​Theft and compensation: on news publishers and AI models

Large language artificial intelligence models are fuelled by content on the Internet, and much of this content comprises news reports gathered, curated and published by media professionals and organisations with decades of experience. As creative industries reckon with their labour getting diffused into unaccountable clusters of graphics processing units that reproduce styles and spit out human-level artwork in mere seconds, the news industry has reason to fear the compounding of permission-less innovation into an existentially threatening heist of several lifetimes of work. Previous waves of digitisation peeled away captive audiences from print and broadcast media by replacing these with a web-charged attention economy, and Big Tech platforms further squeezed news media's place in these rapid transformations by often short-changing the very sources of information that their businesses relied on to be useful to the public. In a landscape where even precarious business models in the Internet age are threatened by a reluctance to pay for news and declining public trust in professional news-gathering, AI may very well be a body blow. It is clear: AI firms, with their billions in market capitalisation, must not be permitted to just take what they want from the Internet, synthesise these inputs into monetised insights, and pretend that the whole process is a form of victimless, innovative progress. Publishers have a clear right to decide who gets to hoover up their entire corpuses, and to ensure that their businesses benefit from the AI wave. To this end, the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade's committee on copyright and AI is a welcome step.
This is not a decelerationist, or 'decel' demand, as those who advocate for rapid AI development might be quick to say. The news industry has fought as search giants and social media companies profited enormously on the back of its content and set the terms for how the financial benefits flowed back to it. That cannot be permitted to happen — as social media platforms turn more and more into video-focused walled gardens, discouraging even a step outside their apps. For the news organisations, the avenues to earn are shrinking. As AI-generated overviews of news content with source links are reduced to a footnote, it is time for compensation to be negotiated at the time of publishers' content being scraped from their websites in the first place. AI firms may claim 'fair use' in model training, but there is nothing fair — morally or legally — about accessing and disseminating troves of news without taking the creators and processors into confidence. News publishers and policymakers must now fight for their share in the AI era.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Hindu

4 hours ago

• The Hindu

​Theft and compensation: on news publishers and AI models

Large language artificial intelligence models are fuelled by content on the Internet, and much of this content comprises news reports gathered, curated and published by media professionals and organisations with decades of experience. As creative industries reckon with their labour getting diffused into unaccountable clusters of graphics processing units that reproduce styles and spit out human-level artwork in mere seconds, the news industry has reason to fear the compounding of permission-less innovation into an existentially threatening heist of several lifetimes of work. Previous waves of digitisation peeled away captive audiences from print and broadcast media by replacing these with a web-charged attention economy, and Big Tech platforms further squeezed news media's place in these rapid transformations by often short-changing the very sources of information that their businesses relied on to be useful to the public. In a landscape where even precarious business models in the Internet age are threatened by a reluctance to pay for news and declining public trust in professional news-gathering, AI may very well be a body blow. It is clear: AI firms, with their billions in market capitalisation, must not be permitted to just take what they want from the Internet, synthesise these inputs into monetised insights, and pretend that the whole process is a form of victimless, innovative progress. Publishers have a clear right to decide who gets to hoover up their entire corpuses, and to ensure that their businesses benefit from the AI wave. To this end, the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade's committee on copyright and AI is a welcome step. This is not a decelerationist, or 'decel' demand, as those who advocate for rapid AI development might be quick to say. The news industry has fought as search giants and social media companies profited enormously on the back of its content and set the terms for how the financial benefits flowed back to it. That cannot be permitted to happen — as social media platforms turn more and more into video-focused walled gardens, discouraging even a step outside their apps. For the news organisations, the avenues to earn are shrinking. As AI-generated overviews of news content with source links are reduced to a footnote, it is time for compensation to be negotiated at the time of publishers' content being scraped from their websites in the first place. AI firms may claim 'fair use' in model training, but there is nothing fair — morally or legally — about accessing and disseminating troves of news without taking the creators and processors into confidence. News publishers and policymakers must now fight for their share in the AI era.

Business Standard

14 hours ago

• Business Standard

DPIIT asks ministries to compile list of business approvals to improve NSWS

Government departments are compiling a list of all business approvals, renewals, registrations and compliances required by business entities to identify duplication and streamline processes, according to official sources. This effort is part of the National Single Window System (NSWS) initiative, aimed at providing businesses a unified digital platform for seamless approvals from both Central and State governments. The initiative is being led by the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), which has been engaging with various government stakeholders and industry representatives to improve user experience on the single window system. Industry associations, sources said, have recommended creating an exhaustive, ministry-wise list of approvals and eliminating additional or redundant approvals that fall outside this list. 'The idea is to have symmetry of information, ensure transparency, improve the ease of doing business in the country and reduce the compliance burden,' a senior official said. Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal launched the NSWS in September 2021. 'The system has been working very smoothly for domestic as well as foreign investors. It has made the lives of investors easier. There is scope for more approvals, including from states, to move to this platform,' said Atul Pandey, Partner, Khaitan & Co. NSWS is a digital platform designed to help investors identify and apply for required approvals based on their business needs. Since investment proposals typically involve multiple approvals across states and departments, the NSWS seeks to eliminate the need for multiple applications across different portals and reduce the number of physical office visits, enabling time-bound clearances. The DPIIT has also held a series of meetings with industry associations, urging them to promote usage of the portal among their members. Users can currently access over 671 Central Approvals and 6,880 State Approvals through the system. The portal now hosts applications for approvals from 32 Central Ministries and Departments, and 29 State Governments. NSWS has also onboarded various government schemes, including the Vehicle Scrapping Policy, Indian Footwear and Leather Development Programme (IFLDP), Sugar and Ethanol Policy, and the National Programme on High Efficiency Solar PV Modules under the PLI Schemes. Under these schemes, NSWS has facilitated over 400 investors in applying for DPIIT's IFLDP applications, while 25 investors have submitted applications for Registered Vehicle Scrapping Facilities.

India Gazette

a day ago

• India Gazette

Trump says he deserves Nobel Peace Prize for global diplomacy, including India and Pakistan efforts

Washington, DC [US], June 22 (ANI): US President Donald Trump has said he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize for his diplomatic efforts in resolving various global conflicts, including a cessation of hostilities between India and Pakistan. Speaking to reporters after landing in New Jersey, Trump mentioned several instances where, in his view, his actions merited the prestigious award. 'They should give me the Nobel Prize for Rwanda, and if you look at Congo, or you could say Serbia, Kosovo, you could say a lot of them. I mean, the big one is India and Pakistan,' he said. 'I should have gotten it four or five times. I would think the Abraham Accords would be a good one too. But they won't give me a Nobel Peace Prize because they only give it to liberals,' he added. Trump also highlighted his efforts with India and Pakistan, stating, 'We did a very great job with India and Pakistan. And we had India in. It looks like we're going to be making a great deal with India and Pakistan.' When asked about the reports of planes landing in Iran from China, Trump responded, 'They say that they're there to take people out. But I can't tell you about that.' He also commented on his rapport with Chinese President Xi Jinping, saying, 'I get along very well with China. I get along very well with President Xi. I like him. He likes me. We have a very good relationship. I can't imagine them getting involved.' Since the start of the Israel-Iran war on June 12, several Internet users have been claiming that China is secretly supporting Iran militarily, based on images from Flightradar24 (a website that tracks real-time aircraft movements), France 24 reported. On Monday, a pro-Iranian account on X called SilencedSirs claimed that 'two giant cargo planes flying from China to Iran turned off their tracking signals before entering Iranian airspace'. According to SilencedSirs, the proof is two-fold: a video shared in a post viewed over six million times made by a supposed media outlet called Prime Scope, and a screenshot of an aircraft's route tracked by Flightradar24, purporting to show one of the planes in Iranian airspace. According to France 254, since Friday, many Internet users have also been sharing other Flightradar24 images purporting to show several flights from China entering Iran. (ANI)