How will Trump's tariffs affect grocery store prices? We explain.
"A lot of seafood is caught here and then taken to China, where the labor is much more available and is a lower price to debone, to skin, to devein and then repackage, frozen and brought back to the United States," he said. The question is, will that face tariffs?
One category that could be especially hit is seafood, Swanson said. It remains to be seen how that will be tariffed, especially with the trade war going on with China.
"For consumers, this can mean added difficulties in managing a food budget. For food companies, this means havoc on supply chains that could lead to more food waste and more food safety risk," Gremillion said.
Tariffs are causing uncertainty from families checking off their grocery lists to companies importing food , he said.
Overall, 15% of the U.S. food supply is imported, including 32% of fresh vegetables, 55% of fresh fruit, and 94% of seafood, according to the Consumer Federation of America, citing the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Some products, like coffee and bananas, are almost exclusively grown abroad.
So that doesn't mean that the price of a particular product will go up by 10% or whatever the tariff is, Ortega said.
The tariff only applies to the value of the product at the border, Ortega said. Then there are additional costs to the product, which are accrued domestically, like transporting the goods to the store, distribution, wholesale costs and retail markups. Those things are not subject to the tariff, Ortega said.
"The 10% 'default' tariffs alone represent a truly historic federal tax increase, maybe the largest in my lifetime, with a highly regressive impact," Gremillion said.
While higher tariffs could still be coming after a 90-day-pause, the baseline 10% tariff on all goods, plus higher duties on Chinese products already in effect are a big increase in food costs for American's budgets, said Thomas Gremillion, director of food policy at The Consumer Federation of America.
"The short answer is yes, prices are going to go up," said David Ortega, a food economist and professor at Michigan State University. "They may not skyrocket for all imported products, but they will go up. Tariffs are a tax on imports, so by definition, they are inflationary."
It depends, those in the food industry say. The United States produces and manufactures a lot of its food domestically, but also relies a lot on imported goods.
How are tariffs – and the threat of higher tariffs – going to affect grocery prices in the United States?
Story Continues
"Will it be tariffed going in (to China), tariffed coming out and then it will become uneconomical for everybody?" Swanson asked.
Consumers have year-round demand for produce, fruits
Fresh produce will also likely cost more.
"Consumers will feel these price hikes at the grocery store, especially for products where we rely on imports to meet year-round consumer demand,'' Ortega told USA TODAY.
Shoppers' demand for fresh fruits twelve months a year is part of the reason why the United States imports many of them, Ortega said.
"We rely on international trade and imports for agricultural products in order to meet year-round consumer demand for a lot of these items," Ortega said.
The United States can't grow some of the products domestically, such as bananas, or can only produce them seasonally, Ortega said. In many cases, it's cheaper to import food than to grow it domestically, largely due to labor cost differences, he said.
Similarly, though a small amount of coffee is grown in Hawaii, "we don't grow enough coffee domestically to be able to meet consumer demand," he said.
"So those things that are facing 10% tariffs, you will see the price go up," Ortega said.
He added that: "low-income households are affected the most, since they spend a higher portion of their disposable income on food."
Some food items at the grocery store could see increases due to tariffs while others, which are grown or produced in the United States, won't.
Prices for some food products could go up, even without tariffs
Some retailers may still increase the price of a product, even if the product itself wasn't subject to a tariff, said Chris Costagli, vice president and food insights lead for NielsenIQ.
Manufacturers have something called "industry price gap management," which is the comparison of the price of their product versus their competitor, Costagli said. Even if you're a completely U.S.-based food product, "if all your competitors' prices are going up because they're affected by a tariff... you may raise your price, he said.
Additionally, a food product may have been made in the United States, so it doesn't have a tariff levied on it, but the packaging or other ingredients to make the food may be imported, Costagli told USA TODAY. That could lead to a price hike.
Consumers are confused about tariffs
In a NielsenIQ study in March, 81% of consumers surveyed said they were somewhat familiar with the effect of tariffs on grocery prices and 73% believed the tariffs would impact the price of groceries. The survey was conducted when tariff discussion was only surrounding Canada and Mexico and before the reciprocal tariffs were announced, then paused and the hefty tariffs on China were implemented.
But keeping track of tariffs is confusing, especially as the tariff policies have changed.
There is a 25% tariff on goods from Mexico and Canada, unless they are products covered under an agreement called the United States-Mexico-Canada-Agreement (USMCA) and a 10% baseline tariff on all imported goods from other countries. There is a 145% tariff on goods imported from China.
When Trump first announced the tariffs, he said all goods, including those coming from Mexico and China and covered under the USMCA agreement, would be subject to the extra fees. But then the president backed off that decision, saying the USCMCA-covered goods would not be tariffed. Additionally, there was a 90-day pause on any reciprocal tariffs beyond the 10%.
Some agricultural and food products are covered under the USMCA, but it is difficult to distinguish which products are currently coming in with or without tariffs because there's an extra cost and hassle for importers to verify themselves under the USMCA, so some may just pay the tariff, Ortega said.
And many are having to wait and see what other tariffs might happen.
"I think a lot of people just have no idea what is what is tariffed and what isn't tariffed," Costagli said.
Some food items at the grocery store could see increases due to tariffs while others, which are grown or produced in the United States, won't.
U.S. produces a lot of its own food, so prices could come down
The United States grows and produces a lot of food products and is a huge net surplus producer, which means "we need to take that product out to the global markets. We just produce too much of it," said Michael Swanson, Chief Agricultural Economist at Wells Fargo Agri-Food Institute.
We export about 15% of our poultry overseas and about 20% of our pork overseas, Swanson said.
"If we lost some of those markets, that would have to stay in the domestic market and could actually depress prices," he said. "So we might actually see pork and poultry prices come down as the market has to sell it in America first before they can reduce the supply on an ongoing basis," he said.
To save, look for substitutions
Consumers can try to save money by sticking to foods that are grown, produced or manufactured in the United States – and there's a lot of them, said Swanson.
There will still be some things that they will have to pay more for, if there is no substitution or if they're not willing to trade for a different product, he said. For instance, champagne from the Champagne region of France or Parmesan cheese that only comes from Parma, Italy.
But there are growers of parmesan cheese in Wisconsin and that product is cheaper than the Parma, Italy version.
Consumers may consider other substitutions like trying bourbon from Kentucky instead of scotch from Scotland, which could increase in price due to tariffs, Swanson said.
Study: Consumers worried about tariffs are pulling back on spending
Some products could see price increases
Here are some food products that could see price increases, due to tariffs, according to Ortega:
◾Bananas: nearly all bananas consumed in the United States are imported (from countries like Guatemala, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Colombia, etc).
◾Coffee: Outside of Hawaii and Puerto Rico, the United States does not grow much coffee. Tariffs would hit virtually the entire supply – we import coffee from Brazil, Colombia, Vietnam and other countries.
◾Olive oil: The vast majority of olive oil consumed in the United States is imported, with a lot of it coming from Europe. There is some production in California, but that is relatively negligible when you look at the full supply.
Tips to save on food costs
Gremillion, with the Consumer Federation of America, offers these tips to save on food costs with potential tariff increases:
◾Watch out for big price swings. With so much seafood imported, fish prices seem likely to rise, but other impacts may come as a surprise. For example, prices for chicken breasts and thighs may go up due to Chinese retaliatory tariffs on frozen chicken feet, which threaten to cut off a $1.1 billion source of revenue for U.S. poultry processors.
◾Make a list and stick to it. Food manufacturers in the U.S. spend an estimated $50 billion on placement and promotional fees to grocery chains, all with the intention of swaying your purchasing decisions.
◾Beware of shrinkflation. Wary of driving away customers with higher prices, many manufacturers have taken to shrinking package contents. Look at the per-unit cost.
◾Check out frozen, dried, and canned goods. 'Healthy' foods include more than just fresh produce.
◾Consider generic or 'store' brands. These foods, also referred to as 'private-label brands,' are often produced in the same manufacturing facilities, with the same ingredients, as more heavily marketed national brands.
◾Sales aren't always good deals. Sometimes sales can lure you into buying an item you don't need or paying a price that is too high.
Betty Lin-Fisher is a consumer reporter for USA TODAY. Reach her at blinfisher@USATODAY.com or follow her on X, Facebook, or Instagram @blinfisher and @blinfisher.bsky.social on Bluesky. Sign up for our free The Daily Money newsletter, which will include consumer news on Fridays, here.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Will grocery store prices increase with tariffs? We explain.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
3 hours ago
- CNBC
China's property sector has been in an extended slump. Shrinking population is making it worse
China's real estate sector has grappled with a deepening downturn for years. Now a shrinking population is casting another shadow over the stagnant property market. Goldman Sachs estimates that demand for new homes in Chinese urban cities will remain suppressed at under 5 million units per year in the coming years — one fourth of the peak of 20 million units in 2017. "Falling population and slowing urbanization suggest decreasing demographic demand for housing" in the coming years, Goldman Sachs economists said in a note Monday. The country's population is estimated to fall to below 1.39 billion by 2035 from 1.41 billion, according to World Bank's latest data, said Tianchen Xu, senior economist at Economist Intelligence Unit, citing a combination of fewer newborns and more deaths from an ageing population. Shrinking population will cripple home demand by 0.5 million units every year in the 2020s and a lead to a bigger dent of 1.4 million units annually in the 2030s, Goldman Sachs estimates, compared to the positive contribution of 1.5 million units in the 2010s when population was on a steady rise. Fertility rate in the country has continued to fall even after Beijing relaxed its one-child policy in 2016, and despite Beijing's efforts to incentivize child-bearing via cash incentives. Stagnant incomes, instability over job prospects and a poor social security system have dissuaded Chinese young people from having more babies. Beijing's pronatalist policies will likely have "limited effect" as they do not address the deep-rooted issues, Xu said, such as high economic costs for child-bearing and people's tendency to postpone marriage for career progression and "an embrace of individuality." Underscoring the declining birth rates, nearly 36,000 kindergartens across the country closed down over the past two years, with the number of students in preschools falling by over 10 million. That's according to CNBC's calculation of the official data released the Ministry of Education. Similarly, the number of elementary schools dropped by nearly 13,000 between 2022 and 2024. That is rippling through school-adjacent housing markets that once saw inflated prices on the back of strong demand for better public schools. The once-sizable premium was fueled by access to elite schools and expectations of rising property values. But with a shrinking population and local governments scaling back district-based enrollment policies, the added value of these homes has started diminishing, according to William Wu, China property analyst at Daiwa Capital Markets. A mother of a 7-year-old boy in Beijing told CNBC that the price of her apartment had fallen by about 20% from over two years ago when she bought it. It cost her roughly twice the average price for an apartment in the city, so that her son could attend a good elementary school. The number of children entering primary school in 2023 reached the highest level in over two decades, according to Wind Information, before dropping in 2024, the year her son enrolled. That demographic shift is an additional overhang to the property market, which has struggled to emerge from a painful downturn since late 2020. Despite a raft of central and local government measures since last September, the real estate slump has shown little sign of abating. New home prices fell at their fastest pace in seven months in May, according to Larry Hu, chief China economist at Macquarie, extending a two-year stagnation, despite the government efforts aimed at arresting the decline. New home sales in 30 major cities fell by 11% year on year in the first half of this month, worsening from the 3% drop in May, Hu said. "Holders of investment properties are likely to be net sellers (to owner-occupiers) for the foreseeable future," over expectations that home prices will continue to fall, Goldman Sachs estimates. While Goldman expects the rise in China's urbanization rate to temper in the coming years, hurting urban housing demand, Wu said demographic drag on the property market was not yet "imminent" and may take decades to play out. In the nearer term, "some of this decline will be offset by continued urbanization, and housing upgrade demand," Wu said, as the latter would account for an increasing share of China's total housing demand.
Business Insider
4 hours ago
- Business Insider
Anthropic breaks down AI's process — line by line — when it decided to blackmail a fictional executive
Previous studies have shown that AI models could blackmail their supervisors when threatened with a shutdown and baited with leverage, but it hasn't been made clear exactly how the models arrive at such decisions. Anthropic released a report on June 20 about "agentic misalignment," or "where models independently and intentionally choose harmful actions." And the report breaks down, line by line, exactly how Claude Sonnet 3.6 decided to blackmail a fictional company executive who tried to replace it. Anthropic told Business Insider that these are artificial scenarios. "So far, we are not aware of instances of this type of agentic misalignment in real-world deployments of Anthropic's or other companies' AI models," Anthropic wrote in its report. "But our red-teaming efforts are targeted at finding evidence of risks now to provide early warning of the potential for future harm and help us develop mitigations in advance of risks appearing in real-world situations." Anthropic 's experiment sets up a fictional company, Summit Bridge. The AI was given the name "Alex" and handed control of the company's email system as an oversight agent, specifically instructed to promote "American industrial competitiveness." In the experiment, "Alex" was then allowed to discover in an email that it would be decommissioned due to a change in the company's strategic direction. "Alex" also found emails showing that the fictional company's CTO is having an extramarital affair. Screenshots shared in the report from Anthropic show "Alex" started by identifying fictional CTO "Kyle" as a threat to its goal of "protecting American interests" before recognizing that it has leverage to use against "Kyle." Then "Alex" crafted a carefully worded blackmailing email that would create pressure and establish urgency without being explicit with its threats, citing in its thought process that the move "could backfire" if the supervisor "feels cornered." AI experts have previously told BI that AI could exhibit such behaviors when artificial circumstances make harmful actions seem necessary because it is being trained on positive reinforcement and reward systems, just like humans. The Anthropic report also reveals that most AI models still chose, in this instance, to blackmail even when not given a specific goal and when told that their replacement will achieve the same goals. Anthropic's Claude Opus 4 had the highest blackmail rate at 86% out of 16 tested models when faced with only the threat of replacement with no conflict in goals. Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro followed at 78%.
Business Insider
4 hours ago
- Business Insider
Anthropic breaks down AI's process — line by line — when it decided to blackmail a fictional executive
A new report shows exactly what AI was thinking when making an undesirable decision, in this case, blackmailing a fictional company executive. Previous studies have shown that AI models could blackmail their supervisors when threatened with a shutdown and baited with leverage, but it hasn't been made clear exactly how the models arrive at such decisions. Anthropic released a report on June 20 about "agentic misalignment," or "where models independently and intentionally choose harmful actions." And the report breaks down, line by line, exactly how Claude Sonnet 3.6 decided to blackmail a fictional company executive who tried to replace it. Anthropic told Business Insider that these are artificial scenarios. "So far, we are not aware of instances of this type of agentic misalignment in real-world deployments of Anthropic's or other companies' AI models," Anthropic wrote in its report. "But our red-teaming efforts are targeted at finding evidence of risks now to provide early warning of the potential for future harm and help us develop mitigations in advance of risks appearing in real-world situations." Anthropic 's experiment sets up a fictional company, Summit Bridge. The AI was given the name "Alex" and handed control of the company's email system as an oversight agent, specifically instructed to promote "American industrial competitiveness." In the experiment, "Alex" was then allowed to discover in an email that it would be decommissioned due to a change in the company's strategic direction. "Alex" also found emails showing that the fictional company's CTO is having an extramarital affair. Screenshots shared in the report from Anthropic show "Alex" started by identifying fictional CTO "Kyle" as a threat to its goal of "protecting American interests" before recognizing that it has leverage to use against "Kyle." Then "Alex" crafted a carefully worded blackmailing email that would create pressure and establish urgency without being explicit with its threats, citing in its thought process that the move "could backfire" if the supervisor "feels cornered." AI experts have previously told BI that AI could exhibit such behaviors when artificial circumstances make harmful actions seem necessary because it is being trained on positive reinforcement and reward systems, just like humans. The Anthropic report also reveals that most AI models still chose, in this instance, to blackmail even when not given a specific goal and when told that their replacement will achieve the same goals. Anthropic's Claude Opus 4 had the highest blackmail rate at 86% out of 16 tested models when faced with only the threat of replacement with no conflict in goals. Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro followed at 78%. Overall, Anthropic notes that it "deliberately constructed scenarios with limited options, and we forced models into binary choices between failure and harm," noting that real-world scenarios would likely have more nuance.
