
Celebrating community: The key to good mental health this Mental Health Awareness Week
Health service calls for shift to prevention, long-term funding and cross-government planning as system faces growing pressure
WITH just one year to go until the next Senedd election, NHS leaders in Wales have issued a stark warning to politicians of all parties: without urgent and radical change, the Welsh health and social care system will face an unsustainable future.
The Welsh NHS Confederation, which represents all health boards and trusts in Wales, has published a new report setting out what NHS leaders want from the next Welsh Government. Based on responses from 95 senior NHS figures across the country, the report highlights the urgent need to move away from reactive, short-term measures and towards a long-term strategy focused on prevention, wellbeing, and coordinated action across government departments.
Key among the recommendations is a call for a cross-government strategy to improve health and reduce inequalities, with 87% of NHS leaders backing a national plan that would tackle the wider causes of poor health—such as poverty, housing, education, and employment.
The Confederation warns that without such action, the NHS will struggle to cope with rising demand, driven by factors including an ageing population, an increase in chronic and preventable illnesses, and ongoing workforce shortages. The number of people in Wales living with four or more long-term conditions is projected to double by 2035, placing even greater strain on already overburdened services.
Darren Hughes, director of the Welsh NHS Confederation, said: 'There is only so far the NHS and other public bodies can go in making meaningful, sustainable progress if the right conditions aren't in place.
'Short-term funding cycles make it extremely difficult for organisations to plan effectively, invest wisely, and build the kind of resilient communities we need. If we are serious about reversing the decline in the nation's health, we must focus now on prevention, early intervention and addressing health inequalities at their root.'
He added that demographic trends paint a worrying picture, with the proportion of the population aged 80 and over expected to double between 2000 and 2038. This group already accounts for a disproportionate share of NHS activity.
The Confederation is urging the next government to embrace the principles of the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015, which it says are not being fully realised under current funding arrangements.
While the report has been welcomed by many within the sector, some observers note that successive Welsh Governments—both Labour-led and, in coalition periods, involving Plaid Cymru and the Liberal Democrats—have long acknowledged the importance of prevention, yet struggled to shift funding and policy at the necessary scale.
Critics argue that similar calls have been made repeatedly over the past decade, yet the reality on the ground remains dominated by crisis response and waiting list backlogs. In February 2024, the Welsh Government was forced to issue a £175 million emergency funding package to tackle pressures in emergency care and elective surgery.
Meanwhile, the latest statistics from StatsWales show that as of March 2025, over 750,000 patient pathways remain open—meaning more than one in five people in Wales is waiting for planned treatment or assessment. The British Medical Association Cymru has described the situation as 'deeply worrying,' while acknowledging the immense strain frontline staff are under.
The Confederation's report does not shy away from the scale of the challenge, noting that achieving a shift to prevention will require bold political choices, including long-term investment in public health, closer integration with local government and social care, and a reallocation of resources away from acute care.
Political parties are now beginning to shape their manifestos ahead of the May 2026 Senedd election. Welsh Labour, which has led the Welsh Government since devolution began in 1999, has pledged to maintain a publicly funded, publicly delivered NHS. Plaid Cymru has emphasised the need for a 'National Health and Care Service' to integrate health and social care. The Welsh Conservatives have called for more choice for patients, greater use of technology, and a reduction in management bureaucracy.
The Welsh NHS Confederation said it would engage with all parties over the coming months to ensure that the voice of health and care leaders is heard in shaping the policy agenda.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Rhyl Journal
17 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Denbighshire, Conwy, Gwynedd & Anglesey MPs back assisted dying bill
MPs voted 314 in favour, to 291 against, during the third reading of Labour's Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) in Parliament on Friday (June 20). This does not mean the bill has become law, but it allows it to now progress to the House of Lords for further scrutiny. The majority almost halved since the last vote in November, during the bill's second reading. If successful, the bill would make assisted suicide legal for terminally ill adults expected to die within six months, and with the mental capacity to make a choice about how to end their life. Below are comments from MPs Llinos Medi, Liz Saville Roberts, Claire Hughes, Gill German and Becky Gittins on why they all backed the bill. Llinos Medi (Image: Submitted) "I am assured that the bill has been strengthened during the scrutiny process. For example, I voted in favour of an amendment to prevent health professionals such as doctors from initiating conversations with under-18s about assisted dying, which passed. "Regardless of today's vote, scrutiny does not end here. As MPs, we have a duty and I remain committed to listening to all voices, including those who oppose the bill. "Whatever your opinion on today's outcome, I believe that we should show respect to both sides of the debate. Days like today are not easy and we must show compassion to all." Liz Saville Roberts (Image: Submitted) "I believe that adults who are terminally ill, with a prognosis of six months or less to live, and who have full mental capacity, should have the legal right to make this profoundly personal decision for themselves, free from coercion and with strong safeguards in place. "I fully understand the concerns many people, including disability rights groups and medical organisations, have raised about protecting individuals. "That is why I support the inclusion of strict safeguards, involving medical professionals, social workers and judicial oversight, to ensure that each decision is carefully assessed, voluntary, and free from pressure. "I am also conscious of concerns about the so-called 'slippery slope'. However, the bill is tightly framed, applying only to terminally ill adults and excluding those whose suffering is solely related to mental illness. Any further changes would require full parliamentary scrutiny." Claire Hughes (Image: Submitted) "Fundamentally, I believe we should all have the right to decide what happens to our bodies and when enough is enough. "I believe that the status quo - where only terminally ill people with the wealth to enable them to travel to Dignitas are able to exercise control over their final moments - is not good enough. "This bill has gone through a robust process, making it rigorous, practical and safe, and is rooted in the principles of compassion, justice and human dignity. "I want, again, to make it abundantly clear that good palliative care and giving terminally ill people the choice to choose an assisted death, are not mutually exclusive." Gill German (Image: Rick Matthews) "During report stage, I supported New Clause 10, which expands the bill's protection for medical practitioners to ensure they have 'no obligation' to administer an assisted death and provide legal protections for medical professionals to ensure they are not subject to punishment for refusing to carry out an assisted death. "Further, I voted against New Clause 1 and 2. While I respect the deeply held views on all sides, I believe both amendments introduced unnecessary risks by restricting open, compassionate conversations between clinicians and patients that are often essential to end-of-life care. "New Clause 1, which was not adopted, would have banned doctors from raising assisted dying with adult patients at all, even when clinically appropriate. This clause would disproportionately harm those with lower health literacy who may not know how to start the conversation. "New Clause 2, which was passed, prevents doctors from discussing assisted dying with under-18s in any context. I believe this risks isolating terminally ill teenagers or young relatives of dying patients, by preventing doctors from discussing assisted dying with under-18s in any context. "This may drive vulnerable young people towards unregulated and potentially harmful sources of information." Becky Gittins (Image: Submitted) "I believe there are as many safeguards as practically possible contained within this bill to ensure free and fair choice for patients to make this decision in an informed way, free from coercion. "I hope that the high level of parliamentary scrutiny that this bill has received will encourage a more forensic consideration of the role of patient decision-making across the UK and broader society. "Throughout the legislative process, the attention given to the needs of the most vulnerable people and the importance of ensuring a free choice has brought an essential focus on the role of coercion, domestic abuse, disability, ableism and poverty on people's ability to genuinely make a free decision about their lives – whether on this issue or many others."


The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Deborah James' dad calls for NHS cancer revolution in letter to Government
DAME Deborah James' dad has backed calls for Wes Streeting to end cancer diagnosis and treatment delays, warning 'there is no time to lose'. Alistair James issued a plea for the Health Secretary to overhaul NHS care with the upcoming cancer strategy. 4 4 4 He has signed an open letter led by Cancer Research UK that calls for faster diagnosis, waiting time targets to be met, smoking reduction and more equal access to treatment. Sun columnist Dame Debs died in 2022 after a years-long battle with bowel cancer. Her Bowelbabe charity fund has since raised £17million for research and a laboratory at the prestigious Francis Crick Institute was recently named after the mum-of-two. Dad Alistair said: 'Three years ago this week, Deborah died at the age of 40 from bowel cancer. 'I am so proud that her legacy continues through the fantastic Bowelbabe Fund. 'Too many people are waiting too long to be diagnosed and treated for bowel cancer. 'And the percentage of cancers being diagnosed at an early stage, when there is a greater chance of survival, has hardly changed for almost a decade. 'We have an opportunity to shape the next decade of the government's plans for cancer and you can help make a difference by signing Cancer Research UK's open letter to the Health Secretary, Wes Streeting.' 4 The letter to Mr Streeting has already been signed by 5,500 people. It said: 'Nearly 1 in 2 of us will get cancer in our lifetimes, and across England, cancer cases are increasing, patients face unacceptable waits and unequal access to treatment. 'In 2024 alone, 74,000 people in England were not treated on time for cancer. 'People with cancer deserve better. They need better. 'There is no time to waste.' Sign the letter online at


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Mounjaro weight loss jabs now available from GPs
The NHS in England is set to begin a mass rollout of the anti-obesity drug Mounjaro (tirzepatide) on Monday, with GPs allowed to prescribe it for the first time. The initiative is expected to reach approximately 220,000 severely obese people with multiple health complications across England over the next three years. Eligibility for the drug includes a body mass index (BMI) over 40 and at least four other obesity-linked health problems, such as type 2 diabetes or high blood pressure. Leading family doctors have raised concerns about the additional workload and training implications for GPs associated with the new rollout. Pharmacy experts anticipate potential pressure on drug supplies and say that the medication should be part of a comprehensive weight management strategy, not a standalone solution.