logo
The sheep-farming fight tarnishing the Lake District fells

The sheep-farming fight tarnishing the Lake District fells

Yahoo19-05-2025

Butterflies flutter over a verdant Lake District meadow, and tiny fish make their way over the gravel of the crystal-clear Swindale Beck as it meanders through the valley.
Somewhere on the hillside scrub a cuckoo calls. Above, a peregrine and buzzard circle the bluest of skies, diving towards the bright yellow common gorse below us, the gentle breeze wafting its distinctive coconut scent.
As the path through this remarkable, award-winning valley opens up – it's one of three that make up the 12 square miles of farmland, moorland, rivers, rainforest and wildflower meadows that is Wild Haweswater – two walkers stop and gasp at the beauty of it all.
If there were a classic springtime scene in the Lake District it would surely be this… that is, if there weren't one thing missing. It's lambing season – yet there are no iconic Lake District sheep to be seen.
And that's because, on this land tenanted by the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) from landowners United Utilities (Haweswater being a reservoir supplying two million people in the North West with drinking water), the thousands of sheep that have traditionally been tasked with grazing have gradually been destocked – to the point where, a few weeks ago, some of the last were sold by the RSPB at auction.
Farmers have been keeping sheep on the upland fells for centuries, although in truly significant numbers only since the Second World War, when food production was ramped up. Particularly since the foot-and-mouth outbreak in 2001, landowners – sometimes via their tenants – have destocked, changing land management policies in line with the direction of government subsidies towards agri-environment schemes.
In the RSPB's case, it believed that the environmental aims it had for the landscape of the two farms that had sheep on them – Naddle and Swindale – would be better served by replacing the grazing areas with cattle and ponies, replanting trees and native plants and even restoring the river running through the valley back to its natural route.
And for all that the RSPB and United Utilities have the right to do this given it is their land, some local sheep farmers believe that these environmental schemes and policies are the final nail in the coffin for a traditional industry that is on its knees. Residents reckon this beautiful part of the eastern Lakes has lost half its farms in the past 10 years.
'[The RSPB sold the sheep] for what? So they can do some more rewilding? What a load of rubbish,' says Katy Cropper, a local farmer and sheepdog trainer who used to help the farmers at Swindale gather their sheep.
'See over there?' she asks, pointing across the valley. 'The fell looks to me like an overgrown mess. It used to be beautiful, [grazed by sheep which were] maintained by farmers for generations. Now it's just a tinderbox of long brown grass waiting to go up in flames.
'All this money is being spent on a waste of time; millions of pounds spent on trees which I can't see growing successfully. And we can't eat trees, can we? What's happened here has spoilt the community, ruined people's livelihoods. What are the families who have grown up shepherding these lands going to do now?'
The stats bear it out: Defra's report last year had the UK's sheep population at a record low, while the Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board industry body recently published a report showing sheep meat imports were up 59 per cent on 2023 for the first two months of 2025.
While the research shows the UK is self-sufficient in sheep meat, as the National Sheep Association points out, self-sufficiency is not the same as food or industry security – both of which are vulnerable if governments and agencies prioritise imports and environmental schemes over domestic production.
It feels like Wild Haweswater, then, is at the heart of a battle for the true soul, the very character of the Lake District. Indeed, the Unesco description of the Lake District National Park when it was awarded World Heritage status makes explicit reference to the symbiotic relationship between farming and the environment in this part of the world: 'A landscape of exceptional beauty, shaped by persistent and distinctive agro-pastural traditions and local industry which give it special character.'
Yet the general consensus among the conservation community and environmental stakeholders is that if you want to maintain and develop the exceptional beauty of a landscape, sheep are probably not the best option: they believe they tend to degrade or destroy the natural, native plant life by constantly nibbling away at the trees, shrubs and flowering plants attempting to come through; heavier-footed animals, they say, trample the bracken instead and spread wildflower seed through their dung.
Back at Naddle Farm – one of two farms here that the RSPB maintains – they're careful not to call what they do rewilding. 'It's a landscape restoration partnership with United Utilities,' says Annabel Rushton, the RSPB's people and partnerships manager.
Hers may sound like a desk job, but she can't wait to get out into that landscape and show me an alder that now has rowan growing out of it. 'A classic indicator of a temperate rainforest,' she says. 'It's the second-largest area of this type of rainforest in the Lake District; a very special place.
'And then in the hay meadow, we'll have great burnet, wood cranesbill, melancholy thistle – it's like a wash of colour which then brings in all the insect life: golden-ringed dragonflies, dark green fritillaries, chimney sweeper moths. And our work to restore this habitat, bring it back from a pretty degraded state, is just getting better each year.'
What frustrates the RSPB in this debate the most, though, is the narrative that it's somehow pushed out the sheep farmers of this area in favour of wildflowers. It's its own farming team which manages the livestock and habitat, and ultimately the RSPB didn't believe it could meet its aims for conservation on its land while running a flock of sheep.
'Look over there,' says Rushton, pointing beyond a particularly magnificent area of bright yellow gorse. 'You can still see sheep in this landscape on the common land, it's just that our objectives for our land are different.'
As we wind our way through Swindale, Glen Swainson, Wild Haweswater's senior site manager, says the RSPB doesn't want to remove animals entirely but create a wood pasture, 'a really lovely balance between agriculture and nature conservation.
'It is still a farmed landscape that needs managing,' he admits when we come to a pasture with hill ponies happily grazing. 'We've had sheep, we've got cattle, and we've got these ponies, but the sheep element always has more of a struggle to it in terms of making it pay as well.That's upland sheep farming as a whole; everyone will tell you the economics of it are really difficult.'He has a point. Post-Brexit, the EU Common Agricultural Policy – which gave area-based direct payment subsidies to farmers – came to an end. These direct payments made up more than 80 per cent of government support for farmers and last year's 'Future of Sheep Farming' debate in the Houses of Parliament was quite clear that subsidies were relied upon 'to provide a business profit'.
The new system based on Environmental Land Management schemes pays farmers for providing 'public goods' such as environmental improvements. The Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI) also pays farmers to adopt and maintain sustainable farming practices that can protect and enhance the natural environment alongside food production, although that itself hit the headlines when it was halted in March, with no new SFI applications accepted after this date until a spending review was completed.
'I can actually see some sense in what the RSPB are doing in terms of economics,' says Mark Bousfield, who has lived and farmed sheep in the Swindale valley for most of his life. 'The farms here wouldn't survive without the enhancements the Government gives. But the government subsidies now aren't in food production, really, they're in environmental payouts.'
But this isn't just a debate about economics or livelihoods. Spend any time with the people who live and work here, and they're also worried that these environmental schemes are not actually being managed properly.
Magnus McIntosh lives at the end of the valley and with his wife, he's refurbished a derelict farmhouse once used by a local artist captivated by the views. It's still off-grid, and their young son was the first child to be born here in decades.
'We have a responsibility to nurture the environment and protect habitats,' he says. 'The area around here is a Site of Special Scientific Interest, and it's one of the reasons we came here.
'The hay meadows are incredible; in 1985, they were one of the most species-rich in north-west Cumbria.
But my worry is that the removal of sheep and a lot of the RSPB projects are actually having a detrimental effect. The meadows have visibly declined; they do actually require careful management and a strict grazing regime.
'It's going to end up being a bleak little valley with reeds everywhere and dead grass. It feels like there's a lot of money being wasted; rewilding schemes today appear driven by funding opportunities rather than genuine care for wildlife and long-term ecological health.'
For McIntosh, it's about conserving, improving and enhancing the landscape as it is now, not trying to return it to how it was 1,000 years ago. You get the sense that his local MP, Tim Farron, recognises there's a real issue here, too.
'There is definitely an ideological and unjustified determination to massively reduce, if not remove, the presence of sheep from the Lake District,' he says. 'And I think that is dangerous, and based upon this idea that we're massively overgrazed. Now that was the case before foot-and-mouth, but that was a generation ago.
'So a lot of the understanding about the relationship between sheep numbers and the nature of the environment is just massively, inexcusably out of date. And what that leads to is this sense that sheep are somehow like locusts, which I think a lot of non-farmers seem to believe. If you go for wilderness solutions, you don't always get biodiversity – you get invasive species taking over.'
Farron thinks that removing sheep from the Lake District landscape is as much a potential branding issue too. 'Would Unesco take away their World Heritage Site status from the Lake District? I mean, they could if you look at the citation, it specifically credits farmers for the way the landscape looks. And that would be devastating.'
So what is the solution? For Farron, it's perfectly clear what needs to be done.
'One really simple thing under the stewardship schemes is that you are entitled as a farmer to take an option to create woodland pasture, where you can grow trees, and graze animals – but only if they're cattle. What we desperately need is a woodland pasture option in the uplands that allows people to be sheep farmers as well, allowing for the differences in how they graze.
'So I think, rather than everyone getting in their bunkers and shouting at each other, there's a perfectly sensible, clever way we can move forward here, where we do protect nature, we do grow trees, and we also maintain the importance to our heritage, our landscape, our environment and our food production capabilities.'
As the sun begins to go down on another perfect Lake District day, the RSPB seems just as keen not to get embroiled in a culture war. Woodland pasture, of course, is what the RSPB is actually proposing for Swindale – although currently Farron doubts whether it could or would put sheep there at the moment.
'People will have different opinions on what we are doing here,' admits Swainson. 'But we will always try to continue a good relationship with everyone; there are ways in which every facet of life in this valley can work together.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Black bear spotted in Greenville. 450 sighted in Upstate in 2024, how to report a sighting
Black bear spotted in Greenville. 450 sighted in Upstate in 2024, how to report a sighting

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Black bear spotted in Greenville. 450 sighted in Upstate in 2024, how to report a sighting

A black bear was twice spotted near downtown Greenville, according to several social media reports on June 19 and June 20. Rep. Chandra Dillard posted about the sighting on social media. "Everyone loves Greenville; even the bears," she wrote in her post. The bear was spotted in the Poe Mill, James St., Southern Side neighborhoods, according to her post. "Don't engage. Call SC DNR 1-800-922-5431," she advised. WYFF 4 reported that "a black bear was spotted twice in 24 hours near downtown Greenville." The first sighting occurred on the night of June 19 on 6th Avenue near the Poe Mill area, and the bear was spotted again on June 20 on James Street, according to WYFF. Black bears are roaming in the Upstate, and they're on the prowl for food. Last year, there were 450 black bear sightings in the region, according to the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources. Sightings are on the rise due to increased human activity and development in bear habitat and the use of technology like doorbell cameras, which allow for more sightings to be captured. But is this reason to be worried about black bears? Not exactly. "Black bears are so timid today partly because they evolved alongside such powerful predators as saber-toothed cats, American lions, dire wolves and short-faced bears, all of which became extinct only about 12,000 years ago," said the North American Bear Center. "Black bears were the only one of these that could climb trees, so black bears survived by staying near trees and developing the attitude: run first and ask questions later. The timid ones passed on their genes to create the black bear of today." Here's what to know about black bears in the state. Black bears are omnivores that eat both plants and animals. Their diet generally consists of berries, nuts, insects, fish, and meat. Because black bears are opportunistic, they will devour anything that is readily available, including human food and garbage. The black bear diet is also highly dependent on season and location. Offensive black bear attacks are rare and usually occur in remote areas where bears come in contact with humans the least, per the North American Bear Center. "The 750,000 black bears of North America kill less than one person per year on average, while men 18-24 are 167 times more likely to kill someone than a black bear," the center said. When a human is attacked by a black bear, it is typically a defensive reaction to the person being too close ― a situation that is easily avoidable. Injuries that occur are usually minor. Since most black bears in the wild today are timid, they are more likely to run away to a tree when frightened. "By contrast, startled grizzlies may charge and occasionally attack, making grizzlies over 20 times more dangerous than black bears," per the center. According to the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, there has never been a fatality or even an attack attributed to a black bear in S.C. In the eastern U.S., only two human fatalities attributed to bears have occurred over the last 100 years. Current sustaining black bear populations exist in the mountains/upper Piedmont and northern coastal counties. Never feed or approach bears. Intentionally feeding bears or allowing them to find anything that smells or tastes like food teaches bears to approach homes and people looking for more. Secure food, garbage and recycling. Food and food odors attract bears, so do not reward them with easily available food, liquids or garbage. Remove bird feeders when bears are active. Birdseed and grains have lots of calories, so they are attractive to bears. Removing feeders is the best way to avoid creating conflicts with bears. Never leave pet food outdoors. Feed pets indoors when possible. If you must feed pets outside, feed in single portions and remove bowls afterwards. Store pet food where bears cannot see or smell it. Clean and store grills, smokers. Clean grills after each use and make sure that all grease, fat and food particles are removed. Store clean grills and smokers in a secure area that keeps bears out. Alert neighbors to bear activity. See bears in the area or evidence of bear activity? Tell your neighbors and share info on how to avoid bear conflicts. You can report a black bear sighting to the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources by visiting this link, For black bear emergencies, call 911 or 1-800-922-5431. Nina Tran covers trending topics for The Greenville News. Reach her via email at ntran@ This article originally appeared on Greenville News: Black bear spotted in Greenville, SC: How to report a sighting in SC

I Love Finding Birds' Nests, but What's in Them Troubles Me
I Love Finding Birds' Nests, but What's in Them Troubles Me

New York Times

time6 hours ago

  • New York Times

I Love Finding Birds' Nests, but What's in Them Troubles Me

Most birds go to great lengths to hide their nests. So when I find one, invariably so carefully crafted and astonishingly intricate, I'm filled with awe. They are marvels of the natural world. The weave of twigs, grass, leaves and other natural materials is specific to each species. Most birds use nests only to raise their young. For small birds, this could be less than one month out of the year. For that reason, I generally don't consider them homes. But the analogy is apt, if only to convey the uniqueness of their architecture. Of a house, you might say: That's a craftsman or a Cape Cod or a colonial. The same sort of design distinction can be seen in a nest. That's a robin's nest or a warbler's or a red-tailed hawk's. Birds can be choosy about the materials they use to build their nest. Some line their nests with snakeskin to ward off enemies. Others fasten lichens with spider silk to the exterior for camouflage. Still others stuff feathers inside dome-shaped nests of sticks or create false entrances to dupe predators or add aromatic leaves to repel parasites and enhance the immune systems of their nestlings. Increasingly, and troublingly for what it says about the state of the planet, birds are also using all sorts of plastic litter and other trash to build their nests. These photos reflect yet another way the human signature has affixed itself on the natural world. Among the trash that birds use to build their nests are strips of tarp; wrappers from gum, candy and cigarettes; plastic cotton and twine; shipping material; landscaping refuse; and insulation. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store