Govt proposes to repeal 141-year-old Explosives Act, 1884 to bring new law

The government has proposed to repeal the 141-year-old Explosives Act of 1884 and introduce a new law stating that the existing legislation is based on the old British pattern and is not adequately meeting the country's growing requirements.
The Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) has sought comments and suggestions from the general public, industry associations and other entities concerned on the proposal before July 17 this year.
It said the Explosives Act, 1884 is a pre-constitutional act and it was comprehensively modified in 1978.
Many large and small companies began to manufacture high explosives after independence.
"It is observed that the Explosives Act, 1884, which is based on the old British pattern and is not adequately meeting the country's growing requirements and development in the explosive sector thereby resulted in difficulties for the industry," the DPIIT's note for public and stakeholder consultations said.
To remove shortcomings in the existing legislation and obviate the difficulties experienced by the industry, the Explosives Act, 1884 was comprehensively amended in 1978.
The law was enacted to regulate the manufacture, possession, use, sale, transport, import and export of explosives for commercial purposes and to prevent accidents (explosion) due to explosives in the territory of India.
During the examination of all the pre-constitutional acts from the purview of their suitability and relevance in the present circumstances, it was suggested to take remedial actions for their repeal or re-enactment or consolidation.
"It is proposed to repeal the Explosives Act, 1884 and re-enact a new law with necessary modifications, including in the penal provisions thereof, to bring it in conformity with the current scenario or circumstances," it said.
The salient features of the amendments made in the Explosives Act, 1884 by the Explosives Bill, 2025 includes seven new definitions, and additions of new provisions relating to the third-party inspection agency.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Hindu

42 minutes ago

• The Hindu

No-fly zone declared in Vellore on June 25-26 for Chief Minister's visit

Collector V. R. Subbulaxmi on Sunday has declared that the district will be a no fly zone on June 25-26 during the visit of the Chief Minister M.K. Stalin, who will inaugurate refurbished British era Pentland Multi-Speciality Hospital that comes within Vellore Corporation limits and distribute government financial assistance to beneficiaries. According to a press release, all individuals and civil agencies are prohibited from flying any non-conventional aerial objects in the district without any prior permission on the said days. The district police will destroy or confiscate any UAVs that violate this restriction. Further, the operator found violating these orders will be charged under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code. It has been informed that approval for utilisation of drones by any operator or civil/government agency is governed by guidelines issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs, the release said.

Time of India

43 minutes ago

• Time of India

Tens of thousands rally across Europe for Gaza ceasefire

In Berlin, more than 10,000 people gathered in the centre of the city in support of Gaza, according to police figures. And in the Swiss capital Bern, march organisers estimated that 20,000 people rallied in front of the national parliament, urging the government to back a ceasefire. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tens of thousands of pro-Palestinian protesters marched in European cities calling for an end to the war in Gaza , hours before President Donald Trump said the US military had attacked three Iranian nuclear sites London, AFP journalists saw tens of thousands of protesters, who waved Palestinian flags as they marched through the British capital clad in keffiyeh Berlin, more than 10,000 people gathered in the centre of the city in support of Gaza, according to police in the Swiss capital Bern, march organisers estimated that 20,000 people rallied in front of the national parliament, urging the government to back a also gathered outside a French trade fair near Paris attended by Israeli defence firms, calling for an end to war profiteering and Israel's offensive in have been monthly protests in the British capital since the start of the 20-month-long war between Israel and Hamas, which has ravaged Saturday, protesters there carried signs including "Stop arming Israel" and "No war on Iran" as they marched in the sweltering heat."It's important to remember that people are suffering in Gaza. I fear all the focus will be on Iran now," said 34-year-old Harry Baker."I don't have great love for the Iranian regime, but we are now in a dangerous situation," he said, adding that this was his third pro-Palestinian marches came after Trump announced on social media that the US military had carried out a "very successful attack" on three Iranian nuclear US president added that after the strikes Iran "must now agree to end this war".Tehran had said Saturday that more than 400 people had been killed in Iran since Israel launched strikes last week claiming its arch-foe was close to acquiring a nuclear weapon -- which Iran 25 people have been killed in Israel, according to official figures.

The Hindu

an hour ago

• The Hindu

​Theft and compensation: on news publishers and AI models

Large language artificial intelligence models are fuelled by content on the Internet, and much of this content comprises news reports gathered, curated and published by media professionals and organisations with decades of experience. As creative industries reckon with their labour getting diffused into unaccountable clusters of graphics processing units that reproduce styles and spit out human-level artwork in mere seconds, the news industry has reason to fear the compounding of permission-less innovation into an existentially threatening heist of several lifetimes of work. Previous waves of digitisation peeled away captive audiences from print and broadcast media by replacing these with a web-charged attention economy, and Big Tech platforms further squeezed news media's place in these rapid transformations by often short-changing the very sources of information that their businesses relied on to be useful to the public. In a landscape where even precarious business models in the Internet age are threatened by a reluctance to pay for news and declining public trust in professional news-gathering, AI may very well be a body blow. It is clear: AI firms, with their billions in market capitalisation, must not be permitted to just take what they want from the Internet, synthesise these inputs into monetised insights, and pretend that the whole process is a form of victimless, innovative progress. Publishers have a clear right to decide who gets to hoover up their entire corpuses, and to ensure that their businesses benefit from the AI wave. To this end, the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade's committee on copyright and AI is a welcome step. This is not a decelerationist, or 'decel' demand, as those who advocate for rapid AI development might be quick to say. The news industry has fought as search giants and social media companies profited enormously on the back of its content and set the terms for how the financial benefits flowed back to it. That cannot be permitted to happen — as social media platforms turn more and more into video-focused walled gardens, discouraging even a step outside their apps. For the news organisations, the avenues to earn are shrinking. As AI-generated overviews of news content with source links are reduced to a footnote, it is time for compensation to be negotiated at the time of publishers' content being scraped from their websites in the first place. AI firms may claim 'fair use' in model training, but there is nothing fair — morally or legally — about accessing and disseminating troves of news without taking the creators and processors into confidence. News publishers and policymakers must now fight for their share in the AI era.