logo
Changes to taxi fare costs likely to go ahead in Glasgow

Changes to taxi fare costs likely to go ahead in Glasgow

Glasgow Times14 hours ago

Glasgow's licensing committee has agreed to propose a 3.32% increase to the city's taxi fare scale, following an independent review.
It would see the minimum charge flag fall rise from £4.40 to £4.50 and the soiling charge lifted from £46 to £47.50.
The changes will now be open to representations, which would be reported back to the committee. Some trade representatives disagreed with the review's findings that insurance costs have decreased, saying drivers are reporting rises.
At a licensing meeting on Wednesday, the trade pushed for a more detailed 'bottom-up' review to be carried out.
Cllr Alex Wilson, SNP, the licensing committee chairman, said: 'A bottom-up review would be a great thing for us going forward, certainly there are more changes to the dynamics of what is happening out there.
READ MORE: Glasgow's new tourist tax approved - here's how much visitors will be charged
'I think we need to find out exactly how that is going to impact the trade.'
The review of the taxi fare scales has been carried out by Dr James Cooper. Changes were recommended after the review concluded the 'costs of operating a tax in Glasgow, the production costs, have increased'.
Under the plans, the flag fall distance and time would change from 889 yards to 880 yards and 167 seconds to 165 seconds. Each additional increment is set to change from a distance not exceeding 179 yards to a distance not exceeding 174 yards and the time changed from 38 seconds to 37 seconds.
However, the distance and time charge would remain at an increment of 30p. The additional charge for hires after 9pm and before 6am is expected to remain at £1.50 and the extra charge for hires between 9pm on December 24 and 6am on December 27 and 9pm on December 31 and 6am on January 3 is to stay at £2.70.
Glasgow Taxi Owners Federation wants to see extra charges for additional passengers, beyond two, and an increased night charge of £2 rather than £1.50 to 'encourage night working'.
It also proposed an alternative tariff which it said would be cheaper for customers. Dr Cooper said there was 'certainly a point of discussion around the structure of the tariff' which could be covered by a bottom-up review in future.
READ MORE: Group of 'neo-Nazis' kicked out of full council meeting
Glasgow Taxis said it had carried out work around demand and usage in the city and would like an opportunity to produce its evidence.
Dr Cooper's report had noted that 'insurance costs have declined over the period of review' but this 'follows a significant increase in the previous period'.
A representative from Unite the union was unable to attend the meeting, but, in a submission to the committee, it stated members had been surveyed and 'not one has reported a reduction' in insurance costs, with an average increase of around 8% instead.
The union also said radio dispatch costs have increased, and high new vehicle costs, plus the removal of some grants, are 'creating financial barriers'.
It added the 'council list of approved vehicles needs to be reviewed, as the dependence on local suppliers is preventing competitiveness, as more cost-effective vehicles are now available across the UK'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Bloated' civil service in Scotland hits record size as SNP ministers told to act
‘Bloated' civil service in Scotland hits record size as SNP ministers told to act

Scotsman

time4 hours ago

  • Scotsman

‘Bloated' civil service in Scotland hits record size as SNP ministers told to act

Figures highlighted by Scottish Labour have shown the overall growth in the public sector workforce north of the Border. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... SNP ministers have been told they must deal with the 'bloated' size of the devolved civil service after the number of workers hit a record high. Figures for the first quarter of this year have revealed civil servants working in Scotland's public sector reached 27,400 full-time equivalent (FTE) roles – the highest at any point under devolution. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It means about one in every 200 people living in Scotland were working for the Scottish Government in the first three months of this year. First Minister John Swinney addressing the Scotland 2050 conference in Edinburgh. The number employed by 'other public bodies', often referred to as quangos, also rose by another 200 positions to stand at 21,500 FTE. The figures were highlighted by Scottish Labour, which pointed out staff numbers in the NHS workforce had fallen by 200 over the same period to 161,300 FTE. Anas Sarwar's party subsequently accused the SNP Government of being 'desperately out of touch' and of 'putting self-interest over Scotland's interests'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The public sector employment data goes back to the early devolution era in 1999, when 14,100 civil servants were recorded. A total of 15,800 FTE civil servants worked in the public sector in the first quarter of 2007. The workforce growth has emerged just days after First Minister John Swinney raised the prospect of workforce cutbacks during a keynote speech about national renewal in Glasgow on Monday. Mr Swinney said his Government was committed to avoiding compulsory redundancies as he claimed Scotland's public sector would have to shrink. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Public Finance Minister Ivan McKee earlier this week said the Government would aim to make savings of £1 billion over five years through public sector reform, cutting 'back office costs' to redirect money to the frontline. He said the number of public bodies would be reduced to drive a more efficient system alongside a new review of public sector buildings. Under a different measurement, of the Scottish Government's directly employed staff, numbers have remained between 8,000 and 9,000 FTE since 2021. Scottish Labour Finance spokesperson Michael Marra said: 'Frontline services are stretched to breaking point and NHS staff numbers are falling amid a deadly crisis – but the SNP is sparing no expense on its own bloated operation. 'Once again, the SNP is putting self-interest over Scotland's interests. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'This SNP Government is desperately out of touch with the priorities of the people of Scotland. 'A Scottish Labour government will prioritise frontline services over government bureaucracy and pointless quangos.' The Scottish Government said care should be taken when interpreting quarterly changes in workforce sizes, and stressed the Scottish Government's 'core workforce' had come down by 5 per cent since 2022. A spokesman said: 'It is common for there to be seasonal variation in staffing levels in public services, for example as newly qualified nurses enter the workforce each year following graduation. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Public sector workers have a vital role in the funding, development and delivery of key services ranging from education, health and social care, to transport and safeguarding the natural environment – also providing impartial expert advice to the public, parliament, and ministers. 'They have responded to many significant issues in recent times, such as the pandemic, impacts of the war in Ukraine and the cost-of-living crisis, while taking on more devolved responsibilities in areas such as social security, equal opportunities, consumer advocacy and advice, and expanded tax powers.' Union leaders have warned against any plans for widespread job cuts across the public sector. Unison Scottish secretary Lilian Macer this week described any cuts as a 'political choice' rather than a financial necessity, pointing out Holyrood's budget would increase by £2.9 billion a year on average in the wake of Chancellor Rachel Reeves' Spending Review.

Tourist taxes: be careful what you wish for, because holidaymakers have choices too
Tourist taxes: be careful what you wish for, because holidaymakers have choices too

The Independent

time11 hours ago

  • The Independent

Tourist taxes: be careful what you wish for, because holidaymakers have choices too

In these divided times, seeing multi-party agreement is uplifting. The setting: Glasgow city administration committee on Thursday 19 June. SNP, Labour, Conservatives and Greens joined in voting in favour of the city's visitor levy. From January 2027, people staying in hotels and all other commercial accommodation in Glasgow will pay 5 per cent on top of the bill. Each year, tourists and business travellers will provide £16m for the council to spend on civic improvements and promoting Glasgow. Edinburgh has already decided to charge overnight guests 5 per cent on top of the room rate, starting in July next year. Good to see the two big Scottish cities agreeing on something, too. Back in Glasgow, Ricky Bell of the SNP said there was 'no evidence to suggest that the introduction of a levy would be detrimental to the city'. Free money, then. And (almost) nobody who lives and votes in Glasgow will pay it. What's not to like? A load of locations across Europe and the wider world already have similar tourist taxes. Paris and Rome hardly seem short of tourists, so Mr Bell is surely right: a levy will not deter visitors. At the risk of disrupting such rare unity, I beg to differ. A couple staying in a three-star hotel in the French capital pay £9.50 per night in Paris tourist tax. I shall assume the room itself costs £110, which is what I have been seeing apart from during the Olympics slump last summer. With accommodation tax at 10 per cent in France, the pair will pay just short of 20 per cent in levies – which corresponds to the current rate of VAT in Scotland and the rest of the UK. With their new 5 per cent charge, Edinburgh and Glasgow will leap ahead in the proportion they extract from tourists. By next summer, the 'stealth' visitor tax on foreigners known as air passenger duty will extract £15 for European flights and £102 for North American visitors. It all adds up. Edinburgh and Glasgow are great cities, and share freely with visitors their immense cultural wealth in the shape of world-class museums and galleries. The assumption is that tourist demand is inelastic – the city councils can put on taxes without dampening the desire to visit. I am not so sure. If it were the case, why stop at 5 per cent – let's try 10, or 20? The UK already looks unwelcoming, with a £16 admission fee in the shape of the Electronic Travel Authorisation and a refusal to accept perfectly secure European Union identity cards – disenfranchising around 300 million EU citizens who don't have passports. Edinburgh is a special case. The capital is a huge tourism draw, home to the industry of government and a key business hub. But Glasgow does not enjoy such fortune. If accommodation looks too pricey, visitors from northern England may switch to day trips; other tourists will stay at properties beyond the city's boundaries and the reach of the levy. Either way, the entire spend at a Glasgow property is lost. Another unintended consequence could be that visitors switch to cheaper, characterless budget hotels rather than independent enterprises. Imposing a flat levy across the year looks odd, too. To stretch the season and persuade people to visit off-peak, it would be smarter to have a 15 per cent tax for the four months from the start of June to the end of September, falling to zero for the rest of the year. Fees for visitors are worthwhile if they are substantial and change behaviour The shrewdest tourism tax I have seen in a long while is the brand-new €20 (£17) charge for each passenger arriving on a cruise ship to the Greek islands of Mykonos and Santorini from July to September. Cruise firms are understandably cross that it has been introduced so late in the day. As Paul Ludlow, president of Carnival UK, told me: 'When things are sprung on us late, it's not the way in which we'd like to work.' The principle, though, is sound: 'We really don't need thousands more people arriving for the day and contributing little to the islands' economies, so the least we can do is extract €50,000 from the average ship.' I support every city, region and nation making choices about taxes and tourism. But every tourist has choice, too.

Changes to taxi fare costs likely to go ahead in Glasgow
Changes to taxi fare costs likely to go ahead in Glasgow

Glasgow Times

time14 hours ago

  • Glasgow Times

Changes to taxi fare costs likely to go ahead in Glasgow

Glasgow's licensing committee has agreed to propose a 3.32% increase to the city's taxi fare scale, following an independent review. It would see the minimum charge flag fall rise from £4.40 to £4.50 and the soiling charge lifted from £46 to £47.50. The changes will now be open to representations, which would be reported back to the committee. Some trade representatives disagreed with the review's findings that insurance costs have decreased, saying drivers are reporting rises. At a licensing meeting on Wednesday, the trade pushed for a more detailed 'bottom-up' review to be carried out. Cllr Alex Wilson, SNP, the licensing committee chairman, said: 'A bottom-up review would be a great thing for us going forward, certainly there are more changes to the dynamics of what is happening out there. READ MORE: Glasgow's new tourist tax approved - here's how much visitors will be charged 'I think we need to find out exactly how that is going to impact the trade.' The review of the taxi fare scales has been carried out by Dr James Cooper. Changes were recommended after the review concluded the 'costs of operating a tax in Glasgow, the production costs, have increased'. Under the plans, the flag fall distance and time would change from 889 yards to 880 yards and 167 seconds to 165 seconds. Each additional increment is set to change from a distance not exceeding 179 yards to a distance not exceeding 174 yards and the time changed from 38 seconds to 37 seconds. However, the distance and time charge would remain at an increment of 30p. The additional charge for hires after 9pm and before 6am is expected to remain at £1.50 and the extra charge for hires between 9pm on December 24 and 6am on December 27 and 9pm on December 31 and 6am on January 3 is to stay at £2.70. Glasgow Taxi Owners Federation wants to see extra charges for additional passengers, beyond two, and an increased night charge of £2 rather than £1.50 to 'encourage night working'. It also proposed an alternative tariff which it said would be cheaper for customers. Dr Cooper said there was 'certainly a point of discussion around the structure of the tariff' which could be covered by a bottom-up review in future. READ MORE: Group of 'neo-Nazis' kicked out of full council meeting Glasgow Taxis said it had carried out work around demand and usage in the city and would like an opportunity to produce its evidence. Dr Cooper's report had noted that 'insurance costs have declined over the period of review' but this 'follows a significant increase in the previous period'. A representative from Unite the union was unable to attend the meeting, but, in a submission to the committee, it stated members had been surveyed and 'not one has reported a reduction' in insurance costs, with an average increase of around 8% instead. The union also said radio dispatch costs have increased, and high new vehicle costs, plus the removal of some grants, are 'creating financial barriers'. It added the 'council list of approved vehicles needs to be reviewed, as the dependence on local suppliers is preventing competitiveness, as more cost-effective vehicles are now available across the UK'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store