AAP opposes proposed fee regulation bill, calls it 'anti-parent'
New Delhi [India], June 11 (ANI): In a scathing attack on the BJP-led Delhi Government, senior Aam Admi Party (AAP) leader and Leader of Opposition (LoP) in the Delhi Assembly, Atishi, condemned the concealment and unilateral introduction of the proposed fee regulation bill, the party said in an official statement.
She pointed out that the BJP government deliberately bypasses democratic processes by planning to introduce the Bill through an ordinance, without any public consultation, stakeholder engagement, or legislative scrutiny, as per the release.
'This Fee Regulation Bill has been kept hidden by the BJP. No parent, lawyer, MLA, or Delhi resident has seen this bill. Why is it being concealed? If this bill is in the interest of parents, then why hasn't it been shown to them? Why hasn't it been uploaded to the website? Why hasn't public feedback been invited?' questioned Atishi.
The AAP Legislative Group has formally demanded that the BJP government convene a Special Session of the Delhi Assembly to introduce the Fee Regulation Bill. Atishi stressed that the Bill must be referred to a Select Committee consisting of members from both AAP and BJP, and that comprehensive public consultations must be held before it is passed, it added.
'There was talk of a Fee Regulation law, but no one has seen the draft till date. Parents spoke in one voice: the fee law must not be brought in through an ordinance. The draft bill should be made public, their opinions must be heard, and only then should the bill be passed,' she said.
Calling out the BJP's opaque tactics, Atishi remarked, 'This may be the first time in Delhi's history that such a significant law or policy is being brought without any public feedback. Hiding the draft of a law like this only shows one thing: something is seriously sketchy with it. This bill isn't meant to reduce school fees or to regulate private schools. It's being brought in to protect private schools.'
As per their release, with Education Minister Ashish Sood confirming that the Bill will not be tabled in the Assembly, Atishi said, 'The BJP Government is going to any lengths to shield Delhi's private schools--now sneaking in the Fee Regulation Bill through an ordinance, bypassing the Assembly. This move is anti-parent and pro-private school.'
Earlier in May, the Delhi Cabinet approved the Delhi School Education Transparency in Fixation and Regulation of Fees Bill, 2025, bringing relief to thousands of students and parents across the capital.
Addressing growing concerns over frequent and unregulated fee increases by private schools, the Delhi Cabinet, under the leadership of Chief Minister Rekha Gupta cleared the bill, which is expected to apply to 1,677 private schools in the city.
CM Gupta stated that the government has swiftly acted in response to the widespread panic among students and parents regarding the hikes in school fees. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
17 minutes ago
- Indian Express
AAP retains Ludhiana West against odds, a Rajya Sabha seat for Arvind Kejriwal may be next
In a significant boost for the embattled Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) in Punjab, the party's Sanjeev Arora won the bitter Ludhiana West bypoll Monday by a decent margin of over 10,637 votes. Arora, a prominent industrialist, who is a sitting Rajya Sabha MP of the AAP, defeated the Congress's Bharat Bhushan Ashu, a former minister and two-time MLA. It was the second consecutive defeat for Ashu from Ludhiana West, an urban constituency dominated by Hindu voters. The Akali Dal's slide continues, with the party finishing even behind the BJP to end up fourth. In the 2022 Assembly elections, the AAP's Gurpreet Bassi Gogi had won from Ludhiana West, defeating Ashu. The bypoll was necessitated due to Gogi's death. The speculation all through the campaign was that if Arora won, the Rajya Sabha seat vacated by him would be filled by AAP convenor Arvind Kejriwal. Even if that does not happen, the Ludhiana West victory will come as a breather for the party that lost power to the BJP in Delhi, with even Kejriwal losing his seat, and whose Punjab government has been beset with problems. The takeaways from Monday's result: The Ludhiana West bypoll, coming soon after the AAP defeat in Delhi for the first time since its formation, was seen as a test of if the party could bounce back. Leaving nothing to chance, the AAP was the first to declare Arora as its candidate – doing so in February itself, long before the elections were even announced – and deployed an array of star leaders to campaign. In a major action, a protest by farmers on the Shambhu and Khanauri borders of Punjab, blocking highways for months and inconveniencing movement, was removed overnight, as the business community and industrialists, including from Ludhiana, complained to the AAP government over their mounting losses. During the campaign, Kejriwal made tall promises for Ludhiana and told voters to pick 'the humble and hardworking' Arora, not 'the angry and arrogant' Ashu, and to go with the ruling party in the state. If Arora won, Kejriwal said, he would be made a minister and 'get several projects to Ludhiana'. A defeat in Ludhiana West would have emboldened the Opposition, which has been accusing the AAP Delhi leadership of holding the reins of the Punjab government, including in appointments to government postings, of indulging in 'VVIP culture', and of failure to tackle the drug menace and meet pre-poll promises such as its cash scheme for women. One barb the AAP would have found it difficult to dodge was how it had 'used' Arora, just to get Kejriwal to Parliament. A two-time MLA from Ludhiana West (2012, 2017), Ashu hoped to make a comeback in the bypoll after his defeat to the AAP's Gogi in 2022. A victory would have also been a nice payback for the AAP government imprisoning him for nearly a year in an alleged corruption case. However, again, the Congress's campaign remained fragmented. The faction led by party Punjab chief and Ludhiana Lok Sabha MP Amrinder Singh Raja Warring and, including Leader of the Opposition Partap Singh Bajwa, stayed away from Ashu's campaign. The faction led by former CM Charanjit Singh Channi, and senior MLA Rana Gurjeet Singh and Pargat Singh threw its weight behind him. The AAP repeatedly raised the fact that Ashu and Warring were not on talking terms with each other. The BJP could not repeat its performance from the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, when it had led other parties in the Ludhiana West Assembly segment. However, BJP candidate Jiwan Gupta, whose candidature was announced at the fag end of nomination filing, managed a decent share of 22% votes. That is a contrast to its former ally SAD, whose existential crisis continues. The party's Ludhiana West candidate, Advocate Parupkar Singh Ghumman, got just 9% of the votes, even though SAD president Sukhbir Singh Badal camped in Ludhiana for days and headed the party's campaign in the bypolls. The ruling AAP faced massive allegations of distributing cash, freebies, ration etc to the voters during the bypoll, and several complaints were filed against it by the Opposition parties. The party also faced allegations of brazenly using administrative power and machinery in its campaigning. After the results were declared, CM Mann said: 'This victory shows that the people of Punjab are extremely happy with the working of our government. We are working day and night for the progress and development of Punjab. We will fulfill every promise made during the bypoll.' Ashu said he took 'the entire responsibility for this defeat'. 'I believe that the entire Congress was always with me. I will wholeheartedly support Arora whenever he needs me for Ludhiana's development. I congratulate him for the win.'
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
"Why are you wasting time on a quack?": Pawan Khera hits out at Nishikant Dubey for questioning Indira Gandhi over Shimla Agreement
Congress leader Pawan Khera on Monday slammed BJP MP Nishikant Dubey , who questioned former Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi over the Shimla agreement . Pawan Khera called Nishikant Dubey a "quack" and urged the media not to pay attention to him. Taking a dig at Nishikant Dubey, the Congress leader said that he is not even a student from " WhatsApp University " but of "WhatsApp Nursery". Khera further asked Dubey to go to the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) and discontinue the Shimla Agreement. "Why are you (the media) wasting time on a quack? These are not even students of WhatsApp University but of WhatsApp nursery. Ask him to go to the PMO and tell them to discontinue the Simla Agreement. Why is he wasting time?", Pawan Khera told ANI. Earlier, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Nishikant Dubey targeted former Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, alleging that she signed the Shimla Agreement between India and Pakistan under the pressure of the United States. Sharing a document of a Rajya Sabha debate on 'X', Nishikant Dubey questioned why Indian governed 5000 square mile territory was given to Pakistan by India's "iron lady".The BJP MP further queried why 57 Indian soldiers killed in Pakistan's jail dispute were returning the 93000 Pakistsoldiers, who had surrendered after the 1971 war. Live Events Nishikant Dubey mentioned that former Defence Minister Mahavir Tyagi had raised these questions, but former Indian PM Indira Gandhi left them unanswered. Earlier on Sunday, Nishikant Dubey slammed Rahul Gandhi , questioning the motives of the Congress leader to encourage learning English rather than local languages while also alluding to the "hypocrisy" of opposing the National Education Police (NEP) 2020 for language choice, stating that the 1986 NEP had similar goals. "Rahul Gandhi ji, your investigative advisor is hell bent on destroying you. This is the education policy of 1986 given by your father to the country. in this, your father is promising the country to promote Hindi, teach the Sanskrit language and translate English into regional languages. This same education policy is almost in place now. Students should also grow with regional languages, changes in this have been made by Prime Minister Modi ji in 2020," Dubey said in a post on X in Hindi.
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Florida abortion law confusion: GOP rep says hospital delayed ectopic pregnancy care; blames fearmongering, not policy
Florida Republican Congresswoman Kat Cammack has said that fear surrounding the state's strict abortion laws delayed her emergency treatment for an ectopic pregnancy last year. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Speaking to The Wall Street Journal, Cammack said hospital staff were initially reluctant to administer methotrexate, a drug used to terminate ectopic pregnancies, over concerns they could face legal repercussions. In May 2024, Kat Cammack sought emergency care when she was five weeks into a nonviable ectopic pregnancy that posed a serious threat to her life. Medical personnel hesitated to treat her following the enactment of Florida's six-week abortion ban on May 1. Cammack said she attempted to clarify the law herself by looking it up on her phone and contacting the governor's office. Doctors ultimately administered the medicine after several hours. Although she co-chairs the House pro-life caucus and opposes abortion, Cammack criticised what she described as 'fearmongering' from abortion rights groups, arguing that it contributed to the uncertainty among healthcare providers. She acknowledged that critics might attribute the delay to Republican-led abortion restrictions but maintained that her experience did not constitute an abortion under Florida law. Florida's six-week abortion ban prohibits most abortions after six weeks of pregnancy, a point at which many individuals may not yet be aware they are pregnant. State health officials later issued guidance affirming that abortions are permitted when a pregnant person's life or health is at risk. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The law's wording had caused confusion in medical settings during the initial months of enforcement. Activists and physicians have voiced concerns over the law. Molly Duane of the center for reproductive rights noted that the law does not explicitly define ectopic pregnancy, a condition that can be challenging to diagnose. Alison Haddock, president of the American college of emergency physicians, told The Wall Street Journal that early pregnancy care is "medically complicated" and that doctors worry their clinical decisions could be subject to prosecution. Cammack hoped that going public with her experience would help opposing political groups find common ground. Now in the final stages of a subsequent pregnancy, Cammack said the politics of the incident has had a lasting impact on her. 'I would stand with any woman – Republican or Democrat – and fight for them to be able to get care in a situation where they are experiencing a miscarriage and an ectopic pregnancy,' she said.
