and interesting, but the idea of weaning ourselves from Chinese goods, after doing this, just seems very unrealistic.…I can't imagine living like that long-term." Related: Fed official sends shocking message on interest rate cuts The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

Ukraine's White Angels take risks to rescue civilians under fire
Ukraine's White Angels take risks to rescue civilians under fire

American Military News

timean hour ago

  • American Military News

Ukraine's White Angels take risks to rescue civilians under fire

This article was originally published by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and is reprinted with permission. As Russia continues pressing its attacks into Ukraine's northeastern Sumy region, a special police unit known as the White Angels faces an increasingly daunting mission: Rescuing the last civilian holdouts from villages under heavy fire and getting them to safer regions. The Ukrainian unit must watch for first-person view drones, land mines, and incoming glide bombs as they bounce along dirt roads to find sometimes reluctant villagers and persuade them to accept a ride to a distant emergency shelter. Current Time's Andriy Kuzakov joined the White Angels as they rolled through the back roads of the Sumy region. At one at one, they were forced to hide out under the cover of trees as Russian attack drones stalked overhead. 'There's a first-person view drone,' Kuzakov said. 'Police have come to a prearranged meeting point to pick people up for evacuation. A lot are flying. Meanwhile, we are hiding from them under the trees.' Later, with the threat seemingly passed, the small crew rolled their white van into a settlement where they found a mother and her toddler daughter in urgent need of rescue. White Angel officer Olena Stavytska, an experienced rescuer, distracted the child with games and sweets while getting the two into the van and on the road. Stavytska said the day's rescue numbers were relatively small. 'It varies,' she explained. 'Sometimes 10, sometimes 15, sometimes 20. Many people. The situation in the Khotin area Is worse now. There are a lot of people.' At another location, the White Angels came across Ivan Mykhaylovych, a single man in his 70s, who had been hearing incoming Russian shelling constantly. 'It happened every day,' he said. 'There might have been a couple of calm hours during the night, but otherwise it was constant.' When asked how many other civilian Ukrainians remain in his village, he answered, 'I was the only one left in my area.' One White Angels officer said a major challenge for the unit is persuading locals to leave their homes behind and head somewhere safer. Many won't agree to leave until their house or yard begin to take direct hits from Russian shelling. The proximity of the front line does not seem enough to move most of them on its own. 'The border is about 10 kilometers away,' Kuzakov said, 'and the front line is just 5 or 6 kilometers away.' Blasts and the buzz of drones are constants for residents of this part of Sumy. United Nations figures indicate that more than 13,000 Ukrainian civilians have been killed so far since the full-scale invasion began three years ago, a large portion of that from air strikes. For locals in Sumy, making the decision to leave their homes behind, even with the assistance of the White Angels, is still vexing. The rescuers remain on patrol for those who choose to evacuate while there's still time.

Opinion - Does Trump see an off-ramp for Iran's leaders and a historic tipping point?
Opinion - Does Trump see an off-ramp for Iran's leaders and a historic tipping point?

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion - Does Trump see an off-ramp for Iran's leaders and a historic tipping point?

President Trump has come to possibly one of the most historic tipping points of our time — a tipping point he may have accelerated. A tipping point which, if things continue in this direction, might recalibrate the Middle East for the better for decades to come. The question then becomes: How best to increase the positive momentum? One of the main reasons I believe Trump has been a successful and transformative president is because he brought decades of real-world business experience into the Oval Office for the first time in decades. Love them or not, Joe Biden was a 50-plus-years career politician; Barack Obama was a little-experienced local Chicago politician; George W. Bush was a 'nepo' politician who rode the coattails of his father; Bill Clinton was an academic and career politician; George H.W. Bush was a courageous war hero who then fell into a career of politics and diplomacy; Ronald Reagan was an actor and two-term governor of California; and so on and so on. All these presidents were still creatures of politics and beholden to their particular party. Aside from being the first president in our lifetimes to bring decades of real-world business experience into the White House, Trump gleefully and very publicly cut the special interests' umbilical cords which connected so many presidents to the entrenched elites in D.C. Hence the creation of the 'Never Trump' movement and now a decade of 'Trump Derangement Syndrome.' Trump does believe in 'America First.' To make that expression a reality, he is willing to break with the entrenched elites, outrage the legacy media, ignore academics who never worked in the real world, defy the 'globalist' leaders of other nations and, sometimes, challenge the thinking and perceptions of the MAGA movement. We are witnessing all those Trump tactics with regard to the latest Israel-Iran conflict. In the business world, you are often faced with 'buy,' 'sell' or 'sit this one out' opportunities. While building his global business empire, Trump has engaged in such negotiations thousands of times. More often than not, he acted upon instincts honed by decades of success. Many MAGA supporters — and quite possibly Trump himself — initially viewed the current Israel-Iran war as a 'sit this one out' situation. But Israel's attack on Iran's nuclear weapons facilities may have created an unplanned tipping point for Trump towards much greater peace and stability in the region, while strengthening the national security of the U.S. Going back to before to his first presidential campaign in 2015, Trump had long condemned the Iraq war, the tragic loss of life and the neocons and hawks who incessantly called for that invasion. We saw that same conviction from Trump when it came to the war in Ukraine. He wanted peace and was desperate to stop the useless slaughter of hundreds of thousands of human beings. During his decades of being a master business negotiator, Trump also knew that it was wise — and was often the key tactic — to offer the CEO and upper management of the company he was dealing with a face-saving off ramp. Trump may now sense that the leadership of Iran is desperate for such an off ramp. There is no doubt that Trump believes Iran to be a rogue state directly responsible for the killing and maiming of thousands of American soldiers; of controlling the most ruthless and dangerous terrorist organizations in the world; of openly calling for the annihilation of America; and which is directly destabilizing the Middle East, while causing the deaths and suffering of literally millions of people in the region. But that is the truth of the present and the past. What if one were presented with the rarest of opportunities — to affect the truth of the future? What if, via the actions of others, certain policies and happenstance, you were gifted a window to rid the world of a truly evil entity capable of killing millions? But it was a window quickly and maybe permanently slamming shut. No president in our lifetimes has pushed to keep Americans out of harm's way or for global peace more than Trump. He owes no one an apology nor an explanation. Trump does want peace — but knows peace and freedom come at a cost. In his first term, he saw the window to eliminate ISIS and jumped through it to crush the vilest terrorist organization the world has ever known. With regard to Iran, Trump ordered the elimination of Gen. Qassem Soleimani, a man directly responsible for the killing and maiming of countless American troops. Businessman Trump has operated with the 'carrot and stick' method his entire adult life. Usually while flying by the seat of his pants. Trump created the 'America First' movement. Now, his instincts may be telling him he has a fleeting sliver of time to create an 'Iran First' movement for the long-suffering people of that nation — a people yearning to live in peace, who hate those who have turned their nation into a murderous theocracy. Iranians are poised to act, but they need a tipping point to give them cover not to be slaughtered in the streets if they rise as one to reclaim their country. Trump may be about to give them that tipping point. Douglas MacKinnon is a former White House and Pentagon official. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store