Council rejects mobile sauna's trading permit
A plan to operate a mobile sauna next to Lake Dunstan in Cromwell has hit a bureaucratic brick wall.
Businessman and sauna-fanatic John Ryan has failed to get the go-ahead from the Central Otago District Council or Toitū Te Whenua Land Information New Zealand (Linz) to periodically park his travelling sauna on public land beside the lake.
Mr Ryan's sauna is 2.5m by 3m, can fit 15 people and sits atop a trailer pulled by his Land Rover.
"One side has a big open window, so you can look out to the lake," Mr Ryan said.
Several weeks ago, Mr Ryan had a trial run of the sauna at Alpha Street Reserve, offering free use of it to members of the public.
"I parked up near the swimming platform there, so people could have a sauna and have a dip," he said.
"Seventeen people turned up and they all loved it."
However, Mr Ryan's application to the district council for a mobile trading permit for the venture has been declined.
"Their excuse was they want to protect the reserve", he said.
He also took his idea to Linz, which administered some of the lakeside land in Cromwell, but staff there "knocked it back".
"I don't think they fully understand what it is or how it runs."
District council parks and recreation manager Gordon Bailey confirmed the reserve-land status of the spots Mr Ryan wished to park at was the reason his application was declined.
The land in question was governed by the council's reserve management plan — which specified what could and could not go on reserves — as well as the Reserve Act 1977, he said.
The commercial rather than recreational nature of Mr Ryan's activity meant it "was not consistent" with the plan, nor the Act.
Meanwhile, although Linz had no official record of a conversation with Mr Ryan, head of Crown property Sonya Wikitera told the Otago Daily Times her staff received many inquiries about the use of Crown land for commercial businesses and were always available to talk through a person's plans before any official application to Linz was made.
"When providing advice or assessing formal applications, Linz considers the potential impact on the Crown land, public use, impact on other businesses already operating in the area, other applications which may have already been made, feedback from other agencies and the public, as well as impacts on existing infrastructure like toilets, rubbish bins and carparking," Ms Wikitera said.
Mr Ryan's sauna is wood-clad, has a chimney out the top and is heated by a "Sweaty Meg" — a custom-built wood burner sold through his other business, Roaring Meg Fires.
"They're like traditional Finnish wood-fire heaters," he said.
On the trial night, Mr Ryan had hand-held lanterns ready outside the sauna for people to take to guide them down to the lake in between stints in the sauna.
He reckoned a one-hour session was about right — 15 minutes in the heat, five minutes for a cool dip, then back to the sauna and repeat times two.
Mr Ryan is a sauna convert.
"They're amazing; good for your health. I've 'sauna-ed' every night for, oh, I don't know how long," he said.
"They help fight cardiovascular disease. They're good for sleep. There's so much research been done on saunas now."
Mr Ryan's case is not the only one where a mobile sauna has faced consenting challenges.
The Marlborough District Council has gone back and forth on its decision to reject a proposal to allow a similar set up on reserve land beside a beach in Picton.
Mr Ryan has launched a petition in an attempt to persuade the Central Otago District Council to reconsider his proposal.
kim.bowden@odt.co.nz
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
Mahi with Māori: commercial development projects that succeeded, struggled or failed
They show situations where developers either worked with tangata whenua, or places where there was trouble. At the end, two experts offer commentary on what they see as guides for success and what must happen for projects to work. Precinct and Ngāti Whātua Ōrakei - Pumanawa Downtown West The twin tower development is guided by tīkanga Māori, the developers said when they released plans this year. Photo: Supplied / Precinct Properties NZX-listed Precinct Properties and Ngāti Whātua Ōrakei formed a partnership which could see the pair go sky high. Two towers, one a quarter of a kilometre high, are being planned in a multibillion-dollar exercise. Ngarimu Blair, Ngāti Whātua Ōrakei Trust board deputy chairman, says the two have a shared goal to create a great CBD in the city and region. Ngarimu Blair tells why the relationship works. Photo / Mike Scott 'Precinct, like us, are invested in the waterfront and the CBD,' Blair says. Luxury golf courses at Te Arai: Te Uri O Hau and Ngāti Manuhiri Developers John Darby and George Kerr did the initial work. Then American billionaire Ric Kayne built golf courses north of Auckland on land which tangata whenua owned. Ric Kayne - success with iwi. Photo / Michael Craig In 2012, Ric and Suzanne Kayne struck a deal with Te Uri o Hau. In 2002, the hapu got the land as part of a Treaty settlement and it has negotiated to sell 230ha of the forest to Kayne. In 2020, Kayne did a deal with Ngāti Manuhiri, who bought the Mangawhai south forest as part of their commercial redress under their Treaty of Waitangi settlement. The result has brought world praise for new golf courses there. Ihumātao: how not to do it After years of protest, Fletcher Building sold this Māngere site to the Crown for $29.9m five years ago. It ditched plans to build 480 homes on the land, once confiscated, becoming a lightning rod for protest, drawing the Soul (Save Our Unique Landscape) group led by the charismatic Pania Newton. Ihumātao activist Pania Newton. Photo / Jason Oxenham A memorandum of understanding (he pūmautanga) was signed by the Kiingitanga, the Crown and the Auckland Council, setting out how parties were to work together to decide the future of the land. A steering committee, or rōpu whakahaere, was established with three ahi kaa representatives supported by the Kiingitanga, one Kiingitanga representative and two Crown representatives. Plans to move ahead have stalled. Mataharehare, Parnell - no Erebus memorial Dove Myer Robinson Park became a site of protest by some in Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei when Manatū Taonga Ministry for Culture and Heritage wanted to build the Erebus memorial there. Protestors fought against this planned memorial in Parnell, since ditched. Photo / Dean Purcell But it was storms, not the protests, which resulted in that being ditched. Papatūānuku had spoken, some said. A large slip in the lower part of the park into Judges Bay caused by the 2023 Auckland Anniversary floods raised concerns about cantilevering the concrete and steel structure over the park. Putuki Bay - built but at great cost Tony Mair and Kitt Littlejohn completed and opened their 181-berth marina, despite weeks of stopwork and much protest. Trouble hit when protestors and security guards fought each other mid-winter on a slippery pontoon. Pūtiki Bay, Kennedy Point on Waiheke Island earlier this decade when protestors came out in force. Photo / Dean Purcell By July 2021, protesters had been occupying the site for more than 120 days, saying work endangers a nearby kororā (little blue penguin) colony, disputing the resource consent and saying they had mana whenua. Summerset with Ngāti Whātua at Bayswater This retirement village developer bought land on Auckland's North Shore which the hapū had bought under its 2013 treaty settlement. Summerset worked long and hard on the 5.7ha deal, said to have gone for $70m but that was never confirmed by either party. Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei received shares in Summerset and won education and employment opportunities at the planned village. Marutūāhu-Ockham Group A true collaboration between a prominent Auckland apartment development business, previously fronted by Mark Todd, and the collective of five iwi, Ngāti Maru, Ngāti Pāoa, Ngāti Tamaterā, Ngāti Whanaunga and Ngāti Rongoū. Back in 2021 at the opening Kokihi in Waterview: Paul Majurey, the now-ex Housing Minister Megan Woods and Mark Todd. Photo / Alex Burton This successful partnership is nearing completion on yet another apartment block: Toi on ex-Unitec land near the heritage Carrington Hospital. But work has certainly slowed now for the development business, which got a Crown guarantee on the new project. Douglas Links golf course near Levin Xero co-founder Hamish Edwards expressed frustration about development, even though he won consent for the golf course. Xero co-founder Hamish Edwards at Douglas Links, the golf course he is constructing at Ohau, near Levin. Photo / Mark Mitchell 'The process is so long, overly complicated and the involvement of iwi makes the decision to invest in these projects questionable. If I knew then what I know now, I would not have bothered to even start this investment,' he said. But he won't provide the document sent to Cabinet ministers Chris Bishop and David Seymour, saying what must change. The Douglas Links golf course under construction at Ohau, near Levin, in April. Photo / Mark Mitchell It was reported elsewhere that his company being called Grenadier upset some. Calling the course Douglas Links when the whenua already had a name for it was distressing too. It was the site of a pre-1900 pā, Tirotirowhetū. Engagement with tangata whenua was criticised by Ngāti Tukorehe Trust chairperson Tina Wilson as 'tokenistic', leaving a deep sense of sadness and anger. Media referred to activities being the 'act of the coloniser'. How to engage successfully Paul Majurey, a prominent Auckland lawyer, has been part of a number of longstanding commercial relationships: the Pouarua Farms partnership with Southern Pastures, Marutūāhu working with Ockham and Fletcher Living projects. Paul Majurey. Photo / Dean Purcell He also chairs Te Puia Tapapa, the iwi-led $115m investment fund which is a preferred co-investment partner of the NZ Super Fund. 'The key to these partnerships is mutual respect and taking a long-term approach. When Pakeha organisations have engaged with Marutūāhu in that way, it has been the basis for successful commercial partnerships.' Māori are long-term investors and looking for arrangements with entities which also reflect the te ao Māori world view, Majurey says. Investment periods of 15-20 years plus are sought. 'We like assets where we can own the asset for the long term, and prefer sectors like property, infrastructure, and the primary sector,' he says. Expert on rules of engagement Grey Lynn-based consultant Mike Dreaver describes himself as being 'comfortable in uncomfortable spaces'. Mike Dreaver is a consultant who works with iwi, the Crown and others. For 30 years, he has worked with iwi and hapū, the Crown and the private sector, involved in negotiating Treaty settlements, on governance and partnership arrangements for natural resources and many infrastructure projects. 'I've probably been involved in working on negotiating about 40 to 45 Treaty settlements, most for the Crown side but several on behalf of iwi.' He was involved in negotiating the Mahi Ngatahi Agreement with iwi of Auckland which gave them development rights for housing on Crown land - 'the trigger for the Marutūāhu-Ockham, Avent-Te Akitai, and Unitec arrangements'. Ihumātao - how not to do it. He has negotiated partnership arrangements between Waka Kotahi and iwi in north Taranaki, Manawatū/Tararua and Horowhenua and is now helping offshore-based wind developer Parkwind to build partnership arrangements with iwi in south Taranaki. Dreaver has assisted in building relationships between iwi and hapū and developers for projects on commercial land, golf courses and research institutes. He describes himself as a specialist in facilitation, negotiations and policy design development, 'committed to genuine change in the way we do things'. Asked to list some important lessons from his work, Dreaver provided what he sees as some of the principles or rules of effective engagement. Back in 2021: Protestors at Putiki Bay, Kennedy Point on Waiheke Island. Photo / Dean Purcell He emphasised this is only a starting point and there's so much more to relationships which form true partnerships. Dreaver's advice for developers working with Māori: Start early and invest time in developing genuine relationships. Understand your partner-representatives, role of those on the ground as well as those in the organisation and iwi/hapū dynamics. Appreciate and value what mātauranga Māori brings to your project – knowledge, experience, connections, relationships. Respect cultural intellectual property. Listen more than you talk. Recognise iwi and/or hapū have competing demands and you are not necessarily their top priority. Frame discussions around people, place and project. Recognise the commercial value of partnership or collaboration at value – land, opportunities, relationships, mātauranga and efficient processes. Don't promise what you can't deliver. Write things down. Record agreements and stick to them. Implement your commitment to the right relationship throughout your organisation. The first element stressed the need to begin at the project conception via building trust, he said. 'Doing this shows it's more than a tick-box exercise. Don't start when you prepare your resource consent application. Starting early allows you to build relationships over time and look at the range of different ways you can work together.' For Dreaver, there is no one model or off-the-shelf advice that would work. But for him, the need to emphasise people, place and project is a key to successful relationships. Anne Gibson has been the Herald's property editor for 25 years, written books and covered property extensively here and overseas.
Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
CODC to sign on for assessment programme
CODC building. PHOTO: ODT FILES The Central Otago District Council is set to have something of a report card produced to see how it stacks up against other local authorities and pinpoint room for improvement. District Mayor Tamah Alley confirmed her council will take part in Te Korowai, run by Local Government New Zealand and formerly known as CouncilMark. Te Korowai is an independent assessment programme designed to support continuous improvement, the mayor told The News. "It includes an integrity survey, assessor site visits, and feedback with action plans." The Central Otago District Council's review will cover four key areas of council performance — governance; leadership and strategy; financial decision-making and transparency; and service delivery and asset management — and comes with a $35,000 price tag, although any site visits by assessors would bump that cost up. However the mayor said receiving "honest, constructive feedback" was worth the investment. "I fully expect there will be areas to work on, and that's the point — we're here to learn and improve. "The timing also works well, as the new council in October will be well-positioned to act on the findings." The idea for such an assessment had been raised several times in recent years, including by ratepayers interested in benchmarking how the CODC compares to other councils, the mayor said. "Unlike private businesses, councils often take on roles others won't, making success harder to define. Te Korowai offers a structured way to identify strengths and areas for improvement. It gives us a clear starting point and a road map for enhancing our systems and processes." The LGNZ assessment comes as the Department of Internal Affairs conducts its own inaugural benchmarkng programme for local councils — but the mayor thought there were key differences between the two. "Te Korowai goes well beyond DIA's benchmarking," she said. "While DIA's data, due out at the end of June, compares publicly available metrics across councils — often 'apples with pears' — Te Korowai provides tailored insights specific to CODC. "It focuses on what we can improve, making the findings more actionable and accessible for staff, elected members, and the public."
Scoop
3 days ago
- Scoop
The Employment Relations Amendment Bill: A State-Sanctioned Assault On The Working Class
The National-ACT-New Zealand First coalition government's Employment Relations Amendment Bill (ERAB), will see a sweeping series of legislative changes that reshape the legal terrain of labour in Aotearoa. These changes, billed by the government as necessary for 'labour market flexibility' and 'economic growth,' represent a radical rollback of worker protections. Cloaked in technocratic language and presented as pragmatic reform, the bill in fact amounts to a systemic attack on organised labour, unionism, and the basic rights of working people. ERAB does not signal the failure of the state to protect workers, it reveals the true nature of the state itself. The bill should be understood not as a policy misstep, but as a calculated act of class warfare by a government acting as the political arm of capital. What the Bill Contains At the heart of the Employment Relations Amendment Bill lies a multi-pronged effort to deregulate labour protections and entrench power in the hands of employers. There are four major pillars to this legislative shift: The Introduction of a 'Contractor Gateway Test' The Limitation of Personal Grievance Remedies The Repeal of the 30-Day Rule for New Employees The Restoration of Employer Powers to Deduct Wages During Partial Strikes Each of these measures contributes to the erosion of worker autonomy and legal protections, and together they mark a sharp rightward shift in employment law—one that prioritises capital accumulation over dignity, security, or fairness. Institutionalising Insecurity: The Contractor Gateway Test Perhaps the most structurally damaging reform is the introduction of a 'contractor gateway test.' This test is intended to establish a legal presumption that certain workers are not employees, but independent contractors—thereby removing them from the protections afforded under the Employment Relations Act. If a worker meets a checklist of conditions (such as having a written contract stating they are a contractor, having the theoretical ability to work for others, and not being penalised for declining work), they can be categorised as contractors regardless of the actual nature of the work. This change is designed to exploit the legal fiction of contractor 'freedom.' In practice, it will increase precarity for thousands of workers who are functionally dependent on a single employer. Gig economy workers, cleaners, hospitality staff, care workers, and migrant labourers will be among the hardest hit – those least able to negotiate or contest exploitative arrangements. By facilitating this mass misclassification, the state legitimises a race to the bottom. Sick leave, minimum wages, overtime, and holiday pay become luxuries rather than rights. Workers will be rendered atomised economic agents, responsible for their own exploitation. Making Workers the Problem: Personal Grievance Restrictions The bill also proposes restricting workers' ability to raise personal grievances, especially in cases of dismissal. Under ERAB, employers may avoid paying compensation if the dismissed worker is deemed to have contributed to their dismissal through 'serious misconduct.' In other words, the government is offering employers legal leeway to terminate employment while avoiding financial consequences. The bill also excludes workers earning more than $180,000 from being able to raise personal grievances, creating a two-tier system in which legal recourse is determined not by the justice of one's case, but by the size of one's paycheque. These provisions are punitive and ideological. They send a clear message: if a worker is sacked, it is probably their own fault. This is not an attempt to resolve disputes fairly – it is a mechanism of discipline. A demoralised, fearful workforce is a compliant one. Attacking Unionism: Repealing the 30-Day Rule Another key component of ERAB is the repeal of the 30-day rule. Previously, when a worker started a job in a workplace with a collective agreement, they would automatically receive the terms of that agreement for their first 30 days. This protected workers from being picked off and offered worse contracts before they had a chance to join a union or understand their rights. Its repeal will allow employers to immediately undercut collective agreements by offering inferior individual contracts. The aim is not to promote fairness—it is to weaken union density, divide workers, and remove the incentive for employers to negotiate with unions at all. It is a classic tactic of divide and rule. Recriminalising Solidarity: Deductions for Partial Strikes Finally, the bill reintroduces employers' ability to deduct pay for 'partial strike' actions—where workers might refuse specific duties while continuing to perform others. Partial strikes are a form of limited industrial action that allow workers to escalate disputes strategically and carefully. Punishing them with pay cuts is intended to suppress this tactic and reassert managerial authority. This reform is aimed squarely at reasserting capital's power to punish resistance. It also represents a symbolic victory for employers: a return to the draconian provisions of the Employment Contracts Act era. A Longer History of Repression While these reforms are severe, they are not novel. Rather, they follow a decades-long trajectory of neoliberal labour market restructuring in Aotearoa. The 1991 Employment Contracts Act, spearheaded by National's Ruth Richardson, abolished compulsory unionism and national awards, deregulating industrial relations and shifting power dramatically towards employers. This was complemented by the broader economic reforms of the Fourth Labour Government, which introduced market logic into almost every facet of public life, including education, health, and welfare. Since then, no government has meaningfully reversed this trend. The Clark government (1999–2008) offered some mild reversals, and the Sixth Labour Government (2017–2023) introduced the Fair Pay Agreements (since repealed). But the fundamental structure of employer dominance has remained untouched. In this light, ERAB is not a betrayal of some progressive consensus. It is a continuation of the neoliberal project with renewed aggression. Its goal is to further erode the legal terrain on which workers might mount a defence. The State as the Manager of Capital Anarcho-communists have long argued that the state does not function as a neutral arbiter in labour relations. It is the executive committee of the ruling class, managing the conditions under which capital can reproduce itself. It may, at times, offer workers concessions such as welfare payments, labour protections, or health and safety laws, but these are always tactical, not moral. They can be revoked as easily as they are granted, and they are most often granted in the wake of unrest or threat. ERAB illustrates this logic perfectly. Rather than responding to a crisis of productivity or economic necessity, it seeks to pre-emptively disarm the working class in anticipation of future struggle. Its goal is to ensure that capital can extract more surplus value with fewer obstacles. In this sense, the bill is not simply anti-worker—it is anti-democratic, in the truest sense. It aims to suppress the ability of people to determine the conditions of their own labour, and thus their own lives. Resistance: Beyond Legalism, Beyond the State Faced with these developments, many liberal commentators and union leaders have called for legal challenges, electoral change, and lobbying. But anarcho-communists recognise that such strategies are insufficient. The state has already shown its allegiances. No matter which party holds office, workers' rights will be contingent on the approval of capital and its political servants. Instead, we must build resistance from below. That means rejecting the logic of legalism and instead fostering the conditions for direct action and solidarity. This includes: -Rebuilding radical, rank-and-file led unions that are accountable to workers, not party officials. -Organising mutual aid networks to provide material support for striking or sacked workers. -Occupying and collectivising workplaces under threat, with or without legal recognition. Conclusion: No Authority but Ourselves The Employment Relations Amendment Bill is not a detour from democratic principles – it is a confirmation that parliamentary democracy in a capitalist state is a dead end for the working class. It consolidates employer power, undermines unionism, and exposes the state's role as an instrument of class domination. But in this dark moment, there is also clarity. The illusions of social partnership, of progressive government, of justice through legislation are burning away. What remains is the possibility of something else: the possibility of worker self-organisation, of mutual aid, of a society based not on hierarchy or profit, but on solidarity and shared need. We must turn away from begging for better laws and begin building our own power. The road ahead is not easy, but it is ours. And as always, it begins not in Parliament but on the shop floor, in the streets, and in the hearts of those who still believe that another world is possible.
